Osteoarthritis (OA) of the KneeNCT07742696
Comparison of Postoperative Functional Outcomes Between Subvastus and Medial Parapatellar Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty
A study testing subvastus and medial parapatellar in people with Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study aims to compare the effects of the medial parapatellar approach (MP) and the subvastus approach (SV) on postoperative clinical function in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee
- What is being tested?
- subvastus and medial parapatellar
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 15 Jul 2026to 15 Jul 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 50 to 80 who are diagnosed with end-stage knee osteoarthritis that require unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty;
- Patients who are determined by clinical and laboratory tests to have no absolute surgical contraindications;
- Patients with good compliance, willing and able to undergo follow-up observations as required and sign the informed consent form;
Who cannot join
- Patients with a history of surgery on the affected knee joint in the past;
- Patients with neuromuscular diseases;
- Patients scheduled for knee joint replacement revision surgery;
- Patients with active knee joint infection or systemic infection;
- Patients who receive primary joint replacement due to non-knee osteoarthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis, tuberculous arthritis, traumatic arthritis, etc;
- Patients with valgus or varus deformity of the knee joint greater than 15°;
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patients with knee flexion deformity greater than 15°;
- Patients whose heart and lung functions are determined by clinical and laboratory tests to be unable to tolerate surgery;
- Patients with mental disorders who are unable to cooperate with treatment;
- Patients who is lactating or pregnant;
- Patients who are unwilling to participate in this study and did not sign the informed consent form;
- Patients with poor compliance and inability to cooperate in completing the follow-up observers at critical times;
- For any reason, the researchers believe that the subject is unlikely to complete this study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site
Orthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Haidian
Orthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital, +8613161866294, 2411210441@pku.edu.cn
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Postoperative Functional Outcomes Between Subvastus and Medial Parapatellar Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective Random Controlled Trial
This study aims to compare the effects of the medial parapatellar approach (MP) and the subvastus approach (SV) on postoperative clinical function in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 84 patients, who visit the Joint Surgery Department of Peking University Third Hospital and are diagnosed with end-stage knee osteoarthritis and require unilateral, primary total knee arthroplasty, will be recruited. The patients will be randomly assigned to two groups, with 42 patients in each group. TKA will be performed using the MP and SV approaches respectively. Postoperative data such as quadriceps muscle strength, the time of first unassisted straight leg raise (SLR), joint range of motion (ROM), KSS score, WOMAC score, SF-12 score, VAS score, and shear wave elastography (SWE) of the medial thigh muscle will be collected. The patients will be followed up for 2 years postoperatively to compare the short-term and long-term clinical functional outcomes of the two surgical approaches.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee
- Being tested
- subvastus, medial parapatellar
- Keywords
- medial parapatellar approach, subvastus approach, total knee arthroplasty
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
subvastusProcedure or surgery
Patients receive total knee arthroplasty with subvastus approach to expose the knee joint.
medial parapatellarProcedure or surgery
Patients receive total knee arthroplasty with medial parapatellar approach to expose the knee joint
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| subvastus approach | Experimental | Patients receive total knee arthroplasty with subvastus approach. Receives: Procedure: subvastus |
| medial parapatellar approach | Active comparator | Patients receive total knee arthroplasty with medial parapatellar approach, which is classic, mature and with exact curative effect. Receives: Procedure: medial parapatellar |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC)
The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms and the worse the postoperative functional recovery.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Knee Society Score(KSS)
The lower the score, the more severe the symptoms and the worse the postoperative functional recovery.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Short Form 12 Health Survey Questionnaire(SF-12)
The higher score equals to the better postoperative satisfaction.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
First Unassisted Straight Leg Raise(SLR)
Record the time of the first postoperative unassisted straight leg raise of every patient.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Secondary outcomes (4)
Range of Motion of Knee Joint(ROM)
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)
The higher the score, the stronger the patient's subjective pain perception.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Myodynamia of Quadriceps Femoris
Surgeons will measure the patients' muscle strength of Quadriceps Femoris using manual muscle testing, based on Lovett Scale for Muscle Strength Assessment.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Shear Wave Elastography of Quadriceps Femoris
SWE displays the strength and hardness with precise values.
Measured: 3 months after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Aug 2026
- Study start15 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion15 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jul 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis (OA) of the KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking University Third HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07742696
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PUTH00238
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Aladraii AA, Allehaibi LZ, Fattani AA, Alkhudairy TA, Al-Margan AM, Al-Dubai SAR, Mohammed AA, Mohorjy DK, Alqarni AS. Functional Outcome of Subvastus versus Medial Parapatellar Approaches for Total Knee Replacement in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Mar;12(1):35-39. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_237_23. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
PubMed 38362087Migliorini F, Aretini P, Driessen A, El Mansy Y, Quack V, Tingart M, Eschweiler J. Better outcomes after mini-subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Aug;30(6):979-992. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02648-9. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
PubMed 32152747Khan MNH, Abbas K, Faraz A, Ilyas MW, Shafique H, Jamshed MH, Hashmi P. Total knee replacement: A comparison of the subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Aug 8;68:102670. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102670. eCollection 2021 Aug.
PubMed 34408867Wu Y, Zeng Y, Bao X, Xiong H, Hu Q, Li M, Shen B. Comparison of mini-subvastus approach versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Int J Surg. 2018 Sep;57:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
PubMed 30056128Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3854-3860. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
PubMed 28844632Hosseini-Monfared P, Mirahmadi A, Amiri S, Minaie R, Ghafouri MH, Kazemi SM. Comparable long-term functional outcomes of subvastus and medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: A 10-year follow-up study. J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 8;11(4):e70035. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70035. eCollection 2024 Oct.
PubMed 39380847Mahmoudian A, Lohmander LS, Mobasheri A, Englund M, Luyten FP. Early-stage symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee - time for action. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021 Oct;17(10):621-632. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00673-4. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
PubMed 34465902
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Postoperative Functional Outcomes Between Subvastus and Medial Parapatellar Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective Random Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07742696
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PUTH00238
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee
- Keywords
- medial parapatellar approach, subvastus approach, total knee arthroplasty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 15 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jul 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to compare the effects of the medial parapatellar approach (MP) and the subvastus approach (SV) on postoperative clinical function in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 84 patients, who visit the Joint Surgery Department of Peking University Third Hospital and are diagnosed with end-stage knee osteoarthritis and require unilateral, primary total knee arthroplasty, will be recruited. The patients will be randomly assigned to two groups, with 42 patients in each group. TKA will be performed using the MP and SV approaches respectively. Postoperative data such as quadriceps muscle strength, the time of first unassisted straight leg raise (SLR), joint range of motion (ROM), KSS score, WOMAC score, SF-12 score, VAS score, and shear wave elastography (SWE) of the medial thigh muscle will be collected. The patients will be followed up for 2 years postoperatively to compare the short-term and long-term clinical functional outcomes of the two surgical approaches.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| subvastus approach | Experimental | Procedure: subvastusPatients receive total knee arthroplasty with subvastus approach. |
| medial parapatellar approach | Active comparator | Procedure: medial parapatellarPatients receive total knee arthroplasty with medial parapatellar approach, which is classic, mature and with exact curative effect. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients aged 50 to 80 who are diagnosed with end-stage knee osteoarthritis that require unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty;
- Patients who are determined by clinical and laboratory tests to have no absolute surgical contraindications;
- Patients with good compliance, willing and able to undergo follow-up observations as required and sign the informed consent form;
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients with a history of surgery on the affected knee joint in the past;
- Patients with neuromuscular diseases;
- Patients scheduled for knee joint replacement revision surgery;
- Patients with active knee joint infection or systemic infection;
- Patients who receive primary joint replacement due to non-knee osteoarthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis, tuberculous arthritis, traumatic arthritis, etc;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| subvastusPatients receive total knee arthroplasty with subvastus approach to expose the knee joint. | Procedure or surgery | subvastus approach |
| medial parapatellarPatients receive total knee arthroplasty with medial parapatellar approach to expose the knee joint | Procedure or surgery | medial parapatellar approach |
Primary outcome
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms and the worse the postoperative functional recovery.
Knee Society Score(KSS)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
The lower the score, the more severe the symptoms and the worse the postoperative functional recovery.
Short Form 12 Health Survey Questionnaire(SF-12)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
The higher score equals to the better postoperative satisfaction.
First Unassisted Straight Leg Raise(SLR)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Record the time of the first postoperative unassisted straight leg raise of every patient.
4 secondary outcomes
Range of Motion of Knee Joint(ROM)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Myodynamia of Quadriceps Femoris
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Shear Wave Elastography of Quadriceps Femoris
Time frame: 3 months after receiving total knee arthroplasty
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Aug 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 38362087Aladraii AA, Allehaibi LZ, Fattani AA, Alkhudairy TA, Al-Margan AM, Al-Dubai SAR, Mohammed AA, Mohorjy DK, Alqarni AS. Functional Outcome of Subvastus versus Medial Parapatellar Approaches for Total Knee Replacement in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Mar;12(1):35-39. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_237_23. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 32152747Migliorini F, Aretini P, Driessen A, El Mansy Y, Quack V, Tingart M, Eschweiler J. Better outcomes after mini-subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Aug;30(6):979-992. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02648-9. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 34408867Khan MNH, Abbas K, Faraz A, Ilyas MW, Shafique H, Jamshed MH, Hashmi P. Total knee replacement: A comparison of the subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Aug 8;68:102670. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102670. eCollection 2021 Aug.
- Results publication: PubMed 30056128Wu Y, Zeng Y, Bao X, Xiong H, Hu Q, Li M, Shen B. Comparison of mini-subvastus approach versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Int J Surg. 2018 Sep;57:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 28844632Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3854-3860. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 39380847Hosseini-Monfared P, Mirahmadi A, Amiri S, Minaie R, Ghafouri MH, Kazemi SM. Comparable long-term functional outcomes of subvastus and medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: A 10-year follow-up study. J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 8;11(4):e70035. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70035. eCollection 2024 Oct.
- Results publication: PubMed 34465902Mahmoudian A, Lohmander LS, Mobasheri A, Englund M, Luyten FP. Early-stage symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee - time for action. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021 Oct;17(10):621-632. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00673-4. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Knee Pain and Overweight or Obesity (VESPER-OA 1)
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About Berobenatide Given Once Weekly in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis and Overweight or Obesity With or Without Type 2 Diabetes (VESPER-OA 2)
Obesity, Overweight and/or Obesity
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
RecruitingPhase 2
Genicular Artery Embolization for Reducing Pain in Medically Refractory Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing subvastus and medial parapatellar in people with Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ran Zhao, MD (+8613161866294, 2411210441@pku.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC) (time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07742696, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2026.