Trigger FingerNCT07753460
Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
A study testing Low Level Laser Therapy in people with Trigger Finger and Stenosing Tenosynovitis, run by Dokuz Eylul University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Trigger finger, also known as stenosing tenosynovitis, is one of the most common disorders affecting the hand. Its lifetime prevalence is 2-3%. Patients typically present with locking of the affected finger during flexion and painful catching during extension. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Trigger Finger, Stenosing Tenosynovitis, Trigger Digit
- What is being tested?
- Low Level Laser Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 91 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 7 Aug 2025to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Applying to the outpatient clinic of the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University
- A clinical diagnosis of trigger finger based on typical pain and tenderness over the A1 pulley accompanied by triggering of the affected finger
- Willingness to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Multiple trigger fingers in the same hand
- Fixed deformity (Quinnell grade 4)
- Splint treatment, physical therapy, or steroid injection for the affected trigger finger within the previous 6 months
- Previous surgery for the affected trigger finger
- Musculoskeletal disorders or peripheral nerve injury involving the ipsilateral upper extremity
- Rheumatoid arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren disease, amyloidosis, or mucopolysaccharidosis
Show all 11Show fewer
- Active infection, bleeding, skin lesions, or an implant at the treatment site
- Radiotherapy within the previous 6 months
- Photodermatosis, photosensitivity, or systemic lupus erythematosus
- Pregnancy, epilepsy, coagulopathy, active malignancy, or the presence of a cardiac pacemaker
- Cognitive impairment that precludes understanding of the study questionnaires.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Dokuz Eylul University
Izmir, Balçova, 35330
Gözde Kırım Kaya, MD, gozde.kirimkaya@deu.edu.tr
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy for Trigger Finger: A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Trial
Trigger finger, also known as stenosing tenosynovitis, is one of the most common disorders affecting the hand. Its lifetime prevalence is 2-3%. Patients typically present with locking of the affected finger during flexion and painful catching during extension. In mild cases, pain, swelling, and morning stiffness may be present without triggering. In more severe cases, the affected finger may become locked in flexion.
Conservative treatment methods, corticosteroid injections, and surgical interventions can be used in the treatment of trigger finger. Conservative treatment options include activity modification, splint immobilization, exercise programs, massage, physical therapy modalities including extracorporeal shock wave therapy and therapeutic ultrasound, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Splinting is an inexpensive and effective treatment option for trigger finger.
Read more
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a treatment modality based on photobiomodulation, which leads to biological changes in living organisms through the interaction of photons with atoms or molecules. LLLT is used to promote wound healing and tissue repair, prevent tissue damage, reduce inflammation and edema, and provide analgesia. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of LLLT in the treatment of various musculoskeletal disorders.
This study aims to investigate the effects of adding active LLLT to splint treatment in patients with trigger finger. Patients receiving active LLLT plus splint treatment will be compared with those receiving sham LLLT plus splint treatment in terms of clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Trigger finger develops as a result of a size mismatch between the flexor tendon or tendon sheath and the first annular (A1) pulley at the level of the metacarpal head. Although the A1 pulley is the most commonly affected site, triggering may also occur at the second and third annular pulleys (A2 and A3). The diagnosis of trigger finger is made clinically. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is an adjunctive imaging modality that is increasingly used in the diagnosis of trigger finger. The ultrasonographic findings of trigger finger may include diffuse or nodular hypoechoic thickening of the A1 pulley and increased flexor tendon thickness.
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been shown to be an effective, noninvasive treatment modality for pain reduction in various musculoskeletal disorders. Studies have investigated its effectiveness in the treatment of de Quervain's tenosynovitis, flexor tendon injuries, carpal tunnel syndrome, lateral epicondylitis, plantar fasciitis, and adhesive capsulitis. However, evidence evaluating the effectiveness of LLLT for the treatment of trigger finger remains limited. The literature includes a small, non-randomized, uncontrolled clinical study involving five patients. In addition, a case report described the application of a combination of LLLT, specific hand massage, and hand exercises in a patient with chronic trigger fingers and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Although these studies reported favorable outcomes, high-quality evidence remains limited. To the best of our knowledge, no randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of LLLT for the treatment of trigger finger have been reported in the literature.
This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial designed to investigate the effects of LLLT on clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes in patients with trigger finger. Adults with a clinical diagnosis of trigger finger who meet the eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent will be enrolled. Following randomization, participants will be assigned to either the active LLLT group or the sham LLLT group. Both groups will receive the same splint treatment during the intervention period. LLLT will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks, for a total of 12 treatment sessions, using a wavelength of 830 nm, an output power of 50 mW, continuous mode, and an energy density of 4 J/cm². Participants in the sham group will undergo the same treatment schedule, with the laser device remaining switched off throughout each session. To maintain participant blinding, participants in both groups will wear headphones and an eye mask during each treatment session. All participants will be provided with a metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint blocking splint. The splint will block the MCP joint of the affected finger at 0° while allowing unrestricted movement of the interphalangeal joints. Participants will be instructed to wear the splint continuously for 4 weeks and to remove it only for personal hygiene. Compliance with splint use will be monitored using a daily diary in which participants will record the number of hours they wear the splint each day. The average daily wearing time will be calculated at the end of the treatment period. Participants will be allowed to continue their usual daily and work-related activities while avoiding movements that aggravate triggering symptoms or excessive use of the affected hand. Paracetamol will be permitted as rescue medication if needed, and its use will be recorded throughout the study.
Before treatment, demographic and clinical information, including age, sex, body mass index, affected hand, affected finger, symptom duration, and previous history of trigger finger, will be documented. Outcome measures will include pain intensity assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), triggering severity assessed with the Quinnell Classification, triggering frequency determined by the number of triggering events during 10 consecutive active full-fist movements, the Trigger Finger Assessment Scale (TFAS), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, hand grip strength, patient satisfaction, and ultrasonographic measurements of A1 pulley thickness and flexor tendon thickness. Ultrasonographic assessments will be performed by a single experienced investigator, who will be blinded to treatment allocation. All clinical outcome assessments will also be conducted by an investigator blinded to treatment allocation.
- Conditions
- Trigger Finger, Stenosing Tenosynovitis, Trigger Digit
- Being tested
- Low Level Laser Therapy, Sham Low Level Laser Therapy
- Keywords
- trigger finger, trigger digit, low level laser therapy, metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint, stenosing tenosynovitis
- Medical subject headings
- Trigger Finger Disorder, Tendon Entrapment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low Level Laser TherapyDevice
Also called Low Level Laser Treatment
Low-level laser therapy will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks using a BTL-4000 Smart laser therapy device and the following treatment parameters: a wavelength of 830 nm, an output power of 50 mW, continuous mode, and an energy density of 4 J/cm².
All participants will also receive a metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint for 4 weeks.
Sham Low Level Laser TherapyDevice
Also called Sham Low Level Laser Treatment
Sham low-level laser therapy will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks, for a total of 12 sessions, using a BTL-4000 Smart laser therapy device that will remain switched off throughout each session. To maintain participant blinding, participants in both groups will wear headphones and an eye mask during each treatment session.
All participants will also receive a metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint for 4 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Low Level Laser Therapy | Experimental | Low-level laser therapy will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks using a BTL-4000 Smart laser therapy device and the following treatment parameters: a wavelength of 830 nm, an output power of 50 mW, continuous mode, and an energy density of 4 J/cm². Receives: Device: Low Level Laser Therapy |
| Sham Low Level Laser Therapy | Sham comparator | Sham low-level laser therapy will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks, for a total of 12 sessions, using a BTL-4000 Smart laser therapy device that will remain switched off throughout each session. Receives: Device: Sham Low Level Laser Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analog Scale
Changes in trigger finger pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. Scores range from 0 to 10 cm, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Measured: All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
Quinnell Classification
The severity of triggering will be assessed using the Quinnell Classification: Grade 0, normal movement of the digit; Grade 1, uneven movement; Grade 2, actively correctable locking of the digit; Grade 3, passively correctable locking; and Grade 4, fixed deformity. Higher grades indicate greater triggering severity.
Measured: All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
Trigger Finger Assessment Scale
The Trigger Finger Assessment Scale consists of three separate 0-to-10-point scales that assess the frequency, severity, and functional impact of triggering. Higher scores on each scale indicate more frequent or severe triggering or greater functional impact.
Scale reference: Tarbhai K, Hannah S, von Schroeder HP. Trigger finger treatment: a comparison of 2 splint designs. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(2):243-249.
Measured: All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
Number of Triggering Events During 10 Active Full Fist Movements
The number of triggering events during 10 consecutive active full fist movements will be recorded (0-10).
Measured: All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH)
The QuickDASH is an 11-item questionnaire used to assess physical function and symptoms. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Measured: All participants will be assessed at three time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, and 1 month after treatment
Hand Grip Strength
Hand grip strength will be assessed using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer. Three measurements will be performed on the affected hand, with a 1-minute rest interval between each measurement, and the mean of the three measurements will be recorded.
Measured: All participants will be assessed at three time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, and 1 month after treatment.
A1 Pulley Thickness
A1 pulley thickness will be measured using ultrasonography in the longitudinal plane. The measurement will be taken at the thickest part of the A1 pulley.
Measured: All participants will be assessed at three time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, and 1 month after treatment
Flexor Tendon Thickness
Flexor tendon thickness will be measured using ultrasonography in the longitudinal plane at three points:
- A1 pulley tunnel inlet: metacarpal head-neck junction.
- A1 pulley tunnel outlet: proximal phalangeal base-shaft junction.
- A1 pulley tunnel (interpulley): middle of inlet and outlet.
Reference: Chiang CH, Kuo LC, Kuo YL, Wu KC, Shao CJ, Chern TC, Jou IM. The value of high-frequency ultrasonographic imaging for quantifying trigger digits: a correlative study with clinical findings in patients with different severity grading. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(6):967-974.
Measured: All participants will be assessed at three time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, and 1 month after treatment.
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point scale with the following response options: completely satisfied, almost satisfied, moderately satisfied, somewhat satisfied, and dissatisfied.
Measured: All participants will be assessed at three time points: immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Aug 2026
- Study start7 Aug 2025
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Trigger FingerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dokuz Eylul University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nihan ERDINC GUNDUZ, Dokuz Eylul University
- Investigators
- Elif Akalın, Prof, MD, Study chair, Dokuz Eylul University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07753460
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025/12-03
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy for Trigger Finger: A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07753460
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2025/12-03
- Conditions
- Trigger Finger, Stenosing Tenosynovitis, Trigger Digit
- Keywords
- trigger finger, trigger digit, low level laser therapy, metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint, stenosing tenosynovitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Dokuz Eylul UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Trigger finger, also known as stenosing tenosynovitis, is one of the most common disorders affecting the hand. Its lifetime prevalence is 2-3%. Patients typically present with locking of the affected finger during flexion and painful catching during extension. In mild cases, pain, swelling, and morning stiffness may be present without triggering. In more severe cases, the affected finger may become locked in flexion.
Conservative treatment methods, corticosteroid injections, and surgical interventions can be used in the treatment of trigger finger. Conservative treatment options include activity modification, splint immobilization, exercise programs, massage, physical therapy modalities including extracorporeal shock wave therapy and therapeutic ultrasound, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Splinting is an inexpensive and effective treatment option for trigger finger.
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a treatment modality based on photobiomodulation, which leads to biological changes in living organisms through the interaction of photons with atoms or molecules. LLLT is used to promote wound healing and tissue repair, prevent tissue damage, reduce inflammation and edema, and provide analgesia. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of LLLT in the treatment of various musculoskeletal disorders.
This study aims to investigate the effects of adding active LLLT to splint treatment in patients with trigger finger. Patients receiving active LLLT plus splint treatment will be compared with those receiving sham LLLT plus splint treatment in terms of clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes.
Detailed description
Trigger finger develops as a result of a size mismatch between the flexor tendon or tendon sheath and the first annular (A1) pulley at the level of the metacarpal head. Although the A1 pulley is the most commonly affected site, triggering may also occur at the second and third annular pulleys (A2 and A3). The diagnosis of trigger finger is made clinically. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is an adjunctive imaging modality that is increasingly used in the diagnosis of trigger finger. The ultrasonographic findings of trigger finger may include diffuse or nodular hypoechoic thickening of the A1 pulley and increased flexor tendon thickness.
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been shown to be an effective, noninvasive treatment modality for pain reduction in various musculoskeletal disorders. Studies have investigated its effectiveness in the treatment of de Quervain's tenosynovitis, flexor tendon injuries, carpal tunnel syndrome, lateral epicondylitis, plantar fasciitis, and adhesive capsulitis. However, evidence evaluating the effectiveness of LLLT for the treatment of trigger finger remains limited. The literature includes a small, non-randomized, uncontrolled clinical study involving five patients. In addition, a case report described the application of a combination of LLLT, specific hand massage, and hand exercises in a patient with chronic trigger fingers and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Although these studies reported favorable outcomes, high-quality evidence remains limited. To the best of our knowledge, no randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of LLLT for the treatment of trigger finger have been reported in the literature.
This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial designed to investigate the effects of LLLT on clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes in patients with trigger finger. Adults with a clinical diagnosis of trigger finger who meet the eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent will be enrolled. Following randomization, participants will be assigned to either the active LLLT group or the sham LLLT group. Both groups will receive the same splint treatment during the intervention period. LLLT will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks, for a total of 12 treatment sessions, using a wavelength of 830 nm, an output power of 50 mW, continuous mode, and an energy density of 4 J/cm². Participants in the sham group will undergo the same treatment schedule, with the laser device remaining switched off throughout each session. To maintain participant blinding, participants in both groups will wear headphones and an eye mask during each treatment session. All participants will be provided with a metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint blocking splint. The splint will block the MCP joint of the affected finger at 0° while allowing unrestricted movement of the interphalangeal joints. Participants will be instructed to wear the splint continuously for 4 weeks and to remove it only for personal hygiene. Compliance with splint use will be monitored using a daily diary in which participants will record the number of hours they wear the splint each day. The average daily wearing time will be calculated at the end of the treatment period. Participants will be allowed to continue their usual daily and work-related activities while avoiding movements that aggravate triggering symptoms or excessive use of the affected hand. Paracetamol will be permitted as rescue medication if needed, and its use will be recorded throughout the study.
Before treatment, demographic and clinical information, including age, sex, body mass index, affected hand, affected finger, symptom duration, and previous history of trigger finger, will be documented. Outcome measures will include pain intensity assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), triggering severity assessed with the Quinnell Classification, triggering frequency determined by the number of triggering events during 10 consecutive active full-fist movements, the Trigger Finger Assessment Scale (TFAS), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, hand grip strength, patient satisfaction, and ultrasonographic measurements of A1 pulley thickness and flexor tendon thickness. Ultrasonographic assessments will be performed by a single experienced investigator, who will be blinded to treatment allocation. All clinical outcome assessments will also be conducted by an investigator blinded to treatment allocation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Low Level Laser Therapy | Experimental | Device: Low Level Laser TherapyLow-level laser therapy will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks using a BTL-4000 Smart laser therapy device and the following treatment parameters: a wavelength of 830 nm, an output power of 50 mW, continuous mode, and an energy density of 4 J/cm². |
| Sham Low Level Laser Therapy | Sham comparator | Device: Sham Low Level Laser TherapySham low-level laser therapy will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks, for a total of 12 sessions, using a BTL-4000 Smart laser therapy device that will remain switched off throughout each session. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Applying to the outpatient clinic of the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University
- A clinical diagnosis of trigger finger based on typical pain and tenderness over the A1 pulley accompanied by triggering of the affected finger
- Willingness to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Multiple trigger fingers in the same hand
- Fixed deformity (Quinnell grade 4)
- Splint treatment, physical therapy, or steroid injection for the affected trigger finger within the previous 6 months
- Previous surgery for the affected trigger finger
- Musculoskeletal disorders or peripheral nerve injury involving the ipsilateral upper extremity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low Level Laser TherapyAlso: Low Level Laser TreatmentLow-level laser therapy will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks using a BTL-4000 Smart laser therapy device and the following treatment parameters: a wavelength of 830 nm, an output power of 50 mW, continuous mode, and an energy density of 4 J/cm². All participants will also receive a metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint for 4 weeks. | Device | Low Level Laser Therapy |
| Sham Low Level Laser TherapyAlso: Sham Low Level Laser TreatmentSham low-level laser therapy will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks, for a total of 12 sessions, using a BTL-4000 Smart laser therapy device that will remain switched off throughout each session. To maintain participant blinding, participants in both groups will wear headphones and an eye mask during each treatment session. All participants will also receive a metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint for 4 weeks. | Device | Sham Low Level Laser Therapy |
Primary outcome
Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
Changes in trigger finger pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. Scores range from 0 to 10 cm, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Quinnell Classification
Time frame: All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
The severity of triggering will be assessed using the Quinnell Classification: Grade 0, normal movement of the digit; Grade 1, uneven movement; Grade 2, actively correctable locking of the digit; Grade 3, passively correctable locking; and Grade 4, fixed deformity. Higher grades indicate greater triggering severity.
Trigger Finger Assessment Scale
Time frame: All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
The Trigger Finger Assessment Scale consists of three separate 0-to-10-point scales that assess the frequency, severity, and functional impact of triggering. Higher scores on each scale indicate more frequent or severe triggering or greater functional impact. Scale reference: Tarbhai K, Hannah S, von Schroeder HP. Trigger finger treatment: a comparison of 2 splint designs. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(2):243-249.
Number of Triggering Events During 10 Active Full Fist Movements
Time frame: All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
The number of triggering events during 10 consecutive active full fist movements will be recorded (0-10).
5 secondary outcomes
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH)
Time frame: All participants will be assessed at three time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, and 1 month after treatment
Hand Grip Strength
Time frame: All participants will be assessed at three time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, and 1 month after treatment.
A1 Pulley Thickness
Time frame: All participants will be assessed at three time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, and 1 month after treatment
Flexor Tendon Thickness
Time frame: All participants will be assessed at three time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, and 1 month after treatment.
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: All participants will be assessed at three time points: immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Trigger Finger
Recruiting
A Clinical Study to Compare Functional Outcomes After Surgery Using a Transverse or Longitudinal Surgical Incision in the Skin.
Functional Disturbance as Result
Not yet recruiting
Understanding Patient Preferences When Deciding on a Voluntary Musculoskeletal Test
Non-traumatic Musculoskeletal Conditions, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Enrolling by invitation
A Comparison of Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint With Relative Motion Extension Splint for Trigger Finger
Trigger Finger
RecruitingPhase 4
Ketorolac in Upper Extremity Tendinopathy and Arthropathy
Osteoarthritis, Tendinopathy
Recruiting
Effectiveness of Conservative Interventions in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
Trigger Finger, Stenosing Tenosynovitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Elif Akalın, Prof, MD study chair
Dokuz Eylul University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Low Level Laser Therapy in people with Trigger Finger and Stenosing Tenosynovitis, run by Dokuz Eylul University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Gözde Kırım Kaya, MD (+902324123951, gozde.kirimkaya@deu.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analog Scale (time frame: All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2026.