AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT07737431

Closed-loop Sensorimotor Integrated (CSMI) Control in Exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) for Precise Wrist-hand Rehabilitation After Stroke

A study testing EMG-Driven ENMS in people with Stroke, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether using both brain and muscle signals to control a wrist-hand rehabilitation robot can improve recovery in people with chronic stroke. A total of 48 participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
EMG-Driven ENMS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
1 Jan 2025to 31 Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • at least 6 months after the onset of a unilateral lesion due to stroke;
  • moderate to severe motor disability in the paretic wrist-hand joints (6<Fugl-Meyer Wrist-Hand Assessment (FMAWH)<14) and spasticity in wrist-hand (Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) ≤3);
  • sensory impairment on their affected forearm with a score of 1 measured by the sensation part of light touch in the FMA;
  • maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) with detectable EMG (3 times of the standard deviation above the resting EMG baseline) in the muscle union of the flexor digitorum and flexor carpi radialis (FD-FCR) and that of the extensor digitorum and extensor carpi ulnaris (ED-ECU);
  • sufficient cognition to follow experimental instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination score >21);
  • aged from 30 to 70 years.

Who cannot join

  • currently pregnant;
  • dysphasia (language deficiency);
  • skull implantation;
  • post-stroke neglect;
  • pacemaker implantation;
  • involved in drug studies, other clinical trials, or concurrent medication/occupational/physical treatments on the upper limb;
  • the overall medical condition not suitable for the training (e.g., severe cardiac problem, unstable blood pressure, etc.).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Hong Kong1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    Hung Hom, Kowloon

    Xiaoling Hu, Phd, 852 3400 3206, mailxiaoling.hu@polyu.edu.hk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether using both brain and muscle signals to control a wrist-hand rehabilitation robot can improve recovery in people with chronic stroke.

A total of 48 participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive 20 sessions of wrist-hand rehabilitation using an exoneuromusculoskeleton rehabilitation robot.

Read more

In the closed-loop sensorimotor integrated group, the system will use information from both brain-muscle coordination and muscle activity to recognize the participant's movement intention and provide electrical stimulation and robotic assistance. In the electromyography-driven group, the system will use muscle activity alone to control the electrical stimulation and robotic assistance.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Does control using both brain and muscle signals improve wrist and hand motor function more than control using muscle signals alone? Does this approach produce greater changes in coordination between the brain and muscles? Participants will complete motor-function and brain-muscle assessments before training, immediately after the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after training.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
CSMI-Controlled ENMS, EMG-Driven ENMS
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CSMI-Controlled ENMSDevice

    The exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) provides neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance for wrist-hand rehabilitation. In the CSMI-controlled intervention, corticomuscular coherence and electromyographic signals are jointly used to identify voluntary movement intention and trigger assistance. Participants will receive 20 training sessions.

  • EMG-Driven ENMSDevice

    The exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) provides neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance for wrist-hand rehabilitation. In the EMG-driven intervention, electromyographic activity alone is used to identify voluntary movement intention and trigger assistance. Participants will receive 20 training sessions.

Study groups in NCT07737431
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Closed-Loop Sensorimotor Integrated GroupExperimentalParticipants will receive 20 sessions of wrist-hand rehabilitation using an exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS). In this group, corticomuscular coherence (CMC) and electromyographic (EMG) signals will be used together to identify voluntary movement intention and control neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance during wrist and hand movements.
Receives: Device: CSMI-Controlled ENMS
EMG-Driven GroupActive comparatorParticipants will receive 20 sessions of wrist-hand rehabilitation using the same exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS). In this group, electromyographic (EMG) activity alone will be used to identify voluntary movement intention and control neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance during wrist and hand movements.
Receives: Device: EMG-Driven ENMS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment Wrist/Hand Subscale (FMA-WH) Score

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Wrist and Hand Subscore (FMA-WH) evaluates motor impairment of the paretic wrist and hand after stroke. The score ranges from 0 to 24, including a maximum of 10 points for wrist function and 14 points for hand function. Higher scores indicate better wrist-hand motor function.

    Measured: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Finger Spasticity Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluates resistance to passive movement as an indicator of muscle tone and spasticity at the fingers. Possible grades are 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4, with a minimum grade of 0 and a maximum grade of 4. Higher grades indicate greater resistance to passive movement and more severe spasticity.

    Measured: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training

  2. Wrist Spasticity Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluates resistance to passive movement as an indicator of muscle tone and spasticity at the fingers. Possible grades are 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4, with a minimum grade of 0 and a maximum grade of 4. Higher grades indicate greater resistance to passive movement and more severe spasticity.

    Measured: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training

  3. Elbow Spasticity Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluates resistance to passive movement as an indicator of muscle tone and spasticity at the fingers. Possible grades are 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4, with a minimum grade of 0 and a maximum grade of 4. Higher grades indicate greater resistance to passive movement and more severe spasticity.

    Measured: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training

  4. Fugl-Meyer Assessment Shoulder/Elbow Subscale Score

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Shoulder/Elbow Subscore evaluates proximal upper-extremity motor impairment, including movements of the shoulder, elbow, and forearm. The score ranges from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate better proximal upper-extremity motor function.

    Measured: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training

  5. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score

    The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) evaluates upper-extremity activity performance through 19 items covering grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. The total score ranges from 0 to 57. Higher scores indicate better upper-extremity activity performance.

    Measured: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jul 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
48 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07737431
Sponsor's protocol ID
GRF15218324
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
27 Jul 2026
Last updated
3 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EMG-Driven ENMS in people with Stroke, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Xiaoling Hu, Phd (852 3400 3206, xiaoling.hu@polyu.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fugl-Meyer Assessment Wrist/Hand Subscale (FMA-WH) Score (time frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in