Surgery(PASC)NCT07713147
Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) in Surgical Patients
A study testing Using a PASC Checklist in people with Surgery, run by Ondokuz Mayıs University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study aims to examine the effect of using the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on surgical patients' satisfaction with discharge education and their communication-related issues. This study is designed as a post-test control group randomized trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Using a PASC Checklist
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 264 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 20 Sep 2026to 30 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Willing to participate in the study.
- Scheduled to undergo elective primary major surgery.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Undergoing a surgical procedure classified as a Category A, B, C, or D (major surgery) according to the Interventional Procedures List of the Turkish Ministry of Health.
- Able to understand and complete the checklist, with adequate cognitive ability and no impairment that would interfere with participation.
- Able to provide written informed consent in Turkish.
Who cannot join
- Undergoing a surgical procedure classified as Category E according to the Interventional Procedures List published by the Turkish Public Hospitals Institution.
- Belonging to vulnerable groups, including individuals who are legally restricted, prisoners, or residents of nursing homes.
- Being scheduled for day surgery.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ondokuz Mayıs University Health Practice and Research Center
Samsun, Atakum, 55100
Fatma Cebeci, PhD, +905453215207 ext. +903623121919, fatma.cebeci@omu.edu.tr
Bahadır B Güngör, Prof., +905303203706, bgungor@omu.edu.tr
About this study
Official title: The Effect of the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on Surgical Patients' Satisfaction With Discharge Education and Communication Problems: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aims to examine the effect of using the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on surgical patients' satisfaction with discharge education and their communication-related issues.
This study is designed as a post-test control group randomized trial. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
H₀₁: There is no difference in discharge education satisfaction levels between surgical patients who use the PASC and those in the control group.
H₀₂: There is no difference in communication problems between surgical patients who use the PASC and those in the control group.
•H₁₁: There is a difference in discharge education satisfaction levels between surgical patients who use the PASC and those in the control group.
H₁₂: There is a difference in communication problems between surgical patients who use the PASC and those in the control group. Research Question:• What are the adherence rates for each item of the PASC Checklist and the overall adherence rate among participants?
Participants will:
- From the day the decision for surgery is made until hospital discharge, participants will either use the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) or receive standard perioperative care, according to their group allocation.
- On the day of discharge, participants will complete the Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale, the Healthcare Communication Questionnaire, and the Health Communication Problems Scale.
Read the detailed description
Data Collection Instruments:
Permission to use the scales and the PASC checklist has been obtained from the corresponding authors. Permission for the use of the PASC Checklist, developed by Harris et al. (2022), was obtained in writing from the corresponding author, Assoc. Prof. Kristin Harris, and the content validity process was completed. Written permissions were also obtained via email from Sevinç Meşe for the Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale, Eren Can Kalkan for the Healthcare Communication Questionnaire, and Müjdat Yeşildal for the Healthcare Communication Problems Scale.
- Descriptive Characteristics Form
- Patient Safety Checklist (PASC)
- Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale
- Healthcare Communication Questionnaire
- Healthcare Communication Problems Scale Data Collection Process The study will be conducted among patients undergoing elective general surgery at the Ondokuz Mayıs University Health Practice and Research Center. Patients attending the General Surgery Outpatient Clinic who are scheduled for elective surgery will be assessed for eligibility by the researchers. All patients meeting the eligibility criteria will be consecutively enrolled in the study. Following the provision of written informed consent, participants will be randomized to either the intervention or the control group.
The Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) was developed for patient self-use. Data will be collected using both printed and online forms. All participants will receive printed written instructions explaining how to complete the study forms. Participants assigned to the intervention group will additionally receive written instructions regarding the appropriate use of the PASC and the criteria that will be used to evaluate adherence to the checklist.
The 132 patients randomized to the intervention group will receive the Descriptive Characteristics Form and the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on the day the decision for surgery is made. Participants will be instructed to use the PASC throughout the entire perioperative period, from the preoperative phase until hospital discharge. The completed PASC will be collected by the researcher on the day of discharge. On the day of discharge, participants in the intervention group will complete the Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale, the Healthcare Communication Questionnaire, and the Health Communication Problems Scale using online forms.
The 132 patients randomized to the control group will complete only the Descriptive Characteristics Form at enrollment and will receive routine standard care throughout the perioperative period. On the day of discharge, participants in the control group will also complete the Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale, the Healthcare Communication Questionnaire, and the Health Communication Problems Scale using online forms. All printed study materials from both groups will be collected by the researcher during the discharge process.
Ethical Considerations:
The trial was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ethical IRB: OMÜ KAEK 2025/479-15.10.2025 Sayı: B.30.2. ODM.0.20.08/669-884). All procedures adhered to the ethical principles for human experimentation and the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Prior to data collection, institutional permissions will be obtained from the hospitals where the study will be conducted. Participants will receive detailed information about the study procedures and will sign a voluntary participation consent form.
Sample size calculation:
The required sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1.9.7. A total of 210 participants (105 per group) will be enrolled, based on an effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.50, a power of 95%, and a two-sided significance level of α = 0.05. Since no comparable study reporting an expected dropout rate was identified, a 20 % attrition rate was assumed based on common practice in experimental clinical studies. The sample size obtained from the power analysis was inflated accordingly to account for potential dropouts. Accordingly, the total sample size was determined to be 264 participants, with 132 participants allocated to each group.
Randomization and allocation Participants will be stratified according to the treating surgeon to minimize potential confounding related to differences in surgical practice and perioperative care. Within each stratum, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or control group using block randomization generated by Randomizer.org. The randomization sequence will be generated by an independent statistician before participant recruitment begins. To ensure allocation concealment, each randomly generated allocation and its corresponding group assignment will be placed in sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. After written informed consent has been obtained and eligibility has been confirmed, participants will be assigned to either the PASC intervention group or the standard care control group according to the next envelope in sequence. All eligible patients will be consecutively screened and recorded.
The intervention will be delivered to all participants in the intervention group according to a standardized protocol, and outcome assessments will be conducted at the same time point using validated measurement instruments. To reduce analytical bias, study groups will be coded as Group 1 and Group 2 before data analysis, and all statistical analyses will be performed by an independent statistician blinded to group allocation. Treating surgeons will also be blinded to treatment allocation. However, due to the nature of the intervention, neither the researcher delivering the intervention nor the participants can be blinded.
- Conditions
- Surgery
- Being tested
- Standard Care (in control arm), Using a PASC Checklist
- Keywords
- surgery, checklist, patient safety, PASC, Communication, discharge
- Medical subject headings
- Communication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard Care (in control arm)Other
The 132 patients randomized to the control group will complete only the Descriptive Characteristics Form at enrollment and will receive routine standard care throughout the perioperative period
Using a PASC ChecklistBehavioural
The Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) was developed for patient self-use.The 132 patients randomized to the intervention group will receive the Descriptive Characteristics Form and the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on the day the decision for surgery is made. Participants will be instructed to use the PASC throughout the entire perioperative period, from the preoperative phase until hospital discharge. The completed PASC will be collected by the researcher on the day of discharge.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients using the PASC checklist | Experimental | The 132 patients randomized to the intervention group will receive the Descriptive Characteristics Form and the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on the day the decision for surgery is made. Participants will be instructed to use the PASC throughout the entire perioperative period, from the preoperative phase until hospital discharge. Receives: Other: Standard Care (in control arm); Behavioral: Using a PASC Checklist |
| Patients receiving standard care | Active comparator | The 132 patients randomized to the control group will complete only the Descriptive Characteristics Form at enrollment and will receive routine standard care throughout the perioperative period. Receives: Other: Standard Care (in control arm) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Satisfaction with Discharge Education
Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale: This scale was developed to assess surgical patients' satisfaction with the discharge education process. It consists of 21 items evaluating whether adequate education and information were provided during discharge. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 5 = Completely satisfied, 4 = Satisfied, 3 = Partially satisfied, 2 = Dissatisfied, to 1 = Not satisfied at all. The scale has a five-factor structure (discharge timing, individualized information, home care, infection monitoring, and follow-up care), with factor loadings greater than 0.50 for all items. The overall internal consistency of the scale was excellent, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91.
Measured: Perioperative period
Healthcare Communication
Healthcare Communication Questionnaire: This questionnaire was developed to assess patients' perceptions of healthcare professionals' communication during the delivery of healthcare services. It consists of 13 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = Not at all, 2 = Partially, 3 = Adequately, 4 = Quite a lot, to 5 = To the greatest extent. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.83, while the subscale coefficients ranged from 0.65 to 0.86.
Measured: Perioperative period
Healthcare Communication Problems
Health Communication Problems Scale: This scale was developed to identify patients' health communication problems and the factors underlying these problems. It consists of 13 items and three subscales: effective communication, social communication, and communication barriers. All items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with response options ranging from 1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, to 5 = Strongly agree. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.77 to 0.88, indicating good internal consistency.
Measured: Perioperative period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2026
- Study start20 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is a randomized, double-blind, posttest-only, parallel-group controlled trial.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 264 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ondokuz Mayıs University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Oslo Metropolitan University, University of Bergen, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fatma Cebeci, Ondokuz Mayıs University
- Investigators
- Fatma Cebeci, Dr., Principal investigator, Ondokuz Mayıs University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07713147
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OndokusMU 2025/479
- Acronym
- (PASC)
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared because participant-level data sharing was not included in the informed consent process. Study findings will be reported in aggregate form in scientific publications.
Publications
Harris K, Softeland E, Moi AL, Harthug S, Ravnoy M, Storesund A, Jurmy E, Thakkar B, Haaverstad R, Skeie E, Valen HW, Sevdalis N, Haugen AS. Development and validation of patients' surgical safety checklist. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 25;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07470-z.
PubMed 35216592Gremigni P, Sommaruga M, Peltenburg M. Validation of the Health Care Communication Questionnaire (HCCQ) to measure outpatients' experience of communication with hospital staff. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Apr;71(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
PubMed 18243632
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on Surgical Patients' Satisfaction With Discharge Education and Communication Problems: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07713147
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- (PASC) / OndokusMU 2025/479
- Conditions
- Surgery
- Keywords
- surgery, checklist, patient safety, PASC, Communication, discharge
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 264 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Oslo Metropolitan University, University of Bergen, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
- Study start
- 20 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to examine the effect of using the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on surgical patients' satisfaction with discharge education and their communication-related issues.
This study is designed as a post-test control group randomized trial. The main questions it aims to answer are:
H₀₁: There is no difference in discharge education satisfaction levels between surgical patients who use the PASC and those in the control group.
H₀₂: There is no difference in communication problems between surgical patients who use the PASC and those in the control group.
•H₁₁: There is a difference in discharge education satisfaction levels between surgical patients who use the PASC and those in the control group.
H₁₂: There is a difference in communication problems between surgical patients who use the PASC and those in the control group. Research Question:• What are the adherence rates for each item of the PASC Checklist and the overall adherence rate among participants?
Participants will:
- From the day the decision for surgery is made until hospital discharge, participants will either use the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) or receive standard perioperative care, according to their group allocation.
- On the day of discharge, participants will complete the Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale, the Healthcare Communication Questionnaire, and the Health Communication Problems Scale.
Detailed description
Data Collection Instruments:
Permission to use the scales and the PASC checklist has been obtained from the corresponding authors. Permission for the use of the PASC Checklist, developed by Harris et al. (2022), was obtained in writing from the corresponding author, Assoc. Prof. Kristin Harris, and the content validity process was completed. Written permissions were also obtained via email from Sevinç Meşe for the Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale, Eren Can Kalkan for the Healthcare Communication Questionnaire, and Müjdat Yeşildal for the Healthcare Communication Problems Scale.
- Descriptive Characteristics Form
- Patient Safety Checklist (PASC)
- Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale
- Healthcare Communication Questionnaire
- Healthcare Communication Problems Scale Data Collection Process The study will be conducted among patients undergoing elective general surgery at the Ondokuz Mayıs University Health Practice and Research Center. Patients attending the General Surgery Outpatient Clinic who are scheduled for elective surgery will be assessed for eligibility by the researchers. All patients meeting the eligibility criteria will be consecutively enrolled in the study. Following the provision of written informed consent, participants will be randomized to either the intervention or the control group.
The Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) was developed for patient self-use. Data will be collected using both printed and online forms. All participants will receive printed written instructions explaining how to complete the study forms. Participants assigned to the intervention group will additionally receive written instructions regarding the appropriate use of the PASC and the criteria that will be used to evaluate adherence to the checklist.
The 132 patients randomized to the intervention group will receive the Descriptive Characteristics Form and the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on the day the decision for surgery is made. Participants will be instructed to use the PASC throughout the entire perioperative period, from the preoperative phase until hospital discharge. The completed PASC will be collected by the researcher on the day of discharge. On the day of discharge, participants in the intervention group will complete the Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale, the Healthcare Communication Questionnaire, and the Health Communication Problems Scale using online forms.
The 132 patients randomized to the control group will complete only the Descriptive Characteristics Form at enrollment and will receive routine standard care throughout the perioperative period. On the day of discharge, participants in the control group will also complete the Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale, the Healthcare Communication Questionnaire, and the Health Communication Problems Scale using online forms. All printed study materials from both groups will be collected by the researcher during the discharge process.
Ethical Considerations:
The trial was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ethical IRB: OMÜ KAEK 2025/479-15.10.2025 Sayı: B.30.2. ODM.0.20.08/669-884). All procedures adhered to the ethical principles for human experimentation and the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Prior to data collection, institutional permissions will be obtained from the hospitals where the study will be conducted. Participants will receive detailed information about the study procedures and will sign a voluntary participation consent form.
Sample size calculation:
The required sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1.9.7. A total of 210 participants (105 per group) will be enrolled, based on an effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.50, a power of 95%, and a two-sided significance level of α = 0.05. Since no comparable study reporting an expected dropout rate was identified, a 20 % attrition rate was assumed based on common practice in experimental clinical studies. The sample size obtained from the power analysis was inflated accordingly to account for potential dropouts. Accordingly, the total sample size was determined to be 264 participants, with 132 participants allocated to each group.
Randomization and allocation Participants will be stratified according to the treating surgeon to minimize potential confounding related to differences in surgical practice and perioperative care. Within each stratum, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or control group using block randomization generated by Randomizer.org. The randomization sequence will be generated by an independent statistician before participant recruitment begins. To ensure allocation concealment, each randomly generated allocation and its corresponding group assignment will be placed in sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. After written informed consent has been obtained and eligibility has been confirmed, participants will be assigned to either the PASC intervention group or the standard care control group according to the next envelope in sequence. All eligible patients will be consecutively screened and recorded.
The intervention will be delivered to all participants in the intervention group according to a standardized protocol, and outcome assessments will be conducted at the same time point using validated measurement instruments. To reduce analytical bias, study groups will be coded as Group 1 and Group 2 before data analysis, and all statistical analyses will be performed by an independent statistician blinded to group allocation. Treating surgeons will also be blinded to treatment allocation. However, due to the nature of the intervention, neither the researcher delivering the intervention nor the participants can be blinded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is a randomized, double-blind, posttest-only, parallel-group controlled trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients using the PASC checklist | Experimental | Other: Standard Care (in control arm), Behavioral: Using a PASC ChecklistThe 132 patients randomized to the intervention group will receive the Descriptive Characteristics Form and the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on the day the decision for surgery is made. Participants will be instructed to use the PASC throughout the entire perioperative period, from the preoperative phase until hospital discharge. |
| Patients receiving standard care | Active comparator | Other: Standard Care (in control arm)The 132 patients randomized to the control group will complete only the Descriptive Characteristics Form at enrollment and will receive routine standard care throughout the perioperative period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Willing to participate in the study.
- Scheduled to undergo elective primary major surgery.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Undergoing a surgical procedure classified as a Category A, B, C, or D (major surgery) according to the Interventional Procedures List of the Turkish Ministry of Health.
- Able to understand and complete the checklist, with adequate cognitive ability and no impairment that would interfere with participation.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Undergoing a surgical procedure classified as Category E according to the Interventional Procedures List published by the Turkish Public Hospitals Institution.
- Belonging to vulnerable groups, including individuals who are legally restricted, prisoners, or residents of nursing homes.
- Being scheduled for day surgery.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care (in control arm)The 132 patients randomized to the control group will complete only the Descriptive Characteristics Form at enrollment and will receive routine standard care throughout the perioperative period | Other | Patients receiving standard care, Patients using the PASC checklist |
| Using a PASC ChecklistThe Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) was developed for patient self-use.The 132 patients randomized to the intervention group will receive the Descriptive Characteristics Form and the Patient Safety Checklist (PASC) on the day the decision for surgery is made. Participants will be instructed to use the PASC throughout the entire perioperative period, from the preoperative phase until hospital discharge. The completed PASC will be collected by the researcher on the day of discharge. | Behavioural | Patients using the PASC checklist |
Primary outcome
Satisfaction with Discharge Education
Time frame: Perioperative period
Surgical Patients' Discharge Education Satisfaction Scale: This scale was developed to assess surgical patients' satisfaction with the discharge education process. It consists of 21 items evaluating whether adequate education and information were provided during discharge. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 5 = Completely satisfied, 4 = Satisfied, 3 = Partially satisfied, 2 = Dissatisfied, to 1 = Not satisfied at all. The scale has a five-factor structure (discharge timing, individualized information, home care, infection monitoring, and follow-up care), with factor loadings greater than 0.50 for all items. The overall internal consistency of the scale was excellent, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91.
Healthcare Communication
Time frame: Perioperative period
Healthcare Communication Questionnaire: This questionnaire was developed to assess patients' perceptions of healthcare professionals' communication during the delivery of healthcare services. It consists of 13 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = Not at all, 2 = Partially, 3 = Adequately, 4 = Quite a lot, to 5 = To the greatest extent. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.83, while the subscale coefficients ranged from 0.65 to 0.86.
Healthcare Communication Problems
Time frame: Perioperative period
Health Communication Problems Scale: This scale was developed to identify patients' health communication problems and the factors underlying these problems. It consists of 13 items and three subscales: effective communication, social communication, and communication barriers. All items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with response options ranging from 1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, to 5 = Strongly agree. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.77 to 0.88, indicating good internal consistency.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 35216592Harris K, Softeland E, Moi AL, Harthug S, Ravnoy M, Storesund A, Jurmy E, Thakkar B, Haaverstad R, Skeie E, Valen HW, Sevdalis N, Haugen AS. Development and validation of patients' surgical safety checklist. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 25;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07470-z.
- Background: PubMed 18243632Gremigni P, Sommaruga M, Peltenburg M. Validation of the Health Care Communication Questionnaire (HCCQ) to measure outpatients' experience of communication with hospital staff. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Apr;71(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
- Health Communication Problems: A Scale Development StudyLink provided by the sponsor.
- Development of Discharge Training Satisfaction Scale for Surgical PatientsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared because participant-level data sharing was not included in the informed consent process. Study findings will be reported in aggregate form in scientific publications.
Related trials for Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 1
Serial Amnioinfusions as Regenerative Therapy for Pulmonary Hypoplasia
Renal Failure Congenital, Congenital Renal Anomaly Nos
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Fatma Cebeci, Dr. principal investigator
Ondokuz Mayıs University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Using a PASC Checklist in people with Surgery, run by Ondokuz Mayıs University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Fatma Cebeci, Dr. (+0905453215207 ext. +903623121919, fatma.cebeci@omu.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Satisfaction with Discharge Education (time frame: Perioperative period). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07713147, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2026.