AzTrials
AzTrials

CaregiversCHOOSENCT07764432

Communication and Hospice Online With Optimal Support and Engagement

A study testing Intermittent Hospice Team Support, Online Support Group with untrained facilitator and Online Support Group with trained facilitator in people with Caregivers and Family Caregivers, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The project is a multisite, three-group randomized control trial (RCT) with equal and parallel mixed-methods analysis that allows standardized measures combined with rich qualitative data to test hypotheses and answer research questions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Caregivers, Family Caregivers, Cancer Caregivers
What is being tested?
Intermittent Hospice Team Support, Online Support Group with untrained facilitator and Online Support Group with trained facilitator
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
567 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2027to 30 Apr 2031
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Eligibility Criteria:

  • Family caregiver of cancer patient receiving hospice care from an affiliated hospice organization. Only 1 FCG per patient may be enrolled.
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • Can speak and understand English.
  • Able to access the internet.
  • Has a Facebook account or is willing to create a Facebook account in order to be in this study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Debra P Oliver, PhD, MSW contact

314-747-5357

oliverd@wustl.edu

United States1 site
  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

    Debra P Oliver, PhD, MSW, 314-747-5357, oliverd@wustl.edu

    Debra P Oliver, PhD, MSW

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Communication and Hospice Online With Optimal Support and Engagement (CHOOSE)

The project is a multisite, three-group randomized control trial (RCT) with equal and parallel mixed-methods analysis that allows standardized measures combined with rich qualitative data to test hypotheses and answer research questions. Family caregivers (FCGs) of hospice cancer patients will be recruited and randomized into one of three groups: usual hospice care only (UC), usual care online support group (UCOSG) (without communication strategies), and the CHOOSE intervention group (with communication focus).

Being tested
Intermittent Hospice Team Support, Online Support Group with untrained facilitator, Online Support Group with trained facilitator
Keywords
Caregivers, Family Caregivers, Cancer Caregivers

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intermittent Hospice Team SupportOther

    Intermittent hospice team support will be provided per standard of care guidelines.

  • Online Support Group with untrained facilitatorOther

    The online support group will be held via private, hidden Facebook. The online support group will be led by an untrained facilitator whose role is to enroll participants and maintain guidelines. Specifically, the untrained facilitator has the following roles: enrolls individuals in the group, monitors the discussion to maintain the guidelines to protect the group's integrity, provides information on resources for technical assistance, and notes any outside online groups to which they belong.

  • Online Support Group with trained facilitatorOther

    The online support group will be held via private, hidden Facebook. The online support group led by a trained facilitator focuses on building safe communication and encouraging participant engagement. The trained facilitator has the following roles: enrolls individuals in the group, monitors the discussion to enforce the guidelines and protect the group's integrity, provides technical assistance, moderates group discussions, initiates threads using direct and indirect strategies and communication topic openings, builds a safe environment for communication, encourages participation, and organizes and coordinates Facebook Live activities.

Study groups in NCT07764432
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Usual Care (UC)Active comparatorPatients randomized to the UC arm will receive the standard of care of intermittent hospice team support.
Receives: Other: Intermittent Hospice Team Support
Usual Care Online Social Support (UCOSG)Active comparatorPatients randomized to the UCOSG arm will have access to an online support group in addition to the standard of care of intermittent hospice team support. The online support group is led by an untrained facilitator.
Receives: Other: Intermittent Hospice Team Support; Other: Online Support Group with untrained facilitator
CHOOSE InterventionExperimentalPatients randomized to the CHOOSE intervention will have access to standard of care of intermittent hospice team support and access to an online support group led by a trained facilitator.
Receives: Other: Intermittent Hospice Team Support; Other: Online Support Group with trained facilitator

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item questionnaire that assesses patient depression. The 9-items are ranked by Likert Scale from 0 - Not at all, 1 - Several days, 2 - More than half the days, and 3 - nearly every day. Scores range from 0-27 with lower scores indicating no or minimal depression and higher scores indicating moderate to severe depression.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  2. Changes in General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) score

    The GAD-7 includes 7-items ranked by Likert scale to measure anxiety severity over the past two weeks. Each item is ranked by 4-point Likert scale as follows: 0-Not at all, 1-Several days, 2-More than half the days, and 3-Nearly every day. Scores range from 0-21, with a higher score indicating higher anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Well Being Domain Score

    The PROMIS Physical Well Being Domain measures mobility and ability to perform daily activities and is taken from the PROMIS Scale v1.2 Global Health. The domain contains four-items ranked on various Likert scales. One-items addressing general physical health is ranked on a 5-point Likert Scale from 5-Excellent to 1-Poor. One item addressing physical activities is ranked on a 5-point Likert scale from 5-Completely to 1-Not all. One item addressing fatigue is ranked on a 5-point Likert scale from 5-None to 1-Very Severe. One item addressing pain on average is ranked from a scale from 0-no pain to 10-worst pain imaginable. Scores range from 0-50 with higher the score indicates higher physical function.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  2. Changes in PROMIS Mental Well Being Score

    The PROMIS Mental Well Being score is taken from four-times on the PROMIS Scale v1.2 Global Health. The 4 item sub-scale are administered using 5-point Likert Scale. Three items are ranked on a 5-point Likert Scale from 5-Excellent to 1-Poor. One item addressing emotional problems is ranked on a 5-point Likert scale from 5-Never to 1-Always. Scores range from 0-50 and generally the higher the score indicates greater mental well-being.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  3. Changes in University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale-3 score

    The UCLA Loneliness Scale-3 is a 3-item scale that assesses loneliness. Each item is assessed by a 3-point Likert scale as follows: 1-Hardly ever, 2-Some of the time, and 3-Often. Scores range from 3-9, with the lower the scores indicating less loneliness.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  4. Changes in Zarit Burden-7 Interview score

    The Zarit Burden-7 is a 7-item interview used to measure strain in family and informal caregivers. Each item is ranked using a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Nearly Always). Total score ranges from 0-42. Generally, higher scores indicate a higher level of burden.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  5. Changes in Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Revised (CQLI-R) score

    The CQLI-R contains four-items ranking physical, financial, emotional, and social quality of life. Each item is ranked from 0 to 10 by the caregiver with 0 representing lowest quality of life and 10 representing highest quality of life. Total scores range from 0 to 40 with lower scores indicating lower quality of life to higher scores indicating higher quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  6. Changes in Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL-SF) score

    The ISEL-SF measures perceived social support. The domain contains 12-items with four subscales. Each item is ranked on a 4-point scale as follows: 3-definitely accurate, 2-probably true, 1-probably false, and 0-false). Total scores range from 0 to 48 with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived social support.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  7. Changes in Online Social Support Scale (OSS) score

    The OSS is a 40-item measure assessing the perception of how well social support needs are met with the online group. Items are scores with a 5-point Likert scale as follows: 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = pretty often, 4 = alot. Total score range from 0-160. Higher scores indicate more social support.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  8. Changes in The Group Identification Scale (GIS)

    The GIS is 4-item scale that measures the expression of shared identity within the online support group. Each question is ranked according to a 7-point Likert scale from 1= strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Final score is the average of the four questions and ranges from 0-7. The higher the score indicates a higher sense of shared identity.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  9. Changes in the Social Disconnectedness Perceived Isolation (SDPI) Social Disconnectedness subscale score

    The SDPI is a 17-item scale that measures feelings of disconnectedness and isolation. The SDPI has two subscales: Social Disconnectedness Scale and Perceived Isolation Scale.

    The Social Disconnectedness Scale contains 8-items and measures physical ties. Items include contact frequency and self-reported numbers. All items are scored by taking an average. Scores have generally ranged from -1.30 to 2.34 with lower scores indicated more connectedness and higher scores indicating more disconnectedness.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  10. Changes in Social Disconnectedness Perceived Isolation (SDPI) Perceived Isolation Subscale score

    The SDPI is a 17-item scale that measures feelings of disconnectedness and isolation. The SDPI has two subscales: Social Disconnectedness Scale and Perceived Isolation Scale.

    The Perceived Isolation Scale includes 9-items that measure loneliness and social support. Six-items assesses social support and are ranked on a 3- or 4-point Likert scale. Three-items are included from the UCLA Loneliness Scale assessed by a 3-point Likert scale as follows: 1-Hardly ever, 2-Some of the time, and 3-Often.

    Higher overall final scores indicate greater intensity of perceived isolation.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  11. Changes in Facebook intensity scale score

    The Facebook intensity scale is an 8-item scale that measures active Facebook use and emotional connection to Facebook and integration of Facebook into daily life. Two questions assess number of Facebook friends and time spent on Facebook. Six of the eight questions use a 5-point Likert scale ranked from 1-5 (1= strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). The higher the score indicates the participant's engagement and usage of Facebook is greater.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

  12. Count of Direct and indirect thread sequences

    Threads refer to the communication posts within online support groups and thread sequences are scenarios to coordinate communication. Thread sequences are categorized as indirect or direct strategies. A direct strategy is categorized as an initial post to open discussion by the facilitator. Indirect strategy is categorized as a reply to a facilitator to invite further discussion. There are four direct and four indirect sequence scenarios for a total of eight scenarios to analyze family caregivers' response and interaction.

    Thread sequences will be reported for indirect and direct thread sequences.

    Measured: Throughout timeline of trial (estimated time 3 months)

  13. Changes in Safety Questions score

    The Safety Question Questionnaire is a 2-question survey to assess the perception of safe communication in the online support group. The survey uses a 6-point Likert scale ranked from 0-5 (0=disagree and 5=strongly agree). Total score range from 0-10. Generally, the higher the score indicates a higher perception of safety.

    Measured: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Feb 2027 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2031 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2031 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
567 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07764432
Sponsor's protocol ID
202606091
Other IDs
1R01CA315474-01
Acronym
CHOOSE
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
6 Aug 2026
Last updated
14 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified data and metadata from the project will be archived through the Washington University School of Medicine institutional data repository, Digital Commons Data@Becker. Survey data will be stored in CSV format and transcripts of audio-record interviews will be stored in TXT format.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intermittent Hospice Team Support, Online Support Group with untrained facilitator and Online Support Group with trained facilitator in people with Caregivers and Family Caregivers, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Debra P Oliver, PhD, MSW (314-747-5357, oliverd@wustl.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score (time frame: Baseline and every 14 days until completion of study (estimated total time 3 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in