Seborrheic KeratosesAI\SKNCT07787481
AI in SK Histopathological Diagnosis
An observational study of Seborrheic Keratoses and Artifical Intelligence, run by Al-Azhar University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm in the histopathological diagnosis of Seborrheic keratosis compared to Certified Dermatopathologists. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Seborrheic Keratoses, Artifical Intelligence
- What is being tested?
- This study doesn't include an intervention.
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2026to 1 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Seborrheic keratosis H\&E stained glass slides from the pathology archive of Al-hussein dermatopathology unit.
Who may be able to join
- Histopathological slides diagnosed as Seborrheic keratosis.
- Slides with adequate staining and preservation allowing clear visualization of histopathological features.
Who cannot join
- Slides with poor staining quality or significant artifacts interfering with histopathological interpretation.
- Slides that were damaged, faded, or inadequately preserved.
- Cases with uncertain or inconclusive original diagnoses.
- Slides that could not be successfully digitized due to technical limitations ex: very short or too long slides.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Egypt1 site
Faculty of medicine, Al-Azhar University boys branch in Cairo
Cairo
Hebatullah Fouad Elkerm, +201111075736, hebaf.alkerm@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Performance in the Histopathological Diagnosis of Seborrheic Keratosis
The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm in the histopathological diagnosis of Seborrheic keratosis compared to Certified Dermatopathologists.
Read the detailed description
Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is one of the most common benign epidermal tumors. Treatment is generally unnecessary, although lesions may be removed because of irritation, pruritus, or cosmetic concerns. SK has several clinical and histological subtypes, including common seborrheic keratosis (CSK), which is more prevalent among Caucasians, and dermatosis papulosa nigra (DPN), which is more common in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes III and above. Its development is associated mainly with age and genetic predisposition, with possible contribution from ultraviolet radiation. Lesions may occur almost anywhere except the palms and soles, with the face and upper trunk being common sites. Diagnosis is usually clinical but may be supported by dermoscopy or histopathology.
Histologically, SK represents an intraepidermal proliferation of squamous or basaloid cells. The characteristic findings include acanthosis, papillomatosis, hyperkeratosis, keratin cysts, and keratin pseudocysts. Cellular atypia is generally absent, while the amount of melanin and melanocytes varies according to the degree of pigmentation. SK shows considerable clinical and histological variability, which can sometimes make differentiation from other lesions, such as keratoacanthoma and clear cell acanthoma, challenging.
Recent advances in digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) have created new opportunities for diagnostic support in dermatopathology. AI aims to mimic aspects of human intelligence, while machine learning enables computers to identify patterns from data. Deep learning, neural networks, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are particularly important in image analysis. AI in dermatopathology has evolved from early text-based systems such as TEGUMENT, introduced in 1987, to modern systems capable of directly analyzing digital pathology images. Although widespread clinical implementation is still developing, AI has potential applications in diagnosis, triage, education, and research and requires collaboration between dermatopathologists, pathologists, clinicians, engineers, and data scientists.
Study Methodology
H\&E-stained glass slides will be collected from the Al-Hussein dermatopathology archive, covering the period from 2010 to 2019. A panel of certified dermatopathologists will evaluate the slides. Their diagnoses will serve as the gold standard against which the AI results will be compared.
The slides will be digitized using a Leica Aperio GT450 scanner at 40× magnification. Before scanning, slides will be cleaned and assessed for adequate staining, proper coverslipping, and absence of artifacts such as air bubbles, tissue folds, or debris. The scanner can accommodate 15 racks with 30 slides per rack, for a total of 450 slides per run, with approximately 1.5-2 minutes required to scan each slide.
Whole Slide Images (WSIs) will be generated and stored in SVS format, with individual file sizes typically ranging from approximately 500 MB to 2 GB. The digital slides will then undergo quality control using Aperio ImageScope to ensure adequate focus, clarity, and complete tissue capture. Suboptimal slides will be rescanned. The images will subsequently be transferred to an external hard drive for storage and backup before being uploaded to the HistoGPT cloud platform for AI analysis.
HistoGPT Analysis
The WSIs will be analyzed using HistoGPT, a Vision-Language Model for Digital Pathology. Because WSIs are extremely large, they are first divided into smaller image patches or tiles, typically 256×256 or 512×512 pixels. Tissue detection is then performed to exclude background areas and focus the analysis on the tissue.
HistoGPT uses a Vision Transformer (ViT) and a Hierarchical Vision Transformer (HiViT) to extract histological features at multiple scales. This allows the model to identify both microscopic features, such as cellular atypia and mitotic figures, and larger architectural patterns, such as symmetry, circumscription, and infiltrative growth.
Through attention mechanisms, the model can also establish relationships between spatially distant areas of the slide and recognize the importance of tissue organization and anatomical location. Its cross-modal alignment allows visual histological features to be associated with terminology used in pathology reports, enabling recognition of concepts such as keratin pearls, clefting, and solar elastosis.
Finally, the language component of HistoGPT generates a structured pathology report, potentially including a microscopic description, differential diagnosis, and final diagnosis. The AI-generated reports will be compared with the reports and diagnoses produced by the dermatopathology experts, and the time required for the diagnostic process will also be assessed.
Statistical Analysis
The collected data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26.0 or R programming. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Overall, the study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance and time efficiency of HistoGPT in dermatopathology by comparing its findings with expert dermatopathologists serving as the gold standard.
- Conditions
- Seborrheic Keratoses, Artifical Intelligence
- Being tested
- This study doesn't include an intervention.
- Medical subject headings
- Keratosis, Seborrheic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
This study doesn't include an intervention.Other
This study doesn't include an intervention.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The accuracy of the artificial intelligence algorithm in histopathological diagnosis of seborrheic keratosis evaluated mainly by sensitivity and specificity.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Aug 2026
- Study start1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Seborrheic KeratosesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Al-Azhar UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hebatullah Fouad Mahmoud Elkerm, Al-Azhar University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07787481
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 303
- Acronym
- AI\SK
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 26 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Performance in the Histopathological Diagnosis of Seborrheic Keratosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07787481
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AI\SK / 303
- Conditions
- Seborrheic Keratoses, Artifical Intelligence
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Al-Azhar UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm in the histopathological diagnosis of Seborrheic keratosis compared to Certified Dermatopathologists.
Detailed description
Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is one of the most common benign epidermal tumors. Treatment is generally unnecessary, although lesions may be removed because of irritation, pruritus, or cosmetic concerns. SK has several clinical and histological subtypes, including common seborrheic keratosis (CSK), which is more prevalent among Caucasians, and dermatosis papulosa nigra (DPN), which is more common in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes III and above. Its development is associated mainly with age and genetic predisposition, with possible contribution from ultraviolet radiation. Lesions may occur almost anywhere except the palms and soles, with the face and upper trunk being common sites. Diagnosis is usually clinical but may be supported by dermoscopy or histopathology.
Histologically, SK represents an intraepidermal proliferation of squamous or basaloid cells. The characteristic findings include acanthosis, papillomatosis, hyperkeratosis, keratin cysts, and keratin pseudocysts. Cellular atypia is generally absent, while the amount of melanin and melanocytes varies according to the degree of pigmentation. SK shows considerable clinical and histological variability, which can sometimes make differentiation from other lesions, such as keratoacanthoma and clear cell acanthoma, challenging.
Recent advances in digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) have created new opportunities for diagnostic support in dermatopathology. AI aims to mimic aspects of human intelligence, while machine learning enables computers to identify patterns from data. Deep learning, neural networks, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are particularly important in image analysis. AI in dermatopathology has evolved from early text-based systems such as TEGUMENT, introduced in 1987, to modern systems capable of directly analyzing digital pathology images. Although widespread clinical implementation is still developing, AI has potential applications in diagnosis, triage, education, and research and requires collaboration between dermatopathologists, pathologists, clinicians, engineers, and data scientists.
Study Methodology
H\&E-stained glass slides will be collected from the Al-Hussein dermatopathology archive, covering the period from 2010 to 2019. A panel of certified dermatopathologists will evaluate the slides. Their diagnoses will serve as the gold standard against which the AI results will be compared.
The slides will be digitized using a Leica Aperio GT450 scanner at 40× magnification. Before scanning, slides will be cleaned and assessed for adequate staining, proper coverslipping, and absence of artifacts such as air bubbles, tissue folds, or debris. The scanner can accommodate 15 racks with 30 slides per rack, for a total of 450 slides per run, with approximately 1.5-2 minutes required to scan each slide.
Whole Slide Images (WSIs) will be generated and stored in SVS format, with individual file sizes typically ranging from approximately 500 MB to 2 GB. The digital slides will then undergo quality control using Aperio ImageScope to ensure adequate focus, clarity, and complete tissue capture. Suboptimal slides will be rescanned. The images will subsequently be transferred to an external hard drive for storage and backup before being uploaded to the HistoGPT cloud platform for AI analysis.
HistoGPT Analysis
The WSIs will be analyzed using HistoGPT, a Vision-Language Model for Digital Pathology. Because WSIs are extremely large, they are first divided into smaller image patches or tiles, typically 256×256 or 512×512 pixels. Tissue detection is then performed to exclude background areas and focus the analysis on the tissue.
HistoGPT uses a Vision Transformer (ViT) and a Hierarchical Vision Transformer (HiViT) to extract histological features at multiple scales. This allows the model to identify both microscopic features, such as cellular atypia and mitotic figures, and larger architectural patterns, such as symmetry, circumscription, and infiltrative growth.
Through attention mechanisms, the model can also establish relationships between spatially distant areas of the slide and recognize the importance of tissue organization and anatomical location. Its cross-modal alignment allows visual histological features to be associated with terminology used in pathology reports, enabling recognition of concepts such as keratin pearls, clefting, and solar elastosis.
Finally, the language component of HistoGPT generates a structured pathology report, potentially including a microscopic description, differential diagnosis, and final diagnosis. The AI-generated reports will be compared with the reports and diagnoses produced by the dermatopathology experts, and the time required for the diagnostic process will also be assessed.
Statistical Analysis
The collected data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26.0 or R programming. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Overall, the study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance and time efficiency of HistoGPT in dermatopathology by comparing its findings with expert dermatopathologists serving as the gold standard.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Seborrheic keratosis H\&E stained glass slides from the pathology archive of Al-hussein dermatopathology unit.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Histopathological slides diagnosed as Seborrheic keratosis.
- Slides with adequate staining and preservation allowing clear visualization of histopathological features.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Slides with poor staining quality or significant artifacts interfering with histopathological interpretation.
- Slides that were damaged, faded, or inadequately preserved.
- Cases with uncertain or inconclusive original diagnoses.
- Slides that could not be successfully digitized due to technical limitations ex: very short or too long slides.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| This study doesn't include an intervention.This study doesn't include an intervention. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
The accuracy of the artificial intelligence algorithm in histopathological diagnosis of seborrheic keratosis evaluated mainly by sensitivity and specificity.
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Aug 2026.
Related trials for Seborrheic Keratoses
RecruitingPhase 3
Using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool for Melanoma Diagnosis
Malignant Melanoma of Skin, Other and Unspecified Malignant Neoplasm of Skin
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Seborrheic Keratoses and Artifical Intelligence, run by Al-Azhar University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hebatullah Fouad Elkerm (+201111075736, hebaf.alkerm@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The accuracy of the artificial intelligence algorithm in histopathological diagnosis of seborrheic keratosis evaluated mainly by sensitivity and specificity. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2026.