Atopic Dermatitis (AD)NCT07744516
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Ozonated Oil in Atopic Dermatitis
A study testing ozonated oil and non-ozonated oil in people with Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema), run by Laboratorios Ozoaqua at 3 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 6 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)
- What is being tested?
- ozonated oil and non-ozonated oil
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 22 Sep 2021to 10 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 6 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients aged between 1 month and 6 years.
- Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis.
- Active mild or moderate flare.
- Baseline SCORAD score between 20 and 50 points.
- Availability of parents or legal guardians to administer the treatment and complete the follow-up period.
- Written informed consent provided by the parents or legal guardians.
Who cannot join
- Severe atopic dermatitis.
- Clinically relevant active skin infection.
- Recent use of systemic immunosuppressive treatments.
- Serious concomitant diseases.
- Known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation.
- Clinical conditions that could interfere with the interpretation of the therapeutic response.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Spain3 sites
Alcantarilla-Sangonera Primary Care Centre
Alcantarilla
Novelda Primary Care Centre
Novelda
Torrevieja Hospital
Torrevieja
About this study
Official title: Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Ozonated Oil in Atopic Dermatitis
This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. The study follows a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design and compares clinical progression, as assessed using the SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) index, quality of life, as measured using the IDQoL (Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index), and various safety and cosmetic acceptability outcomes over a 14-day follow-up period. In addition to conventional clinical efficacy endpoints, the study includes responder analyses and quality-of-life assessments to provide a more comprehensive characterisation of the potential therapeutic benefit of ozonated oil in this population.
Read the detailed description
A pilot, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical formulation based on ozonated vegetable oil in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of topical ozonated oil in reducing the severity of paediatric atopic dermatitis, as quantified by the change in the total SCORAD score from baseline to the follow-up visits, from both a continuous perspective, based on the absolute change in SCORAD, and a clinical-response perspective.
The secondary objectives are:
To evaluate the impact of treatment on atopic dermatitis-related quality of life using the IDQoL questionnaire.
To evaluate the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements in SCORAD according to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria.
To quantify the need for rescue medication. To assess the safety and tolerability of the active formulation. To evaluate cosmetic acceptability and subjective satisfaction with the treatment.
The study follows a parallel, two-arm design, with participants randomly assigned to receive either the active formulation or placebo. The active treatment consists of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation, whereas the control group receives a placebo formulation containing the same non-ozonated lipid vehicle. The use of the same vehicle in both groups ensures cosmetic and organoleptic comparability between the formulations, thereby supporting the maintenance of blinding throughout the trial.
The study is conducted under double-blind conditions, such that neither the clinical investigators nor the patients' parents or legal guardians are aware of treatment allocation during follow-up. Formulation coding and randomisation assignments remain concealed until completion of the statistical analysis.
The total clinical follow-up period is 14 days, with assessments performed at three time points:
Baseline visit (Day 0) Follow-up visit (Day 7 ± 1) Final visit (Day 14 ± 2)
The data collected at each study visit are summarised below:
Baseline visit
Demographic variables Clinical and atopic history Dermatological history Baseline SCORAD assessment IDQoL questionnaire
Day 7 visit
Interim SCORAD assessment IDQoL questionnaire Adverse events Treatment adherence Rescue medication use
Day 14 visit
Final SCORAD assessment Adverse events Treatment adherence Rescue medication use Treatment satisfaction, tolerability, and cosmetic acceptability variables
The study is conducted at the paediatric outpatient clinics of Clínica Quirón Valencia, Torrevieja Hospital, and the Novelda and Alcantarilla-Sangonera Primary Care Centres.
The investigational product, corresponding to the active treatment, is Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil. The comparator product, corresponding to placebo, consists of a formulation prepared using the same lipid vehicle but without ozonation. The oil is applied topically once every 12 hours, corresponding to two applications per day, to the affected areas throughout the 14-day study follow-up period. Although the management of atopic dermatitis during the study is based on the topical application of either the active product or the comparator, the use of rescue medication is permitted at the investigators' discretion.
The study population comprises paediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of active mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. Eligible patients are between 1 month and 6 years of age and are required to meet clinical criteria consistent with atopic dermatitis, as determined by specialist medical assessment.
The total study sample comprises 50 patients.
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)
- Being tested
- ozonated oil, non-ozonated oil
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ozonated oilOther
Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil
non-ozonated oilOther
Same lipid vehicle, without ozonation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil | Experimental | Blend of ozonated olive and sunflower vegetable oils. Receives: Other: ozonated oil |
| Non-ozonated vegetable oil | Placebo comparator | The same lipid vehicle, without ozonation. Receives: Other: non-ozonated oil |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in SCORAD score from baseline at days 7 and 14
The primary efficacy outcome is the total SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) score, a widely validated instrument for the clinical assessment of atopic dermatitis.
Three SCORAD assessments are performed throughout the study: at baseline, day 7, and day 14.
The SCORAD index comprises three domains:
- SCORAD A: Extent
This domain assesses the percentage of body surface area affected. In patients younger than 2 years of age, age-specific anatomical weightings for the paediatric population are applied.
- SCORAD B: Intensity
This domain includes the clinical assessment of six dermatological signs: erythema, oedema, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification, and xerosis.
Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3.
- SCORAD C: Subjective symptoms
This domain assesses the perceived severity of pruritus and sleep disturbance, each quantified on a scale from 0 to 10.
- The total SCORAD score is calculated using the standard formula:
SCORAD = A/5 + (7 × B)/2 + C
Measured: 14 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
Number and percentage of patients achieving a SCORAD response at days 7 and 14 relative to baseline
A response is defined as a reduction in SCORAD of ≥8.7 points from baseline, in accordance with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) reported by Schram et al. for this scale. An MCID responder is defined as a patient who achieved this reduction in score
Measured: 14 days
Change in IDQoL score from baseline at day 7
Quality of life is assessed using the Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDQoL), a questionnaire specifically designed for paediatric atopic dermatitis. Two IDQoL assessments are performed during the study: at baseline and on day 7.
The questionnaire comprises 10 items covering pruritus, sleep disturbance, mood, feeding, play and activities, treatment-related problems, dressing, and bathing.
Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in quality of life.
Measured: 7 days
Number and percentage of patients requiring rescue medication during the 14-day follow-up period
During the study, the use of rescue treatments for the management of recurrences or new flares of atopic dermatitis is recorded at the investigators' discretion. Rescue treatment is defined as the use of any medication for the management of flares, particularly topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines.
Measured: 14 days
Number of days of rescue medication use during the 14-day follow-up period.
During the study, the use of rescue treatments for the management of recurrences or new flares of atopic dermatitis is recorded at the investigators' discretion. Rescue treatment is defined as the use of any medication for the management of flares, particularly topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines. In addition to the type and dose of medication, the number of days of administration is recorded.
Measured: 14 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2026
- Study start22 Sep 2021
- Primary completion10 Apr 2026
- Study completion10 Apr 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Atopic Dermatitis (AD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Laboratorios Ozoaqua
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07744516
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DA-OZOAQUA
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Ozonated Oil in Atopic Dermatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07744516
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DA-OZOAQUA
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Laboratorios OzoaquaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Apr 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. The study follows a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design and compares clinical progression, as assessed using the SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) index, quality of life, as measured using the IDQoL (Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index), and various safety and cosmetic acceptability outcomes over a 14-day follow-up period. In addition to conventional clinical efficacy endpoints, the study includes responder analyses and quality-of-life assessments to provide a more comprehensive characterisation of the potential therapeutic benefit of ozonated oil in this population.
Detailed description
A pilot, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical formulation based on ozonated vegetable oil in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of topical ozonated oil in reducing the severity of paediatric atopic dermatitis, as quantified by the change in the total SCORAD score from baseline to the follow-up visits, from both a continuous perspective, based on the absolute change in SCORAD, and a clinical-response perspective.
The secondary objectives are:
To evaluate the impact of treatment on atopic dermatitis-related quality of life using the IDQoL questionnaire.
To evaluate the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements in SCORAD according to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria.
To quantify the need for rescue medication. To assess the safety and tolerability of the active formulation. To evaluate cosmetic acceptability and subjective satisfaction with the treatment.
The study follows a parallel, two-arm design, with participants randomly assigned to receive either the active formulation or placebo. The active treatment consists of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation, whereas the control group receives a placebo formulation containing the same non-ozonated lipid vehicle. The use of the same vehicle in both groups ensures cosmetic and organoleptic comparability between the formulations, thereby supporting the maintenance of blinding throughout the trial.
The study is conducted under double-blind conditions, such that neither the clinical investigators nor the patients' parents or legal guardians are aware of treatment allocation during follow-up. Formulation coding and randomisation assignments remain concealed until completion of the statistical analysis.
The total clinical follow-up period is 14 days, with assessments performed at three time points:
Baseline visit (Day 0) Follow-up visit (Day 7 ± 1) Final visit (Day 14 ± 2)
The data collected at each study visit are summarised below:
Baseline visit
Demographic variables Clinical and atopic history Dermatological history Baseline SCORAD assessment IDQoL questionnaire
Day 7 visit
Interim SCORAD assessment IDQoL questionnaire Adverse events Treatment adherence Rescue medication use
Day 14 visit
Final SCORAD assessment Adverse events Treatment adherence Rescue medication use Treatment satisfaction, tolerability, and cosmetic acceptability variables
The study is conducted at the paediatric outpatient clinics of Clínica Quirón Valencia, Torrevieja Hospital, and the Novelda and Alcantarilla-Sangonera Primary Care Centres.
The investigational product, corresponding to the active treatment, is Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil. The comparator product, corresponding to placebo, consists of a formulation prepared using the same lipid vehicle but without ozonation. The oil is applied topically once every 12 hours, corresponding to two applications per day, to the affected areas throughout the 14-day study follow-up period. Although the management of atopic dermatitis during the study is based on the topical application of either the active product or the comparator, the use of rescue medication is permitted at the investigators' discretion.
The study population comprises paediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of active mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. Eligible patients are between 1 month and 6 years of age and are required to meet clinical criteria consistent with atopic dermatitis, as determined by specialist medical assessment.
The total study sample comprises 50 patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil | Experimental | Other: ozonated oilBlend of ozonated olive and sunflower vegetable oils. |
| Non-ozonated vegetable oil | Placebo comparator | Other: non-ozonated oilThe same lipid vehicle, without ozonation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 6 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female patients aged between 1 month and 6 years.
- Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis.
- Active mild or moderate flare.
- Baseline SCORAD score between 20 and 50 points.
- Availability of parents or legal guardians to administer the treatment and complete the follow-up period.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Severe atopic dermatitis.
- Clinically relevant active skin infection.
- Recent use of systemic immunosuppressive treatments.
- Serious concomitant diseases.
- Known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ozonated oilOzoaqua® Ozonated Oil | Other | Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil |
| non-ozonated oilSame lipid vehicle, without ozonation. | Other | Non-ozonated vegetable oil |
Primary outcome
Change in SCORAD score from baseline at days 7 and 14
Time frame: 14 days
The primary efficacy outcome is the total SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) score, a widely validated instrument for the clinical assessment of atopic dermatitis. Three SCORAD assessments are performed throughout the study: at baseline, day 7, and day 14. The SCORAD index comprises three domains: - SCORAD A: Extent This domain assesses the percentage of body surface area affected. In patients younger than 2 years of age, age-specific anatomical weightings for the paediatric population are applied. - SCORAD B: Intensity This domain includes the clinical assessment of six dermatological signs: erythema, oedema, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification, and xerosis. Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3. - SCORAD C: Subjective symptoms This domain assesses the perceived severity of pruritus and sleep disturbance, each quantified on a scale from 0 to 10. - The total SCORAD score is calculated using the standard formula: SCORAD = A/5 + (7 × B)/2 + C
4 secondary outcomes
Number and percentage of patients achieving a SCORAD response at days 7 and 14 relative to baseline
Time frame: 14 days
Change in IDQoL score from baseline at day 7
Time frame: 7 days
Number and percentage of patients requiring rescue medication during the 14-day follow-up period
Time frame: 14 days
Number of days of rescue medication use during the 14-day follow-up period.
Time frame: 14 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2026.
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Roflumilast Cream 0.3% for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis, Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1/1b Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of ZL-1503 in Healthy Volunteers and Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of NOR-101 in Healthy Adults and Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
RecruitingPhase 2
PRA-216 Atopic Dermatitis Safety and Efficacy Study
Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase II Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LT-002-158 Tablets in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ozonated oil and non-ozonated oil in people with Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema), run by Laboratorios Ozoaqua at 3 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in SCORAD score from baseline at days 7 and 14 (time frame: 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2026.