Cataract SurgeriesNCT07710963
Comparison of the Concordance Between Digital Marking and Manual Marking for Toric Intraocular Lens Positioning
An observational study of Cataract Surgeries, run by Thammasat University.
Trial summary
This cross-sectional comparative study evaluated patients from a single cataract center. In each eye, manual horizontal meridian axis line was marked on the cornea using the manual peripheral corneal marking technique (Horizontal Slit Beam Marking ), while the Verion digital image-guided navigation system provided a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cataract Surgeries
- What is being tested?
- Verion Digital Marking
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2026to 30 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Cataract Patients at Thammasat University
Who may be able to join
- candidates for uncomplicated cataract surgery
Who cannot join
- irregular corneal astigmatism, lens subluxation, uveitis, glaucoma, trauma, history of retinal disease or optic neuropathy, previous intraocular or corneal surgery and corneal disease that could not be evaluated by the ARGOS or VERION systems
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Concordance Between Digital Image-Guided Navigation and Manual Peripheral Corneal Marking for Toric Intraocular Lens Positioning
This cross-sectional comparative study evaluated patients from a single cataract center. In each eye, manual horizontal meridian axis line was marked on the cornea using the manual peripheral corneal marking technique (Horizontal Slit Beam Marking ), while the Verion digital image-guided navigation system provided a reference axis fixed at the horizontal meridian (0°/180°). The primary outcome measure was the difference in degrees between the digital marker and the manual marker horizontal meridian as measured intraoperatively. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, reporting the mean bias (systematic error) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA, mean ± 1.96 SD). A misalignment of ±10° was defined as the threshold of clinical significance.
Read the detailed description
Patients with visually significant cataract and regular corneal astigmatism who were scheduled for phacoemulsification were screened for eligibility. Inclusion criteria were adults (18 -90 years of age) that were candidates for uncomplicated cataract surgery. The exclusion criteria were irregular corneal astigmatism, lens subluxation, uveitis, glaucoma, trauma, history of retinal disease or optic neuropathy, previous intraocular or corneal surgery and corneal disease that could not be evaluated by the ARGOS or VERION systems.
Preoperative assessment included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), which were determined by Snellen's chart and converted to logMAR. Spherical equivalent (SE) and astigmatic refraction (AR) were examined by Full Auto Ref-Keratometer (RK-F2, Canon). Evaluation for corneal astigmatism and axial length with ARGOS® Biometer. Slit lamp examination (BP 900®, Hagg-Streit) intraocular pressure measurement (Canon TX-20P), and dilated retinal examination was performed on all of the patients.
For manual technique a slit-lamp was used. Patients were seated with their head fixed with the horizontal supporting band and their chin placed in the center of the chinrest. A thin horizontal slit beam is projected onto the cornea and moved vertically (up and down) until the area of maximum light concentration (brightest reflection) on the corneal surface is identified. For each eye, after identifying the point of maximum light reflex, under topical anesthesia with 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride eye drops, the corneal limbus was marked at the 0° and 180° meridian (3 and 9 o'clock) positions using a blunt tip of the Sinskey hook coated with sterile gentian violet ink, using light pressure as a single touch of approximately one second, in order to standardize ink deposition and minimize ink spread. The marking was maintained horizontally without any movement during the marking. The thickness of marks was routinely less than 0.25 mm
For the digital technique, preoperative biometry data obtained from the ARGOS Biometer were entered into the Alcon Vision Planner v1.6, which was paired with the VERION Image-Guided System (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, USA) to project the digital overlays directly into the operating microscope. This module captures a high-resolution preoperative reference image of the eye which can be used to document the center of the undilated pupil, corneal reflex position or eccentricity of the visual axis, scleral vessels and iris structures. All marking was performed by the same experienced surgeon (W. Tattiyakul) who was experienced with using all techniques, performed all procedures and measurements. No complications had occurred.
With both the manual and digital marks visible intraoperatively, the angular deviation along the horizontal meridian (in degrees) between the manual mark and the digital reference was recorded from the operating-microscope display for each eye by two trained observers independently, each blinded to the other's readings, using the same standardized display. The mean of the two observers' readings was used for all subsequent analyses, and inter-observer agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis
- Conditions
- Cataract Surgeries
- Being tested
- Verion Digital Marking
- Keywords
- manual marking, digital marking, toric intraocular lens
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Verion Digital MarkingOther
Verion Digital Marking Vs Manual Marking
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean signed angular deviation in degrees of the manual slit-lamp horizontal reference mark from the VERION digital reference meridian
For each eye, the signed angular difference (degrees) between the horizontal reference meridian (0-180°) marked by the manual slit-lamp peripheral corneal marking technique and the corresponding meridian identified by the VERION Image-Guided System (reference standard) is measured intraoperatively. Clockwise deviation is coded positive and counterclockwise negative. Agreement is summarized across eyes as the mean signed angular deviation with 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Reported in a single unit (degrees).
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Proportion of eyes within ±5° of the VERION digital reference meridian, measured intraoperatively
For each eye, the absolute angular difference (degrees) between the horizontal reference meridian marked by the manual slit-lamp peripheral corneal marking technique and the meridian identified by the VERION Image-Guided System (reference standard) is measured intraoperatively. The outcome is the proportion of eyes with an absolute deviation of 5° or less, reported as a percentage (%) of eyes assessed. ±5° is the pre-specified threshold of clinically acceptable agreement for the marking step.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2026
- Study start10 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cataract SurgeriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Thammasat University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pirapat Chareonboonsit, Thammasat University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07710963
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MTU-EC-OP-0-162/69
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Concordance Between Digital Image-Guided Navigation and Manual Peripheral Corneal Marking for Toric Intraocular Lens Positioning
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07710963
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MTU-EC-OP-0-162/69
- Conditions
- Cataract Surgeries
- Keywords
- manual marking, digital marking, toric intraocular lens
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Thammasat UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This cross-sectional comparative study evaluated patients from a single cataract center. In each eye, manual horizontal meridian axis line was marked on the cornea using the manual peripheral corneal marking technique (Horizontal Slit Beam Marking ), while the Verion digital image-guided navigation system provided a reference axis fixed at the horizontal meridian (0°/180°). The primary outcome measure was the difference in degrees between the digital marker and the manual marker horizontal meridian as measured intraoperatively. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, reporting the mean bias (systematic error) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA, mean ± 1.96 SD). A misalignment of ±10° was defined as the threshold of clinical significance.
Detailed description
Patients with visually significant cataract and regular corneal astigmatism who were scheduled for phacoemulsification were screened for eligibility. Inclusion criteria were adults (18 -90 years of age) that were candidates for uncomplicated cataract surgery. The exclusion criteria were irregular corneal astigmatism, lens subluxation, uveitis, glaucoma, trauma, history of retinal disease or optic neuropathy, previous intraocular or corneal surgery and corneal disease that could not be evaluated by the ARGOS or VERION systems.
Preoperative assessment included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), which were determined by Snellen's chart and converted to logMAR. Spherical equivalent (SE) and astigmatic refraction (AR) were examined by Full Auto Ref-Keratometer (RK-F2, Canon). Evaluation for corneal astigmatism and axial length with ARGOS® Biometer. Slit lamp examination (BP 900®, Hagg-Streit) intraocular pressure measurement (Canon TX-20P), and dilated retinal examination was performed on all of the patients.
For manual technique a slit-lamp was used. Patients were seated with their head fixed with the horizontal supporting band and their chin placed in the center of the chinrest. A thin horizontal slit beam is projected onto the cornea and moved vertically (up and down) until the area of maximum light concentration (brightest reflection) on the corneal surface is identified. For each eye, after identifying the point of maximum light reflex, under topical anesthesia with 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride eye drops, the corneal limbus was marked at the 0° and 180° meridian (3 and 9 o'clock) positions using a blunt tip of the Sinskey hook coated with sterile gentian violet ink, using light pressure as a single touch of approximately one second, in order to standardize ink deposition and minimize ink spread. The marking was maintained horizontally without any movement during the marking. The thickness of marks was routinely less than 0.25 mm
For the digital technique, preoperative biometry data obtained from the ARGOS Biometer were entered into the Alcon Vision Planner v1.6, which was paired with the VERION Image-Guided System (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, USA) to project the digital overlays directly into the operating microscope. This module captures a high-resolution preoperative reference image of the eye which can be used to document the center of the undilated pupil, corneal reflex position or eccentricity of the visual axis, scleral vessels and iris structures. All marking was performed by the same experienced surgeon (W. Tattiyakul) who was experienced with using all techniques, performed all procedures and measurements. No complications had occurred.
With both the manual and digital marks visible intraoperatively, the angular deviation along the horizontal meridian (in degrees) between the manual mark and the digital reference was recorded from the operating-microscope display for each eye by two trained observers independently, each blinded to the other's readings, using the same standardized display. The mean of the two observers' readings was used for all subsequent analyses, and inter-observer agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Cataract Patients at Thammasat University
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- candidates for uncomplicated cataract surgery
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- irregular corneal astigmatism, lens subluxation, uveitis, glaucoma, trauma, history of retinal disease or optic neuropathy, previous intraocular or corneal surgery and corneal disease that could not be evaluated by the ARGOS or VERION systems
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Verion Digital MarkingVerion Digital Marking Vs Manual Marking | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Mean signed angular deviation in degrees of the manual slit-lamp horizontal reference mark from the VERION digital reference meridian
Time frame: 6 months
For each eye, the signed angular difference (degrees) between the horizontal reference meridian (0-180°) marked by the manual slit-lamp peripheral corneal marking technique and the corresponding meridian identified by the VERION Image-Guided System (reference standard) is measured intraoperatively. Clockwise deviation is coded positive and counterclockwise negative. Agreement is summarized across eyes as the mean signed angular deviation with 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Reported in a single unit (degrees).
1 secondary outcome
Proportion of eyes within ±5° of the VERION digital reference meridian, measured intraoperatively
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2026.
Related trials for Cataract Surgeries
Not yet recruiting
Trial to Investigate the Safety and Effectiveness of the KI-362-US1 (YP2.2VM) Intraocular Lens (IOL) in Adult Participants for Correction of Aphakia Following Cataract Extraction
Aphakia, Postcataract
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Oxygen Cage Support During Cataract Surgery
Cataract
RecruitingObservational study
Objective Depth-of-Focus Changes During Light Adjustable Lens UV Adjustments
Light Adjustable Lens, Objective Depth of Focus
RecruitingObservational study
Anterior Segment Anatomy Assessed by Swept-Source OCT in Ocular Surgery Patients
Cataract, Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
RecruitingObservational study
Surgical Procedure Efficiency Evaluation stuDy
Cataract, Vitreous Hemorrhage
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cataract Surgeries, run by Thammasat University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean signed angular deviation in degrees of the manual slit-lamp horizontal reference mark from the VERION digital reference meridian (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2026.