AzTrials
AzTrials

Pseudophakic Macular EdemaNCT07723846

Diabetic Nephropathy, Glycemic Control and Pseudophakic Macular Edema After Cataract Surgery

An observational study of Pseudophakic Macular Edema and Diabetic Nephropathies, run by Thammasat University Hospital at 1 site in Thailand.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This retrospective cohort study examines whether the kidney complications of diabetes (diabetic nephropathy) and blood-sugar control before surgery help predict swelling of the central retina, called pseudophakic macular edema (PME), after cataract surgery in people with type 2 diabetes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Phacoemulsification with posterior-chamber IOL
How many people
428 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
1 Jun 2026to 1 Nov 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with posterior-chamber intraocular lens implantation in the in-patient and out-patient services of the Department of Ophthalmology, Thammasat University Hospital, during the study window, and who have a preoperative HbA1c, a preoperative renal function assessment (eGFR and/or UACR), and baseline and postoperative macular OCT documented in the electronic medical record.

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus at the time of surgery
  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with posterior-chamber IOL implantation at TUH during the study period
  • Preoperative HbA1c documented within 3 months before surgery
  • Preoperative renal function within 6 months before surgery: serum creatinine (for CKD-EPI 2021 eGFR) and/or spot urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR)
  • Baseline spectral-domain macular OCT within 1 month before surgery
  • Postoperative OCT available at both 1 month and 3 months after surgery
  • Minimum 3 months of postoperative follow-up documented

Who cannot join

  • Pre-existing macular disease (age-related macular degeneration, epiretinal membrane, macular hole, central serous chorioretinopathy, or clinically significant diabetic macular edema at the time of surgery)
  • Intraoperative complication (posterior-capsule rupture, vitreous loss, zonulolysis, or dropped nucleus)
  • Prior intraocular surgery in the study eye (vitrectomy, glaucoma surgery, or previous cataract surgery)
  • Prior intravitreal injection before cataract surgery
  • Prior posterior-segment or macular laser photocoagulation within 6 months before surgery
  • Uveitis, retinal vein occlusion, retinal detachment, or any non-diabetic retinal pathology
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Prostaglandin-analogue use at the time of surgery
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus (may be examined in a sensitivity analysis)
  • Insufficient data (missing HbA1c, renal function, or postoperative OCT)
  • Bilateral simultaneous surgery (only the first operated eye is included if surgery is sequential)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thailand1 site
  • Thammasat University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology

    Pathum Thani, Khlong Luang, 12120

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Baseline Diabetic Nephropathy and Preoperative Glycemic Control on the Incidence of Pseudophakic Macular Edema Following Phacoemulsification A Retrospective Cohort Study With ROC-Optimized HbA1c Threshold Analysis.

This retrospective cohort study examines whether the kidney complications of diabetes (diabetic nephropathy) and blood-sugar control before surgery help predict swelling of the central retina, called pseudophakic macular edema (PME), after cataract surgery in people with type 2 diabetes.

PME is a common cause of blurred vision after otherwise successful cataract surgery, and people with diabetes are at higher risk. Doctors currently estimate this risk mainly from the HbA1c blood-sugar level and the stage of diabetic eye disease (retinopathy). It is not yet known whether diabetic kidney disease, measured by the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and estimated kidney function (eGFR), adds independent information about who will develop PME.

Read more

Using medical records already collected during routine care at Thammasat University Hospital, the investigators will measure central retinal thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans before uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery with a lens implant, and again 1 and 3 months afterward. PME is defined as at least a 30% increase in central macular thickness. Patients with and without baseline diabetic nephropathy will be compared, and statistical modeling will identify the best preoperative HbA1c threshold for predicting PME.

The results are intended to improve preoperative risk counseling and to help identify diabetic patients who may need closer monitoring after cataract surgery. Because only existing records are used, the study involves no additional visits, tests, or risks for patients.

Read the detailed description

Background and rationale:

Pseudophakic macular edema (PME) is a leading cause of suboptimal visual recovery after otherwise uncomplicated cataract surgery, and diabetes mellitus is an established risk factor. Preoperative risk assessment currently relies mainly on glycemic control (HbA1c) and diabetic retinopathy stage. Diabetic nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy share a common microvascular pathophysiology, yet it has not been established whether baseline diabetic nephropathy carries information about PME risk independently of retinopathy stage and HbA1c. The HbA1c threshold of 7% widely cited in clinical practice also derives from receiver operating characteristic analysis that was not stratified by renal status.

Objectives:

The study tests whether preoperative HbA1c and baseline diabetic nephropathy severity are independent predictors of PME after uncomplicated phacoemulsification in patients with type 2 diabetes, and derives an optimized preoperative HbA1c cut-point for PME prediction, stratified by nephropathy status.

Setting and data sources:

The study is conducted at Thammasat University Hospital, a tertiary academic centre in Pathum Thani, Thailand. Data are abstracted from the hospital electronic medical record, the laboratory information system, the operative-procedure database, and archived spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations. Cohort entry (T = 0) is the date of cataract surgery. The surgical window is January 2020 to December 2025, with a pre-specified extension back to January 2018 if the target sample is not reached. Because the analysis uses pre-existing clinical records only, there is no patient contact, no additional visit or investigation, and no assigned intervention.

Measurement of the exposure:

Renal status is classified using the KDIGO 2022 framework from the preoperative spot urine albumin-creatinine ratio and the estimated glomerular filtration rate, with eGFR calculated by the CKD-EPI 2021 creatinine equation. Diabetic retinopathy severity is recorded using the ETDRS classification and lens hardness using the LOCS III nuclear opalescence grade.

Measurement of the outcome:

Central macular thickness is measured on Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering) or Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec) using the manufacturer's automated macular mapping protocol (macular cube 512 x 128 or an equivalent high-density raster scan), and the device is recorded for each patient. Scans are graded independently by two ophthalmologists masked to clinical and laboratory data. Inter-rater reliability is quantified by the intraclass correlation coefficient, and disagreements are resolved by a senior retinal specialist. Scans of inadequate quality (signal strength below the manufacturer threshold, segmentation failure, or motion artifact) are withdrawn from analysis and logged.

Data quality control:

Data are captured on a standardized electronic case report form with an accompanying data dictionary, implemented in REDCap with range checks, field-type validation, and logic checks. A second investigator verifies abstracted values against the source record: 100% verification of the first 20 to 30 records to confirm process stability, then random audit of at least 15% of records for the remainder of the study. Discrepancies are resolved by joint review, with the principal investigator adjudicating any that remain unresolved.

Sample size justification:

The target enrollment was derived from a two-proportion z-test for unequal allocation (2:1 unexposed to exposed), assuming PME incidence of 5% in unexposed and 15% in exposed eyes, a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and 80% power, with a 15% allowance for incomplete or unusable records. The resulting target provides at least 10 events per candidate predictor for the multivariable model.

Statistical analysis:

Continuous variables are summarized as mean with standard deviation or median with interquartile range according to normality (Shapiro-Wilk test and Q-Q plots), and categorical variables as frequency and percentage. The primary analysis is multivariable logistic regression with PME as the dependent variable. HbA1c, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, eGFR, diabetic retinopathy stage, diabetes duration, and insulin use are forced into the model a priori; other variables are screened univariably at p < 0.20; and the model is refined by backward elimination with likelihood-ratio testing. Results are reported as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, model fit is assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and Nagelkerke R-squared, and multicollinearity by the variance inflation factor. Receiver operating characteristic analysis with the Youden index identifies the optimal preoperative HbA1c cut-point in the whole cohort and separately in the nephropathy and non-nephropathy subgroups; areas under the curve are estimated with 95% confidence intervals by the DeLong method and compared between subgroups using the DeLong test for correlated curves. Pre-specified subgroup analyses are by KDIGO albuminuria category (A1, A2, A3) and eGFR stage (G1 to G2 versus G3 to G5). Sensitivity analyses exclude eyes with severe non-proliferative or proliferative retinopathy, apply the alternative Level 2 threshold for central macular thickness increase, and test an HbA1c by nephropathy status interaction term. Missing-data patterns are assessed with Little's MCAR test; multiple imputation by chained equations (20 imputations) is applied to variables with less than 30% missing data, variables with more than 30% missing are excluded from the primary analysis, and complete-case analysis is reported as a sensitivity analysis. Analyses use SPSS v28.0, R v4.3 or later (pROC and mice packages), and MedCalc v23 or later, with two-sided p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Reporting:

The study is reported in accordance with the STROBE statement for observational studies and the TRIPOD statement for multivariable prediction-model studies.

Being tested
Phacoemulsification with posterior-chamber IOL
Keywords
pseudophakic macular edema, diabetic nephropathy, phacoemulsification, HbA1c, central macular thickness, optical coherence tomography, UACR, eGFR, KDIGO, cataract surgery
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Nephropathies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Cataract

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Phacoemulsification with posterior-chamber IOLOther

    Uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery with posterior-chamber intraocular lens implantation. The observed exposure of interest is baseline diabetic nephropathy and preoperative glycemic status (used to define the two cohorts).

Study groups in NCT07723846
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
No baseline nephropathy (unexposed)Patients with type 2 diabetes without baseline diabetic nephropathy (UACR <30 mg/g and eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²) and with well-controlled glycemia (HbA1c ≤7%) at the time of phacoemulsification.
Receives: Other: Phacoemulsification with posterior-chamber IOL
Baseline nephropathy and/or elevated HbA1c (exposed)Patients with type 2 diabetes who have baseline diabetic nephropathy (UACR ≥30 mg/g and/or eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) and/or elevated preoperative HbA1c (>7%) at the time of phacoemulsification.
Receives: Other: Phacoemulsification with posterior-chamber IOL

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of pseudophakic macular edema (PME)

    Proportion of operated eyes with a ≥30% increase in optical coherence tomography (OCT)-measured central macular thickness (central 1-mm subfield, ETDRS grid) from preoperative baseline, on spectral-domain OCT, graded by two masked ophthalmologists.

    Measured: 1 month and 3 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Absolute change in central macular thickness (CMT)

    Change in OCT central macular thickness (µm) from baseline. Time Frame: 1 month and 3 months.

    Measured: 1 month and 3 months.

  2. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)

    BCVA in logMAR.

    Measured: 1 month and 3 months.

  3. Time to Pseudophakic Macular Edema (PME) onset

    Time from surgery to first detection of PME (weeks).

    Measured: up to 3 months.

  4. PME resolution rate

    Proportion of eyes with PME resolution among those who developed PME.

    Measured: 3 months.

  5. ROC-derived optimal preoperative HbA1c cut-point

    Optimal HbA1c threshold for predicting PME (AUC, sensitivity, specificity, Youden index), stratified by nephropathy status.

    Measured: at analysis (baseline predictor vs 3-month outcome).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jul 2026
  2. Study start1 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
428 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07723846
Sponsor's protocol ID
MTU-EC-OP-0-188/69
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
19 Jul 2026
Last updated
31 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pseudophakic Macular Edema and Diabetic Nephropathies, run by Thammasat University Hospital at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of pseudophakic macular edema (PME) (time frame: 1 month and 3 months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in