AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic Macular EdemaPhase 4SEAFARNCT07753616

South Asian Patients With Diabetic Macular Oedema Treated With Faricimab Assessing the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety (SEAFAR Study)

A Phase 4 study testing Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection, Faricimab in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre Sandwell and west Birmingham NHS trust.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The YOSEMITE and RHINE trials, which studied DMO treated with faricimab, had a majority Caucasian cohort, and the small Asian cohort was East Asian, with no South Asian representation. South Asians have a much higher prevalence of diabetes and its ophthalmic complication of DMO. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Macular Edema
What is being tested?
Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection, Faricimab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Nov 2026to 1 Nov 2029
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to participate:
  • Patients who self-identify themselves as of South Asian origin. Including Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and Sri Lankan.
  • Adults aged ≥18 years at time of consent.
  • Documented diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20-73 ETDRS letters, corresponding approximately to 6/12 to 6/120 Snellen (metres) in the study eye.
  • Centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO) confirmed on SD-OCT, with a central subfield thickness (CST) ≥400 µm, in line with UK NICE guidance in the treatment naïve patients (75% of the cohort). 25% of cohort is previously treated DMO where treatment commenced within 3 years of the screening visit and responded to the anti VEGF, reviewed during this period and developed any clinically significant recurrence of DMO, with vision at least 6/18 or better in the enrolled eye.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Decreased visual acuity attributable primarily to DMO.
  • Both eyes may be eligible; however, the eye with the higher CST will be designated as the study eye.
  • Male or female participants are eligible. Women of childbearing potential must agree to remain abstinent or use highly effective contraception during the study and for at least 3 months after the final dose.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and comply with all study procedures and follow-up.

Who cannot join

  • All subjects meeting any of the following exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from participation:
  • <!-- -->
  • Untreated diabetes mellitus, or initiation of oral or injectable anti-diabetic therapy within 3 months prior to Day 1.
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure: systolic >180 mmHg or diastolic >100 mmHg at rest.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or intention to become pregnant during the study period.
  • Pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP) or macular laser in the study eye within 3 months prior to Day 0.
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Intraocular or periocular corticosteroid therapy in the study eye within 6 months prior to Day 0.
  • Previous treatment with Fluocinolone acetonide (Iluvien) in the study eye.
  • Active proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye.
  • Active ocular or periocular infection, or active intraocular inflammation, in the study eye.
  • Any ocular condition that could confound macular assessment or contribute to irreversible vision loss in the study eye, including:
  • Retinal vein occlusion
  • Significant epiretinal membrane
  • Tractional retinal detachment involving the posterior pole
  • Macular atrophy
  • Foveal scarring
  • Previous vitrectomy in the study eye.
  • Cataract surgery or any other intraocular surgery in the study eye within 3 months of baseline if followed by macular oedema which can confound the DMO diagnosis. Planned cataract surgery in the study eye once treatment commenced and after the loading dose, is allowed as per clinician discretion.
  • Known hypersensitivity to faricimab or any of its excipients.
  • Any systemic condition, abnormal laboratory finding, or concomitant therapy that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise patient safety or the validity of study results.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Charlotte Trinham, RM & G Manager SWBH Trust contact

+44 7790944789

charlotte.trinham1@nhs.net

Yu Jeat Chong, FRCophth contact

+447515497877

yujeat.chong@nhs.net

About this study

The YOSEMITE and RHINE trials, which studied DMO treated with faricimab, had a majority Caucasian cohort, and the small Asian cohort was East Asian, with no South Asian representation. South Asians have a much higher prevalence of diabetes and its ophthalmic complication of DMO.

The SEAFAR study is designed to address this unmet need by specifically evaluating faricimab in a UK-based South Asian cohort with diabetic macular oedema (DMO), delivered via a pragmatic treat-and-extend regimen, for clinically meaningful visual acuity gains, durable anatomic control of DMO, and an acceptable safety profile at week 88 in South Asian patients, with interim benefits by week 52.

Read the detailed description

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO), characterised by accumulation of extracellular fluid in the macula due to breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier, is the most common cause of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. It affects approximately one in fifteen people with diabetes, corresponding to more than 20 million individuals worldwide, and is a leading cause of vision impairment. The risk of diabetes is not equally distributed across populations. In the UK, individuals of South Asian heritage (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan) have a 2-4 times higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to those of European ancestry, with onset often at a younger age and at lower body mass index (BMI) thresholds. They are also shown to have a higher prevalence of retinopathy and maculopathy compared with White Europeans, with worse systemic risk factors (such as HbA1c, blood pressure, cholesterol). Despite this, there is limited trial-based evidence addressing treatment outcomes for these high-risk groups.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has transformed the management of DMO. Pivotal trials such as RISE/RIDE and VIVID/VISTA established the efficacy of ranibizumab and aflibercept in improving visual outcomes and reducing retinal thickness. More recently, faricimab, a bispecific antibody targeting VEGF-A and Angiopoietin-2, has demonstrated efficacy with the potential for extended durability. In the YOSEMITE and RHINE trials, faricimab provided comparable or superior visual and anatomical outcomes to aflibercept 2mg, with a substantial proportion of patients achieving treatment intervals of up to every 16 weeks.

While YOSEMITE and RHINE enrolled over 1,800 patients, the majority of them were non-Asian (n=1747 versus n=144 for Asians). Subgroup analyses for participants in YOSEMITE and RHINE from Asian countries demonstrated broadly similar outcomes between Asian and non-Asian groups. However, the Asian participants were predominantly from East Asia (China, Japan, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan), which means that these findings cannot be extrapolated to South Asian patients given their potentially distinct genetic, biological, and lifestyle risk profiles. Notably, the ELEVATUM trial, designed to evaluate faricimab in underrepresented groups (African-Caribbean, Hispanic, Pacific Islander), similarly did not include adequate representation of South Asians. Thus, a critical evidence gap remains.

The SEAFAR study is designed to address this unmet need by specifically evaluating faricimab in a UK-based South Asian cohort with DMO. The rationale is threefold:

  1. Scientific need: Ethnic differences in disease prevalence, risk factor profiles and possibly treatment response necessitate focused evaluation. Biological differences in angiogenic pathways and systemic disease burden may influence treatment durability and safety.
  2. Clinical relevance: In the 2021 Census data by the UK government, 5.5 million people in England and Wales were from Asian ethnic groups - 1.9 million of these identified with the Indian ethnic group, with 1.6 million from the Pakistani ethnic group.
  3. Health system impact: If faricimab demonstrates similar or greater durability in South Asians, this could substantially reduce injection frequency and clinic visits. This is particularly relevant in communities with higher disease burden and in a National Health Service (NHS) setting where service capacity is constrained.

A pragmatic, Phase IV, single-arm, open-label design is chosen to mirror routine clinical practice while still enabling comparison with previous trial data. By adopting a treat-and-extend protocol up to 24-week intervals, this study will generate real-world, ethnically relevant evidence on the efficacy, durability and safety of faricimab in South Asian patients with DMO.

HYPOTHESIS AND OBJECTIVES

Faricimab, delivered via a pragmatic treat-and-extend regimen, will produce clinically meaningful visual acuity gains, durable anatomic control of DMO, and an acceptable safety profile at week 88 in South Asian patients, with interim benefits by week 52. All participants will have a forced study visit at Week 52 and Week 88 (exit visit) even if not aligned with their treatment interval.

Primary objective:

  1. To evaluate the change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity at week 88 (+/- 14 days) in the study eye, with best responsive patients completing a 24-week extension of their active dosing phase and initiating their observation phase.

Secondary objectives:

  1. Durability: Distribution of maximum dosing interval achieved and the proportion of participants at each interval (Q8W, Q12W, Q16W, Q20W, Q24W).
  2. Anatomy: Change in central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and proportions with absence of DMO (below device-specific inclusion threshold) and absence of intraretinal fluid.
  3. Visual acuity categories: Proportions gaining/losing >=5, >=10, >=15 letters.
  4. Vision-related quality of life: Change from baseline in VFQ-25/EQ-5D.
  5. Diabetic retinopathy severity score (DRSS):
  6. Proportion with a 2 step improvement from baseline
  7. Proportion with a 3 step improvement from baseline
  8. Safety: Ocular/systemic adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE), Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions (SUSARs) from baseline through Week 88.

EXPECTED RISKS AND BENEFITS

Risks:

Participants will experience no study-specific risks. Clinical risks as per standard of care include:

  • Participants may be exposed to risks related to both the intravitreal injection procedure and the study drug, faricimab. Injection-related risks include endophthalmitis, retinal detachment or tear, vitreous haemorrhage, transient or sustained rise in intraocular pressure, cataract progression, subconjunctival haemorrhage, and ocular discomfort.
  • Drug-related risks include intraocular inflammation, retinal vasculitis, vascular occlusion, and very rare systemic arterial thromboembolic events such as stroke or myocardial infarction, which are recognised class effects of anti-VEGF therapy. For identified risks for faricimab, please see the Vabysmo 120 mg/mL Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).
  • In addition, participants may experience inconvenience, anxiety, or discomfort associated with repeated clinic visits, ophthalmic imaging, and intravitreal procedures.

Benefits:

Wider benefits to society and healthcare include the generation of population-specific evidence for the efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab in South Asian patients with DMO, who have historically been underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials. This may support equitable access to evidence-based care and inform NHS service planning by demonstrating whether extended dosing intervals can reduce treatment burden and service demand.

Being tested
Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection, Faricimab
Keywords
diabetic macular oedema, treat and extend, faricimab, south asian, indian, pakistani, bangladeshi, sri lankan

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection, FaricimabDrug

    Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection, Faricimab

Study groups in NCT07753616
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
single arm DMO treated with FaricimabOtherNot described
Receives: Drug: Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection, Faricimab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye

    Change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity in the study eye, measured as ETDRS letter score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 88 (+/- 14 days)

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Distribution of Maximum Dosing Interval Achieved

    Proportion of participants at each maximum dosing interval achieved (Q8W, Q12W, Q16W, Q20W, Q24W).

    Measured: Baseline through Week 88 (+/- 14 days), with interim assessment at Week 52 (+/- 14 days)

  2. Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST)

    Change from baseline in central subfield thickness measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days)

  3. Proportion of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Oedema

    Proportion of participants with central subfield thickness below the device-specific inclusion threshold.

    Measured: Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days)

  4. Proportion of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid

    Proportion of participants with absence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg SD-OCT), based on qualitative fluid status assessment.

    Measured: Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days)

  5. Proportion of Participants Gaining >=5, >=10 and >=15 ETDRS Letters From Baseline

    Proportion of participants gaining 5 or more, 10 or more, and 15 or more letters from baseline in best corrected visual acuity, assessed using ETDRS charts.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days)

  6. Proportion of Participants Losing >=5, >=10 and >=15 ETDRS Letters From Baseline

    Proportion of participants losing 5 or more, 10 or more, and 15 or more letters from baseline in best corrected visual acuity, assessed using ETDRS charts.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days)

  7. Change From Baseline in Vision-Related Quality of Life (NEI VFQ-25)

    Change from baseline in vision-related quality of life, assessed using the VFQ-25 questionnaire, collected on paper or electronically depending on site capability.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days)

  8. Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D)

    Change from baseline in health-related quality of life, assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire, collected on paper or electronically depending on site capability.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days)

  9. Proportion of Participants With a 2-Step or 3-Step Improvement in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score (DRSS) From Baseline

    Proportion of participants with a 2-step or 3-step improvement from baseline in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score, documented in both eyes from wide-field fundus photographs.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days)

  10. Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events

    Number of participants with ocular adverse events. Adverse events will be coded and summarised by frequency, severity, and relationship to treatment. Ocular safety outcomes, including intraocular pressure and events such as endophthalmitis, retinal vasculitis, and retinal vascular occlusion, will be tabulated separately.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 88 (+/- 14 days), with interim assessment at Week 52 (+/- 14 days)

  11. Number of Participants With Systemic Adverse Events

    Number of participants with systemic adverse events. Adverse events will be coded and summarised by frequency, severity, and relationship to treatment.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 88 (+/- 14 days), with interim assessment at Week 52 (+/- 14 days)

  12. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Number of participants with serious adverse events, defined per protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Events will be coded and summarised by frequency, severity, and relationship to treatment.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 88 (+/- 14 days), with interim assessment at Week 52 (+/- 14 days)

  13. Number of Participants With Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions (SUSARs)

    Number of participants with Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions, defined as adverse reactions that are both unexpected and serious.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 88 (+/- 14 days), with interim assessment at Week 52 (+/- 14 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07753616
Sponsor's protocol ID
SWB/SPON/26/04
Other IDs
Agreed
Acronym
SEAFAR
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
27 Jul 2026
Last updated
7 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Pseudonymized data, access provided to need to know basis, UK GPPR rules Aggregate results will be shared after they have been analysed.

Publications

  • Okada AA, Palestine AG, Kramer M, Jabs DA, Standardization Of Uveitis Nomenclature Sun Working Group. Reply to Comment on: Classification Criteria for Behcet Disease Uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;235:339-340. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Oct 27. No abstract available.

    PubMed 34715075
  • Ishida S, Chen SJ, Murata T, Ogura Y, Ruamviboonsuk P, Sakamoto T, Fujita T, Kawano M, Ohsawa S, Abreu F, Haskova Z, Ives J, Silverman D, Yoon YH; YOSEMITE and RHINE Investigators. Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of Faricimab in Patients From Asian Countries With Diabetic Macular Edema: 1-Year Subgroup Analysis of the Phase III YOSEMITE and RHINE Trials. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2023 Sep-Oct 01;12(5):451-459. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000634. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

    PubMed 37851562
  • Wykoff CC, Abreu F, Adamis AP, Basu K, Eichenbaum DA, Haskova Z, Lin H, Loewenstein A, Mohan S, Pearce IA, Sakamoto T, Schlottmann PG, Silverman D, Sun JK, Wells JA, Willis JR, Tadayoni R; YOSEMITE and RHINE Investigators. Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab with extended dosing up to every 16 weeks in patients with diabetic macular oedema (YOSEMITE and RHINE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2022 Feb 19;399(10326):741-755. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00018-6. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

    PubMed 35085503
  • Heier JS, Korobelnik JF, Brown DM, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Do DV, Midena E, Boyer DS, Terasaki H, Kaiser PK, Marcus DM, Nguyen QD, Jaffe GJ, Slakter JS, Simader C, Soo Y, Schmelter T, Vitti R, Berliner AJ, Zeitz O, Metzig C, Holz FG. Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 148-Week Results from the VISTA and VIVID Studies. Ophthalmology. 2016 Nov;123(11):2376-2385. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.032. Epub 2016 Sep 17.

    PubMed 27651226
  • Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, Boyer DS, Patel S, Feiner L, Gibson A, Sy J, Rundle AC, Hopkins JJ, Rubio RG, Ehrlich JS; RISE and RIDE Research Group. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):789-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.039. Epub 2012 Feb 11.

    PubMed 22330964
  • Raymond NT, Varadhan L, Reynold DR, Bush K, Sankaranarayanan S, Bellary S, Barnett AH, Kumar S, O'Hare JP; UK Asian Diabetes Study Retinopathy Study Group. Higher prevalence of retinopathy in diabetic patients of South Asian ethnicity compared with white Europeans in the community: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes Care. 2009 Mar;32(3):410-5. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1422. Epub 2008 Dec 15.

    PubMed 19074992
  • Tillin T, Hughes AD, Godsland IF, Whincup P, Forouhi NG, Welsh P, Sattar N, McKeigue PM, Chaturvedi N. Insulin resistance and truncal obesity as important determinants of the greater incidence of diabetes in Indian Asians and African Caribbeans compared with Europeans: the Southall And Brent REvisited (SABRE) cohort. Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):383-93. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0544. Epub 2012 Sep 10.

    PubMed 22966089
  • Lee R, Wong TY, Sabanayagam C. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015 Sep 30;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s40662-015-0026-2. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26605370
  • Tan GS, Cheung N, Simo R, Cheung GC, Wong TY. Diabetic macular oedema. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Feb;5(2):143-155. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30052-3. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

    PubMed 27496796

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in