Knee OsteoarthristisNCT07722975
Effects of Intermittent Versus Continuous Blood Flow Restriction Training on Pain, Functional Ability, Muscle Strength and Exercise Perception Among Female Patients With Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis
A study testing Intermittent blood flow training (iBFR) and Continuous blood flow training (cBFR) in people with Knee Osteoarthristis, run by Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
This study holds significant clinical, academic, and practical importance in the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Clinically, it addresses a critical need to identify an effective and tolerable strengthening strategy for females with early-stage knee osteoarthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 49 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthristis
- What is being tested?
- Intermittent blood flow training (iBFR) and Continuous blood flow training (cBFR)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 May 2026to 20 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 49 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Female patients aged 40-49 years.
- Diagnosed with Grade II knee osteoarthritis (radiographically confirmed).
- Moderate to severe pain (NPRS 4-7).
- Ability to participate in exercise programs.
Who cannot join
- Severe cardiovascular disease.
- Uncontrolled hypertension.
- Recent knee surgery or intra-articular injection.
- Active cancer or metastatic disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site
Social Security Hospital, Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, 05450
About this study
This study holds significant clinical, academic, and practical importance in the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Clinically, it addresses a critical need to identify an effective and tolerable strengthening strategy for females with early-stage knee osteoarthritis. By directly comparing intermittent and continuous BFR protocols, the findings will provide physiotherapists with evidence-based guidance for optimizing exercise prescription while minimizing discomfort and improving adherence.Academically, this research contributes to the limited body of literature comparing different BFR application strategies in knee osteoarthritis. The inclusion of exercise perception outcomes adds valuable insight into patient-centered rehabilitation, which is often underrepresented in clinical trials.From a practical and societal perspective, identifying a more tolerable BFR approach may enhance long-term exercise participation, delay disease progression, and reduce healthcare burden associated with knee osteoarthritis. The findings may also support the integration of low-load BFR training into rehabilitation programs in resource-limited clinical settings.
Read the detailed description
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic, progressive musculoskeletal disorder characterized by joint degeneration, pain, muscle weakness, and functional limitations, with a higher prevalence among middle-aged women. Quadriceps muscle weakness is a key clinical feature associated with reduced functional capacity and progression of the disease. Although high-load resistance training is considered effective for improving muscle strength, its application is often limited in symptomatic individuals due to increased joint loading and pain, thereby affecting adherence to rehabilitation programs.In recent years, low-load resistance training combined with Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) has gained attention as a viable alternative for enhancing muscle strength while minimizing mechanical stress on the joint. BFR training can be applied using continuous or intermittent protocols. Continuous BFR maintains cuff pressure throughout both exercise and rest periods, whereas intermittent BFR involves periodic deflation during rest intervals. These variations may influence physiological responses, fatigue levels, perceived exertion, and overall exercise tolerance, which are critical factors in clinical rehabilitation.This randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the effects of intermittent and continuous BFR training on pain, functional ability, muscle strength, and exercise perception in females with Grade II knee osteoarthritis. A total of 84 participants will be randomly allocated into two intervention groups and will undergo structured low-load resistance training in conjunction with standard physiotherapy care over a period of 8-12 weeks.Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks, including pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), functional status (WOMAC Index), quadriceps muscle strength, and perceived exertion (Modified Borg Scale). The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence-based insights into the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of BFR application methods, thereby supporting optimized rehabilitation strategies and improving patient-centered outcomes in knee osteoarthritis management.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthristis
- Being tested
- Intermittent blood flow training (iBFR), Continuous blood flow training (cBFR)
- Keywords
- Blood Flow Restriction (BFR), Intermittent BFR, Continuous BFR, Exercise Perception, Functional Ability
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intermittent blood flow training (iBFR)Other
Hamstrings stretching, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Bridge with isometric contraction of the transversus abdominis-CORE training, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Hip abduction with weights , 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Calm exercises with an elastic band, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Calf raises with weights , 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Sensori-motor training at mini-trampoline, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Leg press, 0-60°, 4 sets of 10 repetitions, Seated knee extension , 90-0° of knee flexion, 4 sets of 10 repetitions. In the iBFR group, the cuff is deflated during each set's rest period and is quickly reinflated to the target pressure 20-30 s into the rest, ensuring the entire rest period does not exceed 45 s . Intensity: 20- 30% of 1RM with BFR cuffs, Frequency: 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks. Each session comprises a 10-min warm up with static cycling, a 30-min exercise program, and a 15-min cool down. BFR cuff from Hhccteo company will be used. pressure:130-150 mmHg, cuff width 5-7cm
Continuous blood flow training (cBFR)Other
Hamstrings stretching, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Bridge with isometric contraction of the transversus abdominis-CORE training, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Hip abduction with weights (side lying), 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Calm exercises (side lying) with an elastic band, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Calf raises with weights (standing), 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Sensori motor training (standing) at mini-trampoline, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Leg press (machine), 0-60°, 4 sets of 10 repetitions, Seated knee extension, 90-0° of knee flexion, 4 sets of 10 repetitions. In the cBFR group, the Intensity of excersise will be 20-30% of 1RM with BFR cuffs ,Frequency: 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks. Each session comprises a 10-min warmup with static cycling, a 30-min exercise program, and a 15-min cool down. BFR cuff from Hhccteo company will be used. The parameters will be pressure: 130-150 mmHg, cuff width 5-7 cm. Progressive overload will be applied by gradually increasing repetitions or load as tolerated
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent blood flow | Experimental | Participants will perform low-load resistance exercises at 20-30% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) combined with intermittent BFR application. Cuff pressure will be applied during exercise sets and released during rest intervals. Each session will include a 10-minute warm-up , followed by a 30-minute structured exercise program and a 15-minute cool-down. Sessions will be conducted 2-3 times per week for a duration of 8-12 weeks, with progressive overload applied as tolerated. Receives: Other: Intermittent blood flow training (iBFR) |
| Continuous blood flow training | Experimental | Participants will perform the same low-load resistance exercise protocol (20-30% 1RM) with continuous BFR application. Cuff pressure will be maintained throughout both exercise and rest periods. Exercise selection, session structure (warm-up, training, cool-down), frequency (2-3 sessions/week), and duration (8-12 weeks) will be identical to Group A to ensure comparability between groups Receives: Other: Continuous blood flow training (cBFR) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)
Quadriceps strength will be assessed using standardized isometric testing procedure. It grades muscle strength on a 0-5 scale based on the ability to move a joint against gravity and external resistance. A grade of 0 indicates no visible or palpable muscle contraction, while 1 (Trace) represents a slight contraction without actual movement. Grade 2 (Poor) describes the ability to move the joint through its full range only when gravity is eliminated, whereas Grade 3 (Fair) allows movement through the full range against gravity but without resistance. Grade 4 (Good) indicates movement against moderate resistance, and Grade 5 (Normal) reflects full range of motion against maximal resistance, representing normal muscle strength
Measured: baseline, 6 weeks (post intervention), 12 weeks (follow up)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
The NPRS is a10-point scale (0-10) used to quantify pain intensity. Pain severity will be interpreted as no pain (0), mild pain (1-3), moderate pain (4-6), and severe pain (7-10).
Measured: baseline, 6 weeks (post intervention), 12 weeks( followup)
Modified Borg Scale
It is used to assess ratings of exercise-related perceived exertion. The scale ranges from (0 to 10), where 0 means no breathlessness at all and 10 means maximium breathlessness. According to this, 0-2 for Minimal exertion, 3-4 for Moderate (often target for rehab), 5-6 for Hard and 7-10 is for Very hard to maximal
Measured: baseline, 6 weeks( post intervention), 12 weeks (follow up)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2026
- Study start1 May 2026
- Primary completion10 Jul 2026
- Study completion20 Jul 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthristisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study will use a parallel-group randomized controlled design, with participants randomly allocated into two intervention groups. Group A (Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction - iBFR): participants will perform low-load resistance exercises (20-30% 1RM) with BFR cuffs (130-150 mmHg) applied during exercise and released during rest intervals. Group B (Continuous Blood Flow Restriction - cBFR): participants will perform the same exercise protocol with cuff pressure maintained throughout both exercise and rest periods. Both groups will receive identical exercise programs including leg press, knee extension, hip abduction, calf raises, and core exercises, along with standard physiotherapy care. Sessions will be conducted 2-3 times per week for 8-12 weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned into two parallel groups without crossover to ensure unbiased comparison of outcomes.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07722975
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UBAS/ERB/26/04/012
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Freitas EDS, Miller RM, Heishman AD, Aniceto RR, Silva JGC, Bemben MG. Perceptual responses to continuous versus intermittent blood flow restriction exercise: A randomized controlled trial. Physiol Behav. 2019 Dec 1;212:112717. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112717. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
PubMed 31629764Harper SA, Roberts LM, Layne AS, Jaeger BC, Gardner AK, Sibille KT, Wu SS, Vincent KR, Fillingim RB, Manini TM, Buford TW. Blood-Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise for Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 21;8(2):265. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020265.
PubMed 30795545Sorensen B, Aagaard P, Hjortshoj MH, Hansen SK, Suetta C, Couppe C, Magnusson SP, Johannsen FE. Physiological and clinical effects of low-intensity blood-flow restricted resistance exercise compared to standard rehabilitation in adults with knee osteoarthritis-Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0295666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295666. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 38096198Centner C, Wiegel P, Gollhofer A, Konig D. Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy in Older Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2019 Jan;49(1):95-108. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0994-1.
PubMed 30306467Hughes L, Paton B, Rosenblatt B, Gissane C, Patterson SD. Blood flow restriction training in clinical musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;51(13):1003-1011. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097071. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
PubMed 28259850
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Intermittent Versus Continuous Blood Flow Restriction Training on Pain, Functional Ability, Muscle Strength and Exercise Perception Among Female Patients With Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07722975
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UBAS/ERB/26/04/012
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthristis
- Keywords
- Blood Flow Restriction (BFR), Intermittent BFR, Continuous BFR, Exercise Perception, Functional Ability
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jul 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study holds significant clinical, academic, and practical importance in the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Clinically, it addresses a critical need to identify an effective and tolerable strengthening strategy for females with early-stage knee osteoarthritis. By directly comparing intermittent and continuous BFR protocols, the findings will provide physiotherapists with evidence-based guidance for optimizing exercise prescription while minimizing discomfort and improving adherence.Academically, this research contributes to the limited body of literature comparing different BFR application strategies in knee osteoarthritis. The inclusion of exercise perception outcomes adds valuable insight into patient-centered rehabilitation, which is often underrepresented in clinical trials.From a practical and societal perspective, identifying a more tolerable BFR approach may enhance long-term exercise participation, delay disease progression, and reduce healthcare burden associated with knee osteoarthritis. The findings may also support the integration of low-load BFR training into rehabilitation programs in resource-limited clinical settings.
Detailed description
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic, progressive musculoskeletal disorder characterized by joint degeneration, pain, muscle weakness, and functional limitations, with a higher prevalence among middle-aged women. Quadriceps muscle weakness is a key clinical feature associated with reduced functional capacity and progression of the disease. Although high-load resistance training is considered effective for improving muscle strength, its application is often limited in symptomatic individuals due to increased joint loading and pain, thereby affecting adherence to rehabilitation programs.In recent years, low-load resistance training combined with Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) has gained attention as a viable alternative for enhancing muscle strength while minimizing mechanical stress on the joint. BFR training can be applied using continuous or intermittent protocols. Continuous BFR maintains cuff pressure throughout both exercise and rest periods, whereas intermittent BFR involves periodic deflation during rest intervals. These variations may influence physiological responses, fatigue levels, perceived exertion, and overall exercise tolerance, which are critical factors in clinical rehabilitation.This randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the effects of intermittent and continuous BFR training on pain, functional ability, muscle strength, and exercise perception in females with Grade II knee osteoarthritis. A total of 84 participants will be randomly allocated into two intervention groups and will undergo structured low-load resistance training in conjunction with standard physiotherapy care over a period of 8-12 weeks.Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks, including pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), functional status (WOMAC Index), quadriceps muscle strength, and perceived exertion (Modified Borg Scale). The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence-based insights into the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of BFR application methods, thereby supporting optimized rehabilitation strategies and improving patient-centered outcomes in knee osteoarthritis management.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study will use a parallel-group randomized controlled design, with participants randomly allocated into two intervention groups. Group A (Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction - iBFR): participants will perform low-load resistance exercises (20-30% 1RM) with BFR cuffs (130-150 mmHg) applied during exercise and released during rest intervals. Group B (Continuous Blood Flow Restriction - cBFR): participants will perform the same exercise protocol with cuff pressure maintained throughout both exercise and rest periods. Both groups will receive identical exercise programs including leg press, knee extension, hip abduction, calf raises, and core exercises, along with standard physiotherapy care. Sessions will be conducted 2-3 times per week for 8-12 weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned into two parallel groups without crossover to ensure unbiased comparison of outcomes.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent blood flow | Experimental | Other: Intermittent blood flow training (iBFR)Participants will perform low-load resistance exercises at 20-30% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) combined with intermittent BFR application. Cuff pressure will be applied during exercise sets and released during rest intervals. Each session will include a 10-minute warm-up , followed by a 30-minute structured exercise program and a 15-minute cool-down. Sessions will be conducted 2-3 times per week for a duration of 8-12 weeks, with progressive overload applied as tolerated. |
| Continuous blood flow training | Experimental | Other: Continuous blood flow training (cBFR)Participants will perform the same low-load resistance exercise protocol (20-30% 1RM) with continuous BFR application. Cuff pressure will be maintained throughout both exercise and rest periods. Exercise selection, session structure (warm-up, training, cool-down), frequency (2-3 sessions/week), and duration (8-12 weeks) will be identical to Group A to ensure comparability between groups |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 49 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Female patients aged 40-49 years.
- Diagnosed with Grade II knee osteoarthritis (radiographically confirmed).
- Moderate to severe pain (NPRS 4-7).
- Ability to participate in exercise programs.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Severe cardiovascular disease.
- Uncontrolled hypertension.
- Recent knee surgery or intra-articular injection.
- Active cancer or metastatic disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent blood flow training (iBFR)Hamstrings stretching, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Bridge with isometric contraction of the transversus abdominis-CORE training, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Hip abduction with weights , 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Calm exercises with an elastic band, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Calf raises with weights , 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Sensori-motor training at mini-trampoline, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Leg press, 0-60°, 4 sets of 10 repetitions, Seated knee extension , 90-0° of knee flexion, 4 sets of 10 repetitions. In the iBFR group, the cuff is deflated during each set's rest period and is quickly reinflated to the target pressure 20-30 s into the rest, ensuring the entire rest period does not exceed 45 s . Intensity: 20- 30% of 1RM with BFR cuffs, Frequency: 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks. Each session comprises a 10-min warm up with static cycling, a 30-min exercise program, and a 15-min cool down. BFR cuff from Hhccteo company will be used. pressure:130-150 mmHg, cuff width 5-7cm | Other | Intermittent blood flow |
| Continuous blood flow training (cBFR)Hamstrings stretching, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Bridge with isometric contraction of the transversus abdominis-CORE training, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Hip abduction with weights (side lying), 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Calm exercises (side lying) with an elastic band, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Calf raises with weights (standing), 3 sets of 10 repetitions, Sensori motor training (standing) at mini-trampoline, 3 repetitions of 30 s, Leg press (machine), 0-60°, 4 sets of 10 repetitions, Seated knee extension, 90-0° of knee flexion, 4 sets of 10 repetitions. In the cBFR group, the Intensity of excersise will be 20-30% of 1RM with BFR cuffs ,Frequency: 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks. Each session comprises a 10-min warmup with static cycling, a 30-min exercise program, and a 15-min cool down. BFR cuff from Hhccteo company will be used. The parameters will be pressure: 130-150 mmHg, cuff width 5-7 cm. Progressive overload will be applied by gradually increasing repetitions or load as tolerated | Other | Continuous blood flow training |
Primary outcome
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks (post intervention), 12 weeks (follow up)
Quadriceps strength will be assessed using standardized isometric testing procedure. It grades muscle strength on a 0-5 scale based on the ability to move a joint against gravity and external resistance. A grade of 0 indicates no visible or palpable muscle contraction, while 1 (Trace) represents a slight contraction without actual movement. Grade 2 (Poor) describes the ability to move the joint through its full range only when gravity is eliminated, whereas Grade 3 (Fair) allows movement through the full range against gravity but without resistance. Grade 4 (Good) indicates movement against moderate resistance, and Grade 5 (Normal) reflects full range of motion against maximal resistance, representing normal muscle strength
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks (post intervention), 12 weeks( followup)
The NPRS is a10-point scale (0-10) used to quantify pain intensity. Pain severity will be interpreted as no pain (0), mild pain (1-3), moderate pain (4-6), and severe pain (7-10).
Modified Borg Scale
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks( post intervention), 12 weeks (follow up)
It is used to assess ratings of exercise-related perceived exertion. The scale ranges from (0 to 10), where 0 means no breathlessness at all and 10 means maximium breathlessness. According to this, 0-2 for Minimal exertion, 3-4 for Moderate (often target for rehab), 5-6 for Hard and 7-10 is for Very hard to maximal
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 31629764Freitas EDS, Miller RM, Heishman AD, Aniceto RR, Silva JGC, Bemben MG. Perceptual responses to continuous versus intermittent blood flow restriction exercise: A randomized controlled trial. Physiol Behav. 2019 Dec 1;212:112717. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112717. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
- Background: PubMed 30795545Harper SA, Roberts LM, Layne AS, Jaeger BC, Gardner AK, Sibille KT, Wu SS, Vincent KR, Fillingim RB, Manini TM, Buford TW. Blood-Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise for Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 21;8(2):265. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020265.
- Background: PubMed 38096198Sorensen B, Aagaard P, Hjortshoj MH, Hansen SK, Suetta C, Couppe C, Magnusson SP, Johannsen FE. Physiological and clinical effects of low-intensity blood-flow restricted resistance exercise compared to standard rehabilitation in adults with knee osteoarthritis-Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0295666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295666. eCollection 2023.
- Background: PubMed 30306467Centner C, Wiegel P, Gollhofer A, Konig D. Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy in Older Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2019 Jan;49(1):95-108. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0994-1.
- Background: PubMed 28259850Hughes L, Paton B, Rosenblatt B, Gissane C, Patterson SD. Blood flow restriction training in clinical musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;51(13):1003-1011. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097071. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthristis
Recruiting
Outpatient Physiotherapy vs. mHealth Exercise and Self-Management for Knee Osteoarthritis (MOKneeTOR)
Knee Osteoarthristis
Recruiting
Aquatic Exercise in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
Central Sensitization, Knee Osteoarthristis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Validation of SMARTDIAGO for Remote Functional Assessment of Musculoskeletal Conditions
Knee Osteoarthristis, Hip Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of TrHCROSS® for Different Joints
Joint Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthristis
Recruiting
Treatment of Post Traumatic Knee Osteoarthritis With Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy
Knee Osteoarthristis, ACL Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intermittent blood flow training (iBFR) and Continuous blood flow training (cBFR) in people with Knee Osteoarthristis, run by Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) (time frame: baseline, 6 weeks (post intervention), 12 weeks (follow up)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07722975, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.