AzTrials
AzTrials

Uterine Fibroids (UF)NCT07754877

Safety and Efficacy of Microwave Ablation Alone Versus Microwave Ablation Combined With Chemical Ablation in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

A study testing Microwave ablation combined with chemical ablation and Microwave ablation in people with Uterine Fibroids (UF) and Microwave Ablation, run by Peking University Aerospace Center Hospital at 1 site in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors in women of reproductive age, with a prevalence of 20%-50%, often causing menorrhagia, anemia, pelvic pain, and pressure symptoms that markedly impair quality of life. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
What is being tested?
Microwave ablation combined with chemical ablation and Microwave ablation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
248 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Aug 2026to 30 Aug 2028
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • A definitive diagnosis of uterine fibroids confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography, with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification 0-6;
  • At least one of the following symptoms: menorrhagia, secondary anemia, abdominal/pelvic pain, or compression symptoms;
  • Absence of perimenopausal signs;
  • A safe transabdominal puncture route accessible under imaging guidance.

Who cannot join

  • Suspicion of malignancy on ultrasound or MRI that cannot be ruled out (e.g., uterine sarcoma; uterine fibroids coexisting with cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer; or other gynecological malignancies);
  • Uterine fibroids with coexisting adenomyosis;
  • Menstrual, gestational, or lactational period;
  • Uterine fibroids classified as FIGO type 7;
  • Known allergy to alcohol, lauromacrogol, or related sclerosing agents;
  • Absence of a safe percutaneous puncture route (e.g., lesion adherent to critical structures - bowel, bladder, or major vessels - that cannot be safely separated);
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Uncontrolled acute pelvic inflammatory disease;
  • Significant hepatic, renal, or other major organ dysfunction;
  • Severe coagulopathy, defined as platelet count <50 × 10⁹/L, prothrombin time >25 s, or prothrombin activity <40%;
  • History of other malignancies;
  • Participation in another clinical trial within 1 month prior to informed consent;
  • Any other condition deemed by the investigator to render the subject unsuitable for participation in this trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site
  • Aerospace center hospital

    Beijing

    Lei Liang, 010-59971599, lianglei_csk@126.com

Other trials in China

About this study

Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors in women of reproductive age, with a prevalence of 20%-50%, often causing menorrhagia, anemia, pelvic pain, and pressure symptoms that markedly impair quality of life. Current treatments include pharmacological therapy (GnRH-a, mifepristone) - effective temporarily but with high recurrence after discontinuation; surgical myomectomy or hysterectomy - definitive yet invasive, with prolonged recovery and potential fertility compromise; and minimally invasive therapies such as uterine artery embolization (UAE), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and microwave ablation (MWA), which are increasingly favored for their minimal invasiveness and rapid recovery.

MWA delivers thermal energy via a percutaneously inserted antenna under ultrasound guidance, inducing coagulative necrosis of fibroid tissue through temperatures exceeding 60°C. Advantages include minimal trauma (~2 mm puncture), rapid recovery (discharge within 1-2 days), uterine preservation, and negligible ovarian impact. However, a key limitation is the heat sink effect: in hypervascular fibroids, flowing blood dissipates thermal energy, resulting in incomplete ablation, prolonged procedural time, and higher energy requirements - particularly challenging for fibroids >5 cm in diameter.

Read more

Chemical ablation involves intralesional injection of a sclerosing agent (e.g., lauromacrogol), which damages vascular endothelial cells, causing vascular occlusion, thrombosis, ischemic necrosis, and direct membrane disruption that accelerates apoptosis. Theoretically, pre-ablation chemical sclerotherapy may occlude feeding vessels, attenuate the heat sink effect, and enhance subsequent thermal ablation efficiency. Supporting this concept, an ex vivo bovine liver study demonstrated that pre-injection of 5 mL of 99.5% ethanol around the electrode prior to radiofrequency ablation produced a significantly larger ablation zone at equivalent energy levels compared with ablation alone. Small-sample clinical studies, including a prospective cohort from Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, have preliminarily explored combined chemical ablation plus MWA for uterine fibroids, suggesting improved ablation rates and shorter procedural times, though findings require validation through high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Therefore, the investigators conducted this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to rigorously compare the safety (incidence and severity of adverse events) and efficacy (fibroid volume reduction rate, symptom improvement, quality-of-life outcomes) of MWA alone versus MWA combined with chemical ablation. This study aims to clarify the clinical value of the combined approach and provide high-quality, evidence-based data to guide the optimal selection of minimally invasive treatment strategies for uterine fibroids.

Being tested
Microwave ablation combined with chemical ablation, Microwave ablation
Medical subject headings
Leiomyoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Microwave ablation combined with chemical ablationProcedure or surgery

    Microwave ablation combined with lauromacrogol of Uterine Fibroids

  • Microwave ablationProcedure or surgery

    Microwave ablation of Uterine Fibroids

Study groups in NCT07754877
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
control groupExperimentalMicrowave ablation of uterine fibroids was performed under real-time ultrasound guidance.
Receives: Procedure: Microwave ablation
Experimental groupExperimentalUnder real-time ultrasound guidance, chemical ablation of the uterine fibroid was performed first, followed by microwave ablation.
Receives: Procedure: Microwave ablation combined with chemical ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. ablation rate of uterine fibroids

    Measured: 4 to 6 hours after the operation

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Volume reduction rate

    Measured: 12 months after the operation

  2. Complications

    Measured: 12 months after the operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
microwave ablation lauromacrogol
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
248 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07754877
Sponsor's protocol ID
2026(115)
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
29 Jul 2026
Last updated
10 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in