Bone Metastases of a Malignant TumorSMARTNCT07772206
Single Fraction and Multifraction Arc-Based Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases
A study testing Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (8Gy x 1#) and Multifraction Radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 #) in people with Bone Metastases of a Malignant Tumor and Cancer Pain, run by Oman Ministry of Health at 1 site in Oman.
Trial summary
This prospective randomised pilot feasibility study will compare single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy × 1) with multifraction radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 fractions) for the palliation of painful bone metastases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Metastases of a Malignant Tumor, Cancer Pain
- What is being tested?
- Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (8Gy x 1#) and Multifraction Radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 #)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteOman
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2026to 30 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years
- Histologically proven malignancy
- Radiological evidence of bone or spine metastases
- Pain score ≥4 on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11)
- ECOG Performance Status 0-3
- Life expectancy ≥3 months.
- Ability to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Spinal cord compression requiring emergency therapy
- Previous radiotherapy to same site
- Unstable pathological fracture requiring surgery
- Pregnancy
- Inability to provide consent
- Oligometastatic bone metastases requiring Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: The SMART Trial: A Randomised Feasibility Study Comparing Single Fraction and Multifraction Arc-Based Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases
This prospective randomised pilot feasibility study will compare single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy × 1) with multifraction radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 fractions) for the palliation of painful bone metastases. The study will evaluate pain response at 4 weeks following radiotherapy, together with feasibility, treatment compliance, toxicity, pain flare, retreatment, patient convenience and resource utilisation. The study will generate preliminary data to inform the design of a future definitive randomised trial.
Read the detailed description
Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) is an established standard treatment for palliation of painful bone metastases. However, multifraction radiotherapy (MFRT) continues to be widely used in clinical practice because of concerns regarding durability of pain control and retreatment. With the increasing use of modern arc-based radiotherapy techniques such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), there is a need to evaluate whether single-fraction radiotherapy can provide effective pain palliation while reducing treatment burden and improving resource utilisation.
The SMART trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group pilot feasibility study comparing VMAT-based SFRT (8 Gy in 1 fraction) with VMAT-based MFRT (20 Gy in 5 fractions) in patients with painful bone metastases, including spinal metastases.
Approximately 70 participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SFRT or MFRT. Both treatment schedules will be delivered using VMAT with daily image-guided radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based image guidance.
Stratified block randomisation will be used according to the site of metastasis (spine versus non-spine) to maintain balance between the two treatment groups. Within each stratum, computer-generated variable block randomisation using block sizes of 4 and 6 will be used. Allocation will be concealed using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
Pain will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale at baseline and during follow-up. Participants will be assessed at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after radiotherapy.
The primary aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial at the participating tertiary oncology centre. Feasibility will include recruitment, treatment completion, follow-up completion and completeness of study data.
The primary efficacy outcome will be overall pain response at 4 weeks following radiotherapy. Secondary outcomes will include pain response at other follow-up time points, retreatment rates, pain flare, treatment-related toxicity, patient convenience and resource utilisation.
The study is not powered to provide a definitive non-inferiority conclusion. A non-inferiority margin of 15% has been prespecified to guide estimation of the treatment effect and inform the design and sample size of a future definitive randomised trial. The primary efficacy analysis will compare overall pain response between the two treatment groups using the intention-to-treat population.
The study will generate preliminary feasibility and clinical outcome data to inform the design of a future definitive randomised controlled trial evaluating single-fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy for painful bone metastases.
- Conditions
- Bone Metastases of a Malignant Tumor, Cancer Pain
- Being tested
- Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (8Gy x 1#), Multifraction Radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 #)
- Keywords
- Bone Metastases, Feasibility, Single fraction radiotherapy, Multifraction radiotherapy, Pain response,
- Medical subject headings
- Cancer Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (8Gy x 1#)Radiation
VMAT-based external beam radiotherapy planned to deliver 8 Gy in a single fraction with CBCT-based image guidance for the palliation of painful bone metastasis
Multifraction Radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 #)Radiation
VMAT-based external beam radiotherapy planned to deliver 20 Gy in Five fractions of 4 Gy each with daily CBCT-based image guidance for the palliation of painful bone metastasis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (SFRT) | Experimental | Participants will receive VMAT-basd radiotherapy to painful none metastasis, a total dose of 8 Gy delivered in a single fraction using CBCT based imaging guidance. Receives: Radiation: Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (8Gy x 1#) |
| Multifraction Radiotherapy (MFRT) | Active comparator | Participants will receive VMAT-basd radiotherapy to painful none metastasis, a total dose of 20Gy delivered in Five fractions using daily CBCT based imaging guidance. Receives: Radiation: Multifraction Radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 #) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of target sample recruited
The percentage of the planned target sample successfully recruited during the recruitment period. Recruitment feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥80% (feasibility achieved), Amber 70-79% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <70% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
Measured: From study initiation through completion of the recruitment period.
Percentage of participants completing assigned radiotherapy
The percentage of randomised participants who complete the assigned radiotherapy treatment according to the study protocol. Treatment completion feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥90% (feasibility achieved), Amber 80-89% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <80% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
Measured: From randomisation through completion of assigned radiotherapy.
Percentage of participants completing 3-month follow-up
The percentage of randomised participants who complete the required study follow-up through 3 months after radiotherapy. Follow-up feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥80% (feasibility achieved), Amber 70-79% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <70% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
Measured: From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
Percentage of participants with complete required study data
The percentage of participants with complete required study data according to the study data collection requirements. Data completeness will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥90% (feasibility achieved), Amber 80-89% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <80% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
Measured: From study initiation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
Percentage of participants with major protocol deviations
The percentage of participants with major protocol deviations during the study. A major protocol deviation is a significant departure from the study protocol that may affect participant safety, treatment allocation, assessment of the primary outcome, or validity of the study results. Protocol adherence will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green <10% major protocol deviations (feasibility achieved), Amber 10-20% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red >20% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
Measured: From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Percentage of participants achieving overall pain response at 4 weeks.
Overall pain response will be assessed using the NRS-11 and analgesic use. Pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 2 points in pain from baseline with no escalation in analgesic use. The percentage of participants achieving pain response will be compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
Measured: 4 weeks after radiotherapy
Percentage of participants requiring retreatment
The percentage of participants requiring repeat radiotherapy to the treated sitefor persisten or recurrence of pain will be recorded and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
Measured: From completion of radiotherapy through 3 months after radiotherapy
Percentage of participants experiencing pain flare
Pain flare following radiotherapy will be recorded and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups. Pain flare is defined as increase in NRS pain score by ≥2 points without reduction in analgesic use, or Increase in analgesic requirement by ≥25% without improvement in pain score, followed by return to the baseline pain level or analgesic requirement within 10 days after radiotherapy.
Measured: From completion of radiotherapy through 10 days after radiotherapy.
Percentage of participants achieving overall pain response at 2 weeks and 3 months
Overall pain response will be assessed using the NRS-11 and analgesic use. Pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 2 points in pain from baseline with no escalation in analgesic use. The percentage of participants achieving pain response will be recorded at 2 weeks and 3 months after radiotherapy and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
Measured: 2 weeks and 3 months after radiotherapy
Change in analgesic requirement from baseline
Change in analgesic requirement from baseline will be assessed using the patient's analgesic consumption and expressed as oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED). The change in analgesic requirement will be recorded and compared between the SFRT and MFRT groups.
Measured: At 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months after radiotherapy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bone Metastases of a Malignant TumorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel treatment arms: single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy in 1 fraction) or multifraction radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 fractions). Stratified block randomisation will be used according to spine versus non-spine metastases.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oman Ministry of Health
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Royal Hospital, Oman
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Balaji Subramanian Sitaraman, Oman Ministry of Health
- Investigators
- Balaji Subramanian Sitaraman, MBBS, DNB, Principal investigator, Royal Hospital, Ministry of Health, Oman
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07772206
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MoH/CSR/26/32133
- Acronym
- SMART
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be routinely shared with other researchers. The study is a single-center feasibility study, and the collected data will be used for the approved study objectives and institutional research purposes. Any data sharing, if required in the future, will be considered in accordance with institutional policies, ethical approval, participant confidentiality, and applicable regulations.
Publications
McDonald R, Chow E, Lam H, Rowbottom L, Soliman H. International patterns of practice in radiotherapy for bone metastases: A review of the literature. J Bone Oncol. 2014 Nov 7;3(3-4):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2014.10.003. eCollection 2014 Nov.
PubMed 26909305Hird A, Chow E, Zhang L, Wong R, Wu J, Sinclair E, Danjoux C, Tsao M, Barnes E, Loblaw A. Determining the incidence of pain flare following palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic bone metastases: results from three canadian cancer centers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.044. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
PubMed 19167840Westhoff PG, de Graeff A, Monninkhof EM, Pomp J, van Vulpen M, Leer JW, Marijnen CA, van der Linden YM; Dutch Bone Metastasis Study Group. Quality of Life in Relation to Pain Response to Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 1;93(3):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
PubMed 26281825BalajiSubramanian S, Sathiya K, Balaji K, Thirunavukarasu M, Phanikiran S, Rela M. Re-irradiation after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021 Dec 30;26(6):1060-1065. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0098. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34992882Sahgal A, Myrehaug SD, Siva S, Masucci GL, Maralani PJ, Brundage M, Butler J, Chow E, Fehlings MG, Foote M, Gabos Z, Greenspoon J, Kerba M, Lee Y, Liu M, Liu SK, Thibault I, Wong RK, Hum M, Ding K, Parulekar WR; trial investigators. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1023-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00196-0. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
PubMed 34126044Chow E, Zeng L, Salvo N, Dennis K, Tsao M, Lutz S. Update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Mar;24(2):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
PubMed 22130630Steenland E, Leer JW, van Houwelingen H, Post WJ, van den Hout WB, Kievit J, de Haes H, Martijn H, Oei B, Vonk E, van der Steen-Banasik E, Wiggenraad RG, Hoogenhout J, Warlam-Rodenhuis C, van Tienhoven G, Wanders R, Pomp J, van Reijn M, van Mierlo I, Rutten E. The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study. Radiother Oncol. 1999 Aug;52(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00110-3.
PubMed 10577695Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, Scarantino CW, Ivker RA, Roach M 3rd, Suh JH, Demas WF, Movsas B, Petersen IA, Konski AA, Cleeland CS, Janjan NA, DeSilvio M. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji139.
PubMed 15928300
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The SMART Trial: A Randomised Feasibility Study Comparing Single Fraction and Multifraction Arc-Based Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07772206
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SMART / MoH/CSR/26/32133
- Conditions
- Bone Metastases of a Malignant Tumor, Cancer Pain
- Keywords
- Bone Metastases, Feasibility, Single fraction radiotherapy, Multifraction radiotherapy, Pain response,
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Oman Ministry of HealthOther government
- Collaborators
- Royal Hospital, Oman
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective randomised pilot feasibility study will compare single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy × 1) with multifraction radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 fractions) for the palliation of painful bone metastases. The study will evaluate pain response at 4 weeks following radiotherapy, together with feasibility, treatment compliance, toxicity, pain flare, retreatment, patient convenience and resource utilisation. The study will generate preliminary data to inform the design of a future definitive randomised trial.
Detailed description
Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) is an established standard treatment for palliation of painful bone metastases. However, multifraction radiotherapy (MFRT) continues to be widely used in clinical practice because of concerns regarding durability of pain control and retreatment. With the increasing use of modern arc-based radiotherapy techniques such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), there is a need to evaluate whether single-fraction radiotherapy can provide effective pain palliation while reducing treatment burden and improving resource utilisation.
The SMART trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group pilot feasibility study comparing VMAT-based SFRT (8 Gy in 1 fraction) with VMAT-based MFRT (20 Gy in 5 fractions) in patients with painful bone metastases, including spinal metastases.
Approximately 70 participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SFRT or MFRT. Both treatment schedules will be delivered using VMAT with daily image-guided radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based image guidance.
Stratified block randomisation will be used according to the site of metastasis (spine versus non-spine) to maintain balance between the two treatment groups. Within each stratum, computer-generated variable block randomisation using block sizes of 4 and 6 will be used. Allocation will be concealed using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
Pain will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale at baseline and during follow-up. Participants will be assessed at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after radiotherapy.
The primary aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial at the participating tertiary oncology centre. Feasibility will include recruitment, treatment completion, follow-up completion and completeness of study data.
The primary efficacy outcome will be overall pain response at 4 weeks following radiotherapy. Secondary outcomes will include pain response at other follow-up time points, retreatment rates, pain flare, treatment-related toxicity, patient convenience and resource utilisation.
The study is not powered to provide a definitive non-inferiority conclusion. A non-inferiority margin of 15% has been prespecified to guide estimation of the treatment effect and inform the design and sample size of a future definitive randomised trial. The primary efficacy analysis will compare overall pain response between the two treatment groups using the intention-to-treat population.
The study will generate preliminary feasibility and clinical outcome data to inform the design of a future definitive randomised controlled trial evaluating single-fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy for painful bone metastases.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel treatment arms: single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy in 1 fraction) or multifraction radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 fractions). Stratified block randomisation will be used according to spine versus non-spine metastases.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (SFRT) | Experimental | Radiation: Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (8Gy x 1#)Participants will receive VMAT-basd radiotherapy to painful none metastasis, a total dose of 8 Gy delivered in a single fraction using CBCT based imaging guidance. |
| Multifraction Radiotherapy (MFRT) | Active comparator | Radiation: Multifraction Radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 #)Participants will receive VMAT-basd radiotherapy to painful none metastasis, a total dose of 20Gy delivered in Five fractions using daily CBCT based imaging guidance. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age ≥18 years
- Histologically proven malignancy
- Radiological evidence of bone or spine metastases
- Pain score ≥4 on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11)
- ECOG Performance Status 0-3
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Spinal cord compression requiring emergency therapy
- Previous radiotherapy to same site
- Unstable pathological fracture requiring surgery
- Pregnancy
- Inability to provide consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (8Gy x 1#)VMAT-based external beam radiotherapy planned to deliver 8 Gy in a single fraction with CBCT-based image guidance for the palliation of painful bone metastasis | Radiation | Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (SFRT) |
| Multifraction Radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 #)VMAT-based external beam radiotherapy planned to deliver 20 Gy in Five fractions of 4 Gy each with daily CBCT-based image guidance for the palliation of painful bone metastasis | Radiation | Multifraction Radiotherapy (MFRT) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of target sample recruited
Time frame: From study initiation through completion of the recruitment period.
The percentage of the planned target sample successfully recruited during the recruitment period. Recruitment feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥80% (feasibility achieved), Amber 70-79% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <70% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
Percentage of participants completing assigned radiotherapy
Time frame: From randomisation through completion of assigned radiotherapy.
The percentage of randomised participants who complete the assigned radiotherapy treatment according to the study protocol. Treatment completion feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥90% (feasibility achieved), Amber 80-89% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <80% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
Percentage of participants completing 3-month follow-up
Time frame: From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
The percentage of randomised participants who complete the required study follow-up through 3 months after radiotherapy. Follow-up feasibility will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥80% (feasibility achieved), Amber 70-79% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <70% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
Percentage of participants with complete required study data
Time frame: From study initiation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
The percentage of participants with complete required study data according to the study data collection requirements. Data completeness will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green ≥90% (feasibility achieved), Amber 80-89% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red <80% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
Percentage of participants with major protocol deviations
Time frame: From randomisation through 3 months after radiotherapy.
The percentage of participants with major protocol deviations during the study. A major protocol deviation is a significant departure from the study protocol that may affect participant safety, treatment allocation, assessment of the primary outcome, or validity of the study results. Protocol adherence will be interpreted using predefined traffic-light criteria: Green <10% major protocol deviations (feasibility achieved), Amber 10-20% (borderline feasibility requiring review), and Red >20% (feasibility not achieved and requiring review).
5 secondary outcomes
Percentage of participants achieving overall pain response at 4 weeks.
Time frame: 4 weeks after radiotherapy
Percentage of participants requiring retreatment
Time frame: From completion of radiotherapy through 3 months after radiotherapy
Percentage of participants experiencing pain flare
Time frame: From completion of radiotherapy through 10 days after radiotherapy.
Percentage of participants achieving overall pain response at 2 weeks and 3 months
Time frame: 2 weeks and 3 months after radiotherapy
Change in analgesic requirement from baseline
Time frame: At 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months after radiotherapy
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 26909305McDonald R, Chow E, Lam H, Rowbottom L, Soliman H. International patterns of practice in radiotherapy for bone metastases: A review of the literature. J Bone Oncol. 2014 Nov 7;3(3-4):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2014.10.003. eCollection 2014 Nov.
- Results publication: PubMed 19167840Hird A, Chow E, Zhang L, Wong R, Wu J, Sinclair E, Danjoux C, Tsao M, Barnes E, Loblaw A. Determining the incidence of pain flare following palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic bone metastases: results from three canadian cancer centers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.044. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 26281825Westhoff PG, de Graeff A, Monninkhof EM, Pomp J, van Vulpen M, Leer JW, Marijnen CA, van der Linden YM; Dutch Bone Metastasis Study Group. Quality of Life in Relation to Pain Response to Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 1;93(3):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 34992882BalajiSubramanian S, Sathiya K, Balaji K, Thirunavukarasu M, Phanikiran S, Rela M. Re-irradiation after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021 Dec 30;26(6):1060-1065. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0098. eCollection 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 34126044Sahgal A, Myrehaug SD, Siva S, Masucci GL, Maralani PJ, Brundage M, Butler J, Chow E, Fehlings MG, Foote M, Gabos Z, Greenspoon J, Kerba M, Lee Y, Liu M, Liu SK, Thibault I, Wong RK, Hum M, Ding K, Parulekar WR; trial investigators. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1023-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00196-0. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 22130630Chow E, Zeng L, Salvo N, Dennis K, Tsao M, Lutz S. Update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Mar;24(2):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 10577695Steenland E, Leer JW, van Houwelingen H, Post WJ, van den Hout WB, Kievit J, de Haes H, Martijn H, Oei B, Vonk E, van der Steen-Banasik E, Wiggenraad RG, Hoogenhout J, Warlam-Rodenhuis C, van Tienhoven G, Wanders R, Pomp J, van Reijn M, van Mierlo I, Rutten E. The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study. Radiother Oncol. 1999 Aug;52(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00110-3.
- Results publication: PubMed 15928300Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, Scarantino CW, Ivker RA, Roach M 3rd, Suh JH, Demas WF, Movsas B, Petersen IA, Konski AA, Cleeland CS, Janjan NA, DeSilvio M. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji139.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be routinely shared with other researchers. The study is a single-center feasibility study, and the collected data will be used for the approved study objectives and institutional research purposes. Any data sharing, if required in the future, will be considered in accordance with institutional policies, ethical approval, participant confidentiality, and applicable regulations.
Related trials for Bone Metastases of a Malignant Tumor
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Immunotherapy With Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Followed by Nivolumab or Nivolumab With Cabozantinib for Patients With Advanced Kidney Cancer, The PDIGREE Study
Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Bone
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Anti-Tumor Activity of TYRA-200 in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With Activating FGFR2 Gene Alterations
Locally Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma, Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Recruiting
SFRT and SCART in Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases With Soft Tissue
Bone Metastases in Subjects With Advanced Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Prophylactic Radiotherapy to Prevent Bone Complications in Patients With Metastatic Solid Cancers
Bone Metastases, Metastatic Solid Tumor
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Thermal Ablation and Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Treating Patients With Spine Metastases at Risk for Compressing the Spinal Cord
Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm, Metastatic Head and Neck Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Balaji Subramanian Sitaraman, MBBS, DNB principal investigator
Royal Hospital, Ministry of Health, Oman
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (8Gy x 1#) and Multifraction Radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 #) in people with Bone Metastases of a Malignant Tumor and Cancer Pain, run by Oman Ministry of Health at 1 site in Oman.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Oman. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Balaji Subramanian Sitaraman, MBBS, DNB (+96871926769, balaji.radonc@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of target sample recruited (time frame: From study initiation through completion of the recruitment period.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07772206, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2026.