AzTrials
AzTrials

Athletic Performance EnhancementMPPTNCT07740096

Effects of Microdosed Plyometric Training on Lower-Limb Neuromuscular Function and Sport-Specific Performance in Rope-Skipping Athletes

A study testing Microdosed Plyometric Training and Traditional Concentrated Plyometric Training in people with Athletic Performance Enhancement, run by Chongqing Normal University at 1 site in China.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two ways of scheduling plyometric training in rope-skipping athletes. The study will examine whether short and frequent training sessions have different effects on lower-limb muscle function, rope-skipping performance, and perceived fatigue compared with longer training… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Athletic Performance Enhancement
What is being tested?
Microdosed Plyometric Training and Traditional Concentrated Plyometric Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jun 2026to 31 Aug 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • * Rope-skipping athletes with at least 1 year of rope-skipping training experience
  • Able to complete regular rope-skipping training and all study-related testing procedures
  • No severe lower-limb sports injury within the previous 3 months
  • No cardiovascular disease, neurological disease, or other contraindication to exercise
  • Willing to participate voluntarily and provide written informed consent
  • For participants who are minors, written informed consent must also be obtained from a parent or legal

Who cannot join

  • * Participation in additional systematic strength training or plyometric training during the intervention period
  • Insufficient adherence to the prescribed training program
  • Injury, physical discomfort, or another condition occurring during testing or intervention that prevents continued participation in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Chengdu College of Arts and Sciences

    Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 401331

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effects of Microdosed Plyometric Training on Lower-Limb Neuromuscular Function and Sport-Specific Performance in Rope-Skipping Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two ways of scheduling plyometric training in rope-skipping athletes. The study will examine whether short and frequent training sessions have different effects on lower-limb muscle function, rope-skipping performance, and perceived fatigue compared with longer training sessions performed less often.

Approximately 60 rope-skipping athletes will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will continue their regular rope-skipping training and complete an additional 8-week plyometric training program. One group will perform short plyometric training sessions five days per week. The other group will perform concentrated plyometric training sessions twice per week. The exercise content, weekly training volume, and training progression will be kept as similar as possible between the two groups.

Researchers will assess lower-limb muscle function and rope-skipping-specific performance before and after the intervention. Training attendance, completion, perceived exertion, muscle soreness, and adverse events will also be recorded. The study aims to determine whether distributing plyometric training across more frequent and shorter sessions produces different training effects from concentrating the training into fewer sessions.

Read the detailed description

This study is an 8-week, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial designed to compare microdosed plyometric training with traditional concentrated plyometric training in rope-skipping athletes.

Approximately 60 eligible participants will be randomly allocated to the microdosed plyometric training group or the traditional concentrated plyometric training group, with approximately 30 participants in each group. Participants in both groups will maintain their regular rope-skipping-specific training throughout the study.

The microdosed plyometric training group will perform high-frequency, short-duration plyometric training sessions five days per week. The traditional concentrated plyometric training group will perform plyometric training twice per week using a more concentrated training schedule. The exercise content, total weekly training duration, weekly jump contacts, and progression principles will be kept as consistent as possible between the groups. The main difference will be the frequency and amount of training completed during each session.

Lower-limb neuromuscular function and rope-skipping-specific performance will be assessed before and after the 8-week intervention. Assessments will include measures related to lower-limb muscle strength, explosive performance, and sport-specific performance. Researchers will also record training attendance, training completion, perceived exertion, muscle soreness, and adverse events during the intervention.

The study will evaluate whether the distribution of plyometric training across the week influences physical performance, sport-specific performance, fatigue responses, and training tolerance in rope-skipping athletes.

Being tested
Microdosed Plyometric Training, Traditional Concentrated Plyometric Training
Keywords
Microdosed Plyometric Training, Rope Skipping, Lower-Limb Neuromuscular Function, Explosive Power, Training Frequency, Plyometric Exercise

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Microdosed Plyometric TrainingOther

    Participants assigned to this intervention will continue their regular rope-skipping-specific training and complete an 8-week microdosed plyometric training program. Plyometric training will be distributed across five sessions per week using a high-frequency, short-duration format. The exercise content, total weekly training duration, total weekly jump contacts, and progression principles will be matched as closely as possible to the traditional concentrated plyometric training intervention. The primary difference between the interventions will be training frequency and the amount of training completed in each session.

  • Traditional Concentrated Plyometric TrainingOther

    Participants assigned to this intervention will continue their regular rope-skipping-specific training and complete an 8-week traditional concentrated plyometric training program. Plyometric training will be performed in two concentrated sessions per week. The exercise content, total weekly training duration, total weekly jump contacts, and progression principles will be matched as closely as possible to the microdosed plyometric training intervention. The primary difference between the interventions will be training frequency and the amount of training completed in each session.

Study groups in NCT07740096
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Microdosed Plyometric Training GroupExperimentalParticipants will maintain their regular rope-skipping training and complete high-frequency, short-duration plyometric training five days per week for 8 weeks.
Receives: Other: Microdosed Plyometric Training
Traditional Concentrated Plyometric Training GroupActive comparatorTraditional Concentrated Plyometric Training
Receives: Other: Traditional Concentrated Plyometric Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Knee Extensor Total Work at Week 8

    Lower-limb muscular endurance will be assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer. Following a standardized warm-up and familiarization procedure, participants will perform 30 consecutive maximal concentric knee-extension contractions with the dominant lower limb at an angular velocity of 180 degrees per second. The total work performed by the knee extensors across all valid repetitions will be recorded and reported in joules (J). Change from baseline will be calculated as the Week 8 value minus the baseline value. Higher values indicate greater lower-limb muscular endurance.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8

  2. Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Knee Extensor Peak Torque at Week 8

    Lower-limb muscle strength will be assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer. Following a standardized warm-up and familiarization procedure, participants will perform maximal concentric knee-extension contractions with the dominant lower limb at an angular velocity of 60 degrees per second. The highest peak torque obtained from the valid repetitions will be recorded and reported in newton-metres (N·m). Change from baseline will be calculated as the Week 8 value minus the baseline value. Higher values indicate greater lower-limb muscle strength.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8

  3. Change From Baseline in Standing Broad Jump Distance at Week 8

    Lower-limb explosive performance will be assessed using the standing broad jump test. Following a standardized warm-up, participants will stand behind the take-off line with both feet parallel and jump forward as far as possible using a simultaneous two-foot take-off and landing. Each participant will complete three valid trials, with an adequate recovery interval between trials. The longest valid horizontal distance from the take-off line to the nearest point of contact on landing will be recorded in metres (m). Change from baseline will be calculated as the Week 8 value minus the baseline value. Higher values indicate better lower-limb explosive performance.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change From Baseline in the Number of Valid Repetitions Completed During the 30-Second Single-Rope Speed Test at Week 8

    Rope-skipping-specific performance will be assessed using the 30-second single-rope speed test. Following a standardized warm-up, participants will perform as many valid single-rope skipping repetitions as possible within 30 seconds. One valid repetition will be counted when the rope passes completely under both feet during a successfully completed jump. Repetitions involving rope entanglement, interruption, or unsuccessful rope passage will not be counted. The total number of valid repetitions completed within 30 seconds will be recorded. Change from baseline will be calculated as the Week 8 value minus the baseline value. Higher values indicate better rope-skipping-specific performance.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention

  2. Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Knee Extensor Fatigue Index at Week 8

    Lower-limb muscular fatigue will be assessed during the repeated isokinetic knee-extension test performed at an angular velocity of 180 degrees per second. The fatigue index will be calculated using the mean work of the first three and final three valid repetitions according to the following formula: [(mean work of the first three repetitions - mean work of the final three repetitions) / mean work of the first three repetitions] × 100. The fatigue index will be reported as a percentage (%). Change from baseline will be calculated as the Week 8 value minus the baseline value. Lower values indicate less muscular fatigue and better muscular endurance.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2026
  2. Study start1 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07740096
Sponsor's protocol ID
MPPT-RCT-2026-001
Acronym
MPPT
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
22 Jul 2026
Last updated
31 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared because the current informed consent and ethics approval do not include the sharing of participant-level data with external researchers.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Microdosed Plyometric Training and Traditional Concentrated Plyometric Training in people with Athletic Performance Enhancement, run by Chongqing Normal University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Knee Extensor Total Work at Week 8 (time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in