AzTrials
AzTrials

NeoplasmsNCT07791628

Electrical Grounding and Sleep Quality in Hospitalised Patients With Cancer

A study testing Earthing patch; grounding electrode in people with Neoplasms and Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sleep disturbance is one of the most common and most persistent symptoms in patients admitted for cancer care, and the options available during a short hospital stay are limited. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 79 years
What is being tested?
Earthing patch; grounding electrode
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
25 Oct 2023to 5 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 79 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Inpatients of the oncology ward aged 20 to 79 years
  • Subjective complaint of insomnia, with a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global score of 10 or greater at baseline
  • Histologically or clinically confirmed cancer of any stage from 0 to IV
  • Intact forehead skin permitting application of a grounding patch
  • Scheduled hospital admission of more than three days
  • Able and willing to give written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Baseline Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global score of 9 or less
  • Known or suspected pregnancy
  • History of alcohol dependence with less than two months of abstinence
  • Recent use of an indoor grounding product during sleep for more than one month
  • Habitually walking barefoot outdoors for more than one hour a day for more than one month
  • Unable or unwilling to complete the study procedures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • New Taipei City Municipal TuCheng Hospital

    New Taipei City, TuCheng District, 236

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Effects of Body Grounding Patches on Sleep Quality in Hospitalised Cancer Patients, and the Association Between Body Voltage, the Bedroom Electrical Environment and Sleep Quality: a Randomised, Sham-Controlled Trial

Sleep disturbance is one of the most common and most persistent symptoms in patients admitted for cancer care, and the options available during a short hospital stay are limited. The human body is electrically conductive, so an alternating potential - known as body voltage - is induced on the skin by mains wiring and appliances near the bed. Body voltage can be lowered by connecting the body to earth, and higher body voltage has been reported to be associated with lower vagal (parasympathetic) tone.

This randomised, sham-controlled trial tested whether nightly electrical grounding improves sleep quality in hospitalised patients with cancer who also have clinically significant insomnia. Participants wore a hydrogel patch on the forehead connected by a cord either to a true earth connection or to an externally identical cord that did not complete a conductive circuit. Grounding was applied on two consecutive nights in the oncology ward and then nightly at home until the outpatient follow-up visit. Body voltage was measured before and during grounding in both settings, so that the trial could verify objectively whether the intervention achieved its intended physical effect. Sleep quality, mood, somatic symptoms and daytime sleepiness were assessed by validated self-report questionnaires.

Read the detailed description

Design. Prospective, randomised, sham-controlled, participant-blinded, parallel two-group trial conducted in the oncology ward of New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital.

Allocation. Participants were allocated to true grounding or sham grounding by a randomised block design generated with the Research Randomizer web service. The true and sham cords were externally indistinguishable, differing only in whether a conductive connection was completed internally; participants were therefore blinded to allocation. Investigators who applied the intervention and measured body voltage were necessarily aware of allocation.

Intervention. Grounding was delivered through a medical-grade hydrogel patch of approximately 4 x 5 cm applied to the forehead and connected by a grounding cord, with the impedance of the completed circuit limited to less than 100 ohms. In hospital the cord was connected to the earth terminal of the bedside mains outlet; at home it was connected to a metal window frame, because domestic outlets in Taiwan do not reliably provide a standard earth terminal. Grounding was applied from 21:00 to 06:00 on two consecutive nights in the ward, suspended until discharge, and then applied nightly at home for at least six hours until the outpatient follow-up visit.

Body voltage. The alternating potential at the fingertip was measured with a digital multimeter while the participant lay in bed, both before and during grounding, on each in-hospital study night and once at home.

Remote bedroom assessment. Within two days of discharge a researcher conducted a video call to record the electromagnetic environment of the bedroom using a purpose-designed questionnaire, and to teach the participant to measure body voltage and to ground safely at home.

Statistical analysis. The primary between-group treatment effect was estimated by analysis of covariance, regressing each follow-up score on allocation arm with the corresponding baseline score as covariate. Every model was repeated on rank-transformed data as a sensitivity analysis. All tests were two-sided at the 5% level.

Being tested
Earthing patch; grounding electrode, Sham (No Treatment)
Keywords
electrical grounding, earthing, body voltage, electromagnetic field, bedroom environment, insomnia, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, oncology inpatients, sham-controlled
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Earthing patch; grounding electrodeDevice

    A Medical-grade hydrogel conductive patch ( 4 x 5 cm ) applied to the participants' forehead skin is connected by an electrically conductive cord to a true earth connection (the earth terminal of the bedside mains outlet in hospital, or a metal window frame at home). Applied from 21:00 to 06:00 on two consecutive nights in the hospital ward and then nightly at home for at least six hours for 7 days before the outpatient follow-up visit.

    Assigned Intervention Device: true Electrical grounding patch

  • Sham (No Treatment)Device

    Medical-grade hydrogel patch of approximately 4 x 5 cm applied to the forehead and connected by a sham-grounding cord (not conductively connected ) to an earth connection point.

    Assigned Intervention Device: sham-grounding cord

Study groups in NCT07791628
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
groundingExperimentalA hydrogel patch applied to the forehead is connected by a conductive cord to a true earth connection (the earth terminal of the bedside mains outlet in hospital, or a metal window frame at home). Applied from 21:00 to 06:00 on two consecutive nights in the ward and then nightly at home for at least six hours until the outpatient follow-up visit.
Receives: Device: Earthing patch; grounding electrode
sham groundingSham comparatorA hydrogel conductive patch applied to the participants' forehead skin is connected by an electrically 'non-conductive' cord to a true earth connection (the earth terminal of the bedside mains outlet in hospital, or a metal window frame at home). Applied from 21:00 to 06:00 on two consecutive nights in the hospital ward and then nightly at home for at least six hours for 7 days before the outpatient follow-up visit.
Receives: Device: Sham (No Treatment)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in PSQI scores

    The PSQI is a 19-item self-report instrument assessing sleep quality over the preceding month. It yields a global score ranging from 0 to 21, obtained by summing seven component scores each rated 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.

    Measured: first: Baseline (before the first study night) second: the outpatient follow-up visit, scheduled 7 to 14 days after hospital discharge

  2. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) component scores

    Seven components of the PSQI, each scored 0 to 3: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep.

    Measured: Baseline (before the first study night) and the outpatient follow-up visit, scheduled 7 to 14 days after hospital discharge

  3. Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) domain scores

    Self-rated change in sleep attributable to treatment, across four domains: getting to sleep, quality of sleep, awake following sleep, and behaviour following wakening. Each domain is scored on visual analogue scales; higher scores indicate better sleep. The instrument asks the respondent to compare current sleep with the period before treatment and therefore has no pre-treatment value.

    Measured: Morning after the first in-hospital study night, morning after the second in-hospital study night, and the outpatient follow-up visit 7 to 14 days after discharge

  4. Body voltage at the fingertip

    Alternating-current potential in volts, measured with a digital multimeter at the fingertip while the participant lies in bed, recorded immediately before and during grounding. Lower values indicate less induced electrical potential on the body.

    Measured: Once at first enrollment (on the day before two in-hospital study nights), and once in the participant's own bedroom within 2 days of hospital discharge

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score

    Chinese version of the HADS. Anxiety and depression subscales each range from 0 to 21 and the total score from 0 to 42. Higher scores indicate greater distress.

    Measured: Baseline and the outpatient follow-up visit 7 to 14 days after discharge

  2. Change in Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale (DSSS) score

    Chinese version of the DSSS, assessing depressive and somatic symptoms. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and the outpatient follow-up visit 7 to 14 days after discharge

  3. Change in Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) daily total

    Subjective sleepiness rated on a 9-point scale in the morning, afternoon and evening and summed to a daily total ranging from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater sleepiness.

    Measured: Baseline, the mornings following each of the two in-hospital study nights, and the outpatient follow-up visit 7 to 14 days after discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2026
  2. Study start25 Oct 2023
  3. Primary completion5 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion5 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07791628
Sponsor's protocol ID
202201526B0
Other IDs
CORPVVN005, 202201526B0C601
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
24 Aug 2026
Last updated
28 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Earthing patch; grounding electrode in people with Neoplasms and Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in PSQI scores (time frame: first: Baseline (before the first study night) second: the outpatient follow-up visit, scheduled 7 to 14 days after hospital discharge). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in