Accuracy of AI AppAISGNCT07711613
Accuracy of AI Assisted Surgical Guide (AISG)
A study testing Implant placement using Conventional static surgical guide and Implant placement using AI assisted surgical guide in people with Accuracy of AI App and Accuracy of AI Assisted Surgical Guides, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy of conventional static surgical guide and AI-assisted static surgical guide in implant placement in the esthetic zone of partially edentulous maxilla , This study will be carried out on patients seeking implant placement in partially edentulous esthetic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Accuracy of AI App, Accuracy of AI Assisted Surgical Guides
- What is being tested?
- Implant placement using Conventional static surgical guide and Implant placement using AI assisted surgical guide
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 14 Jul 2026to 14 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 1- Missing teeth in esthetic zone of maxilla. 2-Both genders (male and female). 3- Adult ages (from 21 years to 60 years).
Who cannot join
- Medically compromised patient (uncontrolled diabetes, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hemophilia). 2- Patient with oral habit as bruxism, heavy smoking. 3- Patient with bad oral hygiene. 4- Patient with severe gingival diseases. 5- Patient with severe periodontal diseases (with severe vertical or horizontal bone loss).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Accuracy of AI-Assisted Static Surgical Guides in Delayed Dental Implant Placement in The Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy of conventional static surgical guide and AI-assisted static surgical guide in implant placement in the esthetic zone of partially edentulous maxilla , This study will be carried out on patients seeking implant placement in partially edentulous esthetic zone of maxilla, selected from those who were referred to outpatient clinic of the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University. The main research question is assessing what the difference is upon using AI-assisted surgical guide in terms of the accuracy of implant angular and linear deviation, and implant depth. The expected outcome is that The use of AI-assisted surgical guide in implant placement may provide higher accuracy and less deviation than the conventional static surgical guide. This clinical study will be conducted on 20 surgical guides for placement of 20 implants, divided into 2 groups: Group 1: 10 conventional computer-guided static guides for placement of 10 implants (as control group) Group 2: 10 AI-assisted static surgical guides for placement of 10 implants (as study group) The selected patients will get a pre operative CBCT scan and an intraoral scan then the guide design and generation will be performed using conventional software or AI integrated software according to randomization chart generated by "www.randomizer.org", and after the surgery of implant placement through the prefabricated guides the patients will get an immediate post operative CBCT scan.
Read the detailed description
Wide research has been conducted to enhance the accuracy of implant placement within the bone while adopting more conservative techniques to improve overall success rates. The digital workflow for computer-aided implant surgery includes a range of steps leading to generation of a prosthetically driven, 3-dimensional virtual plan, and generation of static surgical guide. The use of AI integrated software decreases those steps drastically and seems to be a time saver. This study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy of conventional static surgical guide and AI-assisted static surgical guide in implant placement in the esthetic zone of partially edentulous maxilla. This clinical study will be conducted on 20 surgical guides, divided equally and randomly via (www.randomizer.org) into 2 groups: Group 1: 10 implants will be placed using 10 conventional surgical guides which are made using traditional manual planning \& designing (control group). Group 2: 10 implants will be placed using 10 AI-assisted surgical guides crafted with the help of machine learning-based planning software (study group). AI integrated software performs thorough analysis of the patient's anatomy \& a personalized and precise approach of implant placement. By automating the planning process, AI-assisted guides help reduce human error, planning time and provide precise, data-driven recommendations for implant placement position.
Objectives of this study is
Radiographic assessment through:
- pre-operative CBCT \& immediate postoperative CBCT to measure and compare angular and linear deviation, and implant depth between planned and actual implant positions in both groups.
- 6 months post operative CBCT for measuring marginal bone level
- peri implant bone density.
Clinical assessment through:
- Measuring implant stability quotient (ISQ) by Osstell ISQ Scale immediately and 6 months post operative.
- Being tested
- Implant placement using Conventional static surgical guide, Implant placement using AI assisted surgical guide
- Keywords
- Dental implants, Digital implant planning, AI-assisted surgical guide , computer guided surgery , static surgical guide, implant angular deviation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implant placement using Conventional static surgical guideProcedure or surgery
Conventional digitally planned surgical guide used for guided implant placement.
Implant placement using AI assisted surgical guideProcedure or surgery
AI assisted surgical guide for guided placement of dental implants
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| conventional static surgical guide | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Implant placement using Conventional static surgical guide |
| AI assisted static surgical guide | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Implant placement using AI assisted surgical guide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Higher accuracy of AI assisted surgical guide
The deviation between the planned and the actual implant positions will be measured in three dimensions:
- 2) Angular deviation calculated in degrees. Linear deviation at implant platform and implant apex in millimeters. 3) Implant depth in millimeters The less the deviation, the higher the accuracy
Measured: Within 24 hours after implant placement
Secondary outcomes (1)
Successful Osseointegration
Implant stability will be measured using an Osstell device (Implant Stability Quotient - ISQ). 6 months Post-operative CBCT for measuring marginal bone level \& peri implant bone density.
Measured: 6 months postoperative follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2026
- Study start14 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion14 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion14 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Accuracy of AI AppStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Suez Canal UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alshaimaa saeed, Suez Canal University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07711613
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1148
- Acronym
- AISG
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to share individual participant data due to institutional policies and participant confidentiality.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Accuracy of AI-Assisted Static Surgical Guides in Delayed Dental Implant Placement in The Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07711613
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AISG / 1148
- Keywords
- Dental implants, Digital implant planning, AI-assisted surgical guide , computer guided surgery , static surgical guide, implant angular deviation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 14 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 14 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy of conventional static surgical guide and AI-assisted static surgical guide in implant placement in the esthetic zone of partially edentulous maxilla , This study will be carried out on patients seeking implant placement in partially edentulous esthetic zone of maxilla, selected from those who were referred to outpatient clinic of the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University. The main research question is assessing what the difference is upon using AI-assisted surgical guide in terms of the accuracy of implant angular and linear deviation, and implant depth. The expected outcome is that The use of AI-assisted surgical guide in implant placement may provide higher accuracy and less deviation than the conventional static surgical guide. This clinical study will be conducted on 20 surgical guides for placement of 20 implants, divided into 2 groups: Group 1: 10 conventional computer-guided static guides for placement of 10 implants (as control group) Group 2: 10 AI-assisted static surgical guides for placement of 10 implants (as study group) The selected patients will get a pre operative CBCT scan and an intraoral scan then the guide design and generation will be performed using conventional software or AI integrated software according to randomization chart generated by "www.randomizer.org", and after the surgery of implant placement through the prefabricated guides the patients will get an immediate post operative CBCT scan.
Detailed description
Wide research has been conducted to enhance the accuracy of implant placement within the bone while adopting more conservative techniques to improve overall success rates. The digital workflow for computer-aided implant surgery includes a range of steps leading to generation of a prosthetically driven, 3-dimensional virtual plan, and generation of static surgical guide. The use of AI integrated software decreases those steps drastically and seems to be a time saver. This study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy of conventional static surgical guide and AI-assisted static surgical guide in implant placement in the esthetic zone of partially edentulous maxilla. This clinical study will be conducted on 20 surgical guides, divided equally and randomly via (www.randomizer.org) into 2 groups: Group 1: 10 implants will be placed using 10 conventional surgical guides which are made using traditional manual planning \& designing (control group). Group 2: 10 implants will be placed using 10 AI-assisted surgical guides crafted with the help of machine learning-based planning software (study group). AI integrated software performs thorough analysis of the patient's anatomy \& a personalized and precise approach of implant placement. By automating the planning process, AI-assisted guides help reduce human error, planning time and provide precise, data-driven recommendations for implant placement position.
Objectives of this study is
Radiographic assessment through:
- pre-operative CBCT \& immediate postoperative CBCT to measure and compare angular and linear deviation, and implant depth between planned and actual implant positions in both groups.
- 6 months post operative CBCT for measuring marginal bone level
- peri implant bone density.
Clinical assessment through:
- Measuring implant stability quotient (ISQ) by Osstell ISQ Scale immediately and 6 months post operative.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| conventional static surgical guide | Experimental | Procedure: Implant placement using Conventional static surgical guide |
| AI assisted static surgical guide | Active comparator | Procedure: Implant placement using AI assisted surgical guide |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1- Missing teeth in esthetic zone of maxilla. 2-Both genders (male and female). 3- Adult ages (from 21 years to 60 years).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Medically compromised patient (uncontrolled diabetes, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hemophilia). 2- Patient with oral habit as bruxism, heavy smoking. 3- Patient with bad oral hygiene. 4- Patient with severe gingival diseases. 5- Patient with severe periodontal diseases (with severe vertical or horizontal bone loss).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implant placement using Conventional static surgical guideConventional digitally planned surgical guide used for guided implant placement. | Procedure or surgery | conventional static surgical guide |
| Implant placement using AI assisted surgical guideAI assisted surgical guide for guided placement of dental implants | Procedure or surgery | AI assisted static surgical guide |
Primary outcome
Higher accuracy of AI assisted surgical guide
Time frame: Within 24 hours after implant placement
The deviation between the planned and the actual implant positions will be measured in three dimensions: 1) 2) Angular deviation calculated in degrees. Linear deviation at implant platform and implant apex in millimeters. 3) Implant depth in millimeters The less the deviation, the higher the accuracy
1 secondary outcome
Successful Osseointegration
Time frame: 6 months postoperative follow up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to share individual participant data due to institutional policies and participant confidentiality.
Related trials for Accuracy of AI App
Active, not recruiting
Multicenter, Prospective Study Evaluating the Accuracy of an AI-based Smartphone Application for Non-invasive Anemia Detection
Anemia (Diagnosis), Anemia
Recruiting
Evaluating an AI-Based Mobile Application for Chemotherapy Support in Breast Cancer Patients
Breast Cancer, Breast Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implant placement using Conventional static surgical guide and Implant placement using AI assisted surgical guide in people with Accuracy of AI App and Accuracy of AI Assisted Surgical Guides, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact AlShaimaa Saeed, Bachelor (BDS) (+20 115 4727016, alshaimaa_saeed@dent.suez.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Higher accuracy of AI assisted surgical guide (time frame: Within 24 hours after implant placement). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2026.