AzTrials
AzTrials

Autistic Youth, Nintendo Exergaming Group, No Intervention Control GroupNCT07720427

COMPARING EFFECTS OF NINTENDO EXERGAMING TO A NO INTERVENTION CONTROL GROUP

A study testing Nintendo Switch Exergaming in people with Autistic Youth, Nintendo Exergaming Group, No Intervention Control Group, run by University of Delaware at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a pilot randomized clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of delivering a Nintendo Switch exergaming (NE group) intervention in a group of autistic youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) between 5 and 30 years compared to an age-matched, no intervention… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 30 years
What is being tested?
Nintendo Switch Exergaming
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
2 May 2023to 26 Mar 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • A school or medical record of holding an autism diagnosis

Who cannot join

  • Did not follow 1 to 2-step instructions at the pretest.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Health Sciences Campus, University of Delaware

    Newark, Delaware, 19060

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Exergaming Intervention Study

This is a pilot randomized clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of delivering a Nintendo Switch exergaming (NE group) intervention in a group of autistic youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) between 5 and 30 years compared to an age-matched, no intervention control group of autistic youth (Control group) .

Read the detailed description

Parents of each ASD participant completed a screening form and the parent and participant completed an additional screening interview before participating in a pretest visit to confirm study eligibility.

After the motor and cognitive pretests and parent questionnaires were completed and eligibility was confirmed, each participant was randomly assigned to the Nintendo exergaming (NE) intervention or no intervention control group.

Each participant in the NE group received 8 weeks of exergaming intervention for 45-60 minutes per session @2 sessions per week. After the intervention period was completed motor and cognitive posttests and parent questionnaires were completed to assess preliminary outcomes.

We also completed feasibility and acceptability measures using parent, trainer, and child surveys.

Being tested
Nintendo Switch Exergaming
Keywords
Autism, Youth, Nintendo Switch, Exergames, Control, RCT
Medical subject headings
Autistic Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nintendo Switch ExergamingBehavioural

    Each exergaming intervention session included RingFit warm-up, RingFit Adventure Games to target multiple motor domains including body coordination, strength, and endurance and the Nintendo Switch Sports virtual sports targeted body coordination and visuomotor skills.

Study groups in NCT07720427
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nintendo Switch ExergamingExperimentalThis group received 8 weeks of Nintendo Switch Exergaming Intervention @ 2 days per week for 45-60 minutes per session. Pretests and posttests were completed before and after this period.
Receives: Behavioral: Nintendo Switch Exergaming
No Intervention Control GroupNo interventionThis group received 8 weeks of business as usual control period. Pretests and posttests were completed before and after this period.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bruininks Oseretsky Test of Motor Performance

    The BOT-2 is a standardized motor test that is a reliable and valid motor measure for youth between the ages of 4 to 21 years (Bruininks \& Bruininks, 2005). Participants' gross motor skills were assessed using the balance (BAL), bilateral coordination (BLC), strength (STN), and agility (AGIL) subtests of BOT-2. Subtests are combined to provide a body coordination (BC, includes BAL and BLC), strength/agility (SA, includes STR and AGIL) and manual coordination (MC, includes MD and ULC) composite standard score at pretest and posttest. Change in composite standard scores (BC, SA, and MC) were assessed between pretest and posttest performance.

    Measured: Pretest and posttests were conducted within 2 weeks before or after intervention, respectively.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Bilateral Motor Coordination Subtest of there Sensory Integration and Praxis Test (SIPT-BMC) Battery

    The SIPT BMC subtest assesses a youth's ability to imitate 22 novel hand and feet rhythmic actions shown by the tester. During the test, the tester asks the child to repeat bilateral rhythmic sequences of the hands or feet. An error occurrs if the youth does correctly imitate the sequence or rhythm of the tester's movements. A spatial error was scored if the youth's scale or pattern of movement differed from that of the tester. A temporal error occurred if the youth paused during the motor sequence, or moved slow/fast compared to tester. Total spatial and temporal errors were calculated across all imitated actions at pretest and posttest.

    Measured: Pretest and posttests were conducted within 2 weeks before or after intervention, respectively.

  2. Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCD-Q)

    Parents completed the 15-item motor screening tool to report their child's fine- motor, gross-motor, and general coordination abilities compared to their peers. The total score at pretest and posttest were compared.

    Measured: Pretest and posttests were conducted within 2 weeks before or after intervention, respectively.

  3. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)

    Parents completed the BRIEF to assess the youth's executive functioning skills during everyday tasks. The total score at pretest and posttest was compared.

    Measured: Pretest and posttests were conducted within 2 weeks before or after intervention, respectively.

  4. Computerized Modified Flanker Task

    All participants completed the Modified Flanker Task to assess the inhibitory control component of executive functioning. The task consisted of four experimental blocks, with incongruent and congruent conditions presented in random order within each block of 30 trials, with 15 incongruent and 15 congruent trials. a) Congruent: Five fish facing in the same direction, b) Incongruent: The outer four fish faced the same direction while the center fish faced the opposite direction. Participants were instructed to click the arrow button on the screen to indicate the direction of the center fish and to respond as quickly and accurately as possible. We compared the average reaction time at pretest and posttest.

    Measured: Pretest and posttests were conducted within 2 weeks before or after intervention, respectively.

  5. Computerized Modified Stroop Word-Color Task

    The Stroop Task assessed the task switching, flexibility, and response inhibition components of executive functioning. The task consisted of two conditions: Color and Word. Participants were instructed to press the button on the screen to match the color of the letters shown in the color condition, or to match the spelling of the word shown in the Word condition. Each block consisted of 40 trials. Average reaction times at pretest and posttest were compared.

    Measured: Pretest and posttests were conducted within 2 weeks before or after intervention, respectively.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2026
  2. Study start2 May 2023
  3. Primary completion26 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion26 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were confirmed study eligible, then randomly assigned to Nintendo Switch exergaming or no intervention control group. All participants completed pretest and post-tests and parent questionnaires.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07720427
Sponsor's protocol ID
1947455
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
17 Jul 2026
Last updated
22 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nintendo Switch Exergaming in people with Autistic Youth, Nintendo Exergaming Group, No Intervention Control Group, run by University of Delaware at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bruininks Oseretsky Test of Motor Performance (time frame: Pretest and posttests were conducted within 2 weeks before or after intervention, respectively.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in