AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical Spondylotic RadiculopathyNCT07756099

Ba-Duan-Jin Training Versus NASM Approach

A study testing Ba-Duan-Jin Training and NASM Approach in people with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy, run by Rashid Latif Medical College at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is now becoming one of the most common public health concerns in the world. The objective of the current study is to compare the effects of Ba Duan Jin with the National Academy of Sports Medicine-based exercise protocol on pain, range of motion, and disability in patients with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy
What is being tested?
Ba-Duan-Jin Training and NASM Approach
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
42 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
20 Mar 2025to 15 Sep 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy (CSR)

Who cannot join

  • Patients with cardiovascular disease, Mental Disorders, Malignancies, Musculoskeletal Rheumatic, neurological disorders, skin and peripheral vascular disorders

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Arif Memorial Teaching Hospital

    Lahore, 54600

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparative Effects of Ba Duan Jin Training and NASM Approach on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy.

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is now becoming one of the most common public health concerns in the world. The objective of the current study is to compare the effects of Ba Duan Jin with the National Academy of Sports Medicine-based exercise protocol on pain, range of motion, and disability in patients with CSR. The study was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial, was conducted in the Physiotherapy departments of Arif Memorial Teaching Hospital, Hameed Latif Hospital, and Shalamar Hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. Two groups of (no of) patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, aged 20-55, were formed through random allocation: Group A received routine physical therapy + Ba Duan Jin, while Group B received routine physical therapy + NASM-based exercises, with three sessions per week for 6 weeks. To evaluate the treatment protocols' long-term effects, data were gathered at baseline and at 6-week follow-ups. The study employed three outcome measures: Numeric Pain Rating scale (pain), Neck Disability index (disability), and Goniometer (cervical range of motion). Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25. Results of present study showed that after 6-weeks of NASM approach to group B with value of 2.00 for pain and 4.00 for disability, there was a significantly great pain and disability reduction, by assessing with NPRS and NDI with value of compared to group A with value of with value of 3.00 for pain and 12.00 for disability. While both interventions yielded comparable improvements in range of motion among CSR patients. Both Ba Duan Jin and NASM approaches demonstrated efficacy, with the NASM approach showing more pronounced benefits in pain and disability reduction, whereas both interventions had similar effects on range of motion among patients.

Being tested
Ba-Duan-Jin Training, NASM Approach
Keywords
Ba-Duan-Jin training, Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy, Disability, NASM Approach, Pain, Range of Motion
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ba-Duan-Jin TrainingOther

    Ba Duan Jin Training along with Baseline treatment.

  • NASM ApproachOther

    National Academy of Sports Medicine Approach along with Baseline treatment.

Study groups in NCT07756099
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ba Duan Jin TrainingExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Ba-Duan-Jin Training
NASM ApproachActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: NASM Approach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numerical Pain Rating Scale

    Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), a self-reported measure ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst pain". Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and therefore a worse outcome.

    Measured: Pre and post 6 weeks

  2. Goniometer

    It is used to assess range of motion.

    Measured: Pre and post 6 weeks.

  3. Neck Disability Index

    Neck disability was assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 10 items, with total scores ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater neck-related disability and therefore a worse outcome.

    Measured: Pre and Post 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2026
  2. Study start20 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completion25 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07756099
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB/2024/200
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
5 Aug 2026
Last updated
13 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Ye Y, Zhao F, Sun S, Xiong J, Zheng G. The effect of Baduanjin exercise on health-related physical fitness of college students: A randomized controlled trial. Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;10:965544. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.965544. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 36530684
  • Tan TY, Cao BY, Liang WM, Lou S, Han Z, Ji YX, Xiao J. The superiority trial of Baduanjin training on patients chronic low back pain: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04649-1.

    PubMed 39506781
  • Zhang Y, Jiang X. The effect of Baduanjin exercise on the physical and mental health of college students: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 25;102(34):e34897. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034897.

    PubMed 37653828
  • Jabbar KM, Gandomi F. The comparison of two corrective exercise approaches for hyperkyphosis and forward head posture: A quasi-experimental study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(4):677-687. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200160.

    PubMed 33896809

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ba-Duan-Jin Training and NASM Approach in people with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy, run by Rashid Latif Medical College at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numerical Pain Rating Scale (time frame: Pre and post 6 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07756099, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in