Well-beingNCT07777601
Research Regarding Mountain Products: Cropping and Benefits for the USA and Canada - Knowledge Shares With Global Mountain Entrepreneurs
An observational study of Well-being and Financial Support, run by Covaci Brindusa at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The main objective of the project is to sustain bilateral scientific research regarding: Research regarding mountain products: cropping and benefits for the USA and Canada - knowledge shares with global mountain entrepreneurs. Activities: A1. Project management; A2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Well-being, Financial Support, Financial Wellbeing
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2022to 15 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Except children, no one excluded
Who may be able to join
- Persons consuming mountain products
- Persons visiting mountain regions
- Persons using all types of services in mountain area
- No others inclusion criteria
Who cannot join
- No children
- No persons under 21 years old
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Research Regarding Mountain Products: Cropping and Benefits for the USA and Canada
The main objective of the project is to sustain bilateral scientific research regarding: Research regarding mountain products: cropping and benefits for the USA and Canada - knowledge shares with global mountain entrepreneurs. Activities: A1. Project management; A2. Research regarding mountain products health benefits from the USA, Canada and worldwide; A3. Research regarding mountain products in the USA, Canada and worldwide; A4. Research regarding mountain area for mountain products crops from the USA, Canada and worldwide; A5. Land acquisition and sustainability in the USA, Canada and worldwide. Project 002/01.04.2022. Date: 04/01/2022-09/15/2025 (CBM International University), held in Sierra Blanca, Hudspeth Texas, USA; Cherokee Village, Fulton Arkansas, USA; Lynn Lake, Manitoba, Canada (17655 USD).
- Conditions
- Well-being, Financial Support, Financial Wellbeing
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Achievement of external funding objectives
The proportion of respondents who reported achieving their funding objectives, based on Question 13 of the study survey. Respondents could select Yes or No. [1-2]
Measured: 36 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Source of first information about external funds
The source through which respondents first learned about external funds, based on Question 1 of the study survey. Response options included television, radio, newspapers, magazines, internet or website, friends or relatives, and other sources. Results are reported as the number and proportion of respondents for each response category. [1-2]
Measured: 36 months
Characteristics of external funding accessed
Characteristics of the external funding accessed by respondents, assessed using Questions 2 through 7 of the study survey. Variables included duration of use, contracting institution, type of financing, subtype of financing, priority axis, and accessed funding measure. Results were reported according to the response categories for each variable. [1-2]
Measured: 36 months
Perceived quality of external funding application compared with other financing
Respondents' assessment of the quality of the application of funding compared with other types of funding, assessed using Question 8 of the study survey. Responses were recorded on an ordinal five-category scale ranging from Much worse to Much better. [1-2]
Measured: 36 months
Overall perceived quality of implementation of external funds
Respondents' overall assessment of the quality of implementation of external funds, assessed using Question 9 of the study survey. Responses were recorded using the ordinal response categories provided in the survey. [1-2]
Measured: 36 months
Importance of factors considered when choosing an external grant
The importance assigned by respondents to factors considered when choosing an external grant, assessed using Question 10 of the study survey. Factors included application quality, co-financing, need, cost-benefit ratio, and familiarity with the desired funding measure. Each factor was ranked from 1 (least important) to 5 (most important). [1-2]
Measured: 36 months
Recommendation of external funding to others
The proportion of respondents who would recommend external funding to other people, assessed using Question 11 of the study survey. Responses were categorized as Yes or No. [1-2]
Measured: 36 months
Recovery of the full amount requested for financing
The proportion of respondents reporting recovery of the full amount requested for financing, assessed using Question 14 of the study survey. Responses were categorized as Yes or No. [1-2]
Measured: 36 months
Perceived needs for improvement of external funding
Respondents' reported advantages and disadvantages of external funding and their perceived needs and suggestions for improving the financing of external funds, based on the open-ended responses to Questions 12 and 15 of the study. [1-2]
Measured: 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2026
- Study start1 Apr 2022
- Primary completion1 Apr 2024
- Study completion15 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Well-beingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Covaci Brindusa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Covaci Brindusa, CBM International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07777601
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 002/01.04.2022
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
[2]. https://www.survio.com/survey/d/V5G8Z4C6J8B4L7X1B
[1]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10135392
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Research Regarding Mountain Products: Cropping and Benefits for the USA and Canada
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07777601
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 002/01.04.2022
- Conditions
- Well-being, Financial Support, Financial Wellbeing
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Covaci BrindusaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of the project is to sustain bilateral scientific research regarding: Research regarding mountain products: cropping and benefits for the USA and Canada - knowledge shares with global mountain entrepreneurs. Activities: A1. Project management; A2. Research regarding mountain products health benefits from the USA, Canada and worldwide; A3. Research regarding mountain products in the USA, Canada and worldwide; A4. Research regarding mountain area for mountain products crops from the USA, Canada and worldwide; A5. Land acquisition and sustainability in the USA, Canada and worldwide. Project 002/01.04.2022. Date: 04/01/2022-09/15/2025 (CBM International University), held in Sierra Blanca, Hudspeth Texas, USA; Cherokee Village, Fulton Arkansas, USA; Lynn Lake, Manitoba, Canada (17655 USD).
Study design
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Except children, no one excluded
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Persons consuming mountain products
- Persons visiting mountain regions
- Persons using all types of services in mountain area
- No others inclusion criteria
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- No children
- No persons under 21 years old
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Achievement of external funding objectives
Time frame: 36 months
The proportion of respondents who reported achieving their funding objectives, based on Question 13 of the study survey. Respondents could select Yes or No. [1-2]
8 secondary outcomes
Source of first information about external funds
Time frame: 36 months
Characteristics of external funding accessed
Time frame: 36 months
Perceived quality of external funding application compared with other financing
Time frame: 36 months
Overall perceived quality of implementation of external funds
Time frame: 36 months
Importance of factors considered when choosing an external grant
Time frame: 36 months
Recommendation of external funding to others
Time frame: 36 months
Recovery of the full amount requested for financing
Time frame: 36 months
Perceived needs for improvement of external funding
Time frame: 36 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2026.
- Results publication[2]. https://www.survio.com/survey/d/V5G8Z4C6J8B4L7X1B
- Results publication[1]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10135392
- File 002-01.04.2022\_eng.docx (Survey in English)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Survey in RomanianLink provided by the sponsor.
- Answers: jpg files (screenshots)Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Well-being
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Well-being and Financial Support, run by Covaci Brindusa at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Achievement of external funding objectives (time frame: 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07777601, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026.