Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)NCT07802158
Discontinuing Psychotropic Medication Before Psychotherapy for PTSD
An observational study of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), run by Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam.
Trial summary
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is commonly treated with trauma-focused psychotherapy, including prolonged exposure therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Patients frequently also use psychotropic medications for insomnia, anxiety, or other PTSD-related symptoms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2026to 2 Sep 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Chronic post-traumatic stress disorder
Who may be able to join
- Pseudonymized data from patients treated at PSYTREC from late 2026 onwards (after the policy change) that gave written informed consent for the use of their data for research purposes
Who cannot join
- Patients who did not give written informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Discontinuing Psychotropic Medication Before Trauma-Focused Psychotherapy for PTSD: A Policy-Driven Target Trial Emulation
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is commonly treated with trauma-focused psychotherapy, including prolonged exposure therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Patients frequently also use psychotropic medications for insomnia, anxiety, or other PTSD-related symptoms.
In a previous cohort study of more than 6,000 adults with PTSD treated in 2021-2024 (https://doi.org/10.1159/000549259), psychotropic co-medication was associated with less improvement in PTSD symptoms after adjustment for 27 baseline covariates; the overall association persisted at 6-month follow-up. Antidepressants overall, and amitriptyline and mirtazapine specifically, showed the most consistent associations across sensitivity analyses. Whether discontinuing these medications before psychotherapy improves treatment outcome remains unknown.
Read more
This policy-driven natural experiment investigates whether tapering and discontinuing selected psychotropic medications before intensive trauma-focused psychotherapy is associated with greater improvement in PTSD symptoms than continuing the same medications during psychotherapy.
In late 2026, the same specialized trauma treatment center (PSYTREC) will introduce a revised medication-review policy. Medication use and indication are verified, and amitriptyline, mirtazapine, quetiapine, topiramate, zolpidem, and zopiclone are tapered and discontinued before psychotherapy when prescribed off-label for PTSD-related symptoms and when discontinuation is considered clinically appropriate and safe.
Patients treated under the 2026 policy will be compared with similar patients treated in 2021-2024 who used the same medication but continued it during psychotherapy. Statistical adjustment will further account for clinically relevant baseline differences. Sensitivity analyses will assess whether changes in psychotherapy outcomes over calendar time could explain the findings by examining matched patients whose medication management was unaffected by the policy.
The main hypothesis is that discontinuation before trauma-focused psychotherapy is associated with greater reduction in PTSD symptoms. Longer-term PTSD outcomes and the clinical feasibility of medication discontinuation will also be evaluated.
Read the detailed description
Background and rationale A previous prospective cohort study of more than 6,000 patients receiving standardized intensive trauma-focused psychotherapy for PTSD at a high-volume psychotrauma expertise center during 2021-2024 found that concomitant use of several psychotropic medications was associated with smaller reductions in PTSD symptoms (https://doi.org/10.1159/000549259). Analyses adjusted for 27 baseline covariates. Psychotropic co-medication overall was associated with reduced symptom improvement compared with non-use, and this association persisted at 6-month follow-up. Antidepressants overall, amitriptyline, and mirtazapine showed consistent associations with poorer outcomes across sensitivity analyses. Anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants, fluoxetine, zolpidem, and zopiclone showed similar negative associations, although estimates were less consistent across sensitivity analyses.
An important threat to causal inference in comparisons of psychotropic medication users with non-users is confounding by indication: patients receiving psychotropic medication had greater baseline PTSD symptom severity and psychiatric comorbidity. The present study will address this problem by comparing patients using a specific medication under two different clinical policies: patients who continued that medication during psychotherapy in 2021-2024 and patients for whom discontinuation of the same medication will be initiated before psychotherapy under the revised 2026 policy. Together with adjustment for baseline differences, this same-medication comparison will substantially improve clinical comparability. The principal remaining alternative explanation is a secular change in psychotherapy outcomes or patient characteristics between the historical and post-policy periods, which will be examined in dedicated sensitivity analyses. This design will significantly reduce residual confounding and strengthens the plausibility of a causal interpretation.
The purpose of this policy-driven natural experiment will therefore be to investigate whether tapering and discontinuing selected psychotropic medications before intensive trauma-focused psychotherapy, when clinically appropriate, is associated with greater improvement in PTSD symptoms than continuation of the same medications during psychotherapy.
Study design This will be an observational target trial emulation based on a policy-driven natural experiment. In September 2026, the center PSYTREC (Zeist, the Netherlands) will introduce a revised clinical medication-review protocol in which current and recent psychotropic medication use and treatment indication are systematically verified using available clinical and pharmacy information.
The target medications are amitriptyline, mirtazapine, quetiapine, topiramate, zolpidem, and zopiclone when prescribed off-label for PTSD-related symptoms. Under the revised policy, tapering and discontinuation before psychotherapy are initiated when clinically appropriate and safe. Medication management remains part of routine clinical care rather than a randomized research intervention. Tapering schedules are individualized according to medication, dose, duration of use, symptoms, withdrawal effects, and clinical circumstances. Psychotherapy can be postponed or the medication strategy modified when clinically necessary.
The 2026 post-policy cohort will consist of patients using one or more target medications for whom tapering and discontinuation are initiated under the revised protocol. The principal historical comparator will consist of patients treated in 2021-2024 who were using the same target medication or medications at treatment onset, during a period in which these medications were generally continued during psychotherapy. Classification of the 2026 policy cohort will therefore be based on initiation of the discontinuation strategy rather than successful completion of discontinuation.
All patients receive the center's standardized intensive trauma-focused psychotherapy program, including prolonged exposure and EMDR therapy. The primary clinical question is whether the strategy of discontinuing a target medication before psychotherapy is associated with greater improvement in clinician-rated PTSD symptoms than continuation of the same medication during psychotherapy. Longer-term PTSD symptoms and the feasibility and clinical consequences of medication discontinuation will also be evaluated.
Analytical approach Separate target-trial analyses will evaluate discontinuation versus continuation for the target medications. Propensity-score-based and outcome-modeling methods will be used to improve comparability between the 2026 and 2021-2024 cohorts and adjust for clinically relevant baseline factors associated with medication treatment or psychotherapy outcome. These include demographic characteristics, baseline PTSD symptom severity, trauma history, psychiatric comorbidity, previous psychotherapy, concomitant psychotropic medication use, and treatment duration.
Primary propensity-score matching will use nearest-neighbor matching without replacement, with up to two historical controls per 2026 patient and a caliper of 0.2 standard deviations of the logit of the propensity score. Covariate balance will be evaluated using standardized mean differences (<0.10) and variance ratios (0.5-2.0). If adequate balance cannot be achieved with nearest-neighbor matching, full matching will be used. Outcome models will additionally adjust for relevant baseline covariates.
Sensitivity analyses
Secular changes in psychotherapy outcomes will be evaluated in two policy-unaffected populations by comparing propensity-score-matched patients treated in 2026 with comparable patients treated in 2021-2024:
- patients using no psychotropic medication, and
- patients using psychotropic medication but none of the target medications. Specific psychotropic medication use will be included among the matching variables in the latter comparison.
Difference-in-differences analyses will then compare the temporal change for each target-medication group with the temporal change observed in the non-target medicated comparator cohort. The difference-in-differences estimate therefore represents the change in outcome among target-medication patients beyond the contemporaneous change observed among comparable patients whose medication management was unaffected by the discontinuation policy. Statistically, this effect will be estimated from the interaction between target-medication group and calendar period in an adjusted outcome model.
Pre-policy outcome trends during 2021-2024 will be examined for evidence that target-medication and comparator groups already showed differential temporal trends before implementation of the 2026 policy.
E-values will additionally quantify the strength of residual unmeasured confounding that would be required to explain the estimated associations.
Feasibility of discontinuation Clinical information collected during medication review will be used to characterize implementation of the discontinuation strategy, including completion or partial completion of tapering, modifications to the planned taper, clinically relevant discontinuation or rebound symptoms, temporary substitution or other medication changes, and postponement of psychotherapy. These analyses will describe the practical feasibility and clinical consequences of implementing the medication-review policy in routine PTSD care.
- Conditions
- Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
- Keywords
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Psychotherapy, Antidepressive agents, Anticonvulsants, Antipsychotic Agents, Target Trial Emulation
- Medical subject headings
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 target-medication discontinuation cohort | Patients treated from September 2026 who are using amitriptyline, mirtazapine, quetiapine, topiramate, zolpidem, and/or zopiclone off-label for PTSD-related symptoms and for whom tapering and discontinuation before trauma-focused psychotherapy is initiated under the revised medication-review policy. Cohort classification is based on initiation of the discontinuation strategy rather than successful completion of tapering. Primary analyses compare patients with historical users of the same specific medication. | |
| 2021-2024 target-medication continuation cohort | Historical patients treated in 2021-2024 who were using one or more of the same target medications at the start of trauma-focused psychotherapy. Under the clinical policy in place during this period, these medications were generally continued during psychotherapy. For the primary analyses, patients will be compared with 2026 patients using the same specific target medication. | |
| 2026 non-target psychotropic comparator | Patients treated in 2026 who are using psychotropic medication but none of the six target medications and are therefore not subject to the target-medication discontinuation policy. This cohort is used to estimate secular changes in psychotherapy outcomes and as the active comparator in difference-in-differences analyses. | |
| 2021-2024 non-target psychotropic comparator | Historical patients treated in 2021-2024 who were using psychotropic medication but none of the six target medications. These patients provide the historical counterpart to the 2026 non-target psychotropic comparator. The two cohorts will be propensity-score matched, including on psychotropic medication use and relevant baseline clinical characteristics. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CAPS-5 Change Score from Pre- to Post-Treatment
The primary outcome will be the change in PTSD severity on the Dutch CAPS-5, from pre-treatment (past month) to ~10 days post-treatment (past week version). Changes scores were calculated as post-treatment minus pre-treatment. The CAPS-5, a 20-item scale (0-4 per item), is the gold standard for 100 PTSD assessment. Internal consistency was high in the 2021-2024 sample (Cronbach's α = 0.95).
Measured: from pre-treatment (past month) to ~10 days post-treatment (past week version)
Secondary outcomes (3)
PCL-5 Change Score (Pre-Treatment vs. 3 Months Post-Treatment)
The PCL-5 (PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5) is a short, online self-report questionnaire used to measure the 20 symptoms of PTSD.
Measured: Pre-Treatment vs. 3 Months Post-Treatment)
PCL-5 Change Score (Pre-Treatment vs. 6 Months Post-Treatment)
The PCL-5 (PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5) is a short online self-report questionnaire used to measure the 20 symptoms of PTSD.
Measured: Pre-Treatment vs. 6 Months Post-Treatment
PCL-5 Change Score (Pre-Treatment vs. 12 Months Post-Treatment)
The PCL-5 (PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5) is a short online self-report questionnaire used to measure the 20 symptoms of PTSD.
Measured: Pre-Treatment vs. 12 Months Post-Treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Sep 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion2 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Location Academic Medical Center (AMC)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Serge Steenen, Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam
- Investigators
- Em. prof. dr. Ad de Jongh, DMD PhD, Study chair, Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07802158
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10.1159/000549259
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The data that support the findings of this study will not be made publicly available due to privacy reasons. The full data set (deidentified participant data), a data dictionary defining each field in the set and underlying analytic code will be available from the authors upon request via contact with the corresponding author (with a signed data access agreement).
Publications
Steenen SA, van Westrhenen R, Steenen CC, Klausch LT, De Jongh A. Concomitant Psychotropic Medication Is Associated with Reduced Outcomes of Trauma-Focused Psychotherapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Psychother Psychosom. 2025 Nov 10:1-19. doi: 10.1159/000549259. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 41212824
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Discontinuing Psychotropic Medication Before Trauma-Focused Psychotherapy for PTSD: A Policy-Driven Target Trial Emulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07802158
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10.1159/000549259
- Conditions
- Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
- Keywords
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Psychotherapy, Antidepressive agents, Anticonvulsants, Antipsychotic Agents, Target Trial Emulation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Academic Centre for Dentistry in AmsterdamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Location Academic Medical Center (AMC)
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 2 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is commonly treated with trauma-focused psychotherapy, including prolonged exposure therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Patients frequently also use psychotropic medications for insomnia, anxiety, or other PTSD-related symptoms.
In a previous cohort study of more than 6,000 adults with PTSD treated in 2021-2024 (https://doi.org/10.1159/000549259), psychotropic co-medication was associated with less improvement in PTSD symptoms after adjustment for 27 baseline covariates; the overall association persisted at 6-month follow-up. Antidepressants overall, and amitriptyline and mirtazapine specifically, showed the most consistent associations across sensitivity analyses. Whether discontinuing these medications before psychotherapy improves treatment outcome remains unknown.
This policy-driven natural experiment investigates whether tapering and discontinuing selected psychotropic medications before intensive trauma-focused psychotherapy is associated with greater improvement in PTSD symptoms than continuing the same medications during psychotherapy.
In late 2026, the same specialized trauma treatment center (PSYTREC) will introduce a revised medication-review policy. Medication use and indication are verified, and amitriptyline, mirtazapine, quetiapine, topiramate, zolpidem, and zopiclone are tapered and discontinued before psychotherapy when prescribed off-label for PTSD-related symptoms and when discontinuation is considered clinically appropriate and safe.
Patients treated under the 2026 policy will be compared with similar patients treated in 2021-2024 who used the same medication but continued it during psychotherapy. Statistical adjustment will further account for clinically relevant baseline differences. Sensitivity analyses will assess whether changes in psychotherapy outcomes over calendar time could explain the findings by examining matched patients whose medication management was unaffected by the policy.
The main hypothesis is that discontinuation before trauma-focused psychotherapy is associated with greater reduction in PTSD symptoms. Longer-term PTSD outcomes and the clinical feasibility of medication discontinuation will also be evaluated.
Detailed description
Background and rationale A previous prospective cohort study of more than 6,000 patients receiving standardized intensive trauma-focused psychotherapy for PTSD at a high-volume psychotrauma expertise center during 2021-2024 found that concomitant use of several psychotropic medications was associated with smaller reductions in PTSD symptoms (https://doi.org/10.1159/000549259). Analyses adjusted for 27 baseline covariates. Psychotropic co-medication overall was associated with reduced symptom improvement compared with non-use, and this association persisted at 6-month follow-up. Antidepressants overall, amitriptyline, and mirtazapine showed consistent associations with poorer outcomes across sensitivity analyses. Anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants, fluoxetine, zolpidem, and zopiclone showed similar negative associations, although estimates were less consistent across sensitivity analyses.
An important threat to causal inference in comparisons of psychotropic medication users with non-users is confounding by indication: patients receiving psychotropic medication had greater baseline PTSD symptom severity and psychiatric comorbidity. The present study will address this problem by comparing patients using a specific medication under two different clinical policies: patients who continued that medication during psychotherapy in 2021-2024 and patients for whom discontinuation of the same medication will be initiated before psychotherapy under the revised 2026 policy. Together with adjustment for baseline differences, this same-medication comparison will substantially improve clinical comparability. The principal remaining alternative explanation is a secular change in psychotherapy outcomes or patient characteristics between the historical and post-policy periods, which will be examined in dedicated sensitivity analyses. This design will significantly reduce residual confounding and strengthens the plausibility of a causal interpretation.
The purpose of this policy-driven natural experiment will therefore be to investigate whether tapering and discontinuing selected psychotropic medications before intensive trauma-focused psychotherapy, when clinically appropriate, is associated with greater improvement in PTSD symptoms than continuation of the same medications during psychotherapy.
Study design This will be an observational target trial emulation based on a policy-driven natural experiment. In September 2026, the center PSYTREC (Zeist, the Netherlands) will introduce a revised clinical medication-review protocol in which current and recent psychotropic medication use and treatment indication are systematically verified using available clinical and pharmacy information.
The target medications are amitriptyline, mirtazapine, quetiapine, topiramate, zolpidem, and zopiclone when prescribed off-label for PTSD-related symptoms. Under the revised policy, tapering and discontinuation before psychotherapy are initiated when clinically appropriate and safe. Medication management remains part of routine clinical care rather than a randomized research intervention. Tapering schedules are individualized according to medication, dose, duration of use, symptoms, withdrawal effects, and clinical circumstances. Psychotherapy can be postponed or the medication strategy modified when clinically necessary.
The 2026 post-policy cohort will consist of patients using one or more target medications for whom tapering and discontinuation are initiated under the revised protocol. The principal historical comparator will consist of patients treated in 2021-2024 who were using the same target medication or medications at treatment onset, during a period in which these medications were generally continued during psychotherapy. Classification of the 2026 policy cohort will therefore be based on initiation of the discontinuation strategy rather than successful completion of discontinuation.
All patients receive the center's standardized intensive trauma-focused psychotherapy program, including prolonged exposure and EMDR therapy. The primary clinical question is whether the strategy of discontinuing a target medication before psychotherapy is associated with greater improvement in clinician-rated PTSD symptoms than continuation of the same medication during psychotherapy. Longer-term PTSD symptoms and the feasibility and clinical consequences of medication discontinuation will also be evaluated.
Analytical approach Separate target-trial analyses will evaluate discontinuation versus continuation for the target medications. Propensity-score-based and outcome-modeling methods will be used to improve comparability between the 2026 and 2021-2024 cohorts and adjust for clinically relevant baseline factors associated with medication treatment or psychotherapy outcome. These include demographic characteristics, baseline PTSD symptom severity, trauma history, psychiatric comorbidity, previous psychotherapy, concomitant psychotropic medication use, and treatment duration.
Primary propensity-score matching will use nearest-neighbor matching without replacement, with up to two historical controls per 2026 patient and a caliper of 0.2 standard deviations of the logit of the propensity score. Covariate balance will be evaluated using standardized mean differences (<0.10) and variance ratios (0.5-2.0). If adequate balance cannot be achieved with nearest-neighbor matching, full matching will be used. Outcome models will additionally adjust for relevant baseline covariates.
Sensitivity analyses
Secular changes in psychotherapy outcomes will be evaluated in two policy-unaffected populations by comparing propensity-score-matched patients treated in 2026 with comparable patients treated in 2021-2024:
- patients using no psychotropic medication, and
- patients using psychotropic medication but none of the target medications. Specific psychotropic medication use will be included among the matching variables in the latter comparison.
Difference-in-differences analyses will then compare the temporal change for each target-medication group with the temporal change observed in the non-target medicated comparator cohort. The difference-in-differences estimate therefore represents the change in outcome among target-medication patients beyond the contemporaneous change observed among comparable patients whose medication management was unaffected by the discontinuation policy. Statistically, this effect will be estimated from the interaction between target-medication group and calendar period in an adjusted outcome model.
Pre-policy outcome trends during 2021-2024 will be examined for evidence that target-medication and comparator groups already showed differential temporal trends before implementation of the 2026 policy.
E-values will additionally quantify the strength of residual unmeasured confounding that would be required to explain the estimated associations.
Feasibility of discontinuation Clinical information collected during medication review will be used to characterize implementation of the discontinuation strategy, including completion or partial completion of tapering, modifications to the planned taper, clinically relevant discontinuation or rebound symptoms, temporary substitution or other medication changes, and postponement of psychotherapy. These analyses will describe the practical feasibility and clinical consequences of implementing the medication-review policy in routine PTSD care.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 target-medication discontinuation cohort | – | –Patients treated from September 2026 who are using amitriptyline, mirtazapine, quetiapine, topiramate, zolpidem, and/or zopiclone off-label for PTSD-related symptoms and for whom tapering and discontinuation before trauma-focused psychotherapy is initiated under the revised medication-review policy. Cohort classification is based on initiation of the discontinuation strategy rather than successful completion of tapering. Primary analyses compare patients with historical users of the same specific medication. |
| 2021-2024 target-medication continuation cohort | – | –Historical patients treated in 2021-2024 who were using one or more of the same target medications at the start of trauma-focused psychotherapy. Under the clinical policy in place during this period, these medications were generally continued during psychotherapy. For the primary analyses, patients will be compared with 2026 patients using the same specific target medication. |
| 2026 non-target psychotropic comparator | – | –Patients treated in 2026 who are using psychotropic medication but none of the six target medications and are therefore not subject to the target-medication discontinuation policy. This cohort is used to estimate secular changes in psychotherapy outcomes and as the active comparator in difference-in-differences analyses. |
| 2021-2024 non-target psychotropic comparator | – | –Historical patients treated in 2021-2024 who were using psychotropic medication but none of the six target medications. These patients provide the historical counterpart to the 2026 non-target psychotropic comparator. The two cohorts will be propensity-score matched, including on psychotropic medication use and relevant baseline clinical characteristics. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Chronic post-traumatic stress disorder
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pseudonymized data from patients treated at PSYTREC from late 2026 onwards (after the policy change) that gave written informed consent for the use of their data for research purposes
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who did not give written informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
CAPS-5 Change Score from Pre- to Post-Treatment
Time frame: from pre-treatment (past month) to ~10 days post-treatment (past week version)
The primary outcome will be the change in PTSD severity on the Dutch CAPS-5, from pre-treatment (past month) to ~10 days post-treatment (past week version). Changes scores were calculated as post-treatment minus pre-treatment. The CAPS-5, a 20-item scale (0-4 per item), is the gold standard for 100 PTSD assessment. Internal consistency was high in the 2021-2024 sample (Cronbach's α = 0.95).
3 secondary outcomes
PCL-5 Change Score (Pre-Treatment vs. 3 Months Post-Treatment)
Time frame: Pre-Treatment vs. 3 Months Post-Treatment)
PCL-5 Change Score (Pre-Treatment vs. 6 Months Post-Treatment)
Time frame: Pre-Treatment vs. 6 Months Post-Treatment
PCL-5 Change Score (Pre-Treatment vs. 12 Months Post-Treatment)
Time frame: Pre-Treatment vs. 12 Months Post-Treatment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 41212824Steenen SA, van Westrhenen R, Steenen CC, Klausch LT, De Jongh A. Concomitant Psychotropic Medication Is Associated with Reduced Outcomes of Trauma-Focused Psychotherapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Psychother Psychosom. 2025 Nov 10:1-19. doi: 10.1159/000549259. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The data that support the findings of this study will not be made publicly available due to privacy reasons. The full data set (deidentified participant data), a data dictionary defining each field in the set and underlying analytic code will be available from the authors upon request via contact with the corresponding author (with a signed data access agreement).
Related trials for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Active, not recruiting
TMS-fNIRS Personalized Dosing
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Traumatic Brain Injury
Enrolling by invitation
Brief Prolonged Exposure Therapy Versus Clinical Standard to Reduce Posttraumatic Stress Post Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, PTSD
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Effects of Extreme Prematurity on Parenting
Depression Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSD
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Orexin Antagonism on Fear Extinction in PTSD
Insomnia, PTSD
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Web-based Single-session Intervention Combined With Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention for Patients With Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Awaiting Inpatient Treatment
PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Depression
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Em. prof. dr. Ad de Jongh, DMD PhD study chair
Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), run by Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Em. prof. dr. Ad de Jongh, DMD PhD (+31(0)85 303 4444, a.d.jongh@acta.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CAPS-5 Change Score from Pre- to Post-Treatment (time frame: from pre-treatment (past month) to ~10 days post-treatment (past week version)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07802158, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2026.