AzTrials
AzTrials

Obesity Difficult Airway Airway ManagementNCT07787468

Videolaryngoscopes in the Morbidly Obese

A study testing Airway management in people with Obesity Difficult Airway Airway Management, run by Uniwersytet Radomski im. Kazimierza Pułaskiego at 1 site in Poland.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate four videolaryngoscopes used for intubation of extremely obese (class 3 obesity) patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. One hundred adult patients will be scheduled for an elective sleeve gastrectomy at the Mazowiecki Szpital Specjalistyczny in Radom, Poland. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Airway management
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
15 Aug 2026to 1 Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • class 3 obesity
  • bariatric surgery
  • over 18 years old
  • male and female

Who cannot join

  • known difficult laryngoscopy
  • difficult face mask ventilation
  • aged under 18 years old
  • previous history of awake tracheal intubation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Poland1 site
  • Uniwersytet Radomski

    Radom, Masovian Voivodeship, 26-600

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Four Video Laryngoscopes During Intubation of Class 3 Obese Patients - a Randomized Clinical Trial

This study will evaluate four videolaryngoscopes used for intubation of extremely obese (class 3 obesity) patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. One hundred adult patients will be scheduled for an elective sleeve gastrectomy at the Mazowiecki Szpital Specjalistyczny in Radom, Poland. All patients will receive premedication with 300 mg pregabalin 30 minutes before the start of anaesthesia. An extended monitoring will be applied. This consists of ECG, IBP (invasive blood pressure), SpO2, TOF (train-of-four), entropy and volatile anaesthetic concentration. All patients will be placed in a ramped position (HELP - Head-elevated Laryngoscopy Position) and will be pre-oxygenated with FiO2 1.0 for three minutes prior to induction. A standardised local protocol of opioid-free anaesthesia for bariatric patients will be utilised. Prior to proper induction of anaesthesia, IV infusions of 1% lidocaine and dexmedetomidine 10 µg ml-1 will be started. This will be followed by induction with IV propofol (200 mg) and ketamine (50 mg). Rocuronium (100 mg) will be used as a neuromuscular blocking agent. Adequate neuromuscular block will be confirmed and controlled throughout the procedure with TOF Watch (Organon, Dublin, Ireland). A cuffed, size 8.0 tracheal tube with stylet (Sumi, Sulejówek, Poland) will be used for intubation. A single-use hyperangulated blade will be used in all studied devices. Correct placement of the tracheal tube will be confirmed by videolaryngoscopy, capnography and chest auscultation. All patients will be anaesthetised by experienced consultant anaesthetists with over 10 years of clinical practice after completion of specialist training. Furthermore, all anaesthetists participating in the study will be trained with all VLs used until they feel competent. Only two intubation attempts with a studied videolaryngoscope will be allowed. A single attempt will be limited to 60 seconds. A failure is defined as an attempt which lasted more than 60 seconds, when saturation dropped below 90%, after two unsuccessful attempts, when airway injury or bronchospasm occurred. A single-digit number will be allocated to each of the studied videolaryngoscopes: 1 for the C-MAC PM, 2 for the McGrath MAC, 3 for the VisionPro and 4 for the AceScope. A single sheet of paper containing printed number will be placed in an opaque envelope. Then they will be assigned to the participating anaesthetist by computer-generated randomization. The SPSS 29.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) will be used for allocation. Furthermore, patients will be blinded to randomization.

Read the detailed description

This study will evaluate four videolaryngoscopes used for intubation of extremely obese (class 3 obesity) patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. One hundred adult patients will be scheduled for an elective sleeve gastrectomy at the Mazowiecki Szpital Specjalistyczny in Radom, Poland. All patients will receive premedication with 300 mg pregabalin 30 minutes before the start of anaesthesia. An extended monitoring will be applied. This consists of ECG, IBP (invasive blood pressure), SpO2, TOF (train-of-four), entropy and volatile anaesthetic concentration. All patients will be placed in a ramped position (HELP - Head-elevated Laryngoscopy Position) and will be pre-oxygenated with FiO2 1.0 for three minutes prior to induction. A standardised local protocol of opioid-free anaesthesia for bariatric patients will be utilised. Prior to proper induction of anaesthesia, IV infusions of 1% lidocaine and dexmedetomidine 10 µg ml-1 will be started. This will be followed by induction with IV propofol (200 mg) and ketamine (50 mg). Rocuronium (100 mg) will be used as a neuromuscular blocking agent. Adequate neuromuscular block will be confirmed and controlled throughout the procedure with TOF Watch (Organon, Dublin, Ireland). A cuffed, size 8.0 tracheal tube with stylet (Sumi, Sulejówek, Poland) will be used for intubation. A single-use hyperangulated blade will be used in all studied devices. Correct placement of the tracheal tube will be confirmed by videolaryngoscopy, capnography and chest auscultation. All patients will be anaesthetised by experienced consultant anaesthetists with over 10 years of clinical practice after completion of specialist training. Furthermore, all anaesthetists participating in the study will be trained with all VLs used until they feel competent. Only two intubation attempts with a studied videolaryngoscope will be allowed. A single attempt will be limited to 60 seconds. A failure is defined as an attempt which lasted more than 60 seconds, when saturation dropped below 90%, after two unsuccessful attempts, when airway injury or bronchospasm occurred. A single-digit number will be allocated to each of the studied videolaryngoscopes: 1 for the C-MAC PM, 2 for the McGrath MAC, 3 for the VisionPro and 4 for the AceScope. A single sheet of paper containing printed number will be placed in an opaque envelope. Then they will be assigned to the participating anaesthetist by computer-generated randomization. The SPSS 29.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) will be used for allocation. Furthermore, patients will be blinded to randomization.

Collected data will be analysed using Statistica 14.0 (TIBCO Software, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and Microsoft Office Excel 2021 spreadsheet (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the paired Student t-test will be used for data analysis. Continuous variables will be presented either as mean ± SD (standard deviation) or median (IQR - interquartile range) for non-normally distributed data. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test determines whether the analysed variables match the characteristics of a normal distribution. The investigators assumed that the overall success rate of intubation in obese patients would be 90% (α = 0.05, 2-sided, β = 0.1, 95% CI). The calculated sample size requires 95 participants and the final adjusted sample size will be 100 patients to compensate for dropouts. A p-value of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) is considered statistically significant.

Being tested
Airway management
Keywords
Videolaryngoscope, Class 3 obesity, Difficult airway, Intubation
Medical subject headings
Obesity, Morbid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Airway managementDevice

    Device used for intubation

Study groups in NCT07787468
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
C-MAC PMExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Airway management
McGrath MACExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Airway management
VisionProActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Airway management
AceScopeActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Airway management

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. First-attempt success

    This is the percentage of successful tracheal tube placement at the first attempt.

    Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 10 months

  2. Intubation time

    The intubation time is defined as the time from picking up the videolaryngoscope until the correct placement of the tracheal tube has been confirmed by capnography. A stop watch of a mobile phone (Apple, Cupertino, CA, USA) will be used to measure the intubation time.

    Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 10 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Image quality

    It will be evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). This is an eleven-point scale, i.e. from 0 to 10. The NRS score of 0 indicates blurred, difficult to read picture and 10 denotes sharp with adequate colours, top quality image.

    Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 10 months

  2. User-friendliness of the device used

    It will be evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). This is an eleven-point scale, i.e. from 0 to 10, and regarding the ease-of-use 0 denotes a very difficult and complicated to use device while 10 corresponds to an user-friendly equipment.

    Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 10 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Aug 2026
  2. Study start15 Aug 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07787468
Sponsor's protocol ID
1/2026
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
18 Aug 2026
Last updated
26 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Airway management in people with Obesity Difficult Airway Airway Management, run by Uniwersytet Radomski im. Kazimierza Pułaskiego at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

First-attempt success (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 10 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in