AzTrials
AzTrials

Communication SkillsNCT07712185

Home Visit Simulation-based Earthquake Preparedness Training for Nursing Students

A study testing Home Simulation in people with Communication Skills and Self Directed Learning, run by Duzce University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In earthquake preparedness, nurses, who constitute the largest group among healthcare professionals, are expected to play an active role. Public health nurses, with their population-focused protection philosophy, are at the forefront of managing the earthquake preparedness phase. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Home Simulation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
39 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
4 May 2026to 10 Oct 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being a nursing student
  • Volunteering to participate in the study
  • Being able to understand and answer the study questions
  • Completing all data collection forms

Who cannot join

  • Refusing to participate in the study
  • Incomplete completion of data collection forms
  • Withdrawal from the study at any stage
  • Having communication problems that may prevent participation in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Duzce University

    Center, Düzce, 81100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Home Visit Simulation-based Earthquake Preparedness Training for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Quasi-experimental Study

In earthquake preparedness, nurses, who constitute the largest group among healthcare professionals, are expected to play an active role. Public health nurses, with their population-focused protection philosophy, are at the forefront of managing the earthquake preparedness phase. Public health nurses play an active role in practices such as providing health education through home visits, identifying household risks and taking preventive measures, and organizing drills. In this context, nurses need to have sufficient knowledge and skills to take appropriate interventions. However, managing an effective preparedness process is not limited to knowledge and skills alone; it also requires the development of nurses' attitudes and beliefs towards disasters. Therefore, it is of great importance that nursing students graduate with positive attitudes and strong beliefs about earthquake preparedness, in addition to their knowledge and skills. However, developing these skills necessitates the use of experiental learning-based educational methods instead of traditional teaching methods. Therefore, this study was planned to examine the effect of home visit simulation-based earthquake preparedness training, which offers experiental learning opportunities, on nursing students' communication skills, earthquake awareness, and self-regulated learning skills.

Read the detailed description

Even if theoretical knowledge of disaster nursing is provided within the scope of public health courses, in a subject requiring the development of complex experiental skills outside of clinical settings, such as disasters, educational methods that support learning by doing are recommended. Simulation-based learning is an educational method that supports nurses in learning and developing skills by experiencing nursing practices through the simulation of basic situations they may encounter in a hospital setting using structured scenarios. However, a systematic review examining studies on simulation-based learning indicates that the vast majority of studies were conducted in hospital-level simulations, and there are very few studies at the community level. Experiential learning is an important component of simulation-based training. Experiential learning emphasizes that learning is not only a mental activity but also includes bodily and emotional processes by integrating individuals' experiences into the learning process. In experiential learning, participants are actors playing a role assigned to them in the scenario. Thus, through the experiences they gain within the structured scenario, participants achieve cognitive, psychomotor, and affective learning objectives, and the learning process gains a holistic quality. There are few community-based studies that directly involve participants in the scenario using simulation-based experiential learning. Therefore, this planned study aims to enable nursing students to achieve cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning objectives in home visit and earthquake preparedness processes by implementing earthquake preparedness training based on home visit simulations through experiential learning. Furthermore, the study aims to improve students' skills in evaluating real-life environments, identifying risks, and implementing protective measures through home visit simulations. The findings are important both for the design of educational programs and for strengthening the role of nurses in community-based disaster response and preparedness processes. Thus, the study aims to provide concrete and applicable suggestions for both academic literature and practical applications.

In the 2025-2026 spring semester, fourth-year nursing students taking the public health nursing course were given earthquake preparedness training based on home visit simulations. The scenario was created by the researchers and expert opinions were obtained. Data collection tools were applied for a pre-test before the scenario. The scenario was carried out in stages as two home visits. The first home visit aimed to focus on initiating the home visit, data collection, and in-home risk assessment, while the second home visit aimed to focus on earthquake preparedness health education applications. In the study, communication skills, awareness of earthquake preparedness, and self-regulated learning skills were applied before and after the home visit simulation. The applications were carried out in the Preventive Health Practices Laboratory of the Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Duzce University. The laboratory was arranged as a simulation of a home environment consisting of a living room, a bedroom, and a bathroom. The applications were recorded by a recording device in this room. The simulation stages consisted of Briefing, Scenario, and Debriefing. The first home visit was planned to last a maximum of 10 minutes, and the second home visit a maximum of 15 minutes. Analysis sessions were conducted in groups of 10, with each session lasting approximately 30 minutes. Institutional permission was obtained for the research, informed consent was obtained from the students, and permission to use the scales was secured.

Being tested
Home Simulation
Keywords
home visiting, simulation, eathquake awareness, communication skills, self directed learning

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Home SimulationBehavioural

    Participants conducted home visits in a simulated home environment. The first home visit involved data collection and assessment of indoor earthquake risks. The second home visit involved earthquake preparedness training (preparing an earthquake kit, identifying a survival triangle area, demonstrating the "drop, cover, and hold" procedure, etc.).

Study groups in NCT07712185
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Simulation groupExperimentalParticipants in the intervention group participated in two home visit simulations where the first home visit, where they acted as a public health nurse, lasted a maximum of 10 minutes, and the second home visit lasted a maximum of 15 minutes. Debriefings averaging 30 minutes were conducted at the end of each visit.
Receives: Behavioral: Home Simulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Earthquake Preparedness Attitudes and Beliefs

    Earthquake Preparedness Attitudes and Beliefs Scale:This scale is used to evaluate individuals' attitudes and beliefs regarding earthquake preparedness behaviors. The scale consists of four sub-dimensions: attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention. Consisting of a total of 8 items, the scale is structured using a 7-point Likert type, with items scored between "1=Strongly disagree" and "7=Strongly agree". The minimum possible score on the scale is 8, and the maximum score is 56. A higher score indicates that individuals have positive attitudes and strong beliefs regarding earthquake preparedness behaviors.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the simulation intervention

  2. The Communication Skills

    The Communication Skills Scale was adapted into Turkish by and to assess individuals' communication skills. The scale consists of four subdimensions: competence, barriers, body language, and valuing. It includes a total of 36 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "1 = Strongly disagree" to "5 = Strongly agree." Some items are reverse scored. The minimum possible score on the scale is 36, while the maximum possible score is 180. Higher scores indicate better communication skills and more effective interpersonal communication.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the simulation intervention

  3. The Self-Directed Learning Skills

    The Self-Directed Learning Skills Scale was developed by and to evaluate individuals' self-directed learning skills. The scale consists of four subdimensions: motivation, self-monitoring, self-control, and self-confidence. It includes a total of 21 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "1 = Never" to "5 = Always." The minimum possible score on the scale is 21, while the maximum possible score is 105. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-directed learning skills and greater ability to manage one's own learning process effectively.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the simulation intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2026
  2. Study start4 May 2026
  3. Primary completion12 May 2026
  4. Study completion10 Oct 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
39 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07712185
Sponsor's protocol ID
Duzce-U-merve0006
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
18 May 2026
Last updated
17 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Home Simulation in people with Communication Skills and Self Directed Learning, run by Duzce University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Earthquake Preparedness Attitudes and Beliefs (time frame: Baseline and immediately after the simulation intervention). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in