The Success of Caudal BlockNCT07703384
Comparison of The Perfusion Index and The Surgical Pleth Index in Detecting The Effectiveness of Caudal Block in Pediatrics
An observational study of The Success of Caudal Block, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Caudal block is a common method of regional anesthesia. In pediatrics, it works as a supplement to general anesthesia and is a good method for control postoperative pain. By offering superior analgesia, it decreases the use for intravenous opioids, thereby reducing related adverse reactions like nausea, vomiting, and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 6 years
- Conditions the study is for
- The Success of Caudal Block
- What is being tested?
- caudal block
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 6 Jul 2026to 6 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 6 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: study will be conducted in Fayoum University hospital after the local Institutional Ethics Committee and local institutional review board approval. Inclusion criteria * Children aged 1 to 6 years of either sex * With American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II * undergoing elective infraumbilical surgery. Exclusion criteria * parental refusal * Patients with liver disease (e.g. elevated bilirubin >2mg/dL, albumin<3.0g/dL) * Patients with renal disease (e.g. serum creatinine >1.5-2mg/dL) * Cardiac disorders (low EF>50%, sever valvular heart disease) * Recent respiratory tract infection within 1-2 weeks and bronchial asthma * Known organic brain disease (cerebral palsy, tumors) * patients with any contraindication to caudal anesthesia (local infection, coagulation abnormality e.g. INR > 1.5, known structural abnormality e.g. kyphosis) * Known allergy to local anesthetics.
Who may be able to join
- • Children aged 1 to 6 years of either sex
- With American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
- undergoing elective infraumbilical surgery
Who cannot join
- • parental refusal
- Patients with liver disease (e.g. elevated bilirubin >2mg/dL, albumin<3.0g/dL)
- Patients with renal disease (e.g. serum creatinine >1.5-2mg/dL)
- Cardiac disorders (low EF>50%, sever valvular heart disease)
- Recent respiratory tract infection within 1-2 weeks and bronchial asthma
- Known organic brain disease (cerebral palsy, tumors)
- patients with any contraindication to caudal anesthesia (local infection, coagulation abnormality e.g. INR > 1.5, known structural abnormality e.g. kyphosis)
- Known allergy to local anesthetics
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Egypt1 site
Fayoum University hospital
El Fayoum Qesm, Faiyum Governorate, 63514
Safaa G Ragab, MD, 01004631943 ext. +20, Sgr00@fayoum.edu.eg
Yasser S Mostafa, MD, 01010509735 ext. +20, Ysm03@fayoum.edu.eg
About this study
Official title: Comparison of The Perfusion Index and The Surgical Pleth Index in Detecting The Effectiveness of Caudal Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgeries Under General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study
Caudal block is a common method of regional anesthesia. In pediatrics, it works as a supplement to general anesthesia and is a good method for control postoperative pain. By offering superior analgesia, it decreases the use for intravenous opioids, thereby reducing related adverse reactions like nausea, vomiting, and respiratory impairment. Consequently, caudal block is a safe and appropriate method for managing pain in children undergoing different types of surgery. Usually, it is given following general anesthesia in children, making a some difficulty in evaluating the block's effectiveness The success of a caudal block is traditionally predicted by hemodynamic changes in blood pressure and heart rate, although these variables are thought to be unreliable, many tests, like 'swoosh' and 'whoosh' tests, and ultrasonography, can be used to guarantee precise needle placement and enhance the probability of block success.
Other variables are sometimes used, such as laxity of the anal sphincter tone and loss of the cremasteric reflex; however under general anesthesia, their dependability is doubtful and the latter can only be used for male children . Technological developments in pulse oximeters have improved their capacity to monitor other parameters, such as the surgical pleth index (SPI) and perfusion index (PI).
Read more
Perfusion index (PI) is a non-invasive numerical evaluation of the pulsatile strength at a monitoring site that offers helpful data regarding the patient's peripheral perfusion status .
Local vasoconstriction may induce a decrease in PI, whereas vasodilatation causes an increase in PI in the skin at the monitoring site Successful anesthesia onset is indicated by an increase in PI, but failure to do so may be indicated by a lack of increase.
Surgical pleth index (SPI) is another noninvasive, dimensionless score whose value is derived from pulse wave amplitude and heartbeat interval as measured by a pulse oximetry probe The sympathetic reaction of the patient to the surgical stimulus is reflected in SPI , research on SPI indicates that adults with values between 20 and 50 have good nociception, but its usefulness in children is unclear.
The aim of this study This study aims to determine the time to change of value of PI and SPI in assessing the effectiveness of a caudal block in pediatric patients during infraumbilical surgeries under general anesthesia
Read the detailed description
This prospective observational study, will be conducted in Fayoum University hospital after the local Institutional Ethics Committee and local institutional review board approval.
Inclusion criteria
- Children aged 1 to 6 years of either sex
- With American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
- undergoing elective infraumbilical surgery. Exclusion criteria
- parental refusal
- Patients with liver disease (e.g. elevated bilirubin >2mg/dL, albumin<3.0g/dL)
- Patients with renal disease (e.g. serum creatinine >1.5-2mg/dL)
- Cardiac disorders (low EF>50%, sever valvular heart disease)
- Recent respiratory tract infection within 1-2 weeks and bronchial asthma
- Known organic brain disease (cerebral palsy, tumors)
- patients with any contraindication to caudal anesthesia (local infection, coagulation abnormality e.g. INR > 1.5, known structural abnormality e.g. kyphosis)
- Known allergy to local anesthetics. Anesthesia procedure Children will be assessed for enrollment the day before surgery. After enrollment, written informed consent will be obtained from the patient's parents. Children will be fasted according to standard nil per oral (NPO) guidelines: Solids and infant feeds will be withheld for 6 hours, breast milk for 4 hours, and clear fluids for 2 hours before surgery.
There will be three observers in the study: Observer 1 will be a postgraduate in anesthesia and the principal investigator, responsible for screening patients preoperatively to ensure they met the inclusion criteria and will not have any of the exclusion criteria. Observer 2 will be a consultant anesthetist who will administer the anesthesia, Observer 3 will be a postgraduate in anesthesiology who will be unaware of whether the caudal epidural working. Observer 3 will assess the analgesia and the caudal site postoperatively.
An appropriately sized intravenous (IV) peripheral line (22G or 24G) will be secured in the ward, and IV antibiotics will be administered 1 hour before the procedure, all children will undergo routine preoperative preparations by taking full history, general examination and doing investigations: Complete blood count, Coagulation profile, liver and kidney function tests All patients will receive midazolam premedication 0.05 mg/kg (IV) in the preoperative holding area. On shifting to the operating room, standard monitors including electrocardiogram (ECG)monitoring (Lead II and V5), non invasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse oximetry (SpO2), end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), and volatile anesthetic monitoring will be instituted. NIBP cuff will be attached on the arm opposite to the side of intravenous access in all the patients. The core temperature will be monitored using a nasopharyngeal probe in all the patients and will be maintained between 36.5 and 37.5°C. All these parameters and PI will be recorded by putting pulse oximeter on big toe using Nihon Kohden (Life Scope model BSM-3562, Tokyo, Japan), PI is calculated as (AC × 100/DC%), which is the ratio of infrared light absorbed by pulsing arterial flow (AC) to non-pulsatile signals in blood and tissues (DC). Its range is wide, ranging from 0.02 to 20.
SPI will be recorded by putting pulse oximeter on the thumb using GE Healthcare Carestation 620 anesthesia machine (Madison, WI, USA), SPI is calculated using the following formula: SPI = 100 - (0.33 x HBI + 0.67 x PPGA), where PPGA is the plethysmographic waveform amplitude and HBI is the heartbeat interval, The range of values is 0 to 100.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation with 100% oxygen anesthesia will be induced using IV fentanyl (1 mcg/kg) and IV propofol (2-3 mg/kg) until loss of consciousness, this will be followed by the insertion of an appropriately sized supraglottic airway device (i gel or LMA). Anesthesia will be maintained with a mixture of oxygen (50%), air (50%) and isoflurane titrated minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of 1%, IV fluids (Ringer's lactate with 1% dextrose) will be administered at 4-6 mL/kg/hr.
Caudal Block procedure:
Three minutes after anesthesia induction the patient will be positioned in the lateral decubitus position, a caudal block will be performed using the landmark technique under aseptic conditions. After carful preparing and cleaning the area using 10% povidone-iodine, the sacral hiatus will be identified, a 22G, 1 to 1.5 inch hypodermic needle will be inserted until the sacro-coccygeal ligament will be pierced a distinct "pop" indicated entry into the caudal space, a test dose of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine (1:200,000) will be administered at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) to exclude inadvertent intravascular or intrathecal injection. After confirming negative aspiration for blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) then a 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) will be injected at a rate of 1 mL per 3 seconds. The patient will be immediately repositioned supine; The surgical incision will be made approximately 10 min after caudal block administration.
Monitoring and data collection PI, SPI, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) will be monitored throughout the procedure. It will be recorded at baseline after induction just before caudal then every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes The anesthesiologist will administer a rescue dose of IV fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg) and paracetamol if they believe the block to be ineffective A working caudal block will be defined as any one of the following criteria achieved, whichever will be occurred earlier: A surgical pleth index of ≤ 43.5 ,100% increase of PI value from baseline, 15% decrease of MAP, or 15% decrease of HR from the baseline Postoperatively, 30 min after surgery, an anesthesiologist, who will be blinded to the intraoperative PI and SPI or the course of anesthesia throughout surgery, will assess the success of the caudal block when the child is calm or sleeping. A gentle pinch will be applied to the skin starting from the distal part of both lower limbs, and the patients will be observed for signs of grimacing, wincing, withdrawal, or changes in heart rate. If no response will be observed, the stimulus will be progressively applied more proximally until the expected level of blockade will be reached (inguinal region). The verbal response of a communicating child will be used to assess the success of the block.
Primary outcome measures:
Time to change of value of PI and SPI after caudal block
Secondary outcome measures:
- The recorded values of PI, SPI, HR and MAP at baseline after induction just before caudal then every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
- ROC curve of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
- AUC of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
- Best cut of value of PI, SPI, HR and MAP in assessing the effectiveness of a caudal block in pediatric patients during infraumbilical surgeries under general anesthesia
- Sensitivity and specificity of PI, SPI, HR and MAP Statistical analysis and sample size estimation The primary outcome is the difference in time to change between the Perfusion Index (PI) and the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) following caudal block. Based on previous studies, the PI study reported a significant change at 3 minutes after caudal block (Bejugama \& Khatavkar, 2025), while the SPI study identified a clinically useful discrimination threshold (SPI ≤ 43.5) at approximately 5 minutes (Harchandani et al., 2025). Although the observed mean difference between the two indices is 2 minutes, we conservatively target a minimal detectable difference of 0.5 minutes to ensure the study is adequately powered for smaller, yet clinically relevant, differences. Assuming a standard deviation of the paired differences of 1 minute, a two sided significance level α = 0.05, and 80% power, the required sample size for a paired samples t test was calculated using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.7). The minimum sample size obtained is 34 patients. Accounting for a 15% failure of caudal block, the final target sample size is 40 patients
- Conditions
- The Success of Caudal Block
- Being tested
- caudal block
- Keywords
- Caudal Block, Perfusion Index, Pediatric Patients
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
caudal blockProcedure or surgery
Three minutes after anesthesia induction the patient will be positioned in the lateral decubitus position, a caudal block will be performed using the landmark technique under aseptic conditions. After carful preparing and cleaning the area using 10% povidone-iodine, the sacral hiatus will be identified, a 22G, 1 to 1.5 inch hypodermic needle will be inserted until the sacro-coccygeal ligament will be pierced a distinct "pop" indicated entry into the caudal space, a test dose of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine (1:200,000) will be administered at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) to exclude inadvertent intravascular or intrathecal injection. After confirming negative aspiration for blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) then a 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) will be injected at a rate of 1 mL per 3 seconds. The patient will be immediately repositioned supine; The surgical incision will be made approximately 10 min after caudal block administration.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Children aged 1 to 6 years of either sex With ASA I-II undergoing elective infra umbilical surgery. | Children aged 1 to 6 years of either sex With ASA I-II undergoing elective infra umbilical surgery .will receive caudal block Receives: Procedure: caudal block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to change of value of PI and SPI after caudal block
The primary outcome is the difference in time to change between the Perfusion Index (PI) and the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) following caudal block
Measured: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
Secondary outcomes (5)
The recorded values of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
The recorded values of PI, SPI, HR and MAP in assessing the effectiveness of a caudal block in pediatric patients during infraumbilical surgeries under general anesthesia
Measured: at baseline after induction just before caudal then every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
ROC curve of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
ROC curve of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
Measured: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
AUC of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
AUC of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
Measured: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
Best cut of value of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
Best cut of value of PI, SPI, HR and MAP in assessing the effectiveness of a caudal block in pediatric patients during infraumbilical surgeries under general anesthesia
Measured: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
Sensitivity and specificity of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
Sensitivity and specificity of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
Measured: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jul 2026
- Study start6 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion6 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion6 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for The Success of Caudal BlockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fayoum University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Safaa Gaber Ragab, Fayoum University Hospital
- Investigators
- Safaa G Ragab, MD, Principal investigator, Faculty of medicine, Fayoum university
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07703384
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D490
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
M. El-Sonbaty and A. El-Sonbaty, "Evaluation of Perfusion index (PI) efficiency in pediatriccaudal block: Is it the time to depend on PI," Med J Cairo Univ, vol. 83, pp. 223-227, 2015
Orme RM, Berg SJ. The 'swoosh' test--an evaluation of a modified 'whoosh' test in children. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Jan;90(1):62-5.
PubMed 12488381Huiku M, Uutela K, van Gils M, Korhonen I, Kymalainen M, Merilainen P, Paloheimo M, Rantanen M, Takala P, Viertio-Oja H, Yli-Hankala A. Assessment of surgical stress during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;98(4):447-55. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem004. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
PubMed 17329347Bejugama S, Khatavkar SS. Perfusion index as primary predictor of successful caudal block in infraumbilical and lower limb pediatric surgeries: A prospective observational study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2025 Oct-Dec;19(4):594-599. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_379_25. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
PubMed 40994509Ginosar Y, Weiniger CF, Meroz Y, Kurz V, Bdolah-Abram T, Babchenko A, Nitzan M, Davidson EM. Pulse oximeter perfusion index as an early indicator of sympathectomy after epidural anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Sep;53(8):1018-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01968.x. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
PubMed 19397502Park SG, Lee OH, Park YH, Shin HY, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Woo YC. The changes of non-invasive hemoglobin and perfusion index of Pulse CO-Oximetry during induction of general anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Aug;68(4):352-7. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.4.352. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
PubMed 26257847Kus A, Gurkan Y, Gormus SK, Solak M, Toker K. Usefulness of perfusion index to detect the effect of brachial plexus block. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Jun;27(3):325-8. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9439-4. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
PubMed 23397432Ledowski T. Objective monitoring of nociception: a review of current commercial solutions. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e312-e321. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
PubMed 31047645Constant I, Sabourdin N. Monitoring depth of anesthesia: from consciousness to nociception. A window on subcortical brain activity. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Jan;25(1):73-82. doi: 10.1111/pan.12586. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
PubMed 25410376Guo J, Zhu W, Shi Q, Bao F, Xu J. Effect of surgical pleth index-guided analgesia versus conventional analgesia techniques on fentanyl consumption under multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized and controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 4;21(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01366-x.
PubMed 34088270Ledowski T, Schneider M, Gruenewald M, Goyal RK, Teo SR, Hruby J. Surgical pleth index: prospective validation of the score to predict moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e328-e332. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.10.066. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
PubMed 30916030
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of The Perfusion Index and The Surgical Pleth Index in Detecting The Effectiveness of Caudal Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgeries Under General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07703384
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D490
- Conditions
- The Success of Caudal Block
- Keywords
- Caudal Block, Perfusion Index, Pediatric Patients
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fayoum University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 6 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 6 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Caudal block is a common method of regional anesthesia. In pediatrics, it works as a supplement to general anesthesia and is a good method for control postoperative pain. By offering superior analgesia, it decreases the use for intravenous opioids, thereby reducing related adverse reactions like nausea, vomiting, and respiratory impairment. Consequently, caudal block is a safe and appropriate method for managing pain in children undergoing different types of surgery. Usually, it is given following general anesthesia in children, making a some difficulty in evaluating the block's effectiveness The success of a caudal block is traditionally predicted by hemodynamic changes in blood pressure and heart rate, although these variables are thought to be unreliable, many tests, like 'swoosh' and 'whoosh' tests, and ultrasonography, can be used to guarantee precise needle placement and enhance the probability of block success.
Other variables are sometimes used, such as laxity of the anal sphincter tone and loss of the cremasteric reflex; however under general anesthesia, their dependability is doubtful and the latter can only be used for male children . Technological developments in pulse oximeters have improved their capacity to monitor other parameters, such as the surgical pleth index (SPI) and perfusion index (PI).
Perfusion index (PI) is a non-invasive numerical evaluation of the pulsatile strength at a monitoring site that offers helpful data regarding the patient's peripheral perfusion status .
Local vasoconstriction may induce a decrease in PI, whereas vasodilatation causes an increase in PI in the skin at the monitoring site Successful anesthesia onset is indicated by an increase in PI, but failure to do so may be indicated by a lack of increase.
Surgical pleth index (SPI) is another noninvasive, dimensionless score whose value is derived from pulse wave amplitude and heartbeat interval as measured by a pulse oximetry probe The sympathetic reaction of the patient to the surgical stimulus is reflected in SPI , research on SPI indicates that adults with values between 20 and 50 have good nociception, but its usefulness in children is unclear.
The aim of this study This study aims to determine the time to change of value of PI and SPI in assessing the effectiveness of a caudal block in pediatric patients during infraumbilical surgeries under general anesthesia
Detailed description
This prospective observational study, will be conducted in Fayoum University hospital after the local Institutional Ethics Committee and local institutional review board approval.
Inclusion criteria
- Children aged 1 to 6 years of either sex
- With American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
- undergoing elective infraumbilical surgery. Exclusion criteria
- parental refusal
- Patients with liver disease (e.g. elevated bilirubin >2mg/dL, albumin<3.0g/dL)
- Patients with renal disease (e.g. serum creatinine >1.5-2mg/dL)
- Cardiac disorders (low EF>50%, sever valvular heart disease)
- Recent respiratory tract infection within 1-2 weeks and bronchial asthma
- Known organic brain disease (cerebral palsy, tumors)
- patients with any contraindication to caudal anesthesia (local infection, coagulation abnormality e.g. INR > 1.5, known structural abnormality e.g. kyphosis)
- Known allergy to local anesthetics. Anesthesia procedure Children will be assessed for enrollment the day before surgery. After enrollment, written informed consent will be obtained from the patient's parents. Children will be fasted according to standard nil per oral (NPO) guidelines: Solids and infant feeds will be withheld for 6 hours, breast milk for 4 hours, and clear fluids for 2 hours before surgery.
There will be three observers in the study: Observer 1 will be a postgraduate in anesthesia and the principal investigator, responsible for screening patients preoperatively to ensure they met the inclusion criteria and will not have any of the exclusion criteria. Observer 2 will be a consultant anesthetist who will administer the anesthesia, Observer 3 will be a postgraduate in anesthesiology who will be unaware of whether the caudal epidural working. Observer 3 will assess the analgesia and the caudal site postoperatively.
An appropriately sized intravenous (IV) peripheral line (22G or 24G) will be secured in the ward, and IV antibiotics will be administered 1 hour before the procedure, all children will undergo routine preoperative preparations by taking full history, general examination and doing investigations: Complete blood count, Coagulation profile, liver and kidney function tests All patients will receive midazolam premedication 0.05 mg/kg (IV) in the preoperative holding area. On shifting to the operating room, standard monitors including electrocardiogram (ECG)monitoring (Lead II and V5), non invasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse oximetry (SpO2), end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), and volatile anesthetic monitoring will be instituted. NIBP cuff will be attached on the arm opposite to the side of intravenous access in all the patients. The core temperature will be monitored using a nasopharyngeal probe in all the patients and will be maintained between 36.5 and 37.5°C. All these parameters and PI will be recorded by putting pulse oximeter on big toe using Nihon Kohden (Life Scope model BSM-3562, Tokyo, Japan), PI is calculated as (AC × 100/DC%), which is the ratio of infrared light absorbed by pulsing arterial flow (AC) to non-pulsatile signals in blood and tissues (DC). Its range is wide, ranging from 0.02 to 20.
SPI will be recorded by putting pulse oximeter on the thumb using GE Healthcare Carestation 620 anesthesia machine (Madison, WI, USA), SPI is calculated using the following formula: SPI = 100 - (0.33 x HBI + 0.67 x PPGA), where PPGA is the plethysmographic waveform amplitude and HBI is the heartbeat interval, The range of values is 0 to 100.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation with 100% oxygen anesthesia will be induced using IV fentanyl (1 mcg/kg) and IV propofol (2-3 mg/kg) until loss of consciousness, this will be followed by the insertion of an appropriately sized supraglottic airway device (i gel or LMA). Anesthesia will be maintained with a mixture of oxygen (50%), air (50%) and isoflurane titrated minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of 1%, IV fluids (Ringer's lactate with 1% dextrose) will be administered at 4-6 mL/kg/hr.
Caudal Block procedure:
Three minutes after anesthesia induction the patient will be positioned in the lateral decubitus position, a caudal block will be performed using the landmark technique under aseptic conditions. After carful preparing and cleaning the area using 10% povidone-iodine, the sacral hiatus will be identified, a 22G, 1 to 1.5 inch hypodermic needle will be inserted until the sacro-coccygeal ligament will be pierced a distinct "pop" indicated entry into the caudal space, a test dose of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine (1:200,000) will be administered at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) to exclude inadvertent intravascular or intrathecal injection. After confirming negative aspiration for blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) then a 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) will be injected at a rate of 1 mL per 3 seconds. The patient will be immediately repositioned supine; The surgical incision will be made approximately 10 min after caudal block administration.
Monitoring and data collection PI, SPI, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) will be monitored throughout the procedure. It will be recorded at baseline after induction just before caudal then every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes The anesthesiologist will administer a rescue dose of IV fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg) and paracetamol if they believe the block to be ineffective A working caudal block will be defined as any one of the following criteria achieved, whichever will be occurred earlier: A surgical pleth index of ≤ 43.5 ,100% increase of PI value from baseline, 15% decrease of MAP, or 15% decrease of HR from the baseline Postoperatively, 30 min after surgery, an anesthesiologist, who will be blinded to the intraoperative PI and SPI or the course of anesthesia throughout surgery, will assess the success of the caudal block when the child is calm or sleeping. A gentle pinch will be applied to the skin starting from the distal part of both lower limbs, and the patients will be observed for signs of grimacing, wincing, withdrawal, or changes in heart rate. If no response will be observed, the stimulus will be progressively applied more proximally until the expected level of blockade will be reached (inguinal region). The verbal response of a communicating child will be used to assess the success of the block.
Primary outcome measures:
Time to change of value of PI and SPI after caudal block
Secondary outcome measures:
- The recorded values of PI, SPI, HR and MAP at baseline after induction just before caudal then every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
- ROC curve of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
- AUC of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
- Best cut of value of PI, SPI, HR and MAP in assessing the effectiveness of a caudal block in pediatric patients during infraumbilical surgeries under general anesthesia
- Sensitivity and specificity of PI, SPI, HR and MAP Statistical analysis and sample size estimation The primary outcome is the difference in time to change between the Perfusion Index (PI) and the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) following caudal block. Based on previous studies, the PI study reported a significant change at 3 minutes after caudal block (Bejugama \& Khatavkar, 2025), while the SPI study identified a clinically useful discrimination threshold (SPI ≤ 43.5) at approximately 5 minutes (Harchandani et al., 2025). Although the observed mean difference between the two indices is 2 minutes, we conservatively target a minimal detectable difference of 0.5 minutes to ensure the study is adequately powered for smaller, yet clinically relevant, differences. Assuming a standard deviation of the paired differences of 1 minute, a two sided significance level α = 0.05, and 80% power, the required sample size for a paired samples t test was calculated using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.7). The minimum sample size obtained is 34 patients. Accounting for a 15% failure of caudal block, the final target sample size is 40 patients
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Children aged 1 to 6 years of either sex With ASA I-II undergoing elective infra umbilical surgery. | – | Procedure: caudal blockChildren aged 1 to 6 years of either sex With ASA I-II undergoing elective infra umbilical surgery .will receive caudal block |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 6 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- study will be conducted in Fayoum University hospital after the local Institutional Ethics Committee and local institutional review board approval. Inclusion criteria * Children aged 1 to 6 years of either sex * With American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II * undergoing elective infraumbilical surgery. Exclusion criteria * parental refusal * Patients with liver disease (e.g. elevated bilirubin >2mg/dL, albumin<3.0g/dL) * Patients with renal disease (e.g. serum creatinine >1.5-2mg/dL) * Cardiac disorders (low EF>50%, sever valvular heart disease) * Recent respiratory tract infection within 1-2 weeks and bronchial asthma * Known organic brain disease (cerebral palsy, tumors) * patients with any contraindication to caudal anesthesia (local infection, coagulation abnormality e.g. INR > 1.5, known structural abnormality e.g. kyphosis) * Known allergy to local anesthetics.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- • Children aged 1 to 6 years of either sex
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- • parental refusal
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| caudal blockThree minutes after anesthesia induction the patient will be positioned in the lateral decubitus position, a caudal block will be performed using the landmark technique under aseptic conditions. After carful preparing and cleaning the area using 10% povidone-iodine, the sacral hiatus will be identified, a 22G, 1 to 1.5 inch hypodermic needle will be inserted until the sacro-coccygeal ligament will be pierced a distinct "pop" indicated entry into the caudal space, a test dose of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine (1:200,000) will be administered at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) to exclude inadvertent intravascular or intrathecal injection. After confirming negative aspiration for blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) then a 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) will be injected at a rate of 1 mL per 3 seconds. The patient will be immediately repositioned supine; The surgical incision will be made approximately 10 min after caudal block administration. | Procedure or surgery | Children aged 1 to 6 years of either sex With ASA I-II undergoing elective infra umbilical surgery. |
Primary outcome
Time to change of value of PI and SPI after caudal block
Time frame: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
The primary outcome is the difference in time to change between the Perfusion Index (PI) and the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) following caudal block
5 secondary outcomes
The recorded values of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
Time frame: at baseline after induction just before caudal then every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
ROC curve of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
Time frame: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
AUC of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
Time frame: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
Best cut of value of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
Time frame: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
Sensitivity and specificity of PI, SPI, HR and MAP
Time frame: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2026.
- BackgroundM. El-Sonbaty and A. El-Sonbaty, "Evaluation of Perfusion index (PI) efficiency in pediatriccaudal block: Is it the time to depend on PI," Med J Cairo Univ, vol. 83, pp. 223-227, 2015
- Background: PubMed 12488381Orme RM, Berg SJ. The 'swoosh' test--an evaluation of a modified 'whoosh' test in children. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Jan;90(1):62-5.
- Background: PubMed 17329347Huiku M, Uutela K, van Gils M, Korhonen I, Kymalainen M, Merilainen P, Paloheimo M, Rantanen M, Takala P, Viertio-Oja H, Yli-Hankala A. Assessment of surgical stress during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;98(4):447-55. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem004. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
- Background: PubMed 40994509Bejugama S, Khatavkar SS. Perfusion index as primary predictor of successful caudal block in infraumbilical and lower limb pediatric surgeries: A prospective observational study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2025 Oct-Dec;19(4):594-599. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_379_25. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
- Background: PubMed 19397502Ginosar Y, Weiniger CF, Meroz Y, Kurz V, Bdolah-Abram T, Babchenko A, Nitzan M, Davidson EM. Pulse oximeter perfusion index as an early indicator of sympathectomy after epidural anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Sep;53(8):1018-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01968.x. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 26257847Park SG, Lee OH, Park YH, Shin HY, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Woo YC. The changes of non-invasive hemoglobin and perfusion index of Pulse CO-Oximetry during induction of general anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Aug;68(4):352-7. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.4.352. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
- Background: PubMed 23397432Kus A, Gurkan Y, Gormus SK, Solak M, Toker K. Usefulness of perfusion index to detect the effect of brachial plexus block. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Jun;27(3):325-8. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9439-4. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
- Background: PubMed 31047645Ledowski T. Objective monitoring of nociception: a review of current commercial solutions. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e312-e321. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
- Background: PubMed 25410376Constant I, Sabourdin N. Monitoring depth of anesthesia: from consciousness to nociception. A window on subcortical brain activity. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Jan;25(1):73-82. doi: 10.1111/pan.12586. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
- Background: PubMed 34088270Guo J, Zhu W, Shi Q, Bao F, Xu J. Effect of surgical pleth index-guided analgesia versus conventional analgesia techniques on fentanyl consumption under multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized and controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 4;21(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01366-x.
- Background: PubMed 30916030Ledowski T, Schneider M, Gruenewald M, Goyal RK, Teo SR, Hruby J. Surgical pleth index: prospective validation of the score to predict moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e328-e332. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.10.066. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for The Success of Caudal Block
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Caudal and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks With Pain Monitoring in Children
Regional Anesthesia Success, Pain Monitor During Anesthesia
RecruitingObservational study
CAUDAL EPIDURAL BLOCK IN PEDIATRIC SURGERY CASES
Pediatric Patient
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Perfusion Index in Caudal Epidural Anasthesia
Caudal Epidural Block
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Safaa G Ragab, MD principal investigator
Faculty of medicine, Fayoum university
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of The Success of Caudal Block, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ahmed M Abdelrayif, M.Sc. (01097804630 ext. +20, ama102@fayoum.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to change of value of PI and SPI after caudal block (time frame: every minute for 10 minutes after caudal block as well as at skin incision then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07703384, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2026.