VapingNCT07767929
Evaluating Narrative Vaping Prevention Video Ads for Adolescents and Young Adults
A study testing Acted-Out Narrative Ads and Non-Acted-Out Narrative Testimonial Ads in people with Vaping, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the persuasive effectiveness of narrative advertisements: with acted-out plots (where characters enact a vaping-related experience) versus narrative advertisements without acted-out plots and control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 20 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Vaping
- What is being tested?
- Acted-Out Narrative Ads and Non-Acted-Out Narrative Testimonial Ads
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,910 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2026to Aug 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 20 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 13-20 years old.
- Current vaper or at risk of vaping. Participants will be considered as a current vaper if they report using e-cigarettes in the past 30 days. Participants will be considered as "at-risk of vaping" if they answer anything other than "definitely not' to 3 screening items assessing their susceptibility to vaping (e.g., "If one of your best friends were to offer you a vape, would you use it?" Response options: definitely not, probably not, probably yes, definitely yes).
- Live in the United States
Who cannot join
- Younger than 13 years or older than 21 years.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Caroline Ritchie contact
United States2 sites
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Fairfield University
Fairfield, Connecticut, 06824
Ran Tao, PhD, 203-254-4000, rantao599@gmail.com
Ran Tao, PhD
About this study
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the persuasive effectiveness of narrative advertisements: with acted-out plots (where characters enact a vaping-related experience) versus narrative advertisements without acted-out plots and control. Using a 3-arm between-subjects randomized design, approximately 1,910 adolescents and young adults (aged 13-20) in the U.S. who vape or are susceptible to vaping will be recruited online. Participants will be randomly assigned to view video ads from one of three conditions (narrative with acted-out plots, narrative without acted-out plots, or control videos) and complete a post-exposure survey evaluating message engagement, emotional response, perceived effectiveness, and psychological reactance.
Read the detailed description
Study Rationale: Health communication campaigns are an evidence-based approach to preventing and reducing tobacco product use. Narrative messaging is widely used in public health campaigns, but research is lacking to identify which specific objective message features drive narrative persuasion. This study examines whether acted-out plots improve message engagement and reduce psychological reactance among youth. Setting \& Recruitment: Adolescent and young adult participants will be recruited by Qualtrics Services. Participants who are 18 to 20 years old and are eligible for the study will view a consent form as part of the survey and check a box to indicate that they agree to participate in the study. For minor participants, Qualtrics will recruit parents of 13-17-year-olds, so they will receive the survey invitation with the parental permission/consent form. From there, parents will be asked to pass the survey to their child. Once the participant has completed the consent/assent process, they will be able to begin the survey. Procedures: Eligible participants will complete a baseline screener assessing demographics and vaping product use. They will then be randomized in one of three conditions and view 3 video advertisements in a random order from their assigned group. Immediate post-ad measures will assess affective and evaluative responses, followed by a post-exposure questionnaire measuring vaping risk beliefs and behavioral susceptibility. After the survey, participants will view a debrief page linking them to The Real Cost website with information about tobacco use harms. The survey will take 15-20 minutes.
- Conditions
- Vaping
- Being tested
- Acted-Out Narrative Ads, Non-Acted-Out Narrative Testimonial Ads, Neutral Control Videos
- Keywords
- Vaping prevention, Health communication, Tobacco Use
- Medical subject headings
- Vaping, Tobacco Use
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Acted-Out Narrative AdsBehavioural
Participants view 3 randomly ordered vaping prevention video ads featuring characters enacting a vaping-related experience or consequence (e.g., experiencing addiction/withdrawal symptoms).
Non-Acted-Out Narrative Testimonial AdsBehavioural
Participants view 3 randomly ordered narrative testimonial video ads featuring testimonial narration with static visual presentations, without character enactment.
Neutral Control VideosBehavioural
Participants view 3 neutral/informational text-and-voice-only control ads about vaping without any testimonial element.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Condition 1 | Experimental | Acted-Out Narrative Video Ads Receives: Behavioral: Acted-Out Narrative Ads |
| Condition 2 | Experimental | Non-Acted-Out Narrative Video Ads Receives: Behavioral: Non-Acted-Out Narrative Testimonial Ads |
| Condition 3 | Active comparator | Control Videos Receives: Behavioral: Neutral Control Videos |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Message engagement
Assessed using a standard 3-item self-report scale (e.g., " I could picture myself in the scene of the events described in the ad", "I was mentally involved while watching the ad"). Responses are scored on a 1-5 Likert scale, with higher averaged scores indicating deeper engagement.
Measured: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Perceived Message Effectiveness
The 3-item perceived message effectiveness scale assesses the extent to which participants perceived the vaping prevention video ads as effective. Response options are on a 5-point scale from 1="Not at all" to 5="A great deal". The overall scale score is determined by averaging scores from the 3 items, with higher scores representing higher perceived message effectiveness.
Measured: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Negative Affect
Negative Affect is measured via a 3-item scale assessing negative affects (e.g., "How much do these ads make you feel anxious/ Disgusted/Scared ") on a 1-5 scale, with higher scores representing higher negative affect.
Measured: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Psychological Reactance
Evaluated using a single-item measure of message resistance ( " How much does this ad annoy you? ") scored on a 1-5 scale, with higher scores representing higher reactance.
Measured: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Vaping Susceptibility
Evaluated using a 3-item index evaluating future intentions (e.g., "Do you think you will use an e-cigarette or vape in the next year?") scored on a 1-4 response scale, with higher scores representing vaping susceptibility.
Measured: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Vaping beliefs
Evaluated using an 8-item index evaluating future intentions (e.g., " If you vape, how likely or unlikely is it that you will… Become addicted to vaping/ Breathe in dangerous chemicals?") scored on a 1-5 response scale, with higher scores representing higher vaping beliefs.
Measured: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2026
- Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionAug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for VapingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,910 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Seth M Noar, PhD, Principal investigator, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterSarah Kowitt, PhD, Principal investigator, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07767929
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 24-2140-B
- Other IDs
- U54DA060049
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 2 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating Narrative Vaping Prevention Video Ads for Adolescents and Young Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07767929
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 24-2140-B
- Conditions
- Vaping
- Keywords
- Vaping prevention, Health communication, Tobacco Use
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,910 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Study start
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the persuasive effectiveness of narrative advertisements: with acted-out plots (where characters enact a vaping-related experience) versus narrative advertisements without acted-out plots and control. Using a 3-arm between-subjects randomized design, approximately 1,910 adolescents and young adults (aged 13-20) in the U.S. who vape or are susceptible to vaping will be recruited online. Participants will be randomly assigned to view video ads from one of three conditions (narrative with acted-out plots, narrative without acted-out plots, or control videos) and complete a post-exposure survey evaluating message engagement, emotional response, perceived effectiveness, and psychological reactance.
Detailed description
Study Rationale: Health communication campaigns are an evidence-based approach to preventing and reducing tobacco product use. Narrative messaging is widely used in public health campaigns, but research is lacking to identify which specific objective message features drive narrative persuasion. This study examines whether acted-out plots improve message engagement and reduce psychological reactance among youth. Setting \& Recruitment: Adolescent and young adult participants will be recruited by Qualtrics Services. Participants who are 18 to 20 years old and are eligible for the study will view a consent form as part of the survey and check a box to indicate that they agree to participate in the study. For minor participants, Qualtrics will recruit parents of 13-17-year-olds, so they will receive the survey invitation with the parental permission/consent form. From there, parents will be asked to pass the survey to their child. Once the participant has completed the consent/assent process, they will be able to begin the survey. Procedures: Eligible participants will complete a baseline screener assessing demographics and vaping product use. They will then be randomized in one of three conditions and view 3 video advertisements in a random order from their assigned group. Immediate post-ad measures will assess affective and evaluative responses, followed by a post-exposure questionnaire measuring vaping risk beliefs and behavioral susceptibility. After the survey, participants will view a debrief page linking them to The Real Cost website with information about tobacco use harms. The survey will take 15-20 minutes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Condition 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: Acted-Out Narrative AdsActed-Out Narrative Video Ads |
| Condition 2 | Experimental | Behavioral: Non-Acted-Out Narrative Testimonial AdsNon-Acted-Out Narrative Video Ads |
| Condition 3 | Active comparator | Behavioral: Neutral Control VideosControl Videos |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 20 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 13-20 years old.
- Current vaper or at risk of vaping. Participants will be considered as a current vaper if they report using e-cigarettes in the past 30 days. Participants will be considered as "at-risk of vaping" if they answer anything other than "definitely not' to 3 screening items assessing their susceptibility to vaping (e.g., "If one of your best friends were to offer you a vape, would you use it?" Response options: definitely not, probably not, probably yes, definitely yes).
- Live in the United States
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Younger than 13 years or older than 21 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Acted-Out Narrative AdsParticipants view 3 randomly ordered vaping prevention video ads featuring characters enacting a vaping-related experience or consequence (e.g., experiencing addiction/withdrawal symptoms). | Behavioural | Condition 1 |
| Non-Acted-Out Narrative Testimonial AdsParticipants view 3 randomly ordered narrative testimonial video ads featuring testimonial narration with static visual presentations, without character enactment. | Behavioural | Condition 2 |
| Neutral Control VideosParticipants view 3 neutral/informational text-and-voice-only control ads about vaping without any testimonial element. | Behavioural | Condition 3 |
Primary outcome
Message engagement
Time frame: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Assessed using a standard 3-item self-report scale (e.g., " I could picture myself in the scene of the events described in the ad", "I was mentally involved while watching the ad"). Responses are scored on a 1-5 Likert scale, with higher averaged scores indicating deeper engagement.
5 secondary outcomes
Perceived Message Effectiveness
Time frame: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Negative Affect
Time frame: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Psychological Reactance
Time frame: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Vaping Susceptibility
Time frame: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Vaping beliefs
Time frame: Baseline (after each video exposure)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Sep 2026.
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical TrialsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Vaping
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
PK/PD of Vaping THC-containing Liquids vs. Smoked Cannabis
Cigarette Smoking-Related Carcinoma
Active, not recruiting
Vaping Cessation Using the Ottawa Model for Smoking Cessation Among E-Cigarette Users
Tobacco Smoking, Vaping
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Lung Health and Breath Biomarkers: Acute Effects of Inhaled Cannabis
Cannabis Use, Tobacco
Active, not recruiting
Mindful Breaths: Mindfulness for Young Adult Vaping
Vaping Cessation
Recruiting
Young Adult Tobacco/Nicotine and Cannabis Co-use
Tobacco Use Disorder, Nicotine Dependence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Caroline Ritchie contact
Seth M Noar, PhD principal investigator
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sarah Kowitt, PhD principal investigator
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Acted-Out Narrative Ads and Non-Acted-Out Narrative Testimonial Ads in people with Vaping, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Victoria Triana (919-984-0000, Victoria_Triana@med.unc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Message engagement (time frame: Baseline (after each video exposure)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Sep 2026.