AzTrials
AzTrials

Keloid ScarsPhase 4MISTNCT07718269

Microneedling vs. 5-Fluorouracil or Steroid Injections for Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids

A Phase 4 study testing Microneedling with 5-Fluorouracil, Intralesional 5-fluorouracil and Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide in people with Keloid Scars and Hypertrophic Scar, run by Alexandria University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the efficacy and safety of microneedling-assisted 5-fluorouracil delivery in comparison with intralesional 5-fluorouracil, intralesional corticosteroid, and microneedling with saline for the treatment of pathological scars. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Keloid Scars, Hypertrophic Scar
What is being tested?
Microneedling with 5-Fluorouracil, Intralesional 5-fluorouracil and Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
12 Jan 2023to 8 Mar 2025
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients diagnosed with HTSs or keloids

Who cannot join

  • pregnant or lactating females, immunocompromised patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • alexandria University Hospital

    Alexandria

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Microneedling With 5-Fluorouracil Versus Intralesional 5-Fluorouracil or Corticosteroids for Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the efficacy and safety of microneedling-assisted 5-fluorouracil delivery in comparison with intralesional 5-fluorouracil, intralesional corticosteroid, and microneedling with saline for the treatment of pathological scars.

Read the detailed description

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are dermal fibroproliferative disorders unique to humans. They are common and usually occur following burns, trauma, inflammation, or surgery, but sometimes occur spontaneously. Despite an array of therapeutic approaches for scar therapy such as surgical excision, occlusive dressings, topical and intralesional corticosteroids, interferon, cryosurgery, radiation, pressure therapy, laser therapy, retinoic acid, and silicone gel sheeting, no single method provides complete benefit. For this reason, the medical care of HTSs and keloids remains clinically challenging. The study was conducted on 60 patients complaining of HTSs \& keloids.

Being tested
Microneedling with 5-Fluorouracil, Intralesional 5-fluorouracil, Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide, Microneedling With saline
Keywords
keloid, Hypertrophic scars, Microneedling, 5-Fluorouracil, Corticosteroids
Medical subject headings
Keloid, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Microneedling with 5-FluorouracilProcedure or surgery

    Undiluted 5-FU was applied topically after microneedling

  • Intralesional 5-fluorouracilDrug

    undiluted 5-fluorouracil was applied topically

  • Intralesional Triamcinolone AcetonideDrug

    Triamcinolone acetonide was administered intralesionally

  • Microneedling With salineProcedure or surgery

    saline was applied after microneedling

Study groups in NCT07718269
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Microneedling with 5-FluorouracilActive comparatorIntervention Name: Microneedling With 5 Fluorouracil Intervention Type: Procedure
Receives: Procedure: Microneedling with 5-Fluorouracil
Intralesional 5-FluorouracilActive comparatorIntervention name: Intralesional 5-Fluorouracil Intervention Type: drug
Receives: Drug: Intralesional 5-fluorouracil
Intralesional CorticosteroidsActive comparatorIntervention name: Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide Intervention type: drug
Receives: Drug: Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide
Microneedling with normal salinePlacebo comparatorIntervention name: Microneedling with normal saline Intervention type: Procedure
Receives: Procedure: Microneedling With saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Vancouver Scar Scale

    To detect the Change in scar severity assessed by the Vancouver Scar Scale based on four scar characteristics (vascularity 0-3, pliability 0-5, height 0-3, pigmentation 0-2) with the minimum total score 0 (normal) and the maximum total score 13 (most severe scar). Higher scores after treatment mean worse outcome.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. ImageJ Analysis

    To objectively assess scar surface area. To quantify treatment effect, the percentage of change in scar area was calculated for each patient using the formula:

    ■("Percentage of change=" ("Post treatment area - Baseline area" /"Baseline area" )"×100" ), Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

    Measured: 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Patient's satisfaction score

    grade 0 (No satisfaction), grade I (poor less than 25%), grade II (fair 25-50%), grade III (Good 51-75%) and grade IV (Excellent 76-100%). The minimum total score 0 and the maximum total score 100. The higher scores mean a better outcome

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. visual analogue scale

    to assess pain and pruritus. The minimum score is 0 indicated no pain or itching and the maximum score 10 represented the most severe pain or itching. The higher score mean a worse outcome

    Measured: 3 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jul 2026
  2. Study start12 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion15 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion8 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were assigned to one of four parallel treatment groups to compare the efficacy and safety of microneedling with 5-fluorouracil, intralesional 5-fluorouracil, intralesional corticosteroids, and Microneedling with normal saline as a control group in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07718269
Sponsor's protocol ID
0107751
Other IDs
00012098
Acronym
MIST
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
17 Jul 2026
Last updated
22 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: PD will not be shared due to participant confidentiality and ethical considerations

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Microneedling with 5-Fluorouracil, Intralesional 5-fluorouracil and Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide in people with Keloid Scars and Hypertrophic Scar, run by Alexandria University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Vancouver Scar Scale (time frame: 3 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in