NeoplasmsSPARKLE-2NCT07745816
Effectiveness and Implementation of 'Supportive and Palliative Care Review Kit in Locations Everywhere'
A study testing SPARKLE-2 in people with Neoplasms and Palliative Care, run by National Cancer Centre, Singapore at 2 sites in Singapore.
Trial summary
Advanced cancer patients often experience significant physical and emotional symptoms, which can lead to frequent hospital visits and reduced quality of life. Although palliative care can help manage these symptoms and improve well-being, it is often introduced too late. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasms, Palliative Care
- What is being tested?
- SPARKLE-2
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSingapore
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2026to 31 Mar 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 21 years old or older
- Diagnosed of advanced cancer diagnosis, defined as metastatic or recurrent/ progressive Stage III/IV solid tumour
- Has an unplanned hospital admission and expected to be discharged home
- Able to speak English or Mandarin Chinese or Malay
- Able to provide informed consent
- Additional inclusion criteria for patient participants of semi-structured interviews are:
Show all 15Show fewer
- Enrolled in the SPARKLE-2 RCT, whether randomized to the SPARKLE intervention or usual care group and regardless of fidelity to trial procedures.
- 21 years old or older
- Self-endorsing or identified by an enrolled patient as a spouse/partner, relative or friend who knows them well and who provides support due to their cancer
- Able to speak English or Mandarin Chinese or Malay
- Able to provide informed consent
- 21 years old or older
- Healthcare professional who is involved in the clinical care of patients with advanced cancer for at least 50% of their work hours
- Able to provide informed consent
- Involved in the processes of the SPARKLE-2
Who cannot join
- Assessed by the treating physician as unable to complete study procedures
- Unable to complete patient-reported outcome measures
- 1. Unable to complete interviews
- Healthcare professionals that are not providing care for cancer patients.
- Unable to complete interviews
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Jess Ng Hiv Choo contact
Singapore2 sites
National Cancer Centre, Singapore
Singapore, 168583
Dr Grace Meijuan YANG, MD, MPH, PhD
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169608
Dr Yi ZHOU, MD, MRCP (UK), MMed
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness and Implementation of 'Supportive and Palliative cAre Review Kit in Locations Everywhere' (SPARKLE-2) - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Advanced cancer patients often experience significant physical and emotional symptoms, which can lead to frequent hospital visits and reduced quality of life. Although palliative care can help manage these symptoms and improve well-being, it is often introduced too late.
A proactive symptom monitoring model, SPARKLE-2 aims to identify patients who need palliative care earlier by regularly checking their symptoms using a simple questionnaire. Patients with concerned symptoms will receive timely support from the palliative care team, with the goal of improving their quality of life, reducing unnecessary hospital admissions, and helping more patients receive care in the community rather than in hospital. In the earlier SPARKLE-1 study, it showed the improvement of patients' physical wellbeing. SPARKLE-2 seeks to test the effectiveness among advanced cancer patients with unplanned hospital visits while simultaneously collecting data on real-world implementation.
Read the detailed description
To evaluate the effectiveness of SPARKLE-2, we will conduct randomized controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes at 3 months between patients receiving usual care and intervention. For longer-term impact of palliative care, we will also measure patient outcomes at 6, 9, and 12 months. To evaluate ways to improve implementation, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to systematically identify processes that influence implementation outcomes.
The specific aims and hypotheses of this mixed methods study are:
- Assess the effectiveness of SPARKLE-2 on health-related quality of life and healthcare utilization among patients with advanced cancer. We hypothesize that the SPARKLE-2 group compared to the usual care group participants will have better health-related quality of life, better health status, earlier palliative care utilisation, and less acute healthcare utilisation.
- Assess implementation processes of SPARKLE-2. We will assess acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility through a structured survey among healthcare providers. Also, we will assess fidelity through completion rate of IPOS screening questionnaires and compliance with clinical response pathways. Implementation costs will be captured from the healthcare system's perspective prospectively using an activity-based costing approach.
- Assess contexts and mechanisms that bring about SPARKLE-2 outcomes. We will interview patients, caregivers and healthcare providers who were involved in SPARKLE-2 to explore their perspectives on factors, including facilitators and barriers, that bring about intervention effects.
- Conditions
- Neoplasms, Palliative Care
- Being tested
- SPARKLE-2
- Keywords
- SPARKLE-2
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SPARKLE-2Behavioural
Patients will receive a Short Message Service (SMS) text on their phone every 2 weeks, inviting them to complete a self-reported online six-item Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) questionnaire over a period of 12 months.
If a patient records higher scores on any IPOS symptom domains, a programme coordinator will then make a phone call to the patient for further assessment of symptoms and concerns identified. If indicated, the programme coordinator would then initiate management of the symptoms and concerns according to structured clinical management protocols.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SPARKLE-2 Intervention | Experimental | Participants will receive SPARKLE-2 immediately at bi-weekly interval. Receives: Behavioral: SPARKLE-2 |
| Usual Care | No intervention | Participants will not receive any study intervention (SPARKLE-2) and will continue to receive their usual care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of life score measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative (FACIT-Pal)
FACIT-Pal is a 46-item measure with a quality-of-life scale (4 domains: physical, emotional, social, and functional well-being) and a palliative care subscale. It has demonstrated internal consistency, reliability and validity for persons with advanced cancer. Quality of life is scored on a scale of 0 to 184, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Measured: 12 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Quality of life score measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative (FACIT-Pal)
The proposed FACIT-Pal assessment schedule is to evaluate longitudinal changes in quality of life over time.
Measured: Every 12 weeks from baseline, till the point of patient death, or till week 48, whichever is earlier.
Palliative care concerns measured using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcomes Scale (IPOS)
IPOS is a brief measure of palliative care problems, covering physical and psychological symptoms, social and spiritual issues, communication, information needs, and practical concerns. Each item is rated on a Likert scale of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate that symptoms and concerns affect the person more. IPOS has been translated to Chinese and validated in Singapore.
Measured: Every 2 weeks from baseline, till the point of patient death, or till week 48, whichever is earlier.
Health states measured using the EuroQOL Group 5-Dimension Health-related Quality of Life Measurement (EQ-5D-5L)
EQ-5D-5L contains a 5-item descriptive system measuring 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/ discomfort, anxiety/ depression; a visual analogue scale measuring overall health status. The tool has been validated in Singapore.
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 27 weeks, and 48 weeks.
Acute healthcare utilization.
Frequency of Emergency Department (ED) visits.
Measured: Baseline until death or end of the study, up to 48 weeks.
Inpatient healthcare utilization and the intervention's impact on inpatient healthcare utilization.
Number of hospital admissions.
Measured: Baseline until death or end of the study, up to 48 weeks.
Healthcare expenditure associated with patient care and the economic impact on intervention.
Total hospital charges.
Measured: Baseline until death or end of the study, up to 48 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2026
- Study start15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Mar 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Centre, Singapore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Grace Meijuan YANG, MD, MPH, PhD, Study chair, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07745816
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2026-0459
- Acronym
- SPARKLE-2
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ellis KR, Furgal A, Wayas F, Contreras A, Jones C, Perez S, Raji D, Smith M, Vincent C, Song L, Northouse L, Langford AT. Symptom burden and quality of life among patient and family caregiver dyads in advanced cancer. Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):3027-3038. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03743-8. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
PubMed 39046614Yang GM, Ke Y, Ng XH, Neo PSH, Cheung YB. Proactive symptom monitoring to initiate timely palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 5;33(3):249. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09311-1.
PubMed 40038129
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness and Implementation of 'Supportive and Palliative cAre Review Kit in Locations Everywhere' (SPARKLE-2) - A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07745816
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPARKLE-2 / 2026-0459
- Conditions
- Neoplasms, Palliative Care
- Keywords
- SPARKLE-2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Centre, SingaporeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Advanced cancer patients often experience significant physical and emotional symptoms, which can lead to frequent hospital visits and reduced quality of life. Although palliative care can help manage these symptoms and improve well-being, it is often introduced too late.
A proactive symptom monitoring model, SPARKLE-2 aims to identify patients who need palliative care earlier by regularly checking their symptoms using a simple questionnaire. Patients with concerned symptoms will receive timely support from the palliative care team, with the goal of improving their quality of life, reducing unnecessary hospital admissions, and helping more patients receive care in the community rather than in hospital. In the earlier SPARKLE-1 study, it showed the improvement of patients' physical wellbeing. SPARKLE-2 seeks to test the effectiveness among advanced cancer patients with unplanned hospital visits while simultaneously collecting data on real-world implementation.
Detailed description
To evaluate the effectiveness of SPARKLE-2, we will conduct randomized controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes at 3 months between patients receiving usual care and intervention. For longer-term impact of palliative care, we will also measure patient outcomes at 6, 9, and 12 months. To evaluate ways to improve implementation, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to systematically identify processes that influence implementation outcomes.
The specific aims and hypotheses of this mixed methods study are:
- Assess the effectiveness of SPARKLE-2 on health-related quality of life and healthcare utilization among patients with advanced cancer. We hypothesize that the SPARKLE-2 group compared to the usual care group participants will have better health-related quality of life, better health status, earlier palliative care utilisation, and less acute healthcare utilisation.
- Assess implementation processes of SPARKLE-2. We will assess acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility through a structured survey among healthcare providers. Also, we will assess fidelity through completion rate of IPOS screening questionnaires and compliance with clinical response pathways. Implementation costs will be captured from the healthcare system's perspective prospectively using an activity-based costing approach.
- Assess contexts and mechanisms that bring about SPARKLE-2 outcomes. We will interview patients, caregivers and healthcare providers who were involved in SPARKLE-2 to explore their perspectives on factors, including facilitators and barriers, that bring about intervention effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SPARKLE-2 Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: SPARKLE-2Participants will receive SPARKLE-2 immediately at bi-weekly interval. |
| Usual Care | No intervention | –Participants will not receive any study intervention (SPARKLE-2) and will continue to receive their usual care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 1. Unable to complete interviews
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SPARKLE-2Patients will receive a Short Message Service (SMS) text on their phone every 2 weeks, inviting them to complete a self-reported online six-item Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) questionnaire over a period of 12 months. If a patient records higher scores on any IPOS symptom domains, a programme coordinator will then make a phone call to the patient for further assessment of symptoms and concerns identified. If indicated, the programme coordinator would then initiate management of the symptoms and concerns according to structured clinical management protocols. | Behavioural | SPARKLE-2 Intervention |
Primary outcome
Quality of life score measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative (FACIT-Pal)
Time frame: 12 weeks.
FACIT-Pal is a 46-item measure with a quality-of-life scale (4 domains: physical, emotional, social, and functional well-being) and a palliative care subscale. It has demonstrated internal consistency, reliability and validity for persons with advanced cancer. Quality of life is scored on a scale of 0 to 184, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
6 secondary outcomes
Quality of life score measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative (FACIT-Pal)
Time frame: Every 12 weeks from baseline, till the point of patient death, or till week 48, whichever is earlier.
Palliative care concerns measured using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcomes Scale (IPOS)
Time frame: Every 2 weeks from baseline, till the point of patient death, or till week 48, whichever is earlier.
Health states measured using the EuroQOL Group 5-Dimension Health-related Quality of Life Measurement (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 27 weeks, and 48 weeks.
Acute healthcare utilization.
Time frame: Baseline until death or end of the study, up to 48 weeks.
Inpatient healthcare utilization and the intervention's impact on inpatient healthcare utilization.
Time frame: Baseline until death or end of the study, up to 48 weeks.
Healthcare expenditure associated with patient care and the economic impact on intervention.
Time frame: Baseline until death or end of the study, up to 48 weeks.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 39046614Ellis KR, Furgal A, Wayas F, Contreras A, Jones C, Perez S, Raji D, Smith M, Vincent C, Song L, Northouse L, Langford AT. Symptom burden and quality of life among patient and family caregiver dyads in advanced cancer. Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):3027-3038. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03743-8. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
- Background: PubMed 40038129Yang GM, Ke Y, Ng XH, Neo PSH, Cheung YB. Proactive symptom monitoring to initiate timely palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 5;33(3):249. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09311-1.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jess Ng Hiv Choo contact
Grace Meijuan YANG, MD, MPH, PhD study chair
National Cancer Centre, Singapore
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SPARKLE-2 in people with Neoplasms and Palliative Care, run by National Cancer Centre, Singapore at 2 sites in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Grace Meijuan YANG, MD, MPH, PhD (63065844, grace.yang.m.j@singhealth.com.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of life score measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative (FACIT-Pal) (time frame: 12 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07745816, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2026.