Visual ImpairmentVIPPSTAR-G1NCT07717671
VIPPSTAR-G1 Digital Early Intervention for Visual Impairment
A study testing VIPPSTAR Digital Early Intervention and Standard Clinical Care in people with Visual Impairment and Cerebral Visual Impairment, run by Università degli Studi di Brescia at 5 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Visual impairment in infancy is associated with significant risks for neurodevelopmental impairment. Early intervention based on enriched visual and multisensory experiences may promote neuroplasticity and improve developmental outcomes, but implementation of intensive interventions in routine clinical practice… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 day to 42 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Visual Impairment, Cerebral Visual Impairment, Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- What is being tested?
- VIPPSTAR Digital Early Intervention and Standard Clinical Care
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2026to 30 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 day to 42 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Inclusion Criteria: Study Sample 1 - Infants at Risk of Visual Impairment
- Gestational age ≤32 weeks OR full-term/newborns>32 weeks of age with neonatal distress (Apgar ≤5 at 10 minutes)
- NAVEG score ≥3
- At least one neurological or neuroimaging abnormality:
- 3 abnormal signs at ATNAT neurological examination OR Abnormal cranial ultrasound findings OR Abnormal MRI findings
Exclusion Criteria: Study Sample 1 - Infants at Risk of Visual Impairment
- Epileptic encephalopathy
- Parents unable to understand local language
Inclusion Criteria: Study Sample 2 - Infants/Toddlers With Visual Impairment
- Age ≤42 months
- Diagnosis of peripheral or cerebral visual impairment
- Moderate or severe visual impairment documented by standardized visual acuity testing Exclusion Criteria: Study Sample 2 - Infants/Toddlers With Visual Impairment
- Age >42 months
- Refractory epilepsy or epileptic encephalopathy
- Participation in another interventional study within previous 12 months
- Parents unable to understand local language
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 3 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
5 sites in 3 countries
Italy3 sites
ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia
Brescia, BS, 25123
Serena Micheletti, Dr, 00390303995724, serena.micheletti@unibs.it
Lucrezia Maria Visconti, Dr, 00390303995724
University of Brescia
Brescia, BS, 25123
Jessica Galli, Prof, 00390303995724, jessica.galli@unibs.it
Erika Loi, Dr, erika.loi@unibs.it
Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences University of Pavia - Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit IRCCS Mondino Foundation
Pavia, BS
Simona Orcesi, Prof, 0039 0382.380280, simona.orcesi@unipv.it
Sabrina Signorini, Dr
Belgium1 site
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Leuven, 3000
Els Ortibus, Prof, 0032 16 34 39 91, els.ortibus@uzleuven.be
Lauren Billestraet, Dr
Moldova1 site
Centrul Republican de Reabilitare pentru Copii
Chisinau, MD-2019
Ecaterina Gîncotă, Dr, +373 686 84279, kbufteac@gmail.com
Amalia Dolinschii, Dr
About this study
Official title: VIPPSTAR-G1: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Caregiver-mediated Digital Intervention to Promote Visual Function and Neurodevelopment in Infants at Risk of/With Visual Impairment
Visual impairment in infancy is associated with significant risks for neurodevelopmental impairment. Early intervention based on enriched visual and multisensory experiences may promote neuroplasticity and improve developmental outcomes, but implementation of intensive interventions in routine clinical practice remains challenging. The VIPPSTAR-G1 study evaluates a caregiver-mediated digital intervention delivered through a dedicated platform designed to support visual and neurodevelopmental functions in infants at risk of or with visual impairment, within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship.
This multicenter, multinational, single-blind randomized controlled trial will enroll 102 newborns at risk of visual impairment and an additional exploratory pilot subgroup of 48 infants and toddlers with established visual impairment. Participants will be randomized to receive either the VIPPSTAR digital intervention plus standard care or standard care alone. Outcomes include visual acuity, smooth pursuit, additional neuro-ophthalmological functions, neurodevelopmental measures, adaptive functioning, language development, parental stress, quality of life, and feasibility of the digital intervention.
Read the detailed description
The VIPPSTAR-G1 study is a multicenter, multinational clinical trial evaluating a caregiver-mediated digital early intervention designed to promote visual function and neurodevelopment in infants at risk of or with visual impairment (VI), within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship. The study is conducted within the framework of the VIPPSTAR Horizon Europe project and integrates telemedicine, digital health technologies, and individualized developmental support into routine clinical care.
Visual function plays a fundamental role in early neurodevelopment. Vision represents the primary means through which infants explore and interact with the environment, while environmental experiences simultaneously shape the maturation and plasticity of visual pathways and broader neurodevelopmental networks. Visual impairment in infancy is therefore associated not only with altered visual functioning but also with increased risk for motor, cognitive, communicative, adaptive, and socio-emotional developmental difficulties.
Visual impairment includes peripheral visual impairment (PVI), caused by ocular or anterior visual pathway disorders, and cerebral visual impairment (CVI), resulting from damage or dysfunction affecting post-geniculate visual pathways and visual cortical networks. These disorders often co-occur. CVI has become one of the leading causes of childhood visual disability in industrialized countries, particularly among infants born preterm or with neonatal neurological complications.
Although early individualized intervention and visually enriched experiences are considered essential to support neuroplasticity and developmental outcomes, implementation of intensive family-centered intervention programs in real-world healthcare systems remains challenging because of limited accessibility, geographic barriers, shortage of specialized services, and socioeconomic constraints affecting families. Digital and telemedicine-based interventions may help overcome these limitations by enabling remote delivery of evidence-based developmental support integrated into everyday family routines.
The VIPPSTAR-G1 protocol evaluates a caregiver-mediated home-based intervention delivered through a dedicated digital platform. The platform provides individualized developmental activities, audiovisual guidance materials, e-learning resources, remote supervision, and continuous communication with clinicians. The intervention is designed to promote naturalistic developmental learning and parent-child interaction within the child's daily environment.
The protocol includes two distinct study populations conducted under a shared methodological framework:
Study Sample 1 - Randomized Controlled Trial Cohort It constitutes the definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) component of the protocol. This cohort includes 102 newborns at risk of visual impairment recruited from Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), nurseries, and neuropsychiatry outpatient clinics across participating sites in Italy, Belgium, and Moldova.
Eligible infants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to: the VIPPSTAR caregiver-mediated digital intervention plus standard care, or standard clinical care alone. Randomization is stratified by recruitment site and biological sex using computer-generated permuted blocks implemented through the REDCap randomization module.
The primary objective of the RCT cohort is to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention in improving: 1)visual acuity, and 2)smooth pursuit eye movements.
Secondary objectives include assessment of: visual processing speed and ocular motor functioning through gaze metrics and qualitative assessments, developmental quotient, adaptive behavior, language development, everyday visual-related behavior, parental stress, quality of life, feasibility, acceptability and usability of the intervention. Primary confirmatory efficacy analyses will be conducted exclusively in Study Sample 1.
Study Sample 2 - Exploratory Pilot Cohort It is an additional exploratory pilot subgroup including 48 infants and toddlers up to 42 months of age with established peripheral or cerebral visual impairment or both.
The objective of this cohort is to evaluate: feasibility, acceptability, usability, adherence, implementation procedures, and preliminary clinical effects of the intervention in a broader clinical population beyond neonates at risk of visual impairment.
Participants in the pilot subgroup follow the same assessment and intervention framework and assessment schedule used in the main RCT cohort. However, this exploratory cohort is not powered for confirmatory efficacy analyses. Data derived from this subgroup will primarily be analyzed descriptively and used to inform future refinement and scalability of the intervention model.
Intervention Description The intervention is a non-pharmacological, non-invasive, caregiver-mediated developmental program delivered remotely through the VIPPSTAR digital platform over a 6-months period.
The platform includes: individualized developmental activities, video demonstrations, audio instructions, e-learning educational materials, secure communication systems, weekly online supervision sessions with clinicians, monitoring tools for adherence and feasibility.
Activities are personalized according to each child's developmental profile, visual functioning, and clinical needs, and are integrated into everyday family routines such as play, caregiving interactions, and home activities.
Clinicians monitor intervention delivery through the digital platform and adapt activities over time according to child responses and caregiver feedback.
Participants allocated to the control group receive standard clinical care according to local institutional practice, including routine follow-up visits and access to clinical communication channels when needed.
Study Timeline and Assessments Participants undergo evaluations at: baseline before randomization (T0), post-intervention after 24 weeks (T1), 6-month follow-up after intervention completion (T2).
Assessments include: neuro-ophthalmological evaluation including ophthalmological assessment and basic visual functions/ocular motor function evaluation; visual processing speed/ eye-tracking based ocularmotor parameters, developmental testing including the assessment of developmental quotient, adaptive behavior assessment, language assessment, parental stress questionnaires, quality-of-life measures, feasibility, acceptability and usability measures.
Outcome assessors and statisticians remain blinded to treatment allocation whenever feasible.
Outcomes
The co-primary outcomes for the RCT cohort are:
Change improvement of visual acuity Change in smooth pursuit function
Secondary outcomes evaluate broader neurodevelopmental, neuro-ophthalmological parameters, adaptive behavior, parental stress, quality of life, and feasibility of the digital intervention.
Data Management and Data Sharing Study data are collected and managed through a centralized REDCap platform hosted at the University of Brescia. All data are pseudo-anonymized and handled in compliance with GDPR and applicable national regulations.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying published study results may be shared upon reasonable request after publication of the primary analyses. Statistical code, metadata, and data dictionaries may also be shared for academic, non-commercial research purposes.
In preparation for multicenter data exchange and digital platform implementation, the consortium is establishing the necessary Data Sharing Agreements, Data Processing Agreements, and software governance procedures among participating institutions and technology providers to ensure secure, compliant, and ethically governed handling of study data.
Ethical Considerations The study has received ethics approval from Comitato Etico Territoriale Lombardia 6 (Approval No. VIPPSTAR G1 - NP 6758; approved 4th June 2026). Written informed consent is obtained from parents or legal guardians before participation.
Given the non-invasive and caregiver-mediated nature of the intervention, the study is considered minimal risk. Safety monitoring procedures are implemented throughout the study period, including systematic monitoring of adverse events, participant burden, and intervention tolerability.
- Being tested
- VIPPSTAR Digital Early Intervention, Standard Clinical Care
- Keywords
- visual impairment, early intervention, digital health, prematurity
- Medical subject headings
- Vision Disorders, Blindness, Cortical, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VIPPSTAR Digital Early InterventionBehavioural
A caregiver-mediated digital intervention aimed at promoting visual and neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants at risk of or with visual impairment, within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship. The intervention includes individualized activities integrated into daily family routines and supported through remote supervision and e-learning content.
Standard Clinical CareOther
Routine clinical care provided according to local healthcare protocols, including follow-up visits and additional evaluations if clinically indicated.Standard intervention protocols according to local healthcare services are allowed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Participants receive a caregiver-mediated, home-based digital intervention delivered through the VIPPSTAR platform, parallel to standard clinical care, within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship. The intervention includes personalized developmental activities, audiovisual materials, weekly online supervision, and continuous communication with clinicians. It includes participants enrolled in both the main RCT cohort and the exploratory pilot cohort. Receives: Behavioral: VIPPSTAR Digital Early Intervention |
| Standard Care Arm | Other | Participants receive standard clinical monitoring and care according to local clinical practice without access to the VIPPSTAR intervention platform. Receives: Other: Standard Clinical Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual acuity measured in cycles per degree or decimes, using Teller Acuity Cards or Lea Symbols
Assessment of improvement in visual acuity from baseline following the intervention. Primary efficacy analyses will be conducted in Study Sample 1 only.
Data from Study Sample 2 will be analyzed descriptively and exploratorily.
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Smooth pursuit assessed on an ordinal scale (continuous, discontinuous, difficult to elicit)
Assessment of changes in smooth pursuit eye movements assessed using a clinical evaluation on an ordinal scale (continuous, discontinuous, difficult to elicit). Primary efficacy analyses will be conducted in Study Sample 1 only.
Data from Study Sample 2 will be analyzed descriptively and exploratorily.
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Secondary outcomes (23)
Fixation Stability assessed on an ordinal scale (stable for more than 3s, unstable for less than 3 s, difficult to evoke, not elicited)
Evaluation of changes in fixation stability using clinical examination (stable for more than 3s, unstable for less than 3 s, difficult to evoke, not elicited)
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Fixation Accuracy - eye tracker-based measure
Change in fixation accuracy using eye tracker
Measured: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Smooth pursuit velocity - eye tracker-based measure
Change in smooth pursuit velocity
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Smooth pursuit accuracy - eye tracker-based measure
Change in smooth pursuit accuracy
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Smooth pursuit number of anticipatory movements - eye tracker based measure
Change in smooth pursuit number of anticipatory movements
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Saccadic eye movements
Changes in saccadic eye movements using a categorial classification: present, normometric with increased latency, dysmetric but with normal latency, dysmetric with increased latency, absent
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Contrast sensitivity
Change in the ability to identify targets, expressed as percentage of contrast level
Measured: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Binocular visual field
Change in the ability to locate targets presented in different areas of the binocular visual field using clinical examination
Measured: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Visual Response Latencies - eye-tracker based measure
Changes in visual response latency
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Visual Response Speed - eye-tracker based measure
Changes on visual response speed
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Visual Response Accuracy - eye-tracker based measure
Changes on visual response accuracy
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Developmental Quotient at Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - IV edition
Changes in cognitive, motor and language quotients at Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-IV
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Developmental Quotient at Reynell Zinkin Scales of visual deficits
Changes in Developmental Quotient and subquotients at Reynell Zinkin Scales for infants with visual impairment aged 12 months and older (corrected age)
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Adaptive Functioning
Changes in raw scores, total quotient and subquotients at Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-III (VABS-III)
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Language Development
Changes in the number of understood/spoken words and sentences, changes in the number of gestures as reported at MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MB-CDI) by parents
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Everyday visual-related behaviour questionnaire (Preverbal Visual Assessment - PreViAs)
Changes in the total score and subscores at Preverbal Visual Assessment (PreViAs) questionnaire for infants aged 23 months and younger (corrected age)
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Every day visual-related behaviour (CVI Parental Questionnaire)
Changes in the total score and subscores at CVI Parental Questionnaire for infants aged 24 months and older
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Parental Stress
Changes in total score and subscores at Parenting Stress Index-4 (PSI-4)
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Quality of Life scores
Changes in total score and subscores at Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Digital platform usability
Evaluation of intervention usability through System Usability Scale (SUS)
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)
Intervention acceptability
Evaluation of intervention acceptability through Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)
Intervention Appropriateness
Evaluation of intervention appropriateness through Interventio Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)
Intervention feasibility
Evaluation of intervention feasibility through Feasibility of Intervention Measures (FIM)
Measured: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2026
- Study start1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Visual ImpairmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This protocol includes: * one randomized controlled trial (Study Sample 1) * one exploratory pilot study (Study Sample 2)
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Università degli Studi di Brescia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Centrul Republican de Reabilitare pentru Copii, Moldova, Vestibular and oculomotor laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, National Center for Rare Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy, LIGHT Center, Brescia, Italy, EODYNE SYSTEMS SL, Barcelona, Spain, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy, University of Pavia, Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy, VIPPSTAR Consortium
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jessica Galli, Università degli Studi di Brescia
- Investigators
- Jessica Galli, Prof, Principal investigator, Unit of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Italy - Department of clinical and experimental sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07717671
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VIPPSTARG1 - NP 6758
- Other IDs
- Horizon Europe Grant Agreement
- Acronym
- VIPPSTAR-G1
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in publications, including demographic, clinical, neurodevelopmental, neuro-ophthalmological, eye-tracking, and questionnaire-derived outcome data, will be made available upon reasonable request after publication of the primary study results. Statistical analysis code may also be shared for academic, non-commercial research purposes. All data sharing requests will be subject to approval by the Sponsor and compliance with applicable national and European data protection regulations, including GDPR requirements. No directly identifiable participant data will be shared. In preparation for multicenter data exchange and digital platform use, the study consortium is establishing the necessary Data Sharing Agreements, Data Processing Agreements, and software governance procedures among participating institutions and technology providers to ensure secure, compliant, and ethically governed handling of study data.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- VIPPSTAR-G1: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Caregiver-mediated Digital Intervention to Promote Visual Function and Neurodevelopment in Infants at Risk of/With Visual Impairment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07717671
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VIPPSTAR-G1 / VIPPSTARG1 - NP 6758
- Keywords
- visual impairment, early intervention, digital health, prematurity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Università degli Studi di BresciaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Centrul Republican de Reabilitare pentru Copii, Moldova, Vestibular and oculomotor laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, National Center for Rare Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy, LIGHT Center, Brescia, Italy, EODYNE SYSTEMS SL, Barcelona, Spain, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy, University of Pavia, Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy, VIPPSTAR Consortium
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Visual impairment in infancy is associated with significant risks for neurodevelopmental impairment. Early intervention based on enriched visual and multisensory experiences may promote neuroplasticity and improve developmental outcomes, but implementation of intensive interventions in routine clinical practice remains challenging. The VIPPSTAR-G1 study evaluates a caregiver-mediated digital intervention delivered through a dedicated platform designed to support visual and neurodevelopmental functions in infants at risk of or with visual impairment, within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship.
This multicenter, multinational, single-blind randomized controlled trial will enroll 102 newborns at risk of visual impairment and an additional exploratory pilot subgroup of 48 infants and toddlers with established visual impairment. Participants will be randomized to receive either the VIPPSTAR digital intervention plus standard care or standard care alone. Outcomes include visual acuity, smooth pursuit, additional neuro-ophthalmological functions, neurodevelopmental measures, adaptive functioning, language development, parental stress, quality of life, and feasibility of the digital intervention.
Detailed description
The VIPPSTAR-G1 study is a multicenter, multinational clinical trial evaluating a caregiver-mediated digital early intervention designed to promote visual function and neurodevelopment in infants at risk of or with visual impairment (VI), within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship. The study is conducted within the framework of the VIPPSTAR Horizon Europe project and integrates telemedicine, digital health technologies, and individualized developmental support into routine clinical care.
Visual function plays a fundamental role in early neurodevelopment. Vision represents the primary means through which infants explore and interact with the environment, while environmental experiences simultaneously shape the maturation and plasticity of visual pathways and broader neurodevelopmental networks. Visual impairment in infancy is therefore associated not only with altered visual functioning but also with increased risk for motor, cognitive, communicative, adaptive, and socio-emotional developmental difficulties.
Visual impairment includes peripheral visual impairment (PVI), caused by ocular or anterior visual pathway disorders, and cerebral visual impairment (CVI), resulting from damage or dysfunction affecting post-geniculate visual pathways and visual cortical networks. These disorders often co-occur. CVI has become one of the leading causes of childhood visual disability in industrialized countries, particularly among infants born preterm or with neonatal neurological complications.
Although early individualized intervention and visually enriched experiences are considered essential to support neuroplasticity and developmental outcomes, implementation of intensive family-centered intervention programs in real-world healthcare systems remains challenging because of limited accessibility, geographic barriers, shortage of specialized services, and socioeconomic constraints affecting families. Digital and telemedicine-based interventions may help overcome these limitations by enabling remote delivery of evidence-based developmental support integrated into everyday family routines.
The VIPPSTAR-G1 protocol evaluates a caregiver-mediated home-based intervention delivered through a dedicated digital platform. The platform provides individualized developmental activities, audiovisual guidance materials, e-learning resources, remote supervision, and continuous communication with clinicians. The intervention is designed to promote naturalistic developmental learning and parent-child interaction within the child's daily environment.
The protocol includes two distinct study populations conducted under a shared methodological framework:
Study Sample 1 - Randomized Controlled Trial Cohort It constitutes the definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) component of the protocol. This cohort includes 102 newborns at risk of visual impairment recruited from Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), nurseries, and neuropsychiatry outpatient clinics across participating sites in Italy, Belgium, and Moldova.
Eligible infants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to: the VIPPSTAR caregiver-mediated digital intervention plus standard care, or standard clinical care alone. Randomization is stratified by recruitment site and biological sex using computer-generated permuted blocks implemented through the REDCap randomization module.
The primary objective of the RCT cohort is to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention in improving: 1)visual acuity, and 2)smooth pursuit eye movements.
Secondary objectives include assessment of: visual processing speed and ocular motor functioning through gaze metrics and qualitative assessments, developmental quotient, adaptive behavior, language development, everyday visual-related behavior, parental stress, quality of life, feasibility, acceptability and usability of the intervention. Primary confirmatory efficacy analyses will be conducted exclusively in Study Sample 1.
Study Sample 2 - Exploratory Pilot Cohort It is an additional exploratory pilot subgroup including 48 infants and toddlers up to 42 months of age with established peripheral or cerebral visual impairment or both.
The objective of this cohort is to evaluate: feasibility, acceptability, usability, adherence, implementation procedures, and preliminary clinical effects of the intervention in a broader clinical population beyond neonates at risk of visual impairment.
Participants in the pilot subgroup follow the same assessment and intervention framework and assessment schedule used in the main RCT cohort. However, this exploratory cohort is not powered for confirmatory efficacy analyses. Data derived from this subgroup will primarily be analyzed descriptively and used to inform future refinement and scalability of the intervention model.
Intervention Description The intervention is a non-pharmacological, non-invasive, caregiver-mediated developmental program delivered remotely through the VIPPSTAR digital platform over a 6-months period.
The platform includes: individualized developmental activities, video demonstrations, audio instructions, e-learning educational materials, secure communication systems, weekly online supervision sessions with clinicians, monitoring tools for adherence and feasibility.
Activities are personalized according to each child's developmental profile, visual functioning, and clinical needs, and are integrated into everyday family routines such as play, caregiving interactions, and home activities.
Clinicians monitor intervention delivery through the digital platform and adapt activities over time according to child responses and caregiver feedback.
Participants allocated to the control group receive standard clinical care according to local institutional practice, including routine follow-up visits and access to clinical communication channels when needed.
Study Timeline and Assessments Participants undergo evaluations at: baseline before randomization (T0), post-intervention after 24 weeks (T1), 6-month follow-up after intervention completion (T2).
Assessments include: neuro-ophthalmological evaluation including ophthalmological assessment and basic visual functions/ocular motor function evaluation; visual processing speed/ eye-tracking based ocularmotor parameters, developmental testing including the assessment of developmental quotient, adaptive behavior assessment, language assessment, parental stress questionnaires, quality-of-life measures, feasibility, acceptability and usability measures.
Outcome assessors and statisticians remain blinded to treatment allocation whenever feasible.
Outcomes
The co-primary outcomes for the RCT cohort are:
Change improvement of visual acuity Change in smooth pursuit function
Secondary outcomes evaluate broader neurodevelopmental, neuro-ophthalmological parameters, adaptive behavior, parental stress, quality of life, and feasibility of the digital intervention.
Data Management and Data Sharing Study data are collected and managed through a centralized REDCap platform hosted at the University of Brescia. All data are pseudo-anonymized and handled in compliance with GDPR and applicable national regulations.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying published study results may be shared upon reasonable request after publication of the primary analyses. Statistical code, metadata, and data dictionaries may also be shared for academic, non-commercial research purposes.
In preparation for multicenter data exchange and digital platform implementation, the consortium is establishing the necessary Data Sharing Agreements, Data Processing Agreements, and software governance procedures among participating institutions and technology providers to ensure secure, compliant, and ethically governed handling of study data.
Ethical Considerations The study has received ethics approval from Comitato Etico Territoriale Lombardia 6 (Approval No. VIPPSTAR G1 - NP 6758; approved 4th June 2026). Written informed consent is obtained from parents or legal guardians before participation.
Given the non-invasive and caregiver-mediated nature of the intervention, the study is considered minimal risk. Safety monitoring procedures are implemented throughout the study period, including systematic monitoring of adverse events, participant burden, and intervention tolerability.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This protocol includes: * one randomized controlled trial (Study Sample 1) * one exploratory pilot study (Study Sample 2)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Behavioral: VIPPSTAR Digital Early InterventionParticipants receive a caregiver-mediated, home-based digital intervention delivered through the VIPPSTAR platform, parallel to standard clinical care, within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship. The intervention includes personalized developmental activities, audiovisual materials, weekly online supervision, and continuous communication with clinicians. It includes participants enrolled in both the main RCT cohort and the exploratory pilot cohort. |
| Standard Care Arm | Other | Other: Standard Clinical CareParticipants receive standard clinical monitoring and care according to local clinical practice without access to the VIPPSTAR intervention platform. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 day to 42 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VIPPSTAR Digital Early InterventionA caregiver-mediated digital intervention aimed at promoting visual and neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants at risk of or with visual impairment, within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship. The intervention includes individualized activities integrated into daily family routines and supported through remote supervision and e-learning content. | Behavioural | Intervention arm |
| Standard Clinical CareRoutine clinical care provided according to local healthcare protocols, including follow-up visits and additional evaluations if clinically indicated.Standard intervention protocols according to local healthcare services are allowed. | Other | Standard Care Arm |
Primary outcome
Visual acuity measured in cycles per degree or decimes, using Teller Acuity Cards or Lea Symbols
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Assessment of improvement in visual acuity from baseline following the intervention. Primary efficacy analyses will be conducted in Study Sample 1 only. Data from Study Sample 2 will be analyzed descriptively and exploratorily.
Smooth pursuit assessed on an ordinal scale (continuous, discontinuous, difficult to elicit)
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Assessment of changes in smooth pursuit eye movements assessed using a clinical evaluation on an ordinal scale (continuous, discontinuous, difficult to elicit). Primary efficacy analyses will be conducted in Study Sample 1 only. Data from Study Sample 2 will be analyzed descriptively and exploratorily.
23 secondary outcomes
Fixation Stability assessed on an ordinal scale (stable for more than 3s, unstable for less than 3 s, difficult to evoke, not elicited)
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Fixation Accuracy - eye tracker-based measure
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Smooth pursuit velocity - eye tracker-based measure
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Smooth pursuit accuracy - eye tracker-based measure
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Smooth pursuit number of anticipatory movements - eye tracker based measure
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Saccadic eye movements
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Contrast sensitivity
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Binocular visual field
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Visual Response Latencies - eye-tracker based measure
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Visual Response Speed - eye-tracker based measure
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Visual Response Accuracy - eye-tracker based measure
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Developmental Quotient at Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - IV edition
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Developmental Quotient at Reynell Zinkin Scales of visual deficits
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Adaptive Functioning
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Language Development
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Everyday visual-related behaviour questionnaire (Preverbal Visual Assessment - PreViAs)
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Every day visual-related behaviour (CVI Parental Questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Parental Stress
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Quality of Life scores
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)
Digital platform usability
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)
Intervention acceptability
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)
Intervention Appropriateness
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)
Intervention feasibility
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2026.
- Website of the VIPPSTAR projectLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in publications, including demographic, clinical, neurodevelopmental, neuro-ophthalmological, eye-tracking, and questionnaire-derived outcome data, will be made available upon reasonable request after publication of the primary study results. Statistical analysis code may also be shared for academic, non-commercial research purposes. All data sharing requests will be subject to approval by the Sponsor and compliance with applicable national and European data protection regulations, including GDPR requirements. No directly identifiable participant data will be shared. In preparation for multicenter data exchange and digital platform use, the study consortium is establishing the necessary Data Sharing Agreements, Data Processing Agreements, and software governance procedures among participating institutions and technology providers to ensure secure, compliant, and ethically governed handling of study data.
Related trials for Visual Impairment
Not yet recruiting
joyVision: The Superiority of Co-design in the Development of a Serious Game for Children With Cerebral Visual Impairment
Cerebral Visual Impairment
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Iopidine to Decrease Intraocular Pressure Rise After Injections
Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Retinopathy
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study About the Safety of a Single ASP2020 Eye Injection and if it Helps People With Vision Loss From Stargardt-type Eye Conditions
Stargardt Disease, Stargardt Macular Dystrophy
RecruitingPhase 3
Intravitreal Faricimab Injections or Fluocinolone Acetonide (0.19 mg) Intravitreal Implants vs Observation for Prevention of VA Loss Due to Radiation Retinopathy
Radiation Retinopathy, Visual Impairment
Recruiting
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Prevent Vision Loss From Diabetes
Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetes Mellitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jessica Galli, Prof principal investigator
Unit of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Italy - Department of clinical and experimental sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
5 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing VIPPSTAR Digital Early Intervention and Standard Clinical Care in people with Visual Impairment and Cerebral Visual Impairment, run by Università degli Studi di Brescia at 5 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Italy, Belgium, Moldova. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jessica Galli, Professor (00390303995724, jessica.galli@unibs.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual acuity measured in cycles per degree or decimes, using Teller Acuity Cards or Lea Symbols (time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2026.