AzTrials
AzTrials

Food InsecurityNCT07718646

Mobile Health Coping Intervention for Mothers Experiencing Food Insecurity

A study testing MOMent in people with Food Insecurity, run by Oklahoma State University at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a pilot study testing a mobile app that is designed to help mothers experiencing food insecurity manage stress and build coping skills. Participants will use the app for 8 weeks and complete surveys about their experiences, mental health, and coping. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Food Insecurity
What is being tested?
MOMent
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
20 Jul 2026to Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Reside in Oklahoma
  • Identify as a woman or non-binary
  • At least 18 years old
  • Have a child under 18 years old living in your household
  • Experienced food insecurity in the past 30 days

Who cannot join

  • Currently undergoing mental health counseling
  • No access to a smartphone (Apple or Android)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Oklahoma State University

    Stillwater, Oklahoma, 74078

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Mobile Health Coping Intervention for Mothers Experiencing Food Insecurity: a CBT-informed Pilot Study

This is a pilot study testing a mobile app that is designed to help mothers experiencing food insecurity manage stress and build coping skills. Participants will use the app for 8 weeks and complete surveys about their experiences, mental health, and coping. The study will help us learn whether the app is helpful and feasible for future research.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-arm pilot study enrolling mothers experiencing food insecurity. Because this is a pilot feasibility study, no comparison group is included. Eligible participants will complete baseline assessments before beginning the intervention, including measures of food security, mental health symptoms, coping strategies, and related psychosocial factors. Participants will then complete an eight-week fully mHealth-based intervention using the Univeristy of Oklahoma Insight mHealth mobile application.

Throughout the intervention, participants will receive 3 daily messages focused on building coping skills, managing stress, and supporting mental well-being. The app includes educational modules, goal-setting activities, coping exercises, daily check-ins, and supportive messages. Participants will engage with the app at their own pace and will receive brief assessments and messages throughout the intervention period.

After completing the eight-week intervention, participants will complete post-intervention assessments to evaluate changes in mental health, coping, and intervention acceptability and feasibility. A subset of participants will also be invited to complete a follow-up interview to provide feedback on their experiences using the app, including facilitators and barriers to engagement.

This pilot study will provide preliminary information on the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of a cognitive behavioral therapy-informed mHealth intervention to support mental health among mothers experiencing food insecurity.

Conditions
Food Insecurity
Being tested
MOMent
Keywords
Food Insecurity, Mental Health, Mobile Applications, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Stress, Psychological, Mothers, Depression, Anxiety
Medical subject headings
Psychological Well-Being, Stress, Psychological, Depression, Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MOMentBehavioural

    An 8-week behavioral intervention delivered through a mobile application that combines multiple behavior change techniques, including coping education, self-monitoring, goal setting, and skill-building reflections The intervention is designed to help participants develop and practice coping strategies to manage stress and improve mental well-being.

Study groups in NCT07718646
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
mHealth appExperimentalMobile phone-delivered content focused on building coping skills, managing stress, and supporting mental well-being among mothers experiencing food insecurity.
Receives: Behavioral: MOMent

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recruitment feasibility

    Percentage (%) of eligible individuals who enroll in the study among all individuals determined eligible through the screening survey. Higher percentages indicate greater recruitment feasibility.

    Measured: Evaluated throughout recruitment and at completion of the recruitment period

  2. Intervention retention

    Percentage (%) of enrolled participants who complete the post-intervention assessment. Higher percentages indicate greater retention.

    Measured: Measured from enrollment through completion of post-intervention data collection (8 weeks)

  3. App Engagement

    Intervention engagement assessed using Insight application analytics, including number of intervention messages opened, number of weekly goal-setting activities completed, and interactions with intervention content. Greater values indicate higher engagement.

    Measured: Measured throughout the 8-week intervention period

  4. Usability

    Systems Usability Scale (SUS) total score (range 0-100). Higher scores indicate greater usability; scores >68 indicate above-average usability.

    Measured: Measured at post-intervention (8 weeks)

  5. Participant Acceptability

    Program satisfaction assessed using investigator-developed 5-point Likert-scale items evaluating intervention acceptability. Mean scores range from 1-5, with higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

    Measured: Measured at post-intervention (8 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Food Security Status

    USDA 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) raw score assessing household, adult, and child food security over the previous 30 days. Scores range from 0-18, with higher scores indicate greater food insecurity.

    Measured: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  2. Cognitive Functioning

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Function Short Form and PROMIS Cognitive Function Abilities Short Form 6a T-scores assessing perceived cognitive functioning. T scores have an average of 50, and 10 is one standard deviation. Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.

    Measured: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  3. Anxiety Symptoms

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) total score (range 0-21). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom severity.

    Measured: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  4. Depressive Symptoms

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score (range 0-27). Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity.

    Measured: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  5. Coping Behaviors

    Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief COPE) questionnaire scores assessing coping quantity and coping style. Scores are calculated according to the Brief COPE scoring protocol; higher scores indicate greater use of each coping strategy. Mean scores range from 1 to 4.

    Measured: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  6. Diet Quality

    Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) score are the output from the National Cancer Institute Diet History Questionnaire III (DHQ III) survey. Higher scores indicate better overall diet quality (score range: 0-100).

    Measured: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  7. Food resource management

    A subset of problem-focused coping, food resource management, will be assessed with an adapted version of items from the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) questionnaire. Scores range from Never (0) to Always (5), with higher mean scores indicating more food resource management behaviors.

    Measured: Measured at baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2026
  2. Study start20 Jul 2026
  3. Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Single arm feasibility trial with pre/post assessments
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07718646
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB-26-160
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
15 Jul 2026
Last updated
14 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MOMent in people with Food Insecurity, run by Oklahoma State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recruitment feasibility (time frame: Evaluated throughout recruitment and at completion of the recruitment period). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in