AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental FatigueMFNAPNCT07700576

Effects of Different Nap Durations on Volleyball Performance and EEG Activity Following Mental Fatigue

A study testing Mental Fatigue Induction, Daytime Nap 20 Minutes and Daytime Nap 40 Minutes in people with Mental Fatigue and Recovery, run by Inonu University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Mental fatigue is known to impair cognitive and physical performance in athletes, but the effectiveness of different nap durations in counteracting these effects remains unclear. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 22 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Mental Fatigue, Recovery, Volleyball
What is being tested?
Mental Fatigue Induction, Daytime Nap 20 Minutes and Daytime Nap 40 Minutes
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Oct 2025to 1 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 22 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male volleyball players aged 19 to 22 years.
  • Minimum of 3 years of regular volleyball training and active participation in organized training.
  • Apparently healthy and free from neurological, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, or metabolic disorders.
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision.
  • Willing to provide written informed consent.
  • Agreed to refrain from strenuous exercise, alcohol, and caffeine for at least 24 hours before each experimental session.

Who cannot join

  • History of neurological, psychiatric, cardiovascular, or musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Current injury affecting sports performance.
  • Use of medications known to influence cognitive function, sleep, or central nervous system activity.
  • Diagnosed sleep disorders.
  • Failure to comply with study procedures or pre-test instructions.
  • Inability to complete all experimental sessions.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Inonu University, Faculty of Sport Sciences

    Malatya, Malatya, 44280

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Effects of Mental Fatigue and Different Nap Durations on Volleyball Performance and Brain Activity

Mental fatigue is known to impair cognitive and physical performance in athletes, but the effectiveness of different nap durations in counteracting these effects remains unclear. The purpose of this randomized crossover study is to investigate the effects of mental fatigue and different nap durations (20, 40, 60, and 90 minutes) on volleyball-specific performance and electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in trained male volleyball players. Mental fatigue is induced using a 15-minute Stroop task. Performance outcomes include the Volleyball Agility Test (VAT) and Countermovement Jump (CMJ), while cortical activity is assessed using resting-state EEG recordings. The findings are expected to improve understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying mental fatigue and recovery and to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding optimal nap duration for athletes.

Read the detailed description

Mental fatigue has emerged as an important factor influencing athletic performance by impairing attention, executive function, decision-making, and motor performance. Volleyball is a sport requiring rapid cognitive processing, agility, explosive power, and precise motor control, making athletes particularly vulnerable to the detrimental effects of mental fatigue. Although daytime napping has been proposed as an effective recovery strategy, the optimal nap duration for restoring sport performance and brain activity following mental fatigue remains uncertain.

This study employs a randomized crossover repeated-measures design in which each participant completes six experimental conditions: Control, Mental Fatigue, Mental Fatigue followed by a 20-minute nap, Mental Fatigue followed by a 40-minute nap, Mental Fatigue followed by a 60-minute nap, and Mental Fatigue followed by a 90-minute nap. Mental fatigue is induced using a standardized 15-minute computerized Stroop task. A 72-hour washout period is maintained between consecutive experimental sessions.

Primary assessments include volleyball-specific agility performance, countermovement jump performance, and resting-state electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings obtained before and after mental fatigue and following the nap intervention. EEG analyses focus on spectral power in the delta, theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands as well as Theta/Alpha and Theta/Beta ratios.

The study aims to determine whether different nap durations differentially improve volleyball-specific performance and cortical activity following mental fatigue. The results are expected to provide practical recommendations for coaches and athletes regarding evidence-based recovery strategies while contributing to a better understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying mental fatigue and post-nap recovery.

Being tested
Mental Fatigue Induction, Control Condition, Daytime Nap 20 Minutes, Daytime Nap 40 Minutes, Daytime Nap 60 Minutes
Keywords
Mental Fatigue, Nap, Volleyball, EEG, Electroencephalography, Recovery, Agility, Countermovement Jump, Cognitive Performance, Brain Activity, Athletes
Medical subject headings
Mental Fatigue

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mental Fatigue InductionBehavioural

    Mental fatigue was induced using a standardized 15-minute computerized Stroop Color-Word Task designed to increase cognitive load and induce mental fatigue before performance and EEG assessments.

  • Control ConditionOther

    Participants watched a neutral documentary for 15 minutes without mental fatigue induction or daytime nap intervention before EEG and performance assessments.

  • Daytime Nap 20 MinutesBehavioural

    Participants underwent a supervised 20-minute daytime nap following mental fatigue induction in a quiet, darkened room before post-intervention EEG and performance assessments.

  • Daytime Nap 40 MinutesBehavioural

    Participants underwent a supervised 40-minute daytime nap following mental fatigue induction in a quiet, darkened room before post-intervention EEG and performance assessments.

  • Daytime Nap 60 MinutesBehavioural

    Participants underwent a supervised 60-minute daytime nap following mental fatigue induction in a quiet, darkened room before post-intervention EEG and performance assessments.

  • Daytime Nap 90 MinutesBehavioural

    Participants underwent a supervised 90-minute daytime nap following mental fatigue induction in a quiet, darkened room before post-intervention EEG and performance assessments.

Study groups in NCT07700576
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlActive comparatorParticipants completed the control condition without mental fatigue induction or daytime nap intervention. A neutral documentary was viewed for 15 minutes. Resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed according to the study protocol.
Receives: Other: Control Condition
Mental FatigueExperimentalParticipants completed a 15-minute computerized Stroop task to induce mental fatigue. Following the mental fatigue protocol, resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed.
Receives: Behavioral: Mental Fatigue Induction
Nap20ExperimentalParticipants completed a 15-minute computerized Stroop task followed by a supervised 20-minute daytime nap. Resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed after the nap intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Mental Fatigue Induction; Behavioral: Daytime Nap 20 Minutes
Nap40ExperimentalParticipants completed a 15-minute computerized Stroop task followed by a supervised 40-minute daytime nap. Resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed after the nap intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Mental Fatigue Induction; Behavioral: Daytime Nap 40 Minutes
Nap60ExperimentalParticipants completed a 15-minute computerized Stroop task followed by a supervised 60-minute daytime nap. Resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed after the nap intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Mental Fatigue Induction; Behavioral: Daytime Nap 60 Minutes
Nap90ExperimentalParticipants completed a 15-minute computerized Stroop task followed by a supervised 90-minute daytime nap. Resting-state EEG recordings, volleyball-specific agility performance, and countermovement jump performance were assessed after the nap intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Mental Fatigue Induction; Behavioral: Daytime Nap 90 Minutes

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. EEG Spectral Power

    Resting-state electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was recorded from the Fz, Cz, Pz, O1, and O2 electrode sites. Power spectral density was analyzed for the delta (1-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), and beta (13-30 Hz) frequency bands. All frequency-band power values were expressed in microvolts squared per hertz (µV²/Hz).

    Measured: At baseline, immediately after the mental fatigue task, and immediately after completion of the assigned intervention during each experimental session.

  2. EEG Theta/Alpha Ratio

    The theta-to-alpha power ratio was calculated from resting-state EEG recordings obtained from the Fz, Cz, Pz, O1, and O2 electrode sites by dividing theta-band power by alpha-band power. The outcome was expressed as a unitless ratio.

    Measured: At baseline, immediately after the mental fatigue task, and immediately after completion of the assigned intervention during each experimental session.

  3. EEG Theta/Beta Ratio

    The theta-to-beta power ratio was calculated from resting-state EEG recordings obtained from the Fz, Cz, Pz, O1, and O2 electrode sites by dividing theta-band power by beta-band power. The outcome was expressed as a unitless ratio.

    Measured: At baseline, immediately after the mental fatigue task, and immediately after completion of the assigned intervention during each experimental session.

  4. Volleyball-Specific Agility Performance

    Volleyball-specific agility performance was assessed using the Volleyball Agility Test (VAT). Performance was quantified as test completion time (seconds), with lower values indicating better agility performance.

    Measured: Immediately after completion of each experimental protocol.

  5. Countermovement Jump Height

    Countermovement jump (CMJ) performance was assessed using the My Jump Lab application by measuring jump height in centimeters (cm), with higher values indicating better jump performance.

    Measured: Immediately after completion of each experimental protocol.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Countermovement Jump-Derived Mechanical and Kinematic Parameters

    Countermovement jump (CMJ)-derived mechanical and kinematic parameters were obtained using the My Jump Lab application from the CMJ assessment performed at the end of each experimental protocol. Participant jump height and body mass were entered into the application's manual data-entry module, which provided flight time (ms), average velocity (m/s), take-off velocity (m/s), and impulse (kg·m/s). These parameters were analyzed as complementary derived measures of CMJ performance.

    Measured: Immediately after completion of each experimental protocol.

  2. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score

    Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a validated self-reported questionnaire that evaluates sleep quality over the previous month. The PSQI consists of 19 self-rated items yielding a global score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer subjective sleep quality.

    Measured: Baseline (before the first experimental session).

  3. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for Perceived Nap Quality

    Perceived nap quality was assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants rated the overall quality of their daytime nap on a horizontal line ranging from 0 mm (very poor nap quality) to 100 mm (excellent nap quality). Higher scores indicate better perceived nap quality.

    Measured: Immediately after each daytime nap intervention (20-, 40-, 60-, and 90-minute nap conditions).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jul 2026
  2. Study start1 Oct 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Randomized crossover repeated-measures design. Each participant completed all six experimental conditions in a randomized order with a 72-hour washout period between sessions.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07700576
Sponsor's protocol ID
OB-MFNAP-2026-01
Other IDs
TDK-2025-4002
Acronym
MFNAP
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
30 Jun 2026
Last updated
14 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared because the study includes a small sample size, and no data-sharing plan was included in the approved study protocol or informed consent. Aggregate study results will be reported in scientific publications.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mental Fatigue Induction, Daytime Nap 20 Minutes and Daytime Nap 40 Minutes in people with Mental Fatigue and Recovery, run by Inonu University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

EEG Spectral Power (time frame: At baseline, immediately after the mental fatigue task, and immediately after completion of the assigned intervention during each experimental session.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in