Temporomandibular DisordersNCT07750743
Temporomandibular Disorders With and Without Chronic Neck Pain
An observational study of Temporomandibular Disorders, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are common musculoskeletal conditions frequently accompanied by cervical dysfunction. Although previous studies have demonstrated associations between cervical impairments and temporomandibular symptoms, the influence of chronic neck pain on cervical function and its contribution to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Temporomandibular Disorders
- How many people
- 67 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 23 Jun 2026to 15 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults aged 18-65 years diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) who were recruited from the Tunceli Oral and Dental Health Center. Participants were classified into two groups according to the presence or absence of chronic neck pain and underwent comprehensive assessments of temporomandibular and cervical function.
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 18 to 65 years.
- Diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD).
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Presence of cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, orthopedic, or other systemic diseases.
- Current infection or malignancy.
- History of cervical spine surgery.
- Acute cervical trauma or fracture.
- Cognitive, psychological, or mental conditions that could interfere with study assessments.
- Inability or unwillingness to complete the study assessments.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Munzur University Faculty of Health Sciences
Tunceli, Bolu
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Cervical Function in Individuals With Temporomandibular Disorders With and Without Chronic Neck Pain: Determinants of Temporomandibular Function
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are common musculoskeletal conditions frequently accompanied by cervical dysfunction. Although previous studies have demonstrated associations between cervical impairments and temporomandibular symptoms, the influence of chronic neck pain on cervical function and its contribution to temporomandibular outcomes remain incompletely understood.
This cross-sectional study aims to compare cervical and temporomandibular characteristics between individuals with TMD with chronic neck pain and those without chronic neck pain, and to identify cervical factors associated with temporomandibular function, maximal mouth opening, and temporomandibular pain. A total of 67 adults diagnosed with TMD according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) will be enrolled and allocated into two groups based on the presence or absence of chronic neck pain.
Read more
Participants will undergo comprehensive assessments including temporomandibular joint range of motion, maximal mouth opening, Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20), craniovertebral angle, cervical range of motion, deep cervical flexor muscle endurance, cervical proprioception, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Group differences and the relationships between cervical function and temporomandibular outcomes will be examined using correlation and regression analyses.
The findings are expected to clarify the contribution of cervical posture, mobility, muscle endurance, and proprioception to temporomandibular dysfunction. The results may support the incorporation of comprehensive cervical assessment and cervical-focused rehabilitation strategies into the clinical management of individuals with temporomandibular disorders.
Read the detailed description
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are among the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint, masticatory muscles, and associated structures. These disorders are characterized by pain, restricted mandibular movement, joint sounds, and impaired jaw function, resulting in limitations in daily activities and reduced quality of life. Increasing evidence suggests that TMD should not be considered an isolated disorder of the temporomandibular joint but rather a complex musculoskeletal condition involving close anatomical, biomechanical, and neurophysiological interactions with the cervical spine. The trigeminocervical complex provides a neurophysiological basis for this relationship by integrating afferent input from both the cervical spine and the trigeminal system, thereby influencing pain processing, motor control, and sensorimotor function.
Individuals with TMD frequently demonstrate forward head posture, reduced cervical range of motion, impaired deep cervical flexor muscle function, and altered cervical proprioception. Although previous studies have reported associations between cervical dysfunction and temporomandibular symptoms, most investigations have evaluated only isolated components of cervical function. Furthermore, the specific influence of chronic neck pain on cervical impairments and its contribution to temporomandibular function has not been comprehensively investigated. Therefore, a more integrated evaluation of cervical posture, mobility, muscle endurance, and proprioception is warranted to better understand the interaction between cervical dysfunction and TMD.
The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to compare cervical function and temporomandibular characteristics between individuals with TMD accompanied by chronic neck pain and those with TMD without chronic neck pain. A secondary objective is to determine which cervical variables independently predict temporomandibular function, maximal mouth opening, and temporomandibular pain intensity.
A total of 67 adults diagnosed with TMD according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) will participate in the study. Participants will be recruited from the Tunceli Oral and Dental Health Center and divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of chronic neck pain. Individuals in the chronic neck pain group must have experienced neck pain for at least three months, report neck pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and have a Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of at least 5. Participants without chronic neck pain must report no neck pain during the previous three months, have a VAS score of zero, and an NDI score below 5. Eligible participants will be between 18 and 65 years of age and diagnosed with TMD according to the DC/TMD criteria. Individuals with cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, orthopedic, or other systemic diseases, infection, malignancy, previous cervical spine surgery, acute cervical trauma or fracture, or cognitive or psychological conditions that could interfere with the assessments will be excluded.
All participants will undergo standardized clinical assessments performed by trained investigators. Temporomandibular joint function will be evaluated by measuring maximal mouth opening, lateral excursion, and protrusion range of motion. Functional limitation related to TMD will be assessed using the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20). Cervical posture will be evaluated by measuring the craniovertebral angle using the PostureScreen application. Total cervical range of motion will be measured with a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device. Deep cervical flexor muscle endurance will be assessed using the Craniocervical Flexion Test. Cervical proprioception will be evaluated using the Joint Position Error Test. Neck disability will be assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), while temporomandibular joint pain intensity and neck pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Statistical analyses will include comparisons between groups using independent-samples t-tests. Associations between cervical and temporomandibular variables will be examined using Pearson correlation analyses. Multiple linear regression and hierarchical regression analyses will be performed to identify independent cervical predictors of temporomandibular function, maximal mouth opening, and temporomandibular pain intensity. Statistical significance will be defined as a two-sided p-value of less than 0.05.
This study is expected to improve the understanding of the relationship between cervical dysfunction and temporomandibular disorders by comprehensively evaluating multiple components of cervical function within the same population. The findings may provide clinically relevant evidence supporting comprehensive cervical assessment and the integration of cervical-focused rehabilitation strategies into the management of individuals with temporomandibular disorders.
- Conditions
- Temporomandibular Disorders
- Keywords
- Temporomandibular disorders, chronic neck pain, cervical proprioception, deep cervical flexor muscles, craniovertebral angle
- Medical subject headings
- Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TMD with Chronic Neck Pain | Adults diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) who had chronic neck pain for at least 3 months, a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score greater than 0, and a Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of ≥5. Participants underwent assessments of temporomandibular function, cervical posture, cervical range of motion, deep cervical flexor endurance, cervical proprioception, neck disability, and pain intensity. | |
| TMD without Chronic Neck Pain | Adults diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) who had no history of neck pain during the previous 3 months, a VAS score of 0, and a Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of <5. Participants underwent the same clinical assessments as the chronic neck pain group. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximum Mouth Opening
Maximum interincisal distance (mm) measured using a flexible measuring tape to evaluate temporomandibular joint mobility.
Measured: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20)
Functional limitation associated with temporomandibular disorders assessed using the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20. The Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 consists of 20 items and yields a total score ranging from 0 to 200, with 0 indicating no functional limitation and 200 indicating maximum functional limitation. Lower scores indicate better jaw function (better outcome), whereas higher scores indicate greater functional limitation (worse outcome).
Measured: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Craniovertebral Angle
Cervical proprioception assessed using the Joint Position Error Test. Joint position error is measured in degrees (°) as the absolute repositioning error between the target and reproduced head position. There is no fixed minimum or maximum value. Lower values indicate better cervical proprioceptive function (better outcome), whereas higher values indicate greater repositioning error and poorer cervical proprioceptive function (worse outcome).
Measured: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Total Cervical Range of Motion
Total cervical range of motion measured with the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device.
Measured: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Deep Cervical Flexor Endurance
Deep cervical flexor muscle endurance assessed using the Craniocervical Flexion Test.
Measured: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Cervical Proprioception
Cervical proprioception evaluated using the Joint Position Error Test. Lower error values indicate better proprioceptive function.
Measured: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Neck-related disability assessed using the Neck Disability Index. The Neck Disability Index is a 10-item questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0 to 50, where 0 indicates no disability and 50 indicates complete disability. Lower scores indicate less neck-related disability (better outcome), whereas higher scores indicate greater neck-related disability (worse outcome).
Measured: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Temporomandibular Joint Pain Intensity
Temporomandibular joint pain intensity assessed using the 10-centimeter Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analog Scale ranges from 0 to 10 centimeters, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Lower scores indicate lower pain intensity (better outcome), whereas higher scores indicate greater pain intensity (worse outcome).
Measured: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2026
- Study start23 Jun 2026
- Primary completion6 Jul 2026
- Study completion15 Jul 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Temporomandibular DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hacettepe UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ceyhun Topcuoglu, Munzur University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07750743
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2026/8-11
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Park Y, Lee T, Seog M, Kim SO, Kim J, Kwon JS, Kang CM. An Analysis of the Temporomandibular Joint Range of Motion and Related Factors in Children and Adolescents. Children (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;8(6):515. doi: 10.3390/children8060515.
PubMed 34204551
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Cervical Function in Individuals With Temporomandibular Disorders With and Without Chronic Neck Pain: Determinants of Temporomandibular Function
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07750743
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2026/8-11
- Conditions
- Temporomandibular Disorders
- Keywords
- Temporomandibular disorders, chronic neck pain, cervical proprioception, deep cervical flexor muscles, craniovertebral angle
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jul 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are common musculoskeletal conditions frequently accompanied by cervical dysfunction. Although previous studies have demonstrated associations between cervical impairments and temporomandibular symptoms, the influence of chronic neck pain on cervical function and its contribution to temporomandibular outcomes remain incompletely understood.
This cross-sectional study aims to compare cervical and temporomandibular characteristics between individuals with TMD with chronic neck pain and those without chronic neck pain, and to identify cervical factors associated with temporomandibular function, maximal mouth opening, and temporomandibular pain. A total of 67 adults diagnosed with TMD according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) will be enrolled and allocated into two groups based on the presence or absence of chronic neck pain.
Participants will undergo comprehensive assessments including temporomandibular joint range of motion, maximal mouth opening, Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20), craniovertebral angle, cervical range of motion, deep cervical flexor muscle endurance, cervical proprioception, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Group differences and the relationships between cervical function and temporomandibular outcomes will be examined using correlation and regression analyses.
The findings are expected to clarify the contribution of cervical posture, mobility, muscle endurance, and proprioception to temporomandibular dysfunction. The results may support the incorporation of comprehensive cervical assessment and cervical-focused rehabilitation strategies into the clinical management of individuals with temporomandibular disorders.
Detailed description
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are among the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint, masticatory muscles, and associated structures. These disorders are characterized by pain, restricted mandibular movement, joint sounds, and impaired jaw function, resulting in limitations in daily activities and reduced quality of life. Increasing evidence suggests that TMD should not be considered an isolated disorder of the temporomandibular joint but rather a complex musculoskeletal condition involving close anatomical, biomechanical, and neurophysiological interactions with the cervical spine. The trigeminocervical complex provides a neurophysiological basis for this relationship by integrating afferent input from both the cervical spine and the trigeminal system, thereby influencing pain processing, motor control, and sensorimotor function.
Individuals with TMD frequently demonstrate forward head posture, reduced cervical range of motion, impaired deep cervical flexor muscle function, and altered cervical proprioception. Although previous studies have reported associations between cervical dysfunction and temporomandibular symptoms, most investigations have evaluated only isolated components of cervical function. Furthermore, the specific influence of chronic neck pain on cervical impairments and its contribution to temporomandibular function has not been comprehensively investigated. Therefore, a more integrated evaluation of cervical posture, mobility, muscle endurance, and proprioception is warranted to better understand the interaction between cervical dysfunction and TMD.
The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to compare cervical function and temporomandibular characteristics between individuals with TMD accompanied by chronic neck pain and those with TMD without chronic neck pain. A secondary objective is to determine which cervical variables independently predict temporomandibular function, maximal mouth opening, and temporomandibular pain intensity.
A total of 67 adults diagnosed with TMD according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) will participate in the study. Participants will be recruited from the Tunceli Oral and Dental Health Center and divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of chronic neck pain. Individuals in the chronic neck pain group must have experienced neck pain for at least three months, report neck pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and have a Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of at least 5. Participants without chronic neck pain must report no neck pain during the previous three months, have a VAS score of zero, and an NDI score below 5. Eligible participants will be between 18 and 65 years of age and diagnosed with TMD according to the DC/TMD criteria. Individuals with cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, orthopedic, or other systemic diseases, infection, malignancy, previous cervical spine surgery, acute cervical trauma or fracture, or cognitive or psychological conditions that could interfere with the assessments will be excluded.
All participants will undergo standardized clinical assessments performed by trained investigators. Temporomandibular joint function will be evaluated by measuring maximal mouth opening, lateral excursion, and protrusion range of motion. Functional limitation related to TMD will be assessed using the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20). Cervical posture will be evaluated by measuring the craniovertebral angle using the PostureScreen application. Total cervical range of motion will be measured with a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device. Deep cervical flexor muscle endurance will be assessed using the Craniocervical Flexion Test. Cervical proprioception will be evaluated using the Joint Position Error Test. Neck disability will be assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), while temporomandibular joint pain intensity and neck pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Statistical analyses will include comparisons between groups using independent-samples t-tests. Associations between cervical and temporomandibular variables will be examined using Pearson correlation analyses. Multiple linear regression and hierarchical regression analyses will be performed to identify independent cervical predictors of temporomandibular function, maximal mouth opening, and temporomandibular pain intensity. Statistical significance will be defined as a two-sided p-value of less than 0.05.
This study is expected to improve the understanding of the relationship between cervical dysfunction and temporomandibular disorders by comprehensively evaluating multiple components of cervical function within the same population. The findings may provide clinically relevant evidence supporting comprehensive cervical assessment and the integration of cervical-focused rehabilitation strategies into the management of individuals with temporomandibular disorders.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TMD with Chronic Neck Pain | – | –Adults diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) who had chronic neck pain for at least 3 months, a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score greater than 0, and a Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of ≥5. Participants underwent assessments of temporomandibular function, cervical posture, cervical range of motion, deep cervical flexor endurance, cervical proprioception, neck disability, and pain intensity. |
| TMD without Chronic Neck Pain | – | –Adults diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) who had no history of neck pain during the previous 3 months, a VAS score of 0, and a Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of <5. Participants underwent the same clinical assessments as the chronic neck pain group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults aged 18-65 years diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) who were recruited from the Tunceli Oral and Dental Health Center. Participants were classified into two groups according to the presence or absence of chronic neck pain and underwent comprehensive assessments of temporomandibular and cervical function.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults aged 18 to 65 years.
- Diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD).
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Presence of cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, orthopedic, or other systemic diseases.
- Current infection or malignancy.
- History of cervical spine surgery.
- Acute cervical trauma or fracture.
- Cognitive, psychological, or mental conditions that could interfere with study assessments.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Maximum Mouth Opening
Time frame: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Maximum interincisal distance (mm) measured using a flexible measuring tape to evaluate temporomandibular joint mobility.
Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20)
Time frame: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Functional limitation associated with temporomandibular disorders assessed using the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20. The Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 consists of 20 items and yields a total score ranging from 0 to 200, with 0 indicating no functional limitation and 200 indicating maximum functional limitation. Lower scores indicate better jaw function (better outcome), whereas higher scores indicate greater functional limitation (worse outcome).
6 secondary outcomes
Craniovertebral Angle
Time frame: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Total Cervical Range of Motion
Time frame: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Deep Cervical Flexor Endurance
Time frame: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Cervical Proprioception
Time frame: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time frame: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Temporomandibular Joint Pain Intensity
Time frame: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Aug 2026.
- Background: PubMed 34204551Park Y, Lee T, Seog M, Kim SO, Kim J, Kwon JS, Kang CM. An Analysis of the Temporomandibular Joint Range of Motion and Related Factors in Children and Adolescents. Children (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;8(6):515. doi: 10.3390/children8060515.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Temporomandibular Disorders
Recruiting
Photobiomodulation for Management of Temporomandibular Disorder Pain
Pain Related to TMD
Recruiting
Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Temporomandibular Disorders.
TMD, Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Dextrose Prolotherapy vs. Sodium Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Jaw Joint Internal Derangement
Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement, TMJ-ID
Recruiting
R01_Pilot Jaw Muscle Phenotypes
Chronic TMD Pain, Temporomandibular Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Temporomandibular Disorders, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximum Mouth Opening (time frame: Baseline (Cross-sectional assessment)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07750743, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2026.