Vestibular HypofunctionNCT07777692
Vestibular Rehabilitation Exercises to Improve Gait, Balance, and Dynamic Visual Acuity in Patients With Vestibular Hypofunction
A study testing Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy and Conventional Physiotherapy in people with Vestibular Hypofunction, run by University of Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
## Brief Summary Unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH) is a condition characterized by reduced or absent function of one vestibular system and commonly results in dizziness, impaired postural control, gait difficulties, reduced dynamic visual acuity, and increased risk of falls. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 39 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Vestibular Hypofunction
- What is being tested?
- Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy and Conventional Physiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2026to 20 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 39 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- • Age group of 39 - 60 was included in this study. (Grill et al., 2018)
- Both male and female gender
- Participants who have chronic condition (past 3 months) (Karabulut et al., 2023)
- Diagnostic tests:
- Tandem Romberg with eyes closed (<30s)
- Timed Up and Go (6 s) - Single leg stance with eyes closed
Show all 9Show fewer
- Timed Up and Go (7 s) Tandem Romberg with eyes closed
- Timed Up and Go (8 s) Standing on foam with eyes closed (Salah et al., 2020)
- Referred patient were confirmed by dynamic visual acuity test (DVAT)(Vital et al., 2010).
Who cannot join
- • Dizziness associated with other neurological conditions (e.g Stroke, diabetic neuropathy) (Yang et al., 2024)
- Bilateral vestibular hypofunction was excluded (Karabulut et al., 2023)
- Patients diagnosed with other neurological conditions that may affect balance, gait, or vestibular function, such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, cerebellar ataxia etc. (Hall et al., 2022)
- Participants with cognitive dysfunction (Hall et al., 2022)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site
1-Km Defence Road, near Bhuptian Chowk, Lahore, Pakistan.
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000
About this study
## Brief Summary
Unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH) is a condition characterized by reduced or absent function of one vestibular system and commonly results in dizziness, impaired postural control, gait difficulties, reduced dynamic visual acuity, and increased risk of falls. These impairments can substantially affect functional independence and quality of life. Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) is an exercise-based physiotherapy approach designed to promote central vestibular compensation through gaze stabilization, habituation, balance, and gait training. However, the evidence comparing the additional benefits of VRT with conventional physiotherapy, particularly in the local population, remains limited. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine and compare the effects of VRT and conventional physiotherapy on balance, gait, dynamic visual acuity, and dizziness-related disability in patients with chronic unilateral vestibular hypofunction.
Read more
A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 58 participants aged 38-60 years with chronic unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Participants were randomly allocated into an experimental group and a control group, with 29 participants in each group. The experimental group received conventional physiotherapy combined with vestibular-specific rehabilitation, including VOR x1/x2 gaze stabilization, postural stability exercises, and habituation exercises. The control group received conventional physiotherapy consisting of core strengthening and gait training without vestibular-specific interventions. Both groups received treatment twice weekly for eight weeks, with each session lasting approximately 45 minutes. Outcome measures included the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test for functional mobility, Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA) for visual stability, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) for dizziness-related disability, and Tandem Romberg testing for balance.
The findings demonstrated greater improvements in the experimental group across the assessed outcomes. TUG performance improved, while DVA and DHI scores showed marked improvement, indicating better visual stability and reduced dizziness-related disability. Romberg performance also improved substantially, reflecting enhanced postural stability and balance control. In comparison, the control group demonstrated smaller or inconsistent changes, particularly in DVA, DHI, and functional mobility. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric tests because most study variables were not normally distributed. Within-group comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, while between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U Test.
The study concluded that vestibular rehabilitation therapy is an effective intervention for improving balance, dynamic visual acuity, and dizziness-related disability in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction. The experimental group showed greater improvements in postural stability, visual stability, and perceived disability than the conventional physiotherapy group. However, no significant between-group difference was observed for TUG, suggesting that conventional physiotherapy may provide adequate improvement in basic functional mobility. Overall, the findings support incorporating vestibular rehabilitation into physiotherapy management of UVH to enhance sensory integration and functional recovery.
The study recommends early initiation of VRT, individualized exercise programs, and emphasis on home exercises to improve adherence and long-term outcomes. Future research should involve larger samples, multicenter studies, longer follow-up periods, and investigation of optimal exercise dosage and progression.
- Conditions
- Vestibular Hypofunction
- Being tested
- Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy, Conventional Physiotherapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vestibular Rehabilitation TherapyBehavioural
Vestibular rehabilitation therapy consisting of gaze stabilization exercises (VOR x1/x2), habituation exercises, and balance training, administered in addition to conventional physiotherapy. The intervention will be provided twice weekly for 8 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 45 minutes.
Conventional PhysiotherapyBehavioural
Conventional physiotherapy consisting of core strengthening and gait training, administered for 8 weeks. Participants received treatment twice weekly.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy + Conventional Physiotherapy | Experimental | Participants in this group will receive vestibular rehabilitation therapy in addition to conventional physiotherapy for 8 weeks. Vestibular rehabilitation will include gaze stabilization exercises (VOR x1/x2), habituation exercises, and balance training. Treatment will be provided twice weekly, with each session lasting approximately 45 minutes. Receives: Behavioral: Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy; Behavioral: Conventional Physiotherapy |
| Conventional Physiotherapy | Active comparator | Participants in this group will receive conventional physiotherapy alone for 8 weeks. The conventional physiotherapy program will include core strengthening and gait training without the vestibular-specific rehabilitation program. Receives: Behavioral: Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy; Behavioral: Conventional Physiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Balance
Measured: 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2026
- Study start15 Apr 2026
- Primary completion20 Jul 2026
- Study completion20 Jul 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Vestibular HypofunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of LahoreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Lahore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sadaf Anjum, University of Lahore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07777692
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Arooj Fatima
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vestibular Rehabilitation Exercises to Improve Gait, Balance, and Dynamic Visual Acuity in Patients With Vestibular Hypofunction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07777692
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Arooj Fatima
- Conditions
- Vestibular Hypofunction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LahoreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jul 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
## Brief Summary
Unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH) is a condition characterized by reduced or absent function of one vestibular system and commonly results in dizziness, impaired postural control, gait difficulties, reduced dynamic visual acuity, and increased risk of falls. These impairments can substantially affect functional independence and quality of life. Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) is an exercise-based physiotherapy approach designed to promote central vestibular compensation through gaze stabilization, habituation, balance, and gait training. However, the evidence comparing the additional benefits of VRT with conventional physiotherapy, particularly in the local population, remains limited. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine and compare the effects of VRT and conventional physiotherapy on balance, gait, dynamic visual acuity, and dizziness-related disability in patients with chronic unilateral vestibular hypofunction.
A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 58 participants aged 38-60 years with chronic unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Participants were randomly allocated into an experimental group and a control group, with 29 participants in each group. The experimental group received conventional physiotherapy combined with vestibular-specific rehabilitation, including VOR x1/x2 gaze stabilization, postural stability exercises, and habituation exercises. The control group received conventional physiotherapy consisting of core strengthening and gait training without vestibular-specific interventions. Both groups received treatment twice weekly for eight weeks, with each session lasting approximately 45 minutes. Outcome measures included the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test for functional mobility, Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA) for visual stability, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) for dizziness-related disability, and Tandem Romberg testing for balance.
The findings demonstrated greater improvements in the experimental group across the assessed outcomes. TUG performance improved, while DVA and DHI scores showed marked improvement, indicating better visual stability and reduced dizziness-related disability. Romberg performance also improved substantially, reflecting enhanced postural stability and balance control. In comparison, the control group demonstrated smaller or inconsistent changes, particularly in DVA, DHI, and functional mobility. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric tests because most study variables were not normally distributed. Within-group comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, while between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U Test.
The study concluded that vestibular rehabilitation therapy is an effective intervention for improving balance, dynamic visual acuity, and dizziness-related disability in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction. The experimental group showed greater improvements in postural stability, visual stability, and perceived disability than the conventional physiotherapy group. However, no significant between-group difference was observed for TUG, suggesting that conventional physiotherapy may provide adequate improvement in basic functional mobility. Overall, the findings support incorporating vestibular rehabilitation into physiotherapy management of UVH to enhance sensory integration and functional recovery.
The study recommends early initiation of VRT, individualized exercise programs, and emphasis on home exercises to improve adherence and long-term outcomes. Future research should involve larger samples, multicenter studies, longer follow-up periods, and investigation of optimal exercise dosage and progression.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy + Conventional Physiotherapy | Experimental | Behavioral: Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy, Behavioral: Conventional PhysiotherapyParticipants in this group will receive vestibular rehabilitation therapy in addition to conventional physiotherapy for 8 weeks. Vestibular rehabilitation will include gaze stabilization exercises (VOR x1/x2), habituation exercises, and balance training. Treatment will be provided twice weekly, with each session lasting approximately 45 minutes. |
| Conventional Physiotherapy | Active comparator | Behavioral: Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy, Behavioral: Conventional PhysiotherapyParticipants in this group will receive conventional physiotherapy alone for 8 weeks. The conventional physiotherapy program will include core strengthening and gait training without the vestibular-specific rehabilitation program. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 39 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- • Age group of 39 - 60 was included in this study. (Grill et al., 2018)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- • Dizziness associated with other neurological conditions (e.g Stroke, diabetic neuropathy) (Yang et al., 2024)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vestibular Rehabilitation TherapyVestibular rehabilitation therapy consisting of gaze stabilization exercises (VOR x1/x2), habituation exercises, and balance training, administered in addition to conventional physiotherapy. The intervention will be provided twice weekly for 8 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 45 minutes. | Behavioural | Conventional Physiotherapy, Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy + Conventional Physiotherapy |
| Conventional PhysiotherapyConventional physiotherapy consisting of core strengthening and gait training, administered for 8 weeks. Participants received treatment twice weekly. | Behavioural | Conventional Physiotherapy, Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy + Conventional Physiotherapy |
Primary outcome
Balance
Time frame: 6 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2026.
Related trials for Vestibular Hypofunction
Active, not recruiting
VertiGO! - Get up and GO! With the Vestibular Implant
Bilateral Vestibular Loss
Active, not recruiting
Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo With and Without Vestibular Hypofunction: Protocol for an Integrated Home-Based Exercise With Self-Managed Education Programme
Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV), Vestibular Hypofunction
Recruiting
Making INformed Decisions in Gaze and Postural Stability: A Pilot Feasibility Study
Vestibular Hypofunction
RecruitingObservational study
MRI Performance and Risk Factors in Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction
Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction, Bilateral Vestibulopathy
Not yet recruiting
OKT With Gaze and Postural Stabilization on Vertigo, MS and QOL in VBH
Vestibular Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy and Conventional Physiotherapy in people with Vestibular Hypofunction, run by University of Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Balance (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026.