Stage IA NSCLCPhase 2NCT07741344
Study of Robotic Assisted/Image Guided Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopic Therapies and Surgery in Stage IA NSCLC
A Phase 2 study testing Bronchoscopic Microwave Ablation and Surgical Resection in people with Stage IA NSCLC, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
This study aims to address the core deficiencies in the field by situating bronchoscopic ablation within the same evidentiary frame as segmentectomy and lobectomy. It will deliver adjusted retrospective comparisons with external validation using population data, a prospective noninferiority evaluation on disease… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stage IA NSCLC
- What is being tested?
- Bronchoscopic Microwave Ablation and Surgical Resection
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 292 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2026to 31 Dec 2029
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Presence of lymph node involvement (N1 or higher) or distant metastases (M1)
- Centrally located tumours within the inner third of the lung or those requiring ablation near major airways
- Tumours adjacent to heat-sensitive structures (e.g., main bronchi, oesophagus, pericardium, aorta, or pulmonary artery) where adequate ablation margins cannot be safely achieved
- Rapidly enlarging lesions or those with high metabolic activity on PET-CT that warrant surgical resection and lymph node evaluation
- Imaging findings suggesting possible nodal involvement that necessitate surgical dissection for accurate staging
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Show all 26Show fewer
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with study procedures
- Presence of electronic implants (e.g., pacemaker or defibrillator) at risk of interference from microwave energy
- Active pulmonary infection, uncorrectable coagulopathy, or ASA score ≥4
- Patients with multiple lesions requiring both surgery and ablation who cannot represent a single treatment strategy within the study
- Surgical Resection Group Inclusion Criteria
- Adults aged ≥18 years
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IA NSCLC (T1N0M0, tumor ≤3 cm)
- Determined by multidisciplinary evaluation to have surgical resection as the preferred standard treatment option, and patient agrees to surgical resection.
- Tumour size between 2.5 and 3.0 cm, or smaller lesions for which surgery is considered the more appropriate option based on tumour features or safety concerns.
- Tumour located in the central third of the lung, or in proximity to heat-sensitive structures where surgery offers better oncologic and safety margins.
- Imaging findings suggest possible lymph node involvement or a clinical indication for systematic nodal dissection and pathological staging.
- Rapidly growing or high-SUV lesions on PET-CT requiring complete resection and full histologic staging.
- Medically fit for general anaesthesia and surgical resection, with capability for intraoperative frozen-section margin assessment
- Presence of lymph node involvement (N1 or higher) or distant metastases (M1)
- High surgical risk or limited pulmonary reserve where a lung-preserving strategy is preferred.
- Tumours clearly suitable for ablation (≤2.5 cm, located in the middle or peripheral third, and safely ablatable with adequate margins).
- Active pulmonary infection, uncorrectable coagulopathy, or unfit for general anaesthesia or lung resection.
- Patients with multiple lesions, some requiring surgery and others ablation, who cannot be assigned to a single treatment strategy within the study.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with study procedures
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Hong Kong1 site
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong
Calvin Sze Hang Ng, 852-3505-2618, calvinng@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
Calvin Sze Hang Ng
About this study
Official title: A Dual-Phase Study Comparing Survival, Immune Activation, and Functional Preservation Between Robotic-assisted / Image Guided Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopic Therapies and Surgery in Stage IA NSCLC
This study aims to address the core deficiencies in the field by situating bronchoscopic ablation within the same evidentiary frame as segmentectomy and lobectomy. It will deliver adjusted retrospective comparisons with external validation using population data, a prospective noninferiority evaluation on disease control and safety, quantitative evidence on pulmonary function and quality of life, and translational endpoints linking circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and immune activation to durability of control. The work is directly aligned with Hong Kong service needs, where a safe lung preserving option that shortens recovery and optimises resource use could relieve surgical waiting pressure while maintaining oncologic outcomes.
- Conditions
- Stage IA NSCLC
- Being tested
- Bronchoscopic Microwave Ablation, Surgical Resection
- Keywords
- Bronchoscopic ablation, Robotic assisted bronchoscopy, Image guided ENB, Stage IA NSCLC, disease-free survival
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bronchoscopic Microwave AblationProcedure or surgery
The study doctor perform robotic-assisted or electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy to locate the target lung lesion, deliver the ablation catheter through the bronchus to the target site for lesion puncture, and conduct microwave ablation. After the surgery, CBCT scanning is conducted to evaluate the ablation effect, and repeated ablation is performed as needed.
Surgical ResectionProcedure or surgery
The study doctor will begin by opening the hilar pleural reflection, followed by dissection of and division of lobar / segmental vein and artery by endostaplers. Segmental or lobar bronchus is dissected out and stapled. Lymphadenectomy will be performed and the specimens will be retrieved using protective bags via utility wound. This lung tissue specimen may also be analysed for research purpose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical Resection arm | Experimental | Participants undergo surgical resection for treatment of the target pulmonary lesion. Receives: Procedure: Surgical Resection |
| Bronchoscopic Microwave Ablation Arm | Experimental | Participants undergo bronchoscopic microwave ablation for treatment of the target pulmonary lesion. Receives: Procedure: Bronchoscopic Microwave Ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at 24 Months
To determine whether bronchoscopic microwave ablation is non-inferior to segmentectomy or lobectomy with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) at 24 months in eligible patients with stage IA lung cancer. DFS is defined as the time from treatment to disease recurrence, progression, or death from any cause.
Measured: Up to 24 months after treatment
Secondary outcomes (18)
Overall Survival
Comparison of overall survival between treatment groups. OS is defined as the time from treatment to death from any cause.
Measured: Up to 24 months after treatment
Local Tumor Control Rate
Proportion of participants without local recurrence at the treated lesion site.
Measured: Up to 24 months after treatment
Time to Recurrence
Time from treatment to first documented local, regional, or distant recurrence.
Measured: Up to 36 months after treatment
Cancer-Specific Mortality
Death attributable to lung cancer.
Measured: Up to 36 months after treatment
Major Procedure-Related Complications
Incidence of major complications requiring intervention, hospitalization, or resulting in significant morbidity.
Measured: 30 days and 90 days after treatment
Procedure-Related Adverse Events
Incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events.
Measured: 30 days and 90 days after treatment
Procedure-Related Mortality
Death attributable to the study procedure.
Measured: 30 days and 90 days after treatment
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
Change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), percent predicted.
Measured: 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment and Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life
Change from baseline in health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire.
Measured: 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment and baseline
Functional Exercise Capacity
Change from baseline in six-minute walk distance (Description in questionnaire)
Measured: 6, 12, 24, and 36 months & Baseline
Return to Usual Activities
Time from treatment until resumption of usual daily activities.
Measured: Up to 36 months after treatment
Post-Treatment Analgesic Use
Duration and intensity of analgesic medication use following treatment.
Measured: Up to 36 months after treatment
Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
Change from baseline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), percent predicted.
Measured: Baseline; 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment
ctDNA Clearance Rate
Percentage of participants achieving circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) clearance, defined as the absence of detectable ctDNA in plasma using the study ctDNA assay.
Measured: Baseline; 1 month and 6 months after treatment
Change in ctDNA Level
Logarithmic fold change in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels from baseline, measured using the study ctDNA assay
Measured: Baseline; 1 month and 6 months after treatment
Change in Immune Activation Biomarker Signature Score
Change from baseline in immune activation biomarker signature score, measured using [specify assay/platform, e.g., RNA sequencing, NanoString immune profiling panel, multiplex immunoassay
Measured: Baseline and 36 months after treatment
Correlation Between Immune Activation Biomarker Signature Score and Duration of Response
Correlation between immune activation biomarker signature score measured using [assay/platform] and duration of response.
Measured: duration of response assessed up to 36 months after treatment
Correlation Between Immune Activation Biomarker Signature Score and Overall Survival
Correlation between immune activation biomarker signature score measured using [assay/platform] and overall survival
Measured: assessed up to 36 months after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Aug 2026
- Study start1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Stage IA NSCLCStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chinese University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 292 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Calvin Sze Hang Ng, Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Calvin Sze Hang Ng, Principal investigator, CUHK
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07741344
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2026.005
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Dual-Phase Study Comparing Survival, Immune Activation, and Functional Preservation Between Robotic-assisted / Image Guided Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopic Therapies and Surgery in Stage IA NSCLC
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07741344
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2026.005
- Conditions
- Stage IA NSCLC
- Keywords
- Bronchoscopic ablation, Robotic assisted bronchoscopy, Image guided ENB, Stage IA NSCLC, disease-free survival
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 292 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to address the core deficiencies in the field by situating bronchoscopic ablation within the same evidentiary frame as segmentectomy and lobectomy. It will deliver adjusted retrospective comparisons with external validation using population data, a prospective noninferiority evaluation on disease control and safety, quantitative evidence on pulmonary function and quality of life, and translational endpoints linking circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and immune activation to durability of control. The work is directly aligned with Hong Kong service needs, where a safe lung preserving option that shortens recovery and optimises resource use could relieve surgical waiting pressure while maintaining oncologic outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical Resection arm | Experimental | Procedure: Surgical ResectionParticipants undergo surgical resection for treatment of the target pulmonary lesion. |
| Bronchoscopic Microwave Ablation Arm | Experimental | Procedure: Bronchoscopic Microwave AblationParticipants undergo bronchoscopic microwave ablation for treatment of the target pulmonary lesion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (26 listed)
- Presence of lymph node involvement (N1 or higher) or distant metastases (M1)
- Centrally located tumours within the inner third of the lung or those requiring ablation near major airways
- Tumours adjacent to heat-sensitive structures (e.g., main bronchi, oesophagus, pericardium, aorta, or pulmonary artery) where adequate ablation margins cannot be safely achieved
- Rapidly enlarging lesions or those with high metabolic activity on PET-CT that warrant surgical resection and lymph node evaluation
- Imaging findings suggesting possible nodal involvement that necessitate surgical dissection for accurate staging
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bronchoscopic Microwave AblationThe study doctor perform robotic-assisted or electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy to locate the target lung lesion, deliver the ablation catheter through the bronchus to the target site for lesion puncture, and conduct microwave ablation. After the surgery, CBCT scanning is conducted to evaluate the ablation effect, and repeated ablation is performed as needed. | Procedure or surgery | Bronchoscopic Microwave Ablation Arm |
| Surgical ResectionThe study doctor will begin by opening the hilar pleural reflection, followed by dissection of and division of lobar / segmental vein and artery by endostaplers. Segmental or lobar bronchus is dissected out and stapled. Lymphadenectomy will be performed and the specimens will be retrieved using protective bags via utility wound. This lung tissue specimen may also be analysed for research purpose. | Procedure or surgery | Surgical Resection arm |
Primary outcome
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at 24 Months
Time frame: Up to 24 months after treatment
To determine whether bronchoscopic microwave ablation is non-inferior to segmentectomy or lobectomy with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) at 24 months in eligible patients with stage IA lung cancer. DFS is defined as the time from treatment to disease recurrence, progression, or death from any cause.
18 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival
Time frame: Up to 24 months after treatment
Local Tumor Control Rate
Time frame: Up to 24 months after treatment
Time to Recurrence
Time frame: Up to 36 months after treatment
Cancer-Specific Mortality
Time frame: Up to 36 months after treatment
Major Procedure-Related Complications
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after treatment
Procedure-Related Adverse Events
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after treatment
Procedure-Related Mortality
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after treatment
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment and Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment and baseline
Functional Exercise Capacity
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 36 months & Baseline
Return to Usual Activities
Time frame: Up to 36 months after treatment
Post-Treatment Analgesic Use
Time frame: Up to 36 months after treatment
Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
Time frame: Baseline; 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment
ctDNA Clearance Rate
Time frame: Baseline; 1 month and 6 months after treatment
Change in ctDNA Level
Time frame: Baseline; 1 month and 6 months after treatment
Change in Immune Activation Biomarker Signature Score
Time frame: Baseline and 36 months after treatment
Correlation Between Immune Activation Biomarker Signature Score and Duration of Response
Time frame: duration of response assessed up to 36 months after treatment
Correlation Between Immune Activation Biomarker Signature Score and Overall Survival
Time frame: assessed up to 36 months after treatment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Stage IA NSCLC
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase 1 Study of NW-301V TCR-T Cells in Advanced Solid Tumors With KRAS G12V Mutation
Advanced Solid Cancer, Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Treatment Effects on Development of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients With Cancer
Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
RecruitingPhase 2
An Adjuvant Study to Evaluate SMS001 (Paclitaxel) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, PK and Efficacy of ONC-392 in Monotherapy and in Combination of Anti-PD-1 in Advanced Solid Tumors and NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Advanced Solid Tumor
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of EVM14 in Combination With Ivonescimab in Sq-NSCLC Patients
Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer sqNSCLC
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Calvin Sze Hang Ng principal investigator
CUHK
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Bronchoscopic Microwave Ablation and Surgical Resection in people with Stage IA NSCLC, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Calvin Sze Hang Ng (852-3505-2618, calvinng@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at 24 Months (time frame: Up to 24 months after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2026.