Postural BalanceNCT-DANCENCT07730710
The Effect of Neuromotor-Cognitive Training on Performance Dancers
A study testing Neuromotor-Cognitive Training in people with Postural Balance and Reaction Time, run by Yeditepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This prospective randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effects of neuromotor-cognitive training on dynamic balance, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance in performance dancers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Postural Balance, Reaction Time, Sensorimotor Performance
- What is being tested?
- Neuromotor-Cognitive Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2026to 30 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Being a professional or performance dancer actively training at the Aytunç Bentürk Dance Academy.
- Being between 18 and 25 years of age.
- Volunteering to participate in the study and providing written informed consent.
- Having no orthopedic, neurological, or systemic injuries in the lower extremities within the last 6 months that could affect balance and motor performance.
Who cannot join
- Having a history of major orthopedic surgery in the lower extremities.
- Any uncorrected visual or vestibular impairments that could negatively affect reaction time or postural control.
- Acute musculoskeletal pain or injury during the baseline assessment period.
- Failure to complete the baseline measurements or formal training sessions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Yeditepe University Faculty of Health Sciences
Istanbul, İ̇stanbul, 34755
Aslı Yeral, 0537 965 8494, asli.yeral@yeditepe.edu.tr
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Neuromotor-Cognitive Training on Dynamic Balance, Reaction Time and Sensorimotor Performance in Performance Dancers
This prospective randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effects of neuromotor-cognitive training on dynamic balance, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance in performance dancers.
The main hypotheses are:
H0: There is no difference in dynamic balance, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance between performance dancers who receive neuromotor-cognitive training and those who follow their routine training schedule.
H1: Performance dancers who receive neuromotor-cognitive training show significant improvements in dynamic balance, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance compared to those who follow their routine training schedule.
Read the detailed description
Performance dancers from the Aytunç Bentürk Dance Academy who meet the eligibility criteria will be included in this prospective randomized controlled study to demonstrate the efficacy of technology-supported training methods. Participants will be randomly allocated into two distinct groups using a standardized allocation protocol: the Neuromotor-Cognitive Training Group (Experimental Arm) and the Routine Training Group (Control Arm).
The Neuromotor-Cognitive Training Group will undergo a structured, technology-supported training protocol incorporating visual stimulus systems to enhance neuromuscular control and cognitive processing speed. The Control Group will maintain their regular and routine dance practice routines during the study period without any additional structured experimental protocols.
Prior to the commencement of the intervention, all participants will be fully informed about the study procedures, and their formal consent will be obtained. Socio-demographic characteristics and baseline professional dance history will be documented using a structured evaluation form.
Objective pre- and post-test assessments will be conducted for both groups to evaluate sensorimotor adaptation. Dynamic balance, designated as the primary outcome measure, will be evaluated using the standardized Y-Balance Test. Secondary outcome measures, including objective reaction time and neuromuscular performance under cognitive load, will be rigorously quantified in milliseconds utilizing the BLAZEPOD® visual stimulus system along with the Reactive Jumping and Landing Test. All final measurements will be statistically analyzed using correlation and inter-rater reliability metrics to determine inter-group differences.
- Being tested
- Neuromotor-Cognitive Training
- Keywords
- Performance Dancers, Neuromotor-Cognitive Training, Dynamic Balance, Visual Stimulus Systems, Cognitive Load, Y-Balance Test, Reactive Agility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Neuromotor-Cognitive TrainingBehavioural
A structured, technology-supported training protocol incorporating visual stimulus systems to enhance neuromuscular control, dynamic balance, and cognitive processing speed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neuromotor-Cognitive Training Group | Experimental | This group will receive a structured, technology-supported training protocol incorporating visual stimulus systems (such as BLAZEPOD®) alongside their routine training schedule to enhance neuromuscular control, dynamic balance, and cognitive processing speed. Receives: Behavioral: Neuromotor-Cognitive Training |
| Routine Training Group | No intervention | This group will maintain their regular and routine dance practice schedules at the academy during the study period, without receiving any additional technology-supported neuromotor-cognitive training protocols. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Y-Balance Test (YBT)
The Y-Balance Test will be used as the primary outcome measure to objectively evaluate the dynamic balance and postural control of the performance dancers. Participants will perform maximal reach tasks in three distinct directions: anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral, while standing on a single limb. The reach distances will be normalized to the participant's leg length, and a comprehensive composite score will be calculated. Higher composite scores represent superior dynamic balance and enhanced neuromuscular control.
Measured: The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
Secondary outcomes (2)
Reactive Jumping and Landing Test
This test will be implemented to assess sensorimotor performance and dynamic neuromuscular control during high-intensity functional movements. Dancers will perform jump-landing sequences in response to sudden, dynamic visual cues that change in real-time. The test quantifies movement execution and lower extremity coordination under cognitive load, providing critical metrics for sensorimotor adaptation and injury risk screening in performance dancers.
Measured: The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
Y-Shaped Reactive Agility Test
This test will be used to evaluate the reactive agility and rapid directional change performance of the dancers under visual cognitive load. Participants will accelerate toward a central point and execute a sudden change of direction (left or right) based on a randomized visual stimulus. The total completion time of the trial will be recorded using an electronic timing system. Shorter completion times indicate superior reactive agility and faster neuromuscular processing.
Measured: The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jul 2026
- Study start10 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion27 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Aug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postural BalanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yeditepe University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07730710
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- yeditepe05
- Acronym
- NCT-DANCE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ortiz A, Olson S, Libby CL, Kwon YH, Trudelle-Jackson E. Kinematic and kinetic reliability of two jumping and landing physical performance tasks in young adult women. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007 May;2(2):104-12.
PubMed 21522208Sheppard JM, Young WB, Doyle TL, Sheppard TA, Newton RU. An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to sprint speed and change of direction speed. J Sci Med Sport. 2006 Aug;9(4):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.019. Epub 2006 Jul 17.
PubMed 16844413Westrick RB, Miller JM, Carow SD, Gerber JP. Exploration of the y-balance test for assessment of upper quarter closed kinetic chain performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;7(2):139-47.
PubMed 22530188Mancini N, Mancini S, Ferrantino M, Moscatelli F, Messina G, Monda M, Ruberto M, Vasco P, Casella C, Colecchia FP, Messina A, Polito R. Effects of a Proprioceptive Training Program on Dynamic Balance and Neuromotor Performance in Adolescent Latin American Dancers. Sports (Basel). 2025 Nov 4;13(11):388. doi: 10.3390/sports13110388.
PubMed 41295771Marchant DC. Attentional focusing instructions and force production. Front Psychol. 2011 Jan 26;1:210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00210. eCollection 2010.
PubMed 21833266Peh SY, Chow JY, Davids K. Focus of attention and its impact on movement behaviour. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Jan;14(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
PubMed 20727824Veale JP, Pearce AJ, Carlson JS. Reliability and validity of a reactive agility test for Australian football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010 Jun;5(2):239-48. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.5.2.239.
PubMed 20625196Muelas Perez R, Sabido Solana R, Barbado Murillo D, Moreno Hernandez FJ. Visual availability, balance performance and movement complexity in dancers. Gait Posture. 2014 Sep;40(4):556-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
PubMed 25086798Badau A. Identifying the Qualities of Attention and the Attentional Style in Indoor Team Sports: A Gender Comparison. Brain Sci. 2024 Jun 21;14(7):623. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070623.
PubMed 39061364Nam SM, Park JW, Ko JH, Kim MJ. The Difference Between Expert Dancers' and Non-Dancers Tapping Timing With and Without an Auditory Stimulus at a Slow Tempo. Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Aug;131(4):1398-1414. doi: 10.1177/00315125241262547. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
PubMed 38876089Huang HJ, Mercer VS. Dual-task methodology: applications in studies of cognitive and motor performance in adults and children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2001 Fall;13(3):133-40.
PubMed 17053670Skoe E, Krizman J, Anderson S, Kraus N. Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Jun;25(6):1415-26. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht311. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
PubMed 24366906Kuczynski M, Szymanska M, Biec E. Dual-task effect on postural control in high-level competitive dancers. J Sports Sci. 2011 Mar;29(5):539-45. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.544046.
PubMed 21294035Nigmatullina Y, Hellyer PJ, Nachev P, Sharp DJ, Seemungal BM. The neuroanatomical correlates of training-related perceptuo-reflex uncoupling in dancers. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Feb;25(2):554-62. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht266. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
PubMed 24072889Golomer E, Cremieux J, Dupui P, Isableu B, Ohlmann T. Visual contribution to self-induced body sway frequencies and visual perception of male professional dancers. Neurosci Lett. 1999 Jun 4;267(3):189-92. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00356-0.
PubMed 10381008
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Neuromotor-Cognitive Training on Dynamic Balance, Reaction Time and Sensorimotor Performance in Performance Dancers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07730710
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NCT-DANCE / yeditepe05
- Keywords
- Performance Dancers, Neuromotor-Cognitive Training, Dynamic Balance, Visual Stimulus Systems, Cognitive Load, Y-Balance Test, Reactive Agility
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Yeditepe UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effects of neuromotor-cognitive training on dynamic balance, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance in performance dancers.
The main hypotheses are:
H0: There is no difference in dynamic balance, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance between performance dancers who receive neuromotor-cognitive training and those who follow their routine training schedule.
H1: Performance dancers who receive neuromotor-cognitive training show significant improvements in dynamic balance, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance compared to those who follow their routine training schedule.
Detailed description
Performance dancers from the Aytunç Bentürk Dance Academy who meet the eligibility criteria will be included in this prospective randomized controlled study to demonstrate the efficacy of technology-supported training methods. Participants will be randomly allocated into two distinct groups using a standardized allocation protocol: the Neuromotor-Cognitive Training Group (Experimental Arm) and the Routine Training Group (Control Arm).
The Neuromotor-Cognitive Training Group will undergo a structured, technology-supported training protocol incorporating visual stimulus systems to enhance neuromuscular control and cognitive processing speed. The Control Group will maintain their regular and routine dance practice routines during the study period without any additional structured experimental protocols.
Prior to the commencement of the intervention, all participants will be fully informed about the study procedures, and their formal consent will be obtained. Socio-demographic characteristics and baseline professional dance history will be documented using a structured evaluation form.
Objective pre- and post-test assessments will be conducted for both groups to evaluate sensorimotor adaptation. Dynamic balance, designated as the primary outcome measure, will be evaluated using the standardized Y-Balance Test. Secondary outcome measures, including objective reaction time and neuromuscular performance under cognitive load, will be rigorously quantified in milliseconds utilizing the BLAZEPOD® visual stimulus system along with the Reactive Jumping and Landing Test. All final measurements will be statistically analyzed using correlation and inter-rater reliability metrics to determine inter-group differences.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neuromotor-Cognitive Training Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Neuromotor-Cognitive TrainingThis group will receive a structured, technology-supported training protocol incorporating visual stimulus systems (such as BLAZEPOD®) alongside their routine training schedule to enhance neuromuscular control, dynamic balance, and cognitive processing speed. |
| Routine Training Group | No intervention | –This group will maintain their regular and routine dance practice schedules at the academy during the study period, without receiving any additional technology-supported neuromotor-cognitive training protocols. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Being a professional or performance dancer actively training at the Aytunç Bentürk Dance Academy.
- Being between 18 and 25 years of age.
- Volunteering to participate in the study and providing written informed consent.
- Having no orthopedic, neurological, or systemic injuries in the lower extremities within the last 6 months that could affect balance and motor performance.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Having a history of major orthopedic surgery in the lower extremities.
- Any uncorrected visual or vestibular impairments that could negatively affect reaction time or postural control.
- Acute musculoskeletal pain or injury during the baseline assessment period.
- Failure to complete the baseline measurements or formal training sessions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neuromotor-Cognitive TrainingA structured, technology-supported training protocol incorporating visual stimulus systems to enhance neuromuscular control, dynamic balance, and cognitive processing speed. | Behavioural | Neuromotor-Cognitive Training Group |
Primary outcome
Y-Balance Test (YBT)
Time frame: The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
The Y-Balance Test will be used as the primary outcome measure to objectively evaluate the dynamic balance and postural control of the performance dancers. Participants will perform maximal reach tasks in three distinct directions: anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral, while standing on a single limb. The reach distances will be normalized to the participant's leg length, and a comprehensive composite score will be calculated. Higher composite scores represent superior dynamic balance and enhanced neuromuscular control.
2 secondary outcomes
Reactive Jumping and Landing Test
Time frame: The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
Y-Shaped Reactive Agility Test
Time frame: The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 21522208Ortiz A, Olson S, Libby CL, Kwon YH, Trudelle-Jackson E. Kinematic and kinetic reliability of two jumping and landing physical performance tasks in young adult women. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007 May;2(2):104-12.
- Background: PubMed 16844413Sheppard JM, Young WB, Doyle TL, Sheppard TA, Newton RU. An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to sprint speed and change of direction speed. J Sci Med Sport. 2006 Aug;9(4):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.019. Epub 2006 Jul 17.
- Background: PubMed 22530188Westrick RB, Miller JM, Carow SD, Gerber JP. Exploration of the y-balance test for assessment of upper quarter closed kinetic chain performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;7(2):139-47.
- Background: PubMed 41295771Mancini N, Mancini S, Ferrantino M, Moscatelli F, Messina G, Monda M, Ruberto M, Vasco P, Casella C, Colecchia FP, Messina A, Polito R. Effects of a Proprioceptive Training Program on Dynamic Balance and Neuromotor Performance in Adolescent Latin American Dancers. Sports (Basel). 2025 Nov 4;13(11):388. doi: 10.3390/sports13110388.
- Background: PubMed 21833266Marchant DC. Attentional focusing instructions and force production. Front Psychol. 2011 Jan 26;1:210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00210. eCollection 2010.
- Background: PubMed 20727824Peh SY, Chow JY, Davids K. Focus of attention and its impact on movement behaviour. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Jan;14(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 20625196Veale JP, Pearce AJ, Carlson JS. Reliability and validity of a reactive agility test for Australian football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010 Jun;5(2):239-48. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.5.2.239.
- Background: PubMed 25086798Muelas Perez R, Sabido Solana R, Barbado Murillo D, Moreno Hernandez FJ. Visual availability, balance performance and movement complexity in dancers. Gait Posture. 2014 Sep;40(4):556-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
- Background: PubMed 39061364Badau A. Identifying the Qualities of Attention and the Attentional Style in Indoor Team Sports: A Gender Comparison. Brain Sci. 2024 Jun 21;14(7):623. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070623.
- Background: PubMed 38876089Nam SM, Park JW, Ko JH, Kim MJ. The Difference Between Expert Dancers' and Non-Dancers Tapping Timing With and Without an Auditory Stimulus at a Slow Tempo. Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Aug;131(4):1398-1414. doi: 10.1177/00315125241262547. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
- Background: PubMed 17053670Huang HJ, Mercer VS. Dual-task methodology: applications in studies of cognitive and motor performance in adults and children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2001 Fall;13(3):133-40.
- Background: PubMed 24366906Skoe E, Krizman J, Anderson S, Kraus N. Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Jun;25(6):1415-26. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht311. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Postural Balance
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
Not yet recruiting
A Comparison of the Effects of Exercise Methods for Adolescent Hyperkyphosis on the Sensorimotor System
Kyphosis Postural Thoracic, Kyphosis
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effects of Exercises on Reactive Balance and Fall Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
COMMUNITY-DWELLING OLDER ADULTS
Recruiting
Effects of Custom 3D Printed Insoles and Short Foot Exercises in Pes Planus
Pes Planus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Neuromotor-Cognitive Training in people with Postural Balance and Reaction Time, run by Yeditepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aslı Yeral, Asst. Prof. Dr (0537 965 8494, asli.yeral@yeditepe.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Y-Balance Test (YBT) (time frame: The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07730710, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2026.