AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck CancerINTEGRATE-HNCNCT07712120

Brief Clinical Psychological Intervention With Biofeedback in Head and Neck Cancer

A study testing Brief clinical psychological intervention using biofeedback techniques in people with Head and Neck Cancer and Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer Patients, run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Head and neck cancer and its surgical treatment may significantly affect patients' psychological well-being, body image, somatic experience, and quality of life. This pilot randomized controlled non-pharmacological study aims to evaluate the short-term efficacy of a brief clinical psychological intervention including… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Brief clinical psychological intervention using biofeedback techniques
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
58 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
20 Nov 2025to Nov 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Patients with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer scheduled to undergo demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction.
  • Age ≥18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form.
  • Ability to understand and communicate in Italian.

Who cannot join

  • Participants will be excluded if they:
  • Are unable to provide written informed consent.
  • Have a diagnosed psychiatric disorder.
  • Have a diagnosed neurocognitive impairment.
  • Are currently undergoing psychological or psychotherapeutic treatment.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Antonella Granieri, Full Professor contact

3204361389 ext. +39

antonella.granieri@unito.it

Maria Domenica Sauta, PhD Student contact

3402816558 ext. +39

mariadomenica.sauta@unito.it

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Head and Neck Cancer Unit, Asl Città di Torino

    Turin

    Giovanni Succo Full Professor, 0115661566, giovanni.succo@unito.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Integrating Clinical Psychology Into the Care of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Head and neck cancer and its surgical treatment may significantly affect patients' psychological well-being, body image, somatic experience, and quality of life. This pilot randomized controlled non-pharmacological study aims to evaluate the short-term efficacy of a brief clinical psychological intervention including biofeedback techniques in reducing post-traumatic stress symptoms in patients undergoing demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction.

Secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of the intervention on somatopsychic distress and quality of life, assess the persistence of intervention effects over time, and examine the impact of flap reconstruction on patients' psychological outcomes and quality of life.

Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving two 60-minute clinical psychological sessions integrating biofeedback techniques or a control group receiving standard care without the study intervention. Psychological and clinical assessments will be performed at baseline (before surgery), at hospital admission for surgery, and at the post-discharge follow-up visit.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Head and neck cancer encompasses oncological conditions that can develop in several anatomical sites, including the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, nasal cavity, and salivary glands. In particular, oral cavity cancer, including cancers of the lips, tongue, floor of the mouth, cheeks, gums, and palate, is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and is characterized by facial disfigurement and functional impairment, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 50%. Approximately 35,310 new cases of oral cavity cancer are diagnosed annually in the United States, and approximately 67,000 new cases occur in the European Union. Treatment for head and neck cancer may include demolitive and/or reconstructive surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. These treatments may result in difficulties with eating, swallowing, and speaking, as well as alterations in body image, with significant consequences for patients' psychological well-being and quality of life. The literature highlights the presence of anxiety, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and depressive symptoms among patients with head and neck cancer. Within an integrated care perspective, it is essential to consider how both the oncological disease and its treatments may affect patients' somatopsychic balance and their ability to perceive, communicate, work, and maintain meaningful relationships. In particular, integrating clinical psychological interventions that focus on the somatic and psychological aspects of illness experience and psychophysiological processes may represent a valuable approach.

However, the literature shows a lack of empirically validated psychological interventions specifically targeting patients with head and neck cancer.

PLANNED STUDY This study is a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and feasibility of a brief clinical psychological intervention including biofeedback techniques to reduce post-traumatic stress symptoms and somatopsychic distress in patients undergoing demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

  • The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the short-term efficacy of a brief clinical psychological intervention, including biofeedback techniques, in reducing post-traumatic stress symptoms in patients undergoing demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction.
  • Secondary objectives are: To compare the effects of the psychological intervention on somatopsychic distress and quality of life in patients undergoing oral cavity or oropharyngeal surgery, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction; to evaluate the persistence over time of the effects of the psychological intervention in patients with and without simultaneous flap reconstruction; to examine the impact of flap reconstruction on quality of life and somatopsychic distress after surgery, regardless of assignment to the psychological intervention.

ENDPOINTS Primary Endpoint: Mean total score on the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) after surgery.Secondary EndpointsMean total score on the Hyperarousal subscale of the IES-R.Mean total score on the Body Image Scale (BIS).Mean score on the Global Health Status scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30).Mean scores on the Social Eating, Social Contact, and Less Sexuality scales of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck (EORTC QLQ-H\&N35).Mean total score on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM).

Proportion of participants completing the intervention.Proportion of participants completing all assessments.

DESIGN:

This is a randomized, controlled, non-pharmacological pilot study involving adult patients with head and neck cancer scheduled to undergo demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. Each participant will receive a unique identification number at the time of randomization. After eligibility confirmation and written informed consent, participants will be stratified according to predefined criteria before randomization. Allocation will be performed using variable block randomization.

Stratification criteria will include:

  • Sex: male vs female.
  • Type of surgery: with vs without simultaneous flap reconstruction.

This approach aims to ensure balance between groups and reduce potential bias. Research staff involved in randomization and delivery of the psychological intervention will be aware of treatment allocation. Outcome assessors and other study personnel will remain blinded to group allocation. Participants will be instructed not to disclose their study group assignment to other patients.

PARTICIPANTS The study will recruit adult patients with head and neck cancer scheduled to undergo demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction, at the Head and Neck Cancer Unit of ASL Città di Torino, Italy. Each participant will receive the study information sheet and provide written informed consent before enrolment. The study does not modify the medical and surgical treatment planned according to standard clinical practice.

Participation in the study is not compatible with initiation of psychological or psychotherapeutic treatment during the study period. If a need for psychological or psychotherapeutic care emerges during the study, the participant will discontinue participation.

SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION In 2023, approximately 50 patients underwent demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx at the Head and Neck Cancer Unit of ASL Città di Torino, including 30 patients without and 20 patients with simultaneous flap reconstruction.Assuming a 15% annual increase in the number of surgical procedures and a clinically relevant difference corresponding to an effect size of 0.5 standard deviations between groups, the estimated sample size is 29 participants per group. With a one-tailed significance level of α=0.15, the study is expected to have 80% statistical power.

DESCRIPTION OF THE BRIEF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION INCLUDING BIOFEEDBACK TECHNIQUES The intervention consists of two clinical psychological sessions based on a psychoanalytic framework, each lasting approximately 60 minutes, integrating biofeedback techniques. Sessions will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. First SessionDuring the first session, the clinician explores the participant's illness history, focusing on the impact of disease-related changes on emotions, thoughts, and interpersonal relationships. Participants are invited to share relevant aspects of their personal history in relation to the experience of illness and treatment.The clinician explores the participant's awareness of the diagnosis, planned surgery, and expected postoperative course, while identifying psychosocial vulnerabilities and resources. Particular attention is given to aspects of body image, identity, and areas of personal investment that may be affected by surgery, as well as preserved resources that may support adaptation.The clinician provides psychoeducation on the relationship between emotional states and bodily responses, explaining how changes in psychophysiological activation may contribute to emotional regulation.A three-minute baseline biofeedback recording is then performed to assess psychophysiological parameters, including respiratory rate, heart rate, heart rate variability, surface electromyography, peripheral temperature, and skin conductance. After psychoeducation on diaphragmatic breathing, the clinician guides the participant in practicing slow and deep breathing with the support of biofeedback monitoring, with the aim of promoting bottom-up self-regulation strategies. At the end of the session, an additional three-minute biofeedback recording is performed. Participants are informed about the usefulness of home practice and are encouraged to perform daily diaphragmatic breathing exercises lasting approximately 10-20 minutes. When possible, participants are encouraged to use the free "Paced Breathing" application to support breathing training with a target of approximately six breathing cycles per minute. Informative material on diaphragmatic breathing is also provided.Second SessionThe second session includes an exploration of thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations that may have emerged following the first session and home practice. Participants undergo a three-minute recording of psychophysiological parameters, followed by a biofeedback session focused on diaphragmatic breathing. The clinician explores any changes in participants' expectations, emotions, and perceptions regarding surgery and postoperative recovery since the first session. At the end of the session, a further three-minute baseline biofeedback recording is performed.

ADMINISTRATION

Assessments will be performed at the following time points:

  • T0 (Baseline): when the participant is placed on the waiting list for demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction.
  • T1: at hospital admission for surgery
  • T2: at the post-discharge follow-up visit after surgery.Clinical and Psychological

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Data analysis will be conducted using SPSS, SAS, and Mplus software.Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, including all randomized participants according to their assigned group, regardless of adherence to the intervention.Continuous variables will be described using mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range (IQR), depending on data distribution. Categorical variables will be reported as frequencies and percentages.Normality of distributions will be assessed through skewness, kurtosis, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.To compare groups after surgery while accounting for baseline differences, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models will be performed, with post-surgery outcomes as dependent variables and baseline scores as covariates.The statistical model will include:

  • Treatment group (experimental vs control).
  • Baseline assessment value.
  • Relevant clinical and demographic covariates, including age and CORE-OM Risk Scale score.If assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity are not met, appropriate transformations or non-parametric alternatives will be considered.Within-group changes over time will be evaluated using paired-samples t-tests when appropriate. Effect estimates will be reported with 90% confidence intervals. Statistical significance will be set at p < 0.10 (one-tailed).

STUDY DURATION AND PHASES Total study duration: 24 months.

  • Months 1-18: participant recruitment and implementation of the study protocol, following approval by the Intercompany Territorial Ethics Committee of AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza of Torino.
  • Months 3-24: data analysis and dissemination of results.The recruitment period may be extended if the required sample size is not achieved.

RISK AND RISK MANAGEMENT The study procedures are not expected to pose risks to participants' physical health. However, participants may experience temporary psychological discomfort when discussing illness-related experiences, emotions, body image, or concerns related to surgery. Participants may also experience discomfort related to the application of biofeedback sensors. Participants will be informed that they may interrupt questionnaires, interviews, or biofeedback sessions at any time to discuss concerns with the clinician. The clinician's clinical training allows them to provide support, address distress, and answer participants' questions.

CONFIDENTIALITY AND DATA PROTECTION Each participant will be assigned a unique alphanumeric identification code.Participant identity and treatment allocation will only be accessible to research personnel involved in randomization and intervention delivery.Outcome assessors and other study personnel will have access only to coded data. Data will be analyzed in pseudonymized form by the Department of Psychology of the University of Torino.Study questionnaires will be stored securely for five years. The study database will be password-protected and accessible only to authorized researchers.All data processing will comply with applicable regulations regarding personal data protection.

Being tested
Brief clinical psychological intervention using biofeedback techniques
Keywords
Quality of life, RCT, Head and neck cancer, post-traumatic stress symptoms, body image, biofeedback, clnical psychology, Mentalization, Personality traits, Psychotherapy
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Brief clinical psychological intervention using biofeedback techniquesOther

    Intervention type: Clinical psychological intervention using biofeedback tecniques.

    The intervention consists of two 60-minute clinical psychological sessions with a psychoanalytic framework. A biofeedback device with physiological sensors is used during the sessions to monitor physiological responses and provide real-time feedback during patients' diaphragmatic breathing. The biofeedback device does not constitute a separate intervention.

    During the first session, the clinician explores the patient's illness history, emotions, relationships, and experience of diagnosis and surgery. A biofeedback baseline is recorded, followed by diaphragmatic breathing training to support emotional regulation. In the second session, the clinician discusses the patient's experience after training, changes in emotions, and expectations about surgery and recovery. Biofeedback and breathing exercises are repeated.

Study groups in NCT07712120
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental GroupExperimentalAssignment to the experimental and control groups will be performed using block randomization with variable block lengths. The stratification criteria are as follows: * Gender: Male (M) vs. Female (F) * Type of intervention: with vs. without simultaneous reconstruction with flaps. The intervention consists of two clinical-psychological interviews with a psychoanalytic framework, each lasting 60 minutes, integrating biofeedback techniques. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Receives: Other: Brief clinical psychological intervention using biofeedback techniques
Control GroupNo interventionNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in post traumatic symptoms after the surgery

    Changes in post traumatic symptoms

    • Total score. Range: 0-88. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
    • Hyperarousal subscale. Range: 0-4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
    • Avoidance subscale. Range: 0-4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
    • Intrusion subscale. Range: 0-4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Measured: T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Changes in Body Image after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique

    Changes in Body Image Scale (BIS) scores after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique

    BIS is a self-report questionnaire using a 4-point Likert scale with 10 items designed to assess body image from affective, behavioral, and cognitive perspectives.

    • Total score ranges from 0 to 30.
    • Higher scores indicate greater body image distress.
    • The total score is calculated by summing all item responses.

    Measured: T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery

  2. Changes in Quality of life after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique

    Changes in Quality of Life ( EORTC QLQ-C30) scores after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique.

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30) is a standardized questionnaire used to assess quality of life in cancer patients.

    The questionnaire contains 30 items grouped into:

    Global Health Status / Quality of Life

    • Overall health
    • Overall quality of life

    Functional Scales

    • Physical functioning
    • Role functioning
    • Emotional functioning
    • Cognitive functioning
    • Social functioning

    Symptom Scales

    • Fatigue
    • Nausea and vomiting
    • Pain

    Single Symptom Items

    • Dyspnea
    • Insomnia
    • Appetite loss
    • Constipation
    • Diarrhea
    • Financial difficulties

    Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale.

    Functional scales \& Global QoL:

    • Higher score = better functioning / better QoL

    Symptom scales:

    • Higher score = worse symptoms

    Measured: T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery

  3. Changes in Quality of life of head and neck cancer patients after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique

    Changes in Quality of Life of head and neck cancer patients (EORTC QLQ-H\&N35) scores after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique.

    The EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a disease-specific module designed to be used together with the EORTC QLQ-C30 for patients with head and neck cancers.

    The QLQ-H\&N35 contains 35 items, covering symptoms and problems common in head and neck cancer.

    Multi-item Symptom Scales

    • Pain
    • Swallowing
    • Senses problems (taste/smell)
    • Speech problems
    • Social eating
    • Social contact
    • Sexuality

    Single-item Symptoms

    • Teeth problems
    • Opening mouth
    • Dry mouth
    • Sticky saliva
    • Coughing
    • Feeling ill
    • Use of painkillers
    • Nutritional supplements
    • Feeding tube
    • Weight loss
    • Weight gain

    Items use a 4-point Likert scale. For the scoring items are transformed to a 0-100 scale.

    Higher score = more severe symptoms / more problems

    Measured: T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery

  4. Changes in psychological distress and therapy outcomes after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique

    Changes in psychological distress and therapy outcomes (CORE-OM) after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique.

    The CORE-OM is a widely used self-report questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress and therapy outcomes. It is commonly used in counseling services, clinical psychology, psychotherapy research, and mental health settings.

    CORE-OM assesses global psychological distress across four main domains:

    • Well-being (subjective emotional state)
    • Problems/Symptoms (anxiety, depression, trauma, physical symptoms)
    • Functioning (daily life, relationships, work/social functioning)
    • Risk (risk to self or others)

    Items are averaged to produce:

    • A total score and a Domain-specific scores
    • Higher scores = greater psychological distress

    Measured: T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery

  5. Changes in mentalization after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique

    Changes in mentalization (MZQ) after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique.

    The Mentalization Questionnaire (MZQ) is a self-report on 5-point Likert scale (e.g., 0 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree) designed to assess a person's capacity for mentalizing - that is, the ability to understand one's own and others' thoughts, feelings, intentions, and mental states.

    The MZQ evaluates impairments in mentalizing across several domains:

    • Refusing self-reflection - Avoidance of thinking about one's own inner states
    • Emotional awareness - Difficulty identifying and understanding emotions
    • Psychic equivalence mode - Believing thoughts and feelings reflect absolute reality
    • Regulation of affect - Difficulty managing emotional states Higher scores indicate greater impairment in mentalizing.

    Measured: T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery

  6. Changes in maladaptive personality traits after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique

    Changes in in maladaptive personality traits (PID-5-BF) scores after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique.

    The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form (PID-5-BF) is 25 items self-report questionnaire developed to assess maladaptive personality traits described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).

    The PID-5-BF evaluates five broad personality trait domains (5 items per trait domain):

    • Negative Affectivity
    • Detachment
    • Antagonism
    • Disinhibition
    • Psychoticism

    Rated on a 4-point scale:

    0 = Very False or Often False

    1. = Sometimes or Somewhat False
    2. = Sometimes or Somewhat True
    3. = Very True or Often True

    Higher scores indicate stronger expression of maladaptive traits.

    Measured: T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2026
  2. Study start20 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completion23 Feb 2026
  4. Study completionNov 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled pilot study. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group using variable block randomization, with stratification by sex and type of surgery (with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction). Participants in the intervention group will receive a brief clinical psychological intervention including biofeedback techniques, consisting of two 60-minute sessions. Participants in the control group will receive standard care without the study psychological intervention. Outcomes will be assessed at three time points: baseline before surgery (T0), hospital admission for surgery (T1), and post-discharge follow-up visit (T2).
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
58 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07712120
Sponsor's protocol ID
0001784
Acronym
INTEGRATE-HNC
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
23 Jun 2026
Last updated
17 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Fossati A, Krueger RF, Markon KE, Borroni S, Maffei C. Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment. 2013 Dec;20(6):689-708. doi: 10.1177/1073191113504984. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

    PubMed 24065702
  • Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, Watson D, Skodol AE. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1879-90. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002674. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

    PubMed 22153017
  • Raimondi G, Samela T, Lester D, Imperatori C, Carlucci L, Contardi A, Balsamo M, Innamorati M. Psychometric Properties of the Italian Mentalization Questionnaire: Assessing Structural Invariance and Construct Validity. J Pers Assess. 2022 Sep-Oct;104(5):628-636. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1991362. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

    PubMed 34694942
  • Hausberg MC, Schulz H, Piegler T, Happach CG, Klopper M, Brutt AL, Sammet I, Andreas S. Is a self-rated instrument appropriate to assess mentalization in patients with mental disorders? Development and first validation of the mentalization questionnaire (MZQ). Psychother Res. 2012;22(6):699-709. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.709325. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

    PubMed 22867004
  • Palmieri G, Evans C, Hansen V, Brancaleoni G, Ferrari S, Porcelli P, Reitano F, Rigatelli M. Validation of the Italian version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Clin Psychol Psychother. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):444-9. doi: 10.1002/cpp.646.

    PubMed 19701881
  • Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, Audin K. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:51-60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.51.

    PubMed 11772852
  • Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Tollesson E, Jensen AB, Razavi D, Maher EJ, Kaasa S. Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessments in head and neck cancer patients. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Acta Oncol. 1994;33(8):879-85. doi: 10.3109/02841869409098450.

    PubMed 7818919
  • Zotti P, Lugli D, Vaccher E, Vidotto G, Franchin G, Barzan L. The EORTC quality of life questionnaire-head and neck 35 in Italian laryngectomized patients. European organization for research and treatment of cancer. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(10):1147-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1016674507150.

    PubMed 11401047
  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.

    PubMed 8433390
  • Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Al Ghazal S. A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2001 Jan;37(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00353-1.

    PubMed 11166145
  • Craparo G, Faraci P, Rotondo G, Gori A. The Impact of Event Scale - Revised: psychometric properties of the Italian version in a sample of flood victims. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1427-32. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S51793. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

    PubMed 24092980
  • Van Hof KS, Hoesseini A, Dorr MC, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Jansen F, Leemans CR, Takes RP, Terhaard CHJ, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Sewnaik A, Offerman MPJ. Caregiver Burden, Psychological Distress and Quality of Life among Informal Caregivers of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Longitudinal Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;19(23):16304. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316304.

    PubMed 36498377
  • Tranby EP, Heaton LJ, Tomar SL, Kelly AL, Fager GL, Backley M, Frantsve-Hawley J. Oral Cancer Prevalence, Mortality, and Costs in Medicaid and Commercial Insurance Claims Data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Sep 2;31(9):1849-1857. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0114.

    PubMed 35732291
  • Tang Y, Hua Y, Huang X, Cao Y, Sun X. Psychological Burden of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy and Their Family Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Survey. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Apr 5;16:927-935. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S398064. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37051506
  • Studer RK, Danuser B, Gomez P. Physicians' psychophysiological stress reaction in medical communication of bad news: A critical literature review. Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Oct;120:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

    PubMed 28666771

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Brief clinical psychological intervention using biofeedback techniques in people with Head and Neck Cancer and Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer Patients, run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Antonella Granieri, Full Professor (3204361389 ext. +39, antonella.granieri@unito.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in post traumatic symptoms after the surgery (time frame: T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07712120, which also lists 28 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in