AzTrials
AzTrials

Axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA)Phase 4NCT07770646

A Pragmatic Trial of Interleukin-17 Inhibition Versus Janus Kinase Inhibition After Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Inhibitor Failure in Axial Spondyloarthritis

A Phase 4 study testing Secukinumab (IL-17i ) and Upadacitinib (JAKi) in people with Axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic trial of IL-17i versus JAKi in adults with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who have failed at least one tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor (TNFi), to estimate the effectiveness of IL-17i versus JAKi at 16 weeks and to determine… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA)
What is being tested?
Secukinumab (IL-17i ) and Upadacitinib (JAKi)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Nov 2026to 15 Sep 2029
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • fulfill ASAS classification criteria for axSpA and/or modified New York classification criteria for AS
  • Active axSpA (ASDAS ≥ 2.1 and/or BASDAI ≥ 4)
  • Failure of or intolerance to ≥1 TNF
  • Participants of reproductive potential must agree to use any form of effective contraception during the study period, in accordance with standard clinical practice and FDA labeling for the assigned study medication
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Previously received an IL-17i or JAKi
  • Active infection requiring antimicrobials
  • Contraindications to either treatment arm:
  • Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)- Crohn's disease or Ulcerative Colitis
  • Active cancer or cancer remission within the past 3 years (apart from non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)
  • History of stroke, heart attack, or blood clots (venous or arterial)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Cirrhosis
  • End-stage renal disease (GFR <15) or dialysis
  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Concomitant use of other biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (tsDMARD) therapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Savannah M Bowman, MD contact

(713) 500-6883

Savannah.Bowman@uth.tmc.edu

United States1 site
  • The University of Texas health Science Center at Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

    Savannah Bowman, MD, (713) 500-6883, Savannah.Bowman@uth.tmc.edu

    Mark C Hwang, (713) 500-6597, Mark.C.Hwang@uth.tmc.edu

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pragmatic Randomized Pilot Trial of Interleukin-17 Inhibition Versus Janus Kinase Inhibition After Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Inhibitor Failure in Axial Spondyloarthritis

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic trial of IL-17i versus JAKi in adults with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who have failed at least one tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor (TNFi), to estimate the effectiveness of IL-17i versus JAKi at 16 weeks and to determine additional effectiveness measures, safety, and treatment persistence of IL-17i versus JAKi

Being tested
Secukinumab (IL-17i ), Upadacitinib (JAKi)
Keywords
comparative effectiveness, axial spondyloarthritis, secukinumab, upadacitinib
Medical subject headings
Axial Spondyloarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Secukinumab (IL-17i )Drug

    Secukinumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-17A. Secukinumab will be given as a prefilled syringe or autoinjector for subcutaneous administration. Dosing is 150 mg subcutaneously at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 followed by 150mg every 4 weeks thereafter for a total of 16 weeks.

  • Upadacitinib (JAKi)Drug

    Upadacitinib is an oral selective inhibitor of janus kinase 1 (JAK1). Participants will take upadacitinib 15mg orally once daily for 16 weeks.

Study groups in NCT07770646
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Secukinumab (IL-17i )ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Secukinumab (IL-17i )
Upadacitinib (JAKi)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Upadacitinib (JAKi)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility as determined by enrollment of ≥60% of eligible patients

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  2. Feasibility as determined by ≥80% retention of randomized participants

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  3. Feasibility as determined by ≥90% completeness of primary clinical data

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  4. Change in the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) reported as a mean (SD)

    This is a 4 item questionnaire and one lab result (CRP). The first 4 questions are scored from 0-10. The result is a single numerical score, typically ranging from about 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more active disease.

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

Secondary outcomes (36)
  1. Number of patients showing an improvement of ≥1.1 and ≥2.0 on the ASDAS score

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  2. Percentage of patients showing an improvement of ≥1.1 and ≥2.0 on the ASDAS score

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  3. Number of participants in the different categories of disease activity as assessed by the ASDAS

    The ASDAS categories are:

    Inactive disease (<1.3) Low disease activity (1.3-<2.1) High disease activity (2.1-3.5) Very high disease activity (>3.5)

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  4. Percentage of participants in the different categories of disease activity as assessed by the ASDAS

    The ASDAS categories are:

    Inactive disease (<1.3) Low disease activity (1.3-<2.1) High disease activity (2.1-3.5) Very high disease activity (>3.5)

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  5. Number of participants that have an ASDAS score of <2.1 and ≥2.1

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  6. Percentage of participants that have an ASDAS score of <2.1 and ≥2.1

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  7. Change in patient global disease activity measured as a mean (SD)

    Disease activity is measured using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no disease) to 10 (very severe disease)

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  8. Change in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) measured as a mean (SD)

    The BASDAI is a self-administered 6-question instrument covering fatigue, spinal (axial) pain, peripheral joint pain/swelling, localized tenderness (enthesitis), and the severity and duration of morning stiffness. Each question is scored 0-10. The final result is a single numerical score ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more active disease

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  9. Change in fatigue as assessed by BASDAI Q1 measured as a mean (SD)

    Fatigue will be assessed using Question 1of the BASDAI and this will be scored on a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 = none and 10 = very severe. The outcome will be reported as the mean (SD). A negative change indicates improvement (reduction in fatigue), while a positive change indicates worsening fatigue

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  10. Change in total back pain as assessed by BASDAI Q2 measured as a mean (SD)

    Total back pain will be assessed using Question 2 of the BASDAI and this will be scored on a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 = none and 10 = very severe. The outcome will be reported as the mean (SD). A negative change indicates improvement (reduction in pain), while a positive change indicates worsening pain

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  11. Change in mean stiffness severity as assessed by BASDAI Q5 measured as a mean (SD)

    Stiffness severity will be assessed using Question 5 of the BASDAI and this will be scored on a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 = no stiffness and 10 = most severe stiffness. The outcome will be reported as the mean (SD). A negative change indicates improvement (reduction in stiffness)while a positive change indicates worsening stiffness

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  12. Change in physical functioning as assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) measured as a mean (SD)

    The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) is a self-administered 10-item questionnaire. It comprises 8 questions on function specific to axSpA and 2 questions on the patient's ability to cope with everyday life, each scored 0-10 on a visual analog scale. The final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 items, ranging from 0 (good function) to 10 (poor function), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  13. Number of participants who met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20% response (ASAS20) criteria

    A participant achieves an ASAS20 response if they have:

    ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement of ≥1 unit (on a 0-10 scale) in at least 3 of the following 4 domains, with no worsening (≥20% and ≥1 unit) in the remaining domain.

    The four domains are:

    Patient global assessment Spinal pain Physical function (measured by BASFI) Inflammation (average of the two BASDAI morning stiffness questions) Higher percentages indicate a greater proportion of patients experienced clinically meaningful improvement.

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16 )

  14. Percentage (%) of participants who met the ASAS20 response criteria

    A participant achieves an ASAS20 response if they have:

    ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement of ≥1 unit (on a 0-10 scale) in at least 3 of the following 4 domains, with no worsening (≥20% and ≥1 unit) in the remaining domain.

    The four domains are:

    Patient global assessment Spinal pain Physical function (measured by BASFI) Inflammation (average of the two BASDAI morning stiffness questions) Higher percentages indicate a greater proportion of patients experienced clinically meaningful improvement.

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  15. Number of participants who met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% response (ASAS40) criteria

    A participant achieves an ASAS40 response if they have:

    ≥40% improvement and an absolute improvement of ≥2 units in at least 3 of the 4 domains, with No worsening in the remaining domain.

    Higher percentages indicate a greater proportion of patients experienced clinically meaningful improvement.

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  16. Percentage of participants who met the ASAS40 response criteria

    A participant achieves an ASAS40 response if they have:

    ≥40% improvement and an absolute improvement of ≥2 units in at least 3 of the 4 domains, with No worsening in the remaining domain.

    Higher percentages indicate a greater proportion of patients experienced clinically meaningful improvement.

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  17. Change in the impact of axSpA on health and functioning as assessed by the ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) measured as a mean (SD)

    The ASAS Health Index is a self-reported 17-item questionnaire assessing functioning, disability, and overall health in spondyloarthritis. Each item is answered dichotomously and scored 1 (agree) or 0 (do not agree), producing a summed total score ranging from 0 to 17, with higher scores indicating worse health/greater impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  18. Number of patients with improvement ≥3 on the ASAS HI score

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  19. Percentage of patients with improvement ≥3 on the ASAS HI score

    Measured: end of treatment (week 16)

  20. Change in peripheral joint inflammation as assessed by the 44 Tender Joint Count (TJC44) measured as a mean(SD)

    Tender Joint Count (TJC44); each of the 44 joints are scored as 0(not tender) or 1(tender) . The total score ranges from 0-44. Higher scored indicate more active peripheral arthritis.

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  21. Change in peripheral joint inflammation as assessed by the 44 Swollen Joint Count (SJC44) measured as a mean(SD)

    Swollen Joint Count (SJC44): each of the 44 joints are scored as 0(Not swollen) or 1(Swollen). The total score ranges from 0-44. Higher scored indicate more active peripheral arthritis.

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  22. Change in peripheral joint inflammation assessed by the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA44) measured as a mean (SD)

    The DAPSA44 is calculated as the simple sum of five components: the 44 Tender Joint Count (TJC44, 0-44), the 44 Swollen Joint Count (SJC44, 0-44), the patient's assessment of peripheral pain (0-10 numeric scale, using BASDAI Q3), the patient's global assessment of disease activity (0-10 numeric scale), and C-reactive protein (mg/dL). The result is a single continuous score, with higher scores indicating greater peripheral disease activity

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  23. Change in severity of enthesitis as assessed by the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) measured as a mean (SD)

    The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) is an enthesitis index, in which 13 entheseal sites are examined for tenderness and each scored as 0 (no tenderness) or 1 (tenderness present). The total score ranges from 0 to 13, with higher scores indicating greater entheseal involvement.

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  24. Change in number of digits with active dactylitis as assessed by the Dactylitis Count measured as a mean(SD)

    The simple dactylitis count assesses each of the 20 digits (10 fingers and 10 toes), scoring each as present (1) or absent (0) for dactylitis. The total score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating a greater number of involved digits.

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  25. Number of patients who developed psoriasis after starting treatment

    Measured: Baseline to week 16

  26. Percentage of patients who developed psoriasis after starting treatment

    Measured: Baseline to week 16

  27. Number of patients who had an occurrence of acute anterior uveitis (AAU) episode since starting treatment

    Measured: Baseline to week 16

  28. Percentage of patients who had an occurrence of acute anterior uveitis (AAU) since starting treatment

    Measured: Baseline to week 16

  29. Number of patients who developed Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) during treatment

    Measured: Baseline to week 16

  30. Percentage of patients who developed Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) during treatment

    Measured: Baseline to week 16

  31. Number of patients who had an adverse event by category during treatment

    Adverse event categories include:

    1. Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    2. Cardiac disorders
    3. Ear and labyrinth disorders
    4. Endocrine disorders
    5. Eye disorders
    6. Gastrointestinal disorders
    7. General disorders and administration site conditions
    8. Hepatobiliary disorders
    9. Immune system disorders
    10. Infections and infestation
    11. Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    12. Lab abnormalities
    13. Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    14. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    15. Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    16. Nervous system disorders
    17. Psychiatric disorders
    18. Renal and urinary disorders
    19. Reproductive system and breast disorders
    20. Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    21. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    22. Vascular disorders

    Measured: Baseline to week 16

  32. Percentage of patients who had an adverse event by category during treatment

    Adverse event categories include:

    1. Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    2. Cardiac disorders
    3. Ear and labyrinth disorders
    4. Endocrine disorders
    5. Eye disorders
    6. Gastrointestinal disorders
    7. General disorders and administration site conditions
    8. Hepatobiliary disorders
    9. Immune system disorders
    10. Infections and infestation
    11. Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    12. Lab abnormalities
    13. Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    14. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    15. Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    16. Nervous system disorders
    17. Psychiatric disorders
    18. Renal and urinary disorders
    19. Reproductive system and breast disorders
    20. Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    21. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    22. Vascular disorders

    Measured: from baseline to week 16

  33. Change in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) measured as a mean(SD)

    Higher values generally indicate greater systemic inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  34. Change in C-reactive Protein (CRP) measured as a mean(SD)

    Higher values generally indicate greater inflammatory activity..

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  35. Treatment persistence at week 16

    Treatment persistence is defined as a patient who remains on randomized therapy at week 16.

    Measured: Week 16

  36. Treatment persistence at week 52

    Treatment persistence at week 52 is defined as patients who remain on randomized therapy at week 52

    Measured: End of study (week 52)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Sep 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07770646
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSC-MS-26-0457
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
12 Aug 2026
Last updated
14 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in