AzTrials
AzTrials

Regional Anesthesia MorbidityNCT07698665

Ketamine Versus Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Scalp Block in Supratentorial Brain Tumor Excision Surgeries

A study testing Scalp Block with Bupivacaine in people with Regional Anesthesia Morbidity and Supratentorial Brain Tumor, run by Cairo University at 2 sites in Egypt.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Supratentorial brain tumor surgeries are associated with significant nociceptive stimulation and postoperative pain, which may adversely affect patient outcomes. Scalp block has emerged as an effective regional anesthetic technique to improve analgesia and reduce opioid consumption. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Scalp Block with Bupivacaine
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
2 sitesEgypt
Study dates
1 Jan 2026to 30 Jul 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age from 20 to 60 years, both sexes, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-III, Supratentorial tumor excision, Supine Position.
  • and operation time: less than 6 hours.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal, disturbed consciousness level (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] < 15). Patients who required reintubation during the study period, those not extubated. immediately after surgery, or those who awoke with neurological deficits impairing. pain assessments were excluded from the final analysis, history of psychotic disorders or previous surgeries, Poor cognitive function.
  • Postictal state or uncontrolled/recurrent seizures, known allergy to dexmedetomidine or ketamine, difficult intubation (Mallampati score > III) or multiple intubation attempts, operation duration > 6 hours, renal dysfunction (creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL, BUN > 20 mg/dL), heart block and patients with chronic headache disorders or those receiving chronic analgesic therapy (for >3 months) were excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Egypt2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Cairo university

    Cairo, Governorate, 002

    Nagy Malak, 01552480258, nagymalak12345@gmail.com

    Nagy Malak, 01552480258, nagymalak@kasralainy.edu.eg

    Recruiting
  • Cairo university Hospitals. kasralainy

    Cairo

    Nagy M Nashed, MD, 01552480258, nagymalak12345@gmail.com

    nagymalak12345@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Ketamine Versus Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Scalp Block in Adults Undergoing Supratentorial Brain Tumor Excision Surgeries for Hemodynamics and Pain Control, Double-blinded Randomized Study

Supratentorial brain tumor surgeries are associated with significant nociceptive stimulation and postoperative pain, which may adversely affect patient outcomes. Scalp block has emerged as an effective regional anesthetic technique to improve analgesia and reduce opioid consumption.

Objective: To compare efficacy of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine in scalp blocks for supratentorial brain tumor surgeries, focusing on analgesia, opioid consumption, and hemodynamic stability.

Read more

Methods:

This randomized double-blinded controlled trial included 80 patients undergoing supratentorial tumor excision, allocated equally into two groups: Group K received bupivacaine with ketamine (2 mg/kg), and Group D received bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg). Intraoperative hemodynamics, fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain scores (NRS), analgesic requirements, and complications were assessed.

Read the detailed description

The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate efficacy of Ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Scalp Block in Adults undergoing Supratentorial Brain Tumor Excision Surgeries for Hemodynamic and Pain Control.

The study was carried out in neurosurgery operating rooms at Cairo University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, MS-483-2025 Egypt. The trial was preregistered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06168903.Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines were adhered Informed written consent was obtained from each patient. There are adequate provisions to maintain participants' privacy and confidentiality of the data.

Randomization will be performed using computer-generated numbers. Allocation concealment will be maintained using serially numbered, opaque, and sealed envelopes. Investigators will remain blind to the sequence, with group assignments contained in envelopes marked only with case numbers. Before each case, a study nurse or assistant will open the corresponding numbered envelope to reveal the patient's group assignment.

  • Dexmedetomidine (D):): Patients will receive a scalp block with a 20 ml syringe containing 1 mg/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine and 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine, with the remainder filled with saline.
  • Ketamine (K): Patients will receive a scalp block with a 20 ml syringe containing 1 mg/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2 mg/kg of ketamine, with the rest filled with saline. The syringes will be prepared by an anesthesia technician and handed blindly to the anesthetist to administer the block.

Study Protocol:

Patients visited the pre-anesthesia room before the procedure. All patients received explanation of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain assessment, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain) [17].

Standard monitoring was applied, including electrocardiography (ECG), non-invasive, invasive blood pressure, and Oxygen Saturation (SaO₂), and baseline vital signs were recorded, including heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation.

Anesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol 2 mg/kg, fentanyl 2 µg/kg, and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg, with mask ventilation for 3 minutes followed by tracheal intubation. Intraoperative signs of inadequate analgesia, such as tachycardia or hypertension exceeding 20% of baseline, were managed with additional 50 µg doses of fentanyl, and total fentanyl consumption was recorded. Anesthesia was maintained using intermittent positive pressure ventilation with isoflurane 0.8-1.2 MAC in an oxygen/air mixture, and atracurium infusion 0.5 mg/kg, while end-tidal CO₂ was monitored.

After induction, bilateral scalp blocks were performed using a 23G needle, with local anesthetic infiltrated around supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, lesser occipital, greater occipital, and great auricular nerves, 2-3 mL per nerve.

Scalp Block Techniques Supraorbital Nerve Block Patient was seated with the head slightly forward and eyes closed. The supraorbital notch was palpated, and a needle was inserted approximately 1 cm above the notch. 2 ml of local anesthetic were injected at this site.

Supratrochlear Nerve Block With the patient in the same position, the injection site was located one finger's breadth medial to the supraorbital nerve. The needle was redirected medially, and 3 mL of local anesthetic was administered.

Zygomaticotemporal Nerve Block The patient's head was turned so that the target side was facing upward. Landmarks included the orbital rim and zygomatic arch. A dual injection technique was used, with 1 mL injected deeply and 2 mL subcutaneously.

Auriculotemporal Nerve Block The injection site was 1-1.5 cm anterior to the ear, above the tragus, taking care to avoid superficial temporal artery. 3ml of local anesthetic were injected subcutaneously.

Greater Occipital Nerve Block With the head turned or the patient seated, the occipital artery was palpated, approximately 3-4 cm lateral to the external occipital protuberance. The needle was inserted perpendicular to the skin medial to the artery, and 3 mL of local anesthetic was injected subcutaneously.

Lesser Occipital Nerve Block Injection site was located about 2.5 cm lateral to the greater occipital nerve block site. 3 ml of local anesthetic were administered subcutaneously.

Great Auricular Nerve Block (Postauricular Branches) The injection site was 1.5 cm posterior to the ear at the level of the tragus. The needle was inserted perpendicular to the bone, withdrawn slightly, and 3 mL of local anesthetic was injected subcutaneously [5].

Hemodynamic Monitoring HR and BP were recorded baseline before induction, 1 and 5 minutes after induction, at intubation, 5 minutes after the scalp block, 5 minutes after pin insertion, 5minutes after skin incision, at 15min, 20min, 25min, 30min,35min, 40min,60min, 95min, 3hour, 4hour and after extubating as well as in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and upon arrival in surgical ICU.

Deviations from baseline were managed according to protocol:

  • Bradycardia (<20% below baseline) was treated with atropine 0.04 mg/kg
  • Hypotension (<20% below baseline) with ephedrine 5 mg IV
  • Hypertension or tachycardia (>20% above baseline) with fentanyl 50 µg IV. At the end of surgery, residual neuromuscular blockade was reversed using atropine 0.01 mg/kg and neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg. Extubating was performed when the patient met standard criteria, including a Glasgow Coma Scale >8, adequate cough and gag reflex, sufficient motor strength, a train-of-four (TOF) ratio >0.9, ability to hold head tilt or hand grip for 5 seconds, adequate tidal volume and oxygenation and hemodynamic stability.

In PACU, standard monitoring was continued, pain was assessed using NRS. Patients were discharged when modified Aldrete Score exceeded 9 [18].

Paracetamol and ketorolac were given as rescue analgesia when NRS score was more than 4. The time from extubating to the first analgesic request was recorded, and total postoperative analgesic consumption was documented.

Any hemodynamic instability, including hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, or hypotension, as well as nausea, vomiting, and other complications, were recorded.

Hemodynamic monitoring (MAP in mmHg) was Pain assessment using NRS (0-10) was conducted upon PACU arrival, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12and 24 hours postop

Being tested
Scalp Block with Bupivacaine
Keywords
Scalp block, Dexemetomedine, Supratentorial
Medical subject headings
Acute Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Scalp Block with BupivacaineDrug

    After induction, bilateral scalp blocks were performed using a 23G needle, with local anesthetic infiltrated around supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, lesser occipital, greater occipital, and great auricular nerves, 2-3 mL per nerve.

Study groups in NCT07698665
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dexmedetomidine (D)ExperimentalPatients will receive a scalp block with a 20 ml syringe containing 1 mg/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine and 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine, with the remainder filled with saline.
Receives: Drug: Scalp Block with Bupivacaine
Ketamine (K):Active comparatorPatients will receive a scalp block with a 20 ml syringe containing 1 mg/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2 mg/kg of ketamine, with the rest filled with saline. The syringes will be prepared by an anesthesia technician and handed blindly to the anesthetist to administer the block.
Receives: Drug: Scalp Block with Bupivacaine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine as adjuvants in scalp blocks

    Compare analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine as adjuvants in scalp blocks for supratentorial tumor resection by measuring total intraoperative fentanyl consumption (in µg).

    Measured: 6 hours

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Compare the time duration after extubating to request the first analgesia.

    Compare the time duration after extubating to request the first analgesia.

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Total analgesic consumption.

    Total analgesic consumption in intraoperative and postoperative period till 24 hours.

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. NRS pain score

    NRS pain score at various time points in the postoperative period till 24 hours.

    Measured: 24 hours

  4. Nausea and vomiting

    Nausea and vomiting incidence

    Measured: 24 hours

  5. Side effects

    Systemic side effects of ketamine (sedation, hallucinations, nystagmus).

    Measured: 24 hours

  6. Side effects

    Systemic side effects of dexmedetomidine (bradycardia).

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2026
  3. Primary completion30 Jul 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
90 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07698665
Sponsor's protocol ID
MS-483-2025
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
7 Jul 2026
Last updated
13 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Scalp Block with Bupivacaine in people with Regional Anesthesia Morbidity and Supratentorial Brain Tumor, run by Cairo University at 2 sites in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine as adjuvants in scalp blocks (time frame: 6 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in