Optic NeuritisMS PredictorNCT07704294
Early Prediction of Outcomes Following Optic Neuritis: Development and Acceptability of a Prognostic Tool
An observational study of Optic Neuritis and Multiple Sclerosis, run by King's College London at 3 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to determine whether genetic information, together with clinical information, can be used to improve prediction of future multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis after a first-time episode of optic neuritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Optic Neuritis, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2026to 1 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants aged 16 and above with a history of a first episode of optic neuritis recruited from one of the three participating NHS sites in London (Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust)
Who may be able to join
- Aged 16 years and above at time of consent
- Previous episode of optic neuritis diagnosed at one of the participating sites
Who cannot join
- Patients for whom data relating to the first episode of ON are not available in the medical record at a participating site
- Children <16 years at the time of recruitment
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom3 sites
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, EC1V 2PD
Neringa Jurkute, MD, PhD, FEBOphth, +44 20 7253 3411, n.jurkute@nhs.net
Neringa Jurkute, MD, PhD, FEBOphth
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE1 7EH
Tasanee Braithwaite, FRCOphth, +44 20 7188 7188, tasanee.braithwaite@kcl.ac.uk
Tasanee Braithwaite, FRCOphth
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE5 9RS
James McHugh, FRCOphth, +44 20 3299 9000, james.mchugh@kcl.ac.uk
James McHugh, FRCOphth
About this study
Official title: Early Prediction of Outcomes Following Optic Neuritis: Development and Acceptability of a Prognostic Tool (MS Predictor)
The goal of this observational study is to determine whether genetic information, together with clinical information, can be used to improve prediction of future multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis after a first-time episode of optic neuritis. The study will also investigate visual outcomes, quality of life, healthcare use, and the acceptability of using genetic information to predict future health outcomes in people with optic neuritis.
The main outcomes that we aim to assess are:
Read more
- Incident diagnosis of MS following a first episode of optic neuritis, including time to MS diagnosis.
- Visual outcomes following optic neuritis, including visual acuity, visual field, and colour vision.
- Clinical care received following optic neuritis, including specialist review, investigations/tests
- Health-related and vision-related quality of life.
- Health economic impacts and healthcare utilisation after experiencing optic neuritis
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices/behaviours about using genetic information to predict future MS disease risk.
If consented, participants will:
- Allow researchers to review information from their medical records relating to their optic neuritis diagnosis, investigations, treatments, and outcomes.
- Be invited to provide a saliva sample for genetic analysis.
- Complete questionnaires about their lifestyle/risk factors, quality of life, and views on genetic risk prediction.
- Allow researchers to track long-term health outcomes using information from their NHS records
- Conditions
- Optic Neuritis, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder, Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG)-Antibody Related Disorders, Sarcoid
- Being tested
- No Intervention: Observational Cohort
- Keywords
- Optic neuritis, Multiple sclerosis, MS, Genetic Risk Score, Risk Prediction, Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein, MOG Antibody Disease, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
- Medical subject headings
- Optic Neuritis, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica, Sarcoidosis, Genetic Risk Score
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No Intervention: Observational CohortOther
Not applicable - No intervention as this is an observation study
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Participants Who Have Experienced Optic Neuritis | Participants with a history of a first episode of optic neuritis recruited from the 3 participating NHS hospitals. Participants will undergo retrospective review of clinical records, complete questionnaires, and may provide a saliva sample for genetic analysis.
Participants will be invited to consent to longer term prospective outcome assessment. Receives: Other: No Intervention: Observational Cohort |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incident Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis Following a First Episode of Optic Neuritis
Occurrence of a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis following a first episode of optic neuritis.
Measured: Extracted from retrospective record at baseline, and reviewed before study end to capture any new events occurring during the 12 month study period.
Secondary outcomes (19)
Visual Acuity (LogMAR)
Visual acuity (LogMAR) measured at first diagnosis of optic neuritis and at subsequent follow-up assessments.
Measured: From the date of first optic neuritis diagnosis until the last available follow-up assessment (up to 15 years).
Visual Field Mean Deviation (dB)
Visual field mean deviation (Decibels) measured at first diagnosis of optic neuritis and at subsequent follow-up assessments
Measured: From the date of first optic neuritis diagnosis until the last available follow-up assessment (up to 15 years).
Colour Vision (Number of Ishihara Plates Correctly Identified)
Colour vision assessed using Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates and reported as the number of plates correctly identified.
Measured: From the date of first optic neuritis diagnosis until the last available follow-up assessment (up to 15 years).
Number of Healthcare Consultations Following Optic Neuritis Diagnosis
Number of healthcare consultations attended following optic neuritis diagnosis, reported by consultation type, including primary care appointments, emergency department attendances, neuro-ophthalmology, neurology, and other relevant specialist clinics.
Measured: 12 months
Number of Investigations Performed Following Optic Neuritis Diagnosis
Number of investigations performed following optic neuritis diagnosis, reported by investigation type, including OCT, visual field testing, MRI, VEP, blood tests, and CSF analysis.
Measured: 12 months
Time to Diagnostic Investigations Following Optic Neuritis Diagnosis (Days)
Time interval (days) from optic neuritis diagnosis to each investigation, reported by investigation type.
Measured: 12 months
Time to Treatment Following Optic Neuritis Diagnosis (Days)
Time interval (Days) from optic neuritis diagnosis to initiation of first treatment course, reported by treatment type.
Measured: 12 months
Number of Treatment Episodes Following Optic Neuritis Diagnosis
Number of treatment episodes received following optic neuritis diagnosis, reported by treatment type (e.g. intravenous corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, disease-modifying therapies).
Measured: 12 months
Health-Related Quality of Life (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L])
Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises five domains, each scored on five levels. Higher levels indicate worse health status and poorer health-related quality of life.
Measured: Measured at baseline recruitment and repeated 3-12 months later
Vision-Related Quality of Life (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 [NEI-VFQ-25])
Vision-related quality of life assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) composite score. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better vision-related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and repeated 3-12 months later
Optic Neuritis-Related Quality of Life (Semi-Structured Questionnaire)
Participant-reported optic neuritis-related quality of life and lived experiences, including symptoms, treatment impacts, emotional well-being, activities of daily living, social participation and personal relationships, explored using a bespoke semi-structured questionnaire
Measured: Measured at baseline recruitment and repeated 3-12 months later
Fatigue (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Fatigue 6a)
Fatigue assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue 6a instrument. Raw scores are converted to T-scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the reference population. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue (worse outcome).
Measured: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Depression (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Depression 4a)
Depression assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression 4a instrument. Raw scores are converted to T-scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the reference population. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms (worse outcome).
Measured: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Work Productivity Loss (Adapted iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire [iPCQ])
Participant-reported work productivity loss associated with optic neuritis or related diseases, including absenteeism, presenteeism and changes to employment. Measured using the Adapted iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)
Measured: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Healthcare Resource Utilisation: Appointments, Emergency Department Attendances and Hospital Admissions (Adapted iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire [iMCQ])
Participant-reported utilisation of healthcare services related to optic neuritis or associated diseases, including appointments with healthcare professionals, emergency department attendances, and hospital admissions
Measured: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Healthcare Resource Utilisation: Investigations and Treatment Interventions (Adapted iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire [iMCQ])
Participant-reported utilisation of diagnostic investigations and therapeutic interventions related to optic neuritis or associated diseases, including imaging, laboratory investigations, electrophysiological testing, and treatments received.
Measured: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Informal Care Received (Hours)
Participant-reported hours of informal care received from family members, friends or acquaintances because of optic neuritis or associated diseases.
Measured: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Out-of-Pocket Costs (Pounds Sterling)
Participant-reported personal expenditure related to optic neuritis and associated diseases in the first year after optic neuritis began (e.g. health insurance, prescription costs, optician/sight tests, low vision aids)
Measured: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices/Behaviours Regarding Genetic Risk Prediction (KAP Questionnaire)
This will be explored using a knowledge, attitudes and practices/behaviour questionnaire to explore how participants feel about the use of genetic information to predict future health outcome risk including multiple sclerosis.
Measured: Baseline recruitment and repeated at 3-12 months later
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Optic NeuritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tasanee Braithwaite, Principal investigator, King's College London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07704294
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 352834
- Other IDs
- 222
- Acronym
- MS Predictor
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 15 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Panthagani J, O'Donovan C, Aiyegbusi OL, Liu X, Bayliss S, Calvert M, Pesudovs K, Denniston AK, Moore DJ, Braithwaite T. Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for future clinical trials in adult patients with optic neuritis. Eye (Lond). 2023 Oct;37(15):3097-3107. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02478-z. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
PubMed 36932161Braithwaite T, Wiegerinck N, Petzold A, Denniston A. Vision Loss from Atypical Optic Neuritis: Patient and Physician Perspectives. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Jun;9(2):215-220. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00247-9. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
PubMed 32200476Laviers H, Petzold A, Braithwaite T. How far should I manage acute optic neuritis as an ophthalmologist? A United Kingdom perspective. Eye (Lond). 2024 Aug;38(12):2238-2245. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03164-4. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
PubMed 38867071Petzold A, Braithwaite T, van Oosten BW, Balk L, Martinez-Lapiscina EH, Wheeler R, Wiegerinck N, Waters C, Plant GT. Case for a new corticosteroid treatment trial in optic neuritis: review of updated evidence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;91(1):9-14. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321653. Epub 2019 Nov 18. No abstract available.
PubMed 31740484Braithwaite T, Subramanian A, Petzold A, Galloway J, Adderley NJ, Mollan SP, Plant GT, Nirantharakumar K, Denniston AK. Trends in Optic Neuritis Incidence and Prevalence in the UK and Association With Systemic and Neurologic Disease. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Dec 1;77(12):1514-1523. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3502.
PubMed 33017023Loginovic P, Wang F, Li J, Ferrat L, Mirshahi UL, Rao HS, Petzold A, Tyrrell J, Green HD, Weedon MN, Ganna A, Tuomi T, Carey DJ; UKBB Eye & Vision Consortium; FinnGen; Geisinger-Regeneron DiscovEHR Collaboration; Oram RA, Braithwaite T. Applying a genetic risk score model to enhance prediction of future multiple sclerosis diagnosis at first presentation with optic neuritis. Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 28;15(1):1415. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44917-9.
PubMed 38418465
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Prediction of Outcomes Following Optic Neuritis: Development and Acceptability of a Prognostic Tool (MS Predictor)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07704294
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MS Predictor / 352834
- Conditions
- Optic Neuritis, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder, Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG)-Antibody Related Disorders, Sarcoid
- Keywords
- Optic neuritis, Multiple sclerosis, MS, Genetic Risk Score, Risk Prediction, Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein, MOG Antibody Disease, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to determine whether genetic information, together with clinical information, can be used to improve prediction of future multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis after a first-time episode of optic neuritis. The study will also investigate visual outcomes, quality of life, healthcare use, and the acceptability of using genetic information to predict future health outcomes in people with optic neuritis.
The main outcomes that we aim to assess are:
- Incident diagnosis of MS following a first episode of optic neuritis, including time to MS diagnosis.
- Visual outcomes following optic neuritis, including visual acuity, visual field, and colour vision.
- Clinical care received following optic neuritis, including specialist review, investigations/tests
- Health-related and vision-related quality of life.
- Health economic impacts and healthcare utilisation after experiencing optic neuritis
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices/behaviours about using genetic information to predict future MS disease risk.
If consented, participants will:
- Allow researchers to review information from their medical records relating to their optic neuritis diagnosis, investigations, treatments, and outcomes.
- Be invited to provide a saliva sample for genetic analysis.
- Complete questionnaires about their lifestyle/risk factors, quality of life, and views on genetic risk prediction.
- Allow researchers to track long-term health outcomes using information from their NHS records
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Participants Who Have Experienced Optic Neuritis | – | Other: No Intervention: Observational CohortParticipants with a history of a first episode of optic neuritis recruited from the 3 participating NHS hospitals. Participants will undergo retrospective review of clinical records, complete questionnaires, and may provide a saliva sample for genetic analysis. Participants will be invited to consent to longer term prospective outcome assessment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants aged 16 and above with a history of a first episode of optic neuritis recruited from one of the three participating NHS sites in London (Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust)
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Aged 16 years and above at time of consent
- Previous episode of optic neuritis diagnosed at one of the participating sites
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients for whom data relating to the first episode of ON are not available in the medical record at a participating site
- Children <16 years at the time of recruitment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No Intervention: Observational CohortNot applicable - No intervention as this is an observation study | Other | Participants Who Have Experienced Optic Neuritis |
Primary outcome
Incident Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis Following a First Episode of Optic Neuritis
Time frame: Extracted from retrospective record at baseline, and reviewed before study end to capture any new events occurring during the 12 month study period.
Occurrence of a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis following a first episode of optic neuritis.
19 secondary outcomes
Visual Acuity (LogMAR)
Time frame: From the date of first optic neuritis diagnosis until the last available follow-up assessment (up to 15 years).
Visual Field Mean Deviation (dB)
Time frame: From the date of first optic neuritis diagnosis until the last available follow-up assessment (up to 15 years).
Colour Vision (Number of Ishihara Plates Correctly Identified)
Time frame: From the date of first optic neuritis diagnosis until the last available follow-up assessment (up to 15 years).
Number of Healthcare Consultations Following Optic Neuritis Diagnosis
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Investigations Performed Following Optic Neuritis Diagnosis
Time frame: 12 months
Time to Diagnostic Investigations Following Optic Neuritis Diagnosis (Days)
Time frame: 12 months
Time to Treatment Following Optic Neuritis Diagnosis (Days)
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Treatment Episodes Following Optic Neuritis Diagnosis
Time frame: 12 months
Health-Related Quality of Life (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L])
Time frame: Measured at baseline recruitment and repeated 3-12 months later
Vision-Related Quality of Life (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 [NEI-VFQ-25])
Time frame: Baseline and repeated 3-12 months later
Optic Neuritis-Related Quality of Life (Semi-Structured Questionnaire)
Time frame: Measured at baseline recruitment and repeated 3-12 months later
Fatigue (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Fatigue 6a)
Time frame: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Depression (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Depression 4a)
Time frame: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Work Productivity Loss (Adapted iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire [iPCQ])
Time frame: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Healthcare Resource Utilisation: Appointments, Emergency Department Attendances and Hospital Admissions (Adapted iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire [iMCQ])
Time frame: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Healthcare Resource Utilisation: Investigations and Treatment Interventions (Adapted iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire [iMCQ])
Time frame: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Informal Care Received (Hours)
Time frame: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Out-of-Pocket Costs (Pounds Sterling)
Time frame: Baseline recruitment and repeated once 3-12 months later
Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices/Behaviours Regarding Genetic Risk Prediction (KAP Questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline recruitment and repeated at 3-12 months later
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 36932161Panthagani J, O'Donovan C, Aiyegbusi OL, Liu X, Bayliss S, Calvert M, Pesudovs K, Denniston AK, Moore DJ, Braithwaite T. Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for future clinical trials in adult patients with optic neuritis. Eye (Lond). 2023 Oct;37(15):3097-3107. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02478-z. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 32200476Braithwaite T, Wiegerinck N, Petzold A, Denniston A. Vision Loss from Atypical Optic Neuritis: Patient and Physician Perspectives. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Jun;9(2):215-220. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00247-9. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
- Background: PubMed 38867071Laviers H, Petzold A, Braithwaite T. How far should I manage acute optic neuritis as an ophthalmologist? A United Kingdom perspective. Eye (Lond). 2024 Aug;38(12):2238-2245. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03164-4. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 31740484Petzold A, Braithwaite T, van Oosten BW, Balk L, Martinez-Lapiscina EH, Wheeler R, Wiegerinck N, Waters C, Plant GT. Case for a new corticosteroid treatment trial in optic neuritis: review of updated evidence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;91(1):9-14. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321653. Epub 2019 Nov 18. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33017023Braithwaite T, Subramanian A, Petzold A, Galloway J, Adderley NJ, Mollan SP, Plant GT, Nirantharakumar K, Denniston AK. Trends in Optic Neuritis Incidence and Prevalence in the UK and Association With Systemic and Neurologic Disease. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Dec 1;77(12):1514-1523. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3502.
- Background: PubMed 38418465Loginovic P, Wang F, Li J, Ferrat L, Mirshahi UL, Rao HS, Petzold A, Tyrrell J, Green HD, Weedon MN, Ganna A, Tuomi T, Carey DJ; UKBB Eye & Vision Consortium; FinnGen; Geisinger-Regeneron DiscovEHR Collaboration; Oram RA, Braithwaite T. Applying a genetic risk score model to enhance prediction of future multiple sclerosis diagnosis at first presentation with optic neuritis. Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 28;15(1):1415. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44917-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Optic Neuritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Safety and Efficacy Study Evaluating CTX112 in Subjects With Refractory Neurologic Autoimmune Disease
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PMS), Neuromyelitis Optica
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy of BAFFR CART for Relapsed/ Refractory Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy of BAFF-R CART for Refractory Neuroimmune Diseases
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, NMO Spectrum Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Registry of Patients With AQP4+ NMOSD Treated With Alexion C5 Inhibitor Therapies
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder, NMOSD
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Clinical and Radiological Impact of Ravulizumab in People With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
Neuromyelitis Optica
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Tasanee Braithwaite principal investigator
King's College London
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Optic Neuritis and Multiple Sclerosis, run by King's College London at 3 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tasanee Braithwaite, Doctor of Medicine (Oxon) (+44 20 7188 7188, tasanee.braithwaite@kcl.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incident Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis Following a First Episode of Optic Neuritis (time frame: Extracted from retrospective record at baseline, and reviewed before study end to capture any new events occurring during the 12 month study period.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07704294, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2026.