AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisOCTNCT07720765

Optical Coherence Tomography in Neurological Practice: Utility and Applicability Across Neurological Diseases (OCt.IN.N)

An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis and Alzheimer Disease, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

OCt.IN.N is a national, monocentric, prospective, observational cohort study evaluating the utility and applicability of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in the diagnostic workup and longitudinal monitoring of neurological diseases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) - Heidelberg SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
1,050 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
9 Oct 2023to 1 Apr 2031
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult patients with a diagnosis of a Central Nervous System neurological disease (Multiple Sclerosis; Alzheimer's disease; Parkinson's disease; migraine/headache) recruited from the neurology outpatient clinics and inpatient wards of IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. Healthy controls recruited primarily from medical students, colleagues, and relatives of patients.

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of a Central Nervous System neurological disease (inflammatory diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis; neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease; migraine/headache) according to currently accepted diagnostic criteria for each condition.
  • Age greater than 18 years.
  • Signed informed consent to study participation.
  • Willingness and ability to undergo all study visits and procedures.
  • Absence of neurological disease.
  • Age greater than 18 years.
  • Signed informed consent to study participation.
  • Willingness and ability to undergo all study visits and procedures.

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to participate or withdrawal of informed consent.
  • Known or confirmed ocular pathology identified during examination (ophthalmological evaluation may be requested at the investigators' discretion).
  • Inability to understand instructions given by investigators.
  • Presence of any condition that, in the investigators' opinion, renders the subject unsuitable for the study.
  • For specific imaging modes using clearly visible light sources (MultiColor, FA, BAF): diagnosis of epilepsy or history of previous epileptic seizures.
  • Refusal to participate or withdrawal of informed consent.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Known or confirmed ocular pathology identified during examination.
  • Inability to understand instructions given by investigators.
  • Presence of any condition that, in the investigators' opinion, renders the subject unsuitable for the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Federica Agosta, MD contact

0226433051

agosta.federica@hsr.it

Roberto Santangelo, MD contact

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele - Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit

    Milan, Milano, 20132

    Federica Agosta, MD, 0226433051, agosta.federica@hsr.it

    Roberto Santangelo, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A National, Monocentric, Prospective Cohort Study to Evaluate the Utility and Applicability of Optical Coherence Tomography in Neurological Clinical Practice

OCt.IN.N is a national, monocentric, prospective, observational cohort study evaluating the utility and applicability of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in the diagnostic workup and longitudinal monitoring of neurological diseases.

840 patients with Central Nervous System neurological diseases (Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, migraine/headache) and 210 age-matched healthy controls will undergo OCT examination at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

OCT is a non-invasive, rapid, and reproducible technique that automatically measures the thickness of individual retinal layers. Retinal layer thicknesses and their longitudinal changes will be correlated with established clinical scales, neuroimaging, and biological markers used in routine neurological practice.

Read the detailed description

The retina and optic nerve share the same embryological origins as the central nervous system (CNS). Several neurological diseases - including Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) - involve the visual system at both pre-chiasmatic (neuro-retina, optic nerve) and post-chiasmatic levels (optic tracts, optic radiations, primary visual cortex).

In MS, optic neuritis is one of the most frequent manifestations and can lead to optic nerve damage with retinal nerve fiber degeneration. In neurodegenerative diseases such as AD and PD, degeneration of retinal ganglion cells has been demonstrated. In AD, longitudinal observational studies have shown accelerated RNFL thinning over time compared to age-matched healthy controls, suggesting that neuro-retinal thinning in neurodegeneration reflects underlying neurodegenerative processes independent of normal aging.

Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive, highly reproducible technique providing automated, high-resolution information on the thickness of individual retinal layers, including the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), the ganglion cell layer (GCL), and the inner plexiform layer (IPL). OCT could represent a reliable, reproducible, and economically accessible tool for the diagnostic workup and monitoring of neurological diseases.

The device used is the Heidelberg SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT (Class IIa CE-marked medical device), operated according to the manufacturer's instructions and indications for use. The device is used according to its approved clinical indication for visualization of the posterior segment of the eye and retinal anatomy measurement.

Study design: monocentric, prospective, observational cohort study. Patients are recruited from the neurology outpatient clinics and inpatient wards of IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital. OCT is performed at baseline (T0) and at follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, and/or 24 months. Ophthalmological evaluation may be requested at the investigators' discretion to exclude concurrent ocular pathology.

Three age subgroups are analyzed for all disease groups and controls: 20-40 years, 40-60 years, and over 60 years.

Statistical analyses include: descriptive statistics and ANOVA models (or non-parametric tests) for between-group comparisons at baseline; linear mixed-effects models for longitudinal changes over time; generalized estimating equations (GEE) when data from both eyes are considered; Pearson or Spearman correlation analyses between OCT measures and clinical, neuroimaging, and biological markers (EDSS for MS; UPDRS for PD; neuropsychological battery for AD; brain MRI, PET, and CSF biomarkers for migraine/headache).

Being tested
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) - Heidelberg SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT
Keywords
Optical Coherence Tomography, OCT, Retinal nerve fiber layer, RNFL, Ganglion cell layer, GCL, Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Migraine, Neurodegeneration, Neuro-retina, Biomarker
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer Disease, Parkinson Disease, Migraine Disorders, Headache Disorders, Nerve Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) - Heidelberg SPECTRALIS HRA+OCTDevice

    Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) performed using the Heidelberg SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT device (Class IIa CE-marked medical device). The procedure is non-invasive: the patient sits in front of the device and is asked to fix a target (light or cross) through a lens. No drugs or contrast agents are administered. OCT automatically acquires images of the macular region (where GCL and IPL are most represented) and the optic nerve head region (where RNFL is most represented), providing automated measurements of the thickness of individual retinal layers.

    OCT is performed at baseline and at follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, and/or 24 months. Ophthalmological evaluation may be performed at the investigators' discretion if OCT images, clinical symptoms, or medical history suggest concurrent ocular pathology. Patients with a known diagnosis of epilepsy or history of epileptic seizures will not undergo specific imaging modes using clearly visible light sources (MultiColor, FA, BAF).

Study groups in NCT07720765
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Multiple Sclerosis patients210 patients with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis according to current diagnostic criteria, stratified into three age subgroups (20-40, 40-60, and over 60 years, 70 per subgroup). Undergo OCT at baseline and follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, and/or 24 months, alongside standard clinical assessments including EDSS.
Receives: Device: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) - Heidelberg SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT
Alzheimer's disease patients210 patients with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease according to current diagnostic criteria, stratified into three age subgroups (70 per subgroup). Undergo OCT at baseline and follow-up visits alongside standard neuropsychological assessments, brain MRI, PET, and CSF biomarkers as part of routine clinical care.
Receives: Device: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) - Heidelberg SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT
Parkinson's disease patients210 patients with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease according to current diagnostic criteria, stratified into three age subgroups (70 per subgroup). Undergo OCT at baseline and follow-up visits alongside standard clinical assessments including UPDRS.
Receives: Device: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) - Heidelberg SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT
Migraine and headache patients210 patients with a diagnosis of migraine or headache according to current diagnostic criteria, stratified into three age subgroups (70 per subgroup). Undergo OCT at baseline and follow-up visits alongside standard clinical assessments.
Receives: Device: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) - Heidelberg SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT
Healthy Controls210 healthy subjects without neurological disease, age-matched to patients, stratified into three age subgroups (20-40, 40-60, and over 60 years, 70 per subgroup). Recruited primarily from medical students, colleagues, and relatives of patients. Undergo OCT at baseline and follow-up visits.
Receives: Device: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) - Heidelberg SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Annual rate of peripapillary RNFL thinning in patients with Multiple Sclerosis vs healthy controls

    Annualized thinning rate (micrometers per year) of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measured by OCT in patients with Multiple Sclerosis compared to age-matched healthy controls.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  2. Annual rate of peripapillary RNFL thinning in patients with Alzheimer's Disease vs healthy controls

    Annualized thinning rate (micrometers per year) of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measured by OCT in patients with Alzheimer's Disease compared to age-matched healthy controls.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  3. Annual rate of peripapillary RNFL thinning in patients with Parkinson's Disease vs healthy controls

    Annualized thinning rate (micrometers per year) of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measured by OCT in patients with Parkinson's Disease compared to age-matched healthy controls.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  4. Annual rate of macular GCL thinning in patients with Multiple Sclerosis disease vs healthy controls

    Annualized thinning rate (micrometers per year) of the macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) measured by OCT in patients with Multiple Sclerosis compared to age-matched healthy controls

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  5. Annual rate of macular GCL thinning in patients with Alzheimer's Disease vs healthy controls

    Annualized thinning rate (micrometers per year) of the macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) measured by OCT in patients with Alzheimer's Disease compared to age-matched healthy controls

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  6. Annual rate of macular GCL thinning in patients with Parkinson's Disease vs healthy controls

    Annualized thinning rate (micrometers per year) of the macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) measured by OCT in patients with Parkinson's Disease compared to age-matched healthy controls

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  7. Annual rate of macular IPL thinning in patients with Multiple Sclerosis vs healthy controls

    Annualized thinning rate (micrometers per year) of the macular inner plexiform layer (IPL) measured by OCT in patients with Multiple Sclerosis compared to age-matched healthy controls

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  8. Annual rate of macular IPL thinning in patients with Alzheimer's Disease vs healthy controls

    Annualized thinning rate (micrometers per year) of the macular inner plexiform layer (IPL) measured by OCT in patients with Alzheimer's Disease compared to age-matched healthy controls

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  9. Annual rate of macular IPL thinning in patients with Parkinson's Disease vs healthy controls

    Annualized thinning rate (micrometers per year) of the macular inner plexiform layer (IPL) measured by OCT in patients with Parkinson's Disease compared to age-matched healthy controls

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Correlation between RNFL thinning rate and EDSS worsening in Multiple Sclerosis

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between the annualized RNFL thinning rate measured by OCT and worsening on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  2. Correlation between GCL thinning rate and EDSS worsening in Multiple Sclerosis

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between the annualized GCL thinning rate measured by OCT and worsening on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  3. Correlation between IPL thinning rate and EDSS worsening in Multiple Sclerosis

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between the annualized IPL thinning rate measured by OCT and worsening on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  4. Correlation between RNFL thinning rate and UPDRS worsening in Parkinson's disease

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between the annualized RNFL thinning rate measured by OCT and worsening on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in patients with Parkinson's disease.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  5. Correlation between GCL thinning rate and UPDRS worsening in Parkinson's disease

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between the annualized GCL thinning rate measured by OCT and worsening on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in patients with Parkinson's disease.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  6. Correlation between RNFL thinning rate and neuropsychological performance in Alzheimer's disease

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between the annualized RNFL thinning rate measured by OCT and scores on comprehensive neuropsychological assessment in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  7. Correlation between GCL thinning rate and neuropsychological performance in Alzheimer's disease

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between the annualized GCL thinning rate measured by OCT and scores on comprehensive neuropsychological assessment in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  8. Correlation between IPL thinning rate and neuropsychological performance in Alzheimer's disease

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between the annualized IPL thinning rate measured by OCT and scores on comprehensive neuropsychological assessment in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  9. Correlation between RNFL thickness and brain MRI lesion load

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived RNFL tickness and brain MRI parameters (lesion load) used in routine clinical practice for each neurological disease subgroup.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  10. Correlation between RNFL thickness and brain MRI cortical atrophy

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived RNFL tickness and brain MRI parameters (cortical atrophy) used in routine clinical practice for each neurological disease subgroup.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  11. Correlation between GCL thickness and brain MRI lesion load

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived GCL tickness and brain MRI parameters (lesion load) used in routine clinical practice for each neurological disease subgroup.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  12. Correlation between GCL thickness and brain MRI cortical atrophy

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived GCL tickness and brain MRI parameters (cortical atrophy) used in routine clinical practice for each neurological disease subgroup.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  13. Correlation between IPL thickness and brain MRI lesion load

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived IPL tickness and brain MRI parameters (lesion load) used in routine clinical practice for each neurological disease subgroup.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  14. Correlation between IPL thickness and brain MRI cortical atrophy

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived IPL tickness and brain MRI parameters (cortical atrophy) used in routine clinical practice for each neurological disease subgroup.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  15. Correlation between RNFL thickness and PET findings

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived RNFL thickness and brain PET parameters used in routine clinical practice for applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  16. Correlation between GCL thickness and PET findings

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived GCL thickness and brain PET parameters used in routine clinical practice for applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  17. Correlation between IPL thickness and PET findings

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived IPL thickness and brain PET parameters used in routine clinical practice for applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  18. 24. Correlation between RNFL thickness and CSF biomarker (Abeta40)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived RNFL thickness and CSF biomarkers (Abeta40) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  19. Correlation between GCL thickness and CSF biomarker (Abeta40)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived GCL thickness and CSF biomarkers (Abeta40) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  20. orrelation between IPL thickness and CSF biomarker (Abeta40)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived IPL thickness and CSF biomarkers (Abeta40) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  21. Correlation between RNFL thickness and CSF biomarker (Abeta42)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived RNFL thickness and CSF biomarkers (Abeta42) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  22. Correlation between GCL thickness and CSF biomarker (Abeta42)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived GCL thickness and CSF biomarkers (Abeta42) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  23. Correlation between IPL thickness and CSF biomarker (Abeta42)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived IPL thickness and CSF biomarkers (Abeta42) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  24. Correlation between RNFL thickness and CSF biomarkers (pTAU)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived RNFL thickness and CSF biomarkers (pTAU) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  25. Correlation between GCL thickness and CSF biomarkers (pTAU)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived GCL thickness and CSF biomarkers (pTAU) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  26. Correlation between IPL thickness and CSF biomarkers (pTAU)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived IPL thickness and CSF biomarkers (pTAU) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  27. Correlation between RNFL thickness and CSF biomarkers (NfL)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived RNFL thickness and CSF biomarkers (NfL) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  28. Correlation between GCL thickness and CSF biomarkers (NfL)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived GCL thickness and CSF biomarkers (NfL) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  29. Correlation between IPL thickness and CSF biomarkers (NfL)

    Pearson or Spearman correlation between OCT-derived IPL thickness and CSF biomarkers (NfL) in applicable neurological disease subgroups.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2026
  2. Study start9 Oct 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2031 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,050 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07720765
Sponsor's protocol ID
OCtINN
Acronym
OCT
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
17 Jul 2026
Last updated
22 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis and Alzheimer Disease, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Federica Agosta, MD (0226433051, agosta.federica@hsr.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Annual rate of peripapillary RNFL thinning in patients with Multiple Sclerosis vs healthy controls (time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in