AzTrials
AzTrials

Text Neck SyndromeNCT07705711

Acute Effects of Classical vs. Percussive Massage on Text Neck Syndrome

A study testing Percussive Massage Therapy and Classic Massage Therapy in people with Text Neck Syndrome, run by Toros University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of our study is to compare the short-term effects of traditional classical massage and percussive massage on neck pain, patient satisfaction level, and upper extremity flexibility in young adults with MBS. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 years
Conditions the study is for
Text Neck Syndrome
What is being tested?
Percussive Massage Therapy and Classic Massage Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
3 Aug 2026to 25 Sep 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • University students aged between 18 and 30 years.
  • Willing to participate in the study and provide informed consent.
  • Have been using a mobile device for at least 1 year.
  • Have no communication impairments.
  • Use a mobile device for at least 3 hours per day.
  • Report at least three of the six core symptoms of Mobile Neck Syndrome (MNS): neck pain, upper back pain, shoulder pain, headache, insomnia, and tingling or numbness in the hands.
  • Have a Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of 10 or higher.

Who cannot join

  • History of generalized joint disorders affecting the head, neck, or shoulder region.
  • History of radiotherapy involving the head, neck, or shoulder region.
  • History of surgery involving the head or neck region.
  • Diagnosis of cervical disc herniation, cervical radiculopathy, or cervical myelopathy.
  • History of inflammatory, neuromuscular, or congenital disorders affecting the head or neck region.
  • Presence of a metal implant in the treatment area.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Current use of analgesics, muscle relaxants, anticoagulants, or other medications that may influence the study outcomes.
  • History of systemic disease.
  • Receipt of any treatment targeting the cervical region within the previous 3 months.
  • Pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • University of Health Sciences

    Ankara, None Selected

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Acute Effects of Classical Massage and Percussive Massage in Young Adults With Text Neck Syndrome

The aim of our study is to compare the short-term effects of traditional classical massage and percussive massage on neck pain, patient satisfaction level, and upper extremity flexibility in young adults with MBS. Another aim of the study is to contribute to the literature, as there are a limited number of studies that directly evaluate the effectiveness of popular vibration devices (Theragun, etc.) compared to classical massage. Original value: With the development of technology and the increase in mobile device usage times, MBS is increasingly common, especially among young adults and university students. There are limited studies in the literature on the treatment of MBS. No studies comparing the acute effects of classical massage and percussion therapy in the treatment of this syndrome have been found. Therefore, our study has the potential to make a unique contribution to the literature by offering a direct comparison between both traditional classical massage and the modern technological method of percussion gun.

Sociodemographic Assessment Form: The form to be prepared before the study will record information such as age (years), gender, body weight (kg) and height (cm) of the participants, as well as trauma-surgery history, systemic problems, and average daily mobile device usage time. Six symptoms reporting MBS diagnostic criteria (neck pain, back pain, shoulder pain, headache, insomnia, tingling and numbness in the hands) will be questioned .

Read more

Pain Assessment: The pain intensity of individuals with MBS will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, which is reported to be valid and reliable. Individuals included in the study will be asked to indicate the pain intensity they experienced in the last week on a vertically positioned 100 mm long line. The marked points will be measured and recorded in millimeters.

Neck Disability Index (NDI): It is planned to use the Neck Disability Index, which has Turkish validity and reliability, to determine neck disability. The first four items of the ten-item questionnaire are related to subjective symptoms, while the other six items are related to daily life activities. When the total score of the questionnaire is examined, 0 points indicate no disability, 5-14 points indicate mild disability, 15-24 points indicate moderate disability, 25-34 points indicate severe disability, and 35 points and above indicate complete disability.

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Level: The treatment satisfaction levels of the participants included in the study will be evaluated with the Patient Satisfaction Scale developed for physical therapy outpatient clinics.

The Turkish validity and reliability study of this 24-item scale was carried out by Tüzün et al. (2009) (Cronbach alpha: 0.88). The scale is scored between 0 (strongly disagree) and 4 (strongly agree), and higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. Assessment of Upper Extremity Balance: Participants' upper extremity balance and performance will be assessed using the Upper Extremity Balance Test.

While maintaining a push-up position with feet no more than twelve inches (30.5 cm) apart, the individual will reach with maximum effort in three directions (medial, superolateral, and inferolateral) with their free hand relative to the fixed hand, and the distance reached in each direction will be recorded. Each individual will be allowed to make 3 practice trials before the test, and the average of 3 trials will be used for analysis.

Assessment of Upper Extremity Flexibility: To assess the upper extremity flexibility of the participants, the Apley Scratch Test will be used. Also called the Dawbarn Test, the Apley Scratch Test provides a rapid assessment of the patient's active range of motion, including internal rotation, extension, and adduction. During the Apley scratch test, the patient attempts to reach upwards from their back, starting from below and aiming to place their hand between their shoulder blades. Then the distance between the two hands is measured with the help of a tape measure.

Interventions Percussive Massage Therapy: Percussive massage therapy will be applied with the TheraGun Relief Navy massage gun, which is planned to be supplied within the scope of the project. Percussive massage application will be applied from distal to proximal along the starting points of the trapezius, levator scapulae and cervical paravertebral muscles at a medium speed (level 2, range: 33-40 Hz) and 12 mm amplitude. Percussive therapy will be performed using the soft head of the massage gun with a treatment time of five minutes for each muscle group.

Classic Massage Therapy: After carefully protecting patient privacy in a prone position, general stroking is applied to the neck area, followed by massage oil using the 3 Stroking-3 Kneading-3 Stroking technique on the erector spinae, trapezius and levator scapulae muscles, from distal to proximal.

Being tested
Percussive Massage Therapy, Classic Massage Therapy
Keywords
text neck syndrome, neck pain, pain, massage therapy
Medical subject headings
Neck Pain, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Percussive Massage TherapyOther

    Percussive massage therapy will be applied with the TheraGun Relief Navy massage gun, which is planned to be supplied within the scope of the project. Percussive massage application will be applied from distal to proximal along the starting points of the trapezius, levator scapulae and cervical paravertebral muscles at a medium speed (level 2, range: 33-40 Hz) and 12 mm amplitude. Percussive therapy will be performed using the soft head of the massage gun with a treatment time of five minutes for each muscle group.

  • Classic Massage TherapyOther

    After carefully protecting patient privacy in a prone position, general stroking is applied to the neck area, followed by massage oil using the 3 Stroking-3 Kneading-3 Stroking technique on the erector spinae, trapezius and levator scapulae muscles, from distal to proximal.

Study groups in NCT07705711
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Percussive Massage TherapyActive comparatorPercussive massage therapy will be applied with the TheraGun Relief Navy massage gun, which is planned to be supplied within the scope of the project. Percussive massage application will be applied from distal to proximal along the starting points of the trapezius, levator scapulae and cervical paravertebral muscles at a medium speed (level 2, range: 33-40 Hz) and 12 mm amplitude.
Receives: Other: Percussive Massage Therapy
Classical Massage TherapyActive comparatorClassic Massage Therapy: After carefully protecting patient privacy in a prone position, general stroking is applied to the neck area, followed by massage oil using the 3 Stroking-3 Kneading-3 Stroking technique on the erector spinae, trapezius and levator scapulae muscles, from distal to proximal.
Receives: Other: Classic Massage Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Neck Pain

    The pain intensity of individuals with MBS will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, which is reported to be valid and reliable. Individuals included in the study will be asked to indicate the pain intensity they experienced in the last week on a vertically positioned 100 mm long line. The marked points will be measured and recorded in millimeters

    Measured: First Interview: Initial Assessment/ Second Assessment: Immediately after the treatment/ Third Assessment: One day after the treatment

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Neck Disability

    Neck Disability Index (NDI): It is planned to use the Neck Disability Index, which has Turkish validity and reliability, to determine neck disability. The first four items of the ten-item questionnaire are related to subjective symptoms, while the other six items are related to daily life activities. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 40. When the total score of the questionnaire is examined, 0 points indicate no disability, 5-14 points indicate mild disability, 15-24 points indicate moderate disability, 25-34 points indicate severe disability, and 35 points and above indicate complete disability. Higher scores indicate higher neck disability.

    Measured: First Interview: Initial Assessment/ Second Assessment: Immediately after the treatment/ Third Assessment: One day after the treatment

  2. Satisfaction Level

    The treatment satisfaction levels of the participants included in the study will be evaluated with the Patient Satisfaction Scale developed for physical therapy outpatient clinics.The Turkish validity and reliability study of this 24-item scale was carried out by Tüzün et al. (2009) (Cronbach alpha: 0.88). The scale is scored between 0 (strongly disagree) and 4 (strongly agree), and higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 96

    Measured: First Interview: Initial Assessment/ Second Assessment: Immediately after the treatment/ Third Assessment: One day after the treatment

  3. Upper Extremity Balance

    Participants' upper extremity balance will be assessed using the Upper Extremity Balance Test. While maintaining a push-up position with feet no more than twelve inches (30.5 cm) apart, the individual will reach with maximum effort in three directions (medial, superolateral, and inferolateral) with their free hand relative to the fixed hand, and the distance reached in each direction will be recorded. Each individual will be allowed to make 3 practice trials before the test, and the average of 3 trials will be used for analysis.

    Measured: First Interview: Initial Assessment/ Second Assessment: Immediately after the treatment/ Third Assessment: One day after the treatment

  4. Upper Extremity Flexibility

    To assess the upper extremity flexibility of the participants, the Apley Scratch Test will be used. The Apley Scratch Test provides a rapid assessment of the patient's active range of motion, including internal rotation, extension, and adduction. During the Apley scratch test, the patient attempts to reach upwards from their back, starting from below and aiming to place their hand between their shoulder blades. Then the distance between the two hands is measured with the help of a tape measure.

    Measured: First Interview: Initial Assessment/ Second Assessment: Immediately after the treatment/ Third Assessment: One day after the treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2026
  2. Study start3 Aug 2026
  3. Primary completion25 Sep 2026
  4. Study completion25 Sep 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07705711
Sponsor's protocol ID
TU-UY-FTR-03
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
5 Jul 2026
Last updated
5 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Percussive Massage Therapy and Classic Massage Therapy in people with Text Neck Syndrome, run by Toros University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Neck Pain (time frame: First Interview: Initial Assessment/ Second Assessment: Immediately after the treatment/ Third Assessment: One day after the treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in