AzTrials
AzTrials

Degenerative Disc DiseaseNCT07775729

Prospective Study of ProteiOS in Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

A study testing Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®) in people with Degenerative Disc Disease and Spinal Stenosis Lumbar, run by Isto Biologics.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study evaluating Influx™ ProteiOS®, an allograft-derived growth factor product, in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
280 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2026to Jan 2030
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-75 years, skeletally mature at time of surgery
  • Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented TLIF, with or without posterolateral fusion, as determined by the treating surgeon
  • For the ALIF study site only: degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented ALIF
  • Radiographic evidence of degenerative lumbar disease on CT, MRI, or plain radiograph (decreased disc height, herniated nucleus pulposus, ligamentum flavum/annulus hypertrophy, facet arthrosis/osteophyte, spinal canal or foraminal stenosis, or vertebral translation >3 mm)
  • Symptoms of low back pain, radiculopathy, or neurogenic claudication consistent with radiographic findings
  • Preoperative back pain ≥4 on a 0-10 VAS
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Preoperative leg pain ≥3 on a 0-10 VAS, consistent with radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication
  • Preoperative ODI score ≥30
  • Failure of ≥6 months non-operative treatment (may be waived for progressive neurological deficit, new/worsening motor weakness, bowel/bladder dysfunction, or cauda equina syndrome)
  • Willing and able to comply with follow-up schedule and provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Scheduled for surgery with synthetic bone grafts containing hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, or other radio-opaque material
  • BMI >40
  • Prior lumbar spine fusion surgery at a level currently scheduled for surgery
  • Malignancy or treatment for malignancy within the last 5 years (benign skin cancer permitted)
  • Osteoporosis/osteopenia (≤2.5 SD below age-matched mean)
  • Use of rhBMP-2 (Infuse) or other active biologics
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Active or systemic infection, malignancy, or severe metabolic bone disease
  • Chronic steroid use (>10 days)
  • Revision fusion at index levels
  • Participation in another interventional clinical study within 30 days of consent
  • Known pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during the study

About this study

Official title: Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of ProteiOS® Allograft Derived Growth Factor in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study evaluating Influx™ ProteiOS®, an allograft-derived growth factor product, in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Participants undergoing 1- to 2-level TLIF (L2-S1) are randomized 2:1 to receive ProteiOS or a control graft (local bone with optional cancellous chip augmentation, no ProteiOS). The primary objective is to determine whether the 12-month interbody fusion rate (assessed by CT using the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser classification) with ProteiOS is non-inferior to control, using a 5-percentage-point non-inferiority margin. Patient-reported outcomes (ODI, VAS, EQ-5D-5L), safety, and healthcare utilization are also assessed. A separate exploratory cohort at one study site will evaluate the same outcomes in participants undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with or without ProteiOS, without formal hypothesis testing.

Read the detailed description

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a widely used technique for degenerative lumbar spine pathology. Prospective, randomized evidence on fusion outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, safety, and healthcare utilization for ProteiOS in TLIF is currently limited to retrospective data. This study randomizes participants 2:1 to ProteiOS versus a within-category control (standard graft material, no ProteiOS), with central, blinded, independent radiographic review of CT and X-ray fusion outcomes. The primary endpoint is CT-confirmed interbody fusion (BSF-3) at 12 months, tested for non-inferiority (margin = 5 percentage points, assumed fusion rates 95% ProteiOS vs. 89% control, 80% power, one-sided α = 0.025, Farrington-Manning likelihood score method). Secondary endpoints include fusion at 6 and 24 months, X-ray-based interbody and posterolateral fusion assessment (Lenke classification for PLF), patient-reported outcomes at 3, 6, and 24 months, adverse events, and healthcare utilization

Being tested
Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®), Standard of Care (SOC)
Keywords
ProteiOS, HCT/P, bone graft, spinal fusion, lumbar interbody fusion, growth factor, allograft, TLIF
Medical subject headings
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Spondylolisthesis, Spinal Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)Other

    Allograft-derived growth factor product (ProteiOS®) containing endogenous osteoinductive, angiogenic, and chemoattractant proteins bound to a scaffold of choice

  • Standard of Care (SOC)Other

    Local autograft with optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation

Study groups in NCT07775729
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TLIF - ProteiOS (Treatment)ExperimentalInflux™ demineralized cortical fibers combined 1:1 with ProteiOS®, ≥50% of total graft volume per level (5-15 cc total), optional cancellous allograft chip augmentation. If PLF indicated: 100% cortical fiber graft + ProteiOS + local bone in Fibrant PAK containment bag.
Receives: Other: Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)
TLIF - ControlActive comparator5-15 cc locally harvested autograft, optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation, no ProteiOS. If PLF indicated: cortical fiber graft + local bone in Fibrant PAK containment bag.
Receives: Other: Standard of Care (SOC)
ALIF - ProteiOS (Treatment)ExperimentalSame ProteiOS-based mixture as TLIF treatment arm
Receives: Other: Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)
ALIF - ControlActive comparatorSame control graft composition as TLIF control arm
Receives: Other: Standard of Care (SOC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Fusion Success (via Computed Tomography (CT) analysis)

    Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

    Measured: 12 Months

  3. Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological

    Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council [MRC] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).

    Measured: 12 Months

  4. Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

    Measured: 12 Months

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Fusion (via Computed Tomography (CT))

    Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.

    Measured: 6 and 24 months

  2. Fusion (x ray)

    Percentage of participants achieving fusion by X-ray. Interbody fusion (all participants): Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification, Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion); success = Grade 3; higher grade = better.

    Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24 months

  3. Adverse Events

    Nature (descriptive) and frequency (number) of procedure and biologic related Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    Measured: 24 months

  4. Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

    Measured: 3, 6, 24 Months

  5. Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological

    Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council [MRC] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).

    Measured: 3, 6, 24 Months

  6. Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

    Measured: 3, 6, 24 Months

  7. Healthcare utilization: Frequency of Hospital Visits

    Number of hospital visits per participant, up to 24 months.

    Measured: Up to 24 months

  8. Healthcare Utilization: Length of Hospital Stay

    Duration of hospital stay per participant, in days, up to 24 months.

    Measured: Up to 24 months

  9. Healthcare Utilization: ICU Time

    Duration of ICU stay per participant, in days, up to 24 months.

    Measured: Up to 24 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Aug 2026
  2. Study startDec 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
2:1 randomization to ProteiOS (treatment) vs. control within each of two surgical cohorts (TLIF, ALIF)
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
280 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07775729
Sponsor's protocol ID
CS-07
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
11 Aug 2026
Last updated
20 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®) in people with Degenerative Disc Disease and Spinal Stenosis Lumbar, run by Isto Biologics.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Fusion Success (via Computed Tomography (CT) analysis) (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in