AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson DiseaseFREEDOMNCT07764874

Unilateral and Staged Bilateral Pallidothalamic Tractotomy Using Exablate MRgFUS in Advanced Parkinson's Disease.

A study testing Unilateral Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy, Staged Bilateral Exablate Pallidothalamic Tractotomy and Best Medical Treatment (BMT) in people with Parkinson Disease, run by InSightec at 1 site in South Korea.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a randomized clinical trial evaluating a focused ultrasound treatment for people with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) who have disabling motor complications and symptoms. The study uses the Exablate Neuro System, which delivers MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Parkinson Disease
What is being tested?
Unilateral Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy, Staged Bilateral Exablate Pallidothalamic Tractotomy and Best Medical Treatment (BMT)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Sep 2026to Jun 2031
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men or women, age 30 years and older
  • Subject is able and willing to give informed consent and able to attend all study visits
  • Subject with a diagnosis of idiopathic PD by UK Brain Bank Criteria as confirmed by a movement disorder neurologist at the site.
  • Subject is interested in receiving bilateral treatment if they qualify.
  • Subject is Levodopa responsive as defined by at least a 30% reduction in MDS-UPDRS motor subscale in the ON vs OFF medication state.
  • Subject has MDS-UPDRS Part III OFF ULE score of ≥ 15 on each side in the meds OFF condition.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Subject experiencing motor complications of PD on optimum medical treatment characterized by dyskinesia (MDS-UPDRS item 4.2 score of ≥ 2) OR Motor fluctuations (MDS-UPDRS item 4.4 score of ≥ 2)
  • Subject is on a stable dose of all PD medications for 30 days prior to screening visit PD assessments as determined by medical records
  • Subject is able to communicate sensations during the Exablate procedure.
  • Subject's pallidothalamic region can be targeted by the Exablate device.

Who cannot join

  • Subject with severe premorbid risks as specified in the MDS-UPDRS Part II subsection motor aspects of experiences of daily living scores:
  • 3 or 4 on question 2.1 (speech) OR
  • 3 or 4 on question 2.3 (chewing and swallowing) OR
  • 4 on question 2.2 (saliva and drooling).
  • Subject where there is suspicion that Parkinsonian symptoms are a side effect from neuroleptic medications.
  • Subject has an MMSE score < 24.
Show all 29Show fewer
  • Subject has other central neurodegenerative disease suspected on neurological examination. These include: multisystem atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome, dementia with Lewy bodies, and Alzheimer's disease.
  • Subject with unstable psychiatric disease, uncontrolled depressive symptoms, psychosis, delusions, hallucinations, or suicidal ideation.
  • Female subject who is pregnant.
  • Female subject of childbearing potential not willing to use contraceptives throughout the duration of the study (~ 24 months)
  • Subject exhibiting any behavior(s) consistent with ethanol or substance abuse.
  • Subject with unstable cardiac status or severe hypertension.
  • Subject with history of abnormal bleeding, hemorrhage, or coagulopathy.
  • Subject with cerebrovascular disease.
  • Subject is receiving anticoagulant (e.g., warfarin) or antiplatelet (e.g., aspirin) therapy within one week of focused ultrasound procedure or drugs known to increase risk or hemorrhage (e.g., Avastin) within one month of focused ultrasound procedure.
  • Subject with advanced kidney disease or on dialysis.
  • Subject with a history of seizures within the past year.
  • Subject with a brain tumor.
  • Subject with life-threatening systemic disease (e.g. HIV, liver failure, blood dyscrasias, etc.).
  • Subject with any illness that in the investigator's opinion precludes participation in this study.
  • Subject with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as implanted metallic devices.
  • Subject who had prior deep brain stimulation of the basal ganglia or thalamus.
  • Subject who is unable to tolerate the required prolonged stationary supine position during treatment.
  • Subject who has an Overall Skull Density Ratio of less than 0.40 as calculated from the screening CT (if this is the only exclusion, subject can participate in the study as part of the reference group).
  • Subject who is participating in another clinical investigation with an active treatment arm
  • Subject who is unable to communicate with the investigator and staff.
  • Subject who is in a nursing home in the last 30 days.
  • Additional Exclusion Criteria for Staged Bilateral PTT procedure
  • Clinically significant neurological event of dysphagia, abnormal speech function, or gait abnormalities that are moderate to severe following first procedure.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Elisa Cerutti, PhD contact

+39 3459182413

elisac@insightec.com

Jai Shetake, PhD contact

+1 469 426 1022

jais@insightec.com

South Korea1 site
  • Korea University Anam Hospital

    Seoul

    Kyoungwon Baik, +82-10-6620-8492, baikkw88@gmail.com

    Kyoungwon Baik

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: An MR Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) Randomized Trial Using the Exablate Neuro System to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety Outcomes of Unilateral and Staged Bilateral Ablation in the Subthalamic Region Involving the Pallidothalamic Tract (PTT) in Advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) With Motor Complications.

This study is a randomized clinical trial evaluating a focused ultrasound treatment for people with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) who have disabling motor complications and symptoms.

The study uses the Exablate Neuro System, which delivers MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS). This technology focuses ultrasound energy on a specific brain target and generates heat to create a small lesion (ablation) without making a surgical incision.

Read more

The target in this study is the Pallidothalamic Tract (PTT), a pathway involved in the abnormal brain circuits that contribute to Parkinson's symptoms and complications.

This study is evaluating whether treating one side of the brain or treating both sides (in separate procedures) provides better outcomes for people with advanced Parkinson's disease who have motor complications and symptoms.

The main outcome measure is the change in the MDS-UPDRS Part III Upper/Lower Extremity (ULE) score at 3 months after first and second side treatment, compared with the respective control groups.

MDS-UPDRS Part III is a standard clinical scale used to assess Parkinson's motor symptoms. ULE score focuses on motor function in the arms and legs. Assessments are performed in the OFF-medication state, meaning Parkinson's medications are temporarily withheld so that the treatment effect can be measured more accurately.

In addition improvement in motor complications will be assessed with MDS-UPDRS Part IV and Patient diaries.

Read the detailed description

A Post Approval Study (US) / Pre Market Extension Study (Outside US), international prospective, multi-center, assessor-blinded, two-stage (2:1) randomized controlled trial evaluating successive Exablate treatment (first and second side) versus BMT (Best Medical Treatment).

In individuals eligible for the staged, bilateral Exablate PTT procedure, building on evidence from the predicate pivotal staged bilateral study that led to PMA approval in the United States, this trial aims to evaluate the successive treatment of 1st and 2nd side Exablate PTT ablation using a two-stage randomized controlled design. In Stage 1, patients will be randomized to receive either 1st side PTT procedure or best medical treatment (BMT). Patients who initially randomized to receive BMT will cross over to receive 1st side PTT procedure after 3 months (if they still qualify for the treatment). All patients will continue to be followed through a 6-month period post 1st side treatment. All eligible patients who reach Stage 2 will be re-randomized to undergo 2nd side PTT procedure or continue with BMT. Patients randomized to receive BMT in stage 2 will cross over to receive 2nd side PTT procedure after 3 months (if they still qualify for the treatment). All patients will continue to be followed through a 12-month period post 2nd side treatment. This design enables evaluation between staged-bilateral treatment, unilateral treatment alone, and standard of care (SOC)/BMT medical therapy. This study will generate real-world comparative data to better inform decision-makers about the generalizability in subthalamic region ablations involving the PTT. Outcomes will be assessed using relevant lateralized Parkinson-specific clinical scales, measures of functional impairment, disease-specific quality of life, adverse events, and patient-reported perceptions of overall treatment effectiveness.

Being tested
Unilateral Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy, Staged Bilateral Exablate Pallidothalamic Tractotomy, Best Medical Treatment (BMT)
Keywords
Exablate, MRgFUS, Pallidothalamic Tract
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Unilateral Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic TractotomyDevice

    1st side Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy for Parkinson's Disease

  • Staged Bilateral Exablate Pallidothalamic TractotomyDevice

    2nd side staged Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy for Parkinson's Disease

  • Best Medical Treatment (BMT)Drug

    Subjects will be managed according to conventional therapeutic guidelines (i.e., best medical treatment) for Parkinson's Disease

Study groups in NCT07764874
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active Group 1_Unilateral Exablate Pallidothalamic TractotomyExperimentalSubjects will undergo the 1st side Exablate procedure (< 30 days after randomization) and will be followed for 6 months. At their Month 6 visit, subjects will have their re-baseline assessment and undergo staged randomization for the 2nd side treatment.
Receives: Device: Unilateral Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy
Control Group 1_Best Medical Treatment (BMT)Active comparatorSubjects will have their standard of care (SOC) treatment adjusted to best effect (BMT), and will be followed for 3 months. After their Month 3 visit, subjects will cross over to receive the 1st side treatment and be followed for 6 months. At their Month 6 visit, subjects will have their Treatment 2 re-baseline assessment and undergo staged randomization for the 2nd side treatment.
Receives: Drug: Best Medical Treatment (BMT)
Active Group 2_Staged Bilateral Exablate Pallidothalamic TractotomyExperimentalSubjects will undergo the 2nd side Exablate procedure (< 30 days after re-baseline assessment, and will be followed for 12 months.
Receives: Device: Unilateral Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy; Device: Staged Bilateral Exablate Pallidothalamic Tractotomy
Control Group 2_BMT after Unilateral Exablate Pallidothalamic TractotomyActive comparatorSubjects will continue with their SOC BMT and will be followed for 3 months. After their Month 3 visit, subjects will cross over to receive the 2nd side treatment and be followed for 12 months.
Receives: Device: Unilateral Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy; Drug: Best Medical Treatment (BMT)
Reference Group_BMT with low SDRActive comparatorSubjects will be offered the option to receive best medical treatment and will be followed to capture natural disease progression at approximately the same time schedule as patients in the randomized groups (~ every 3 - 6 months for up to 24 months).
Receives: Drug: Best Medical Treatment (BMT)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MDS-UPRDS Part III ULE score in the OFF-medication (unilateral treatment)

    Between-group difference (Active Group 1 vs. Control Group 1) in the treatment effect (point change) in the MDS-UPRDS Part III ULE score in the OFF-medication state from Baseline to 3 month.

    This assessment will be performed by a Movement Disorders neurologist blinded to patient study group allocation.

    Measured: 3 Months

  2. MDS-UPRDS Part III ULE score in the OFF-medication (bilateral treatment)

    Between-group difference (Active Group 2 vs. Control Group 2) in the treatment effect (point change) in the MDS-UPRDS Part III ULE score in the OFF-medication state from Baseline to 3 month.

    This assessment will be performed by a Movement Disorders neurologist blinded to patient study group allocation.

    Measured: 3 Months

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. MDS-UPDRS III Total score in the OFF-medication state

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

  2. MDS-UPDRS Part III OFF ULE score

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

  3. MDS-UPDRS Part III ON Total score

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

  4. MDS-UPDRS Part IV Total score

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

  5. Number of hours per day in ON time without troublesome dyskinesia- as measured by patient diaries (unilateral)

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

  6. Number of hours per day in the OFF time as measured by patient diaries (unilateral)

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

  7. Number of hours per day with troublesome dyskinesia (unilateral)

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

  8. Quality of Life as measured by PDQ-39 (unilateral)

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

  9. Levodopa equivalent dose change usage (milligrams) (unilateral)

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.

    Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2026
  2. Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2031 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
This is a 2-stage randomized controlled trial. Stage 1: Subjects will be randomized (2:1) for treatment on one side of the brain vs. BMT for 3 months before being allowed to receive treatment on the 1st side (if eligible). Stage 2: After 6 months post-1st side treatment (and confirmation that they are still eligible to receive their 2nd side treatment), patients will be randomized (2:1) again for treatment on the 2nd side of the brain vs. BMT for 3 months before being allowed to receive treatment on the 2nd side (if eligible). Patients fulfilling all inclusion/exclusion criteria except for the SDR (skull density ratio) requirements (and so anatomically not able to undergo MRgFUS) will be offered the option to receive best medical treatment and will be formally followed as a reference comparator for up to 2 years.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07764874
Sponsor's protocol ID
PD018
Acronym
FREEDOM
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
10 Aug 2026
Last updated
20 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Unilateral Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy, Staged Bilateral Exablate Pallidothalamic Tractotomy and Best Medical Treatment (BMT) in people with Parkinson Disease, run by InSightec at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Elisa Cerutti, PhD (+39 3459182413, elisac@insightec.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

MDS-UPRDS Part III ULE score in the OFF-medication (unilateral treatment) (time frame: 3 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in