AzTrials
AzTrials

Aging DisorderBVE-HAPINCT07734246

Healthy Aging Together - "Getting to Know You Better": Healthy Aging and Predictive Indicator

A study testing Health assessment in people with Aging Disorder, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A key challenge lies in preventing the loss of autonomy and promoting healthy aging-a concept now widely addressed through multidimensional and multidisciplinary approaches, as evidenced by frailty models, comprehensive geriatric assessment practices, and the WHO's "intrinsic capacity" model. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Aging Disorder
What is being tested?
Health assessment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
500 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2026to Mar 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 55 years or older
  • Affiliation with or beneficiary of a social security scheme
  • No objection to the study

Who cannot join

  • Persons protected by law, under guardianship or curatorship,
  • Persons deprived of liberty

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Olivier GUERIN, PROFESSOR contact

+33492034194

guerin.o@chu-nice.fr

About this study

A key challenge lies in preventing the loss of autonomy and promoting healthy aging-a concept now widely addressed through multidimensional and multidisciplinary approaches, as evidenced by frailty models, comprehensive geriatric assessment practices, and the WHO's "intrinsic capacity" model. That said, there is a need to assess in greater detail the extent to which individual factors contribute to health trajectories and to move further by adopting a systemic approach that examines not only the relationships between variables but also their complex interactions. The aim of this study is to identify the multidimensional determinants (medical, physical, nutritional, sensory, psycho-cognitive, psychosocial, and socioeconomic) associated with the autonomy and quality of life of older adults and those who are aging.

Conditions
Aging Disorder
Being tested
Health assessment
Keywords
healthy aging, autonomy, geriatric

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Health assessmentOther

    Questionnaires and tests on health behaviors and health

Study groups in NCT07734246
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Assessed groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Health assessment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. assessment of Autonomy

    Autonomy is assessed using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale of Lawton.

    The scale comprises 8 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 8, with a higher score being better.

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Quality of life

    Quality of life is assessed using the EuroQol at 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire.

    The scale comprises 5 items. Each item is scored from 1 "no problem" to 3 "severe problem". The total score ranges from 5 to 15 with higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

  2. Daily Physical activity Practice (physical behavioral lifestyle measure

    Daily Physical activity Practice is assessed using the Marshall questionnaire comprising 2 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 8. A higher score means a higher level of physical activity. The cut of 4 correspond to "sufficiently active".

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

  3. Sarcopenia (physical measure)

    Sarcopenia is assessed using the SARC-F questionnaire comprising 5 items assessing force, walk difficulties, stand up capacities, climb stairs capacities and fall. Each item is scored from 0 to 2. The total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher score indicating a worse outcome

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

  4. Physical functional force (physical measure)

    Physical functional force is assessed using the 5 sit-to-stand test wich consists of asking the participant to stand up and sit down from a chair 5 times as quickly as possible. The outcome is the time taken to complete the test, and the unit of measurement is seconds.

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

  5. Eating habits (nutritional behavioral lifestyle measure

    Eating habits is assessed using items from the Senior in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition (SCREEN) questionnaire. Higher score indicated better eating habits.

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

  6. Body Mass Index (nutritional measure)

    Body Mass Index corresponds to corresponds to weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared. The unit is kg/m2.

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

  7. Subjective cognitive complaint (cognitive measure)

    Subjective cognitive complaint is assessed using items from the ICOPE cohort, regarding the presence and worsening (yes/no) of memory and orientation problems

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

  8. Working memory (cognitive measure)

    Working memory is assessed using a visual test consisting of remembering the order in which targets are illuminated. More recalls correspond to a better score.

    Measured: : at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

  9. Psychological quality (psychological measure)

    Psychological quality is assessed using items from the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Spirituality, Religiousness and Personal Beliefs (WHOQOL-SRPB) questionnaire. Each item is scored from 1 to 5. Higher score is better.

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

  10. Locus of Control (psycho-social measure)

    : Locus of Control is assessed using items from the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale. It is a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire helps to see if the person thinks that their health depends mainly on their own behavior, that it is perceived as being linked to chance, or that it depends mainly on professionals.

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jul 2026
  2. Study startNov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionNov 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07734246
Sponsor's protocol ID
25-PP-30
Acronym
BVE-HAPI
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
24 Jul 2026
Last updated
29 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Health assessment in people with Aging Disorder, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Olivier GUERIN, PROFESSOR (+33492034194, guerin.o@chu-nice.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

assessment of Autonomy (time frame: at baseline, 6 months later and 12 months later). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in