StrokeNCT07803003
Effects of Maximum Versus Minimum Supervised Telerehabilitation on Upper Limb Function in Post Stroke Patients
A study testing Maximum supervision telerehabilitation and Minimum Supervision Telerehabilitation in people with Stroke and Telerehabilitation, run by Foundation University Islamabad at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
This single-blinded randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of maximum versus minimum therapist supervision during home-based telerehabilitation for improving upper limb motor function, task performance, coordination, and proprioception in stroke survivors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Telerehabilitation, Upper Limb
- What is being tested?
- Maximum supervision telerehabilitation and Minimum Supervision Telerehabilitation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 11 Feb 2026to 10 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stroke either ischemic or hemorrhagic clinically diagnosed or confirmed by MRI or CT.
- Stroke duration between 3 and 24 months.
- Age between 40 and 70 years.
- FMA score of 23-56 out of 66 points on the hemiplegic side.
- Mini mental state examination score greater than 24 out of 30.
- Ability to maintain stable sitting with or without support for at least 30-45 minutes
Show all 10Show fewer
- No serious auditory, memory or visual impairment.
- Ability to read,understand and follow instructions in urdu.
- Access to a device with internet and video capabilities and basic ability to operate it.
- Availability of a caregiver or a family member to assist during sessions if required.
Who cannot join
- - Presence of aphasia or apraxia or unilateral neglect.
- Unable to understand or remember or follow commands.
- Modified ashworth scale score greater than 3 for spasticity.
- History of other brain diseases or brain surgery.
- Other causes of severe upper limb dysfunction.
- Unstable medical condition or vital organ failure including malignancy.
- Inability to cooperate with telerehabilitation procedures.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
Islamabad
Muhammad Ehab Azim, PHD, 051-5788171 ext. 642, ehab@fui.edu.pk
About this study
This single-blinded randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of maximum versus minimum therapist supervision during home-based telerehabilitation for improving upper limb motor function, task performance, coordination, and proprioception in stroke survivors. The study will be conducted at MDL Rehabilitation FUCP and participants' home settings. A total of 30 stroke survivors aged 40-70 years with mild to moderate upper limb impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity [FM-UE] score 23-56) and a stroke duration of 3-24 months will be recruited through purposive sampling and randomly allocated to either the maximum- or minimum-supervision group.Participants in the maximum-supervision group will receive three 45-minute videoconference-based telerehabilitation sessions per week, for a total of 24 sessions over eight weeks. Exercises will be individualized according to baseline FM-UE scores. The minimum-supervision group will perform an independent home-based exercise program at the same frequency and duration, supplemented by weekly therapist check-ins and a self-maintained exercise log. Both groups will receive standardized instructional materials, including an exercise booklet and demonstration videos, and will perform exercises within individual fatigue limits.The primary outcomes will be assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment, Wolf Motor Function Test, Comprehensive Coordination Scale, and Thumb Localization Test, evaluating upper limb motor recovery, functional task performance, coordination, and proprioception.The study is expected to determine whether greater therapist supervision provides superior or comparable outcomes and to contribute evidence for developing effective, scalable, and cost-efficient home-based telerehabilitation models for stroke rehabilitation.
Read the detailed description
This single-blinded randomized controlled trial will compare the effects of maximum versus minimum therapist supervision during home-based telerehabilitation in stroke survivors with upper limb impairment. The study will examine whether the intensity of therapist supervision influences improvements in upper limb motor function, functional task performance, coordination, and proprioception. The study will be conducted over one year at MDL Rehabilitation FUCP and in participants' home settings. With the increasing demand for accessible and home-based stroke rehabilitation, this study aims to determine whether frequent therapist supervision provides additional benefits or whether a less supervised model can achieve comparable functional recovery.
A total of 30 stroke survivors aged 40-70 years will be recruited through purposive sampling. Participants will have experienced a stroke 3-24 months before enrollment and will demonstrate mild to moderate upper limb impairment, defined by a Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score between 23 and 56. Eligible participants will undergo baseline assessment before being randomly allocated into either the maximum-supervision or minimum-supervision group. Randomization will help ensure an appropriate comparison between the two intervention approaches.
The rehabilitation intervention will be developed from a standardized pool of 50 pre-designed therapeutic exercises. This exercise pool will provide a structured range of activities addressing different components of upper limb recovery while allowing the program to be individualized according to each participant's baseline motor ability. Exercise selection and progression will be guided by the participant's initial FMA-UE performance and response to treatment. The intervention will follow a progressive sequence over the eight-week treatment period. During the first two weeks, exercises will primarily focus on range of motion (ROM), mobility, and controlled movement of the affected upper limb. As participants progress, the exercises will gradually incorporate more functional and challenging activities.
During weeks 3 and 4, the program will progress toward bimanual activities requiring coordinated use of both upper limbs. In weeks 5 and 6, greater emphasis will be placed on grasp-and-release activities to improve hand control, object manipulation, and functional use of the affected limb. During the final two weeks, exercises will advance toward fine motor activities requiring greater precision, dexterity, coordination, and selective hand movements. This staged progression from basic movement to increasingly complex functional activities is intended to provide an appropriate therapeutic challenge while supporting gradual improvement in motor control and task performance. Exercises will be selected from the established 50-exercise pool based on individual ability rather than applying an identical exercise sequence to every participant.
Participants in the maximum-supervision group will receive three 45-minute videoconference sessions per week for eight weeks, providing a total of 24 therapist-supervised sessions. During these sessions, the therapist will monitor exercise performance, provide verbal and visual feedback, correct compensatory movement patterns, and modify activities when appropriate. The therapist will also ensure that exercises remain suitable for the participant's functional level and fatigue tolerance. In contrast, participants in the minimum-supervision group will perform their prescribed 45-minute home exercise sessions independently three times per week for the same eight-week period. They will receive weekly therapist check-ins to review progress, address difficulties, and support adherence. Both groups will therefore complete an equivalent overall exercise schedule, while differing primarily in the amount of direct therapist supervision.
To maintain consistency between groups, all participants will receive the same exercise booklet and demonstration videos. They will be instructed to perform exercises within their individual fatigue limits and to follow the prescribed progression. Participants in the minimum-supervision group will maintain an exercise log to record their home practice, while therapist monitoring in the maximum-supervision group will provide more frequent oversight of exercise performance and adherence.
The effects of the intervention will be evaluated using established outcome measures. The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment will assess upper limb motor impairment and recovery. The Wolf Motor Function Test will evaluate functional task performance and upper limb use. Coordination will be assessed using the Comprehensive Coordination Scale, while proprioceptive function will be evaluated using the Thumb Localization Test. These measures will allow assessment of changes across motor recovery, functional performance, coordination, and sensory-motor control.
The study is expected to determine whether intensive therapist supervision results in superior outcomes compared with a minimally supervised home-based program. The findings may help establish an appropriate supervision model for telerehabilitation after stroke and support the development of practical, scalable, and cost-efficient rehabilitation programs that can provide structured upper limb training within the home environment.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Telerehabilitation, Upper Limb
- Being tested
- Maximum supervision telerehabilitation, Minimum Supervision Telerehabilitation
- Keywords
- stroke, telerehabilitation, upper limb, minimum supervision rehab, maximum supervision rehab
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Maximum supervision telerehabilitationProcedure or surgery
Participants in the maximum supervision group will receive physiotherapist-supervised home-based telerehabilitation comprising three 45-minute real-time videoconference sessions per week so 24 sessions over eight weeks. An individualized upper limb exercise program will be prescribed from a standardized exercise pool based on each participant's baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score and functional abilities. Exercises will progress from range of motion for week 1-2 to bimanual tasks for week 3-4 to grasp and release activities for week 5-6 and fine motor activities for week 7-8 with progression tailored to performance and performed within fatigue limits. Participants will receive an exercise booklet and demonstration videos for support.
Minimum Supervision TelerehabilitationProcedure or surgery
Participants in the minimum-supervision group will perform their prescribed 45-minute home exercise sessions independently three times per week for the same eight-week period. The individualized upper limb exercise program will be selected from a standardized exercise pool according to each participant's baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score and functional abilities. Exercises will progress from range-of-motion activities during weeks 1-2, to bimanual tasks during weeks 3-4, grasp-and-release activities during weeks 5-6, and fine motor activities during weeks 7-8 with progression tailored to performance and performed within fatigue limits. Participants will receive an exercise booklet and demonstration videos to facilitate independent exercise performance. Physiotherapists will conduct weekly remote check-ins to monitor adherence, address difficulties, and provide guidance, while participants will maintain a self-reported exercise log.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A - Maximum supervision telerehabilitation | Experimental | Participants in the maximum-supervision group will receive three 45-minute videoconference sessions per week for eight weeks, providing a total of 24 therapist-supervised sessions. During these sessions, the therapist will monitor exercise performance, provide verbal and visual feedback. Receives: Procedure: Maximum supervision telerehabilitation |
| Group B - Minimum supervision telerehabilitation | Experimental | Participants in the minimum-supervision group will perform their prescribed 45-minute home exercise sessions independently three times per week for the same eight-week period. They will receive weekly therapist check-ins to review progress, address difficulties, and support adherence. Receives: Procedure: Minimum Supervision Telerehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Coordination
Comprehensive coordination scale will be used to asses upper limb coordination with higher scores indicating better coordination.
Measured: 8 Weeks
Upper-limb motor function
Upper limb motor function refers to the ability of the affected upper extremity to perform voluntary, controlled, and coordinated movements following stroke. It will be assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Participants with baseline FMA-UE scores of 23-56 will be included, indicating mild to moderate upper limb impairment. The FMA-UE will be measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after the 8-week intervention (post-intervention) to determine changes in motor function.
Measured: 8 Weeks
Upper limb task performance
Upper limb task performance refers to the ability of the affected upper extremity to perform functional movements and goal-directed tasks required for daily activities. It will be assessed using the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), which evaluates functional upper limb movements through standardized tasks. Performance is scored on a 0-5 functional ability scale, with higher scores indicating better function, and task completion time is also recorded.. The WMFT will be measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after the 8-week intervention (post-intervention) to determine changes in upper limb task performance.
Measured: 8 weeks
Proprioception
Proprioception refers to the ability to perceive the position and movement of the affected upper limb without relying on visual input. It will be assessed using the Thumb Localization Test, which evaluates the participant's ability to accurately identify the position of the affected thumb. It will be measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after the 8-week intervention (post-intervention) to determine changes in proprioceptive function.
Measured: 8 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Sep 2026
- Study start11 Feb 2026
- Primary completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation University Islamabad
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07803003
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FUI/FUCP/CTR/Neuro/Tehreem
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Maximum Versus Minimum Supervised Telerehabilitation on Upper Limb Function in Post Stroke Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07803003
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FUI/FUCP/CTR/Neuro/Tehreem
- Conditions
- Stroke, Telerehabilitation, Upper Limb
- Keywords
- stroke, telerehabilitation, upper limb, minimum supervision rehab, maximum supervision rehab
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation University IslamabadUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This single-blinded randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of maximum versus minimum therapist supervision during home-based telerehabilitation for improving upper limb motor function, task performance, coordination, and proprioception in stroke survivors. The study will be conducted at MDL Rehabilitation FUCP and participants' home settings. A total of 30 stroke survivors aged 40-70 years with mild to moderate upper limb impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity [FM-UE] score 23-56) and a stroke duration of 3-24 months will be recruited through purposive sampling and randomly allocated to either the maximum- or minimum-supervision group.Participants in the maximum-supervision group will receive three 45-minute videoconference-based telerehabilitation sessions per week, for a total of 24 sessions over eight weeks. Exercises will be individualized according to baseline FM-UE scores. The minimum-supervision group will perform an independent home-based exercise program at the same frequency and duration, supplemented by weekly therapist check-ins and a self-maintained exercise log. Both groups will receive standardized instructional materials, including an exercise booklet and demonstration videos, and will perform exercises within individual fatigue limits.The primary outcomes will be assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment, Wolf Motor Function Test, Comprehensive Coordination Scale, and Thumb Localization Test, evaluating upper limb motor recovery, functional task performance, coordination, and proprioception.The study is expected to determine whether greater therapist supervision provides superior or comparable outcomes and to contribute evidence for developing effective, scalable, and cost-efficient home-based telerehabilitation models for stroke rehabilitation.
Detailed description
This single-blinded randomized controlled trial will compare the effects of maximum versus minimum therapist supervision during home-based telerehabilitation in stroke survivors with upper limb impairment. The study will examine whether the intensity of therapist supervision influences improvements in upper limb motor function, functional task performance, coordination, and proprioception. The study will be conducted over one year at MDL Rehabilitation FUCP and in participants' home settings. With the increasing demand for accessible and home-based stroke rehabilitation, this study aims to determine whether frequent therapist supervision provides additional benefits or whether a less supervised model can achieve comparable functional recovery.
A total of 30 stroke survivors aged 40-70 years will be recruited through purposive sampling. Participants will have experienced a stroke 3-24 months before enrollment and will demonstrate mild to moderate upper limb impairment, defined by a Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score between 23 and 56. Eligible participants will undergo baseline assessment before being randomly allocated into either the maximum-supervision or minimum-supervision group. Randomization will help ensure an appropriate comparison between the two intervention approaches.
The rehabilitation intervention will be developed from a standardized pool of 50 pre-designed therapeutic exercises. This exercise pool will provide a structured range of activities addressing different components of upper limb recovery while allowing the program to be individualized according to each participant's baseline motor ability. Exercise selection and progression will be guided by the participant's initial FMA-UE performance and response to treatment. The intervention will follow a progressive sequence over the eight-week treatment period. During the first two weeks, exercises will primarily focus on range of motion (ROM), mobility, and controlled movement of the affected upper limb. As participants progress, the exercises will gradually incorporate more functional and challenging activities.
During weeks 3 and 4, the program will progress toward bimanual activities requiring coordinated use of both upper limbs. In weeks 5 and 6, greater emphasis will be placed on grasp-and-release activities to improve hand control, object manipulation, and functional use of the affected limb. During the final two weeks, exercises will advance toward fine motor activities requiring greater precision, dexterity, coordination, and selective hand movements. This staged progression from basic movement to increasingly complex functional activities is intended to provide an appropriate therapeutic challenge while supporting gradual improvement in motor control and task performance. Exercises will be selected from the established 50-exercise pool based on individual ability rather than applying an identical exercise sequence to every participant.
Participants in the maximum-supervision group will receive three 45-minute videoconference sessions per week for eight weeks, providing a total of 24 therapist-supervised sessions. During these sessions, the therapist will monitor exercise performance, provide verbal and visual feedback, correct compensatory movement patterns, and modify activities when appropriate. The therapist will also ensure that exercises remain suitable for the participant's functional level and fatigue tolerance. In contrast, participants in the minimum-supervision group will perform their prescribed 45-minute home exercise sessions independently three times per week for the same eight-week period. They will receive weekly therapist check-ins to review progress, address difficulties, and support adherence. Both groups will therefore complete an equivalent overall exercise schedule, while differing primarily in the amount of direct therapist supervision.
To maintain consistency between groups, all participants will receive the same exercise booklet and demonstration videos. They will be instructed to perform exercises within their individual fatigue limits and to follow the prescribed progression. Participants in the minimum-supervision group will maintain an exercise log to record their home practice, while therapist monitoring in the maximum-supervision group will provide more frequent oversight of exercise performance and adherence.
The effects of the intervention will be evaluated using established outcome measures. The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment will assess upper limb motor impairment and recovery. The Wolf Motor Function Test will evaluate functional task performance and upper limb use. Coordination will be assessed using the Comprehensive Coordination Scale, while proprioceptive function will be evaluated using the Thumb Localization Test. These measures will allow assessment of changes across motor recovery, functional performance, coordination, and sensory-motor control.
The study is expected to determine whether intensive therapist supervision results in superior outcomes compared with a minimally supervised home-based program. The findings may help establish an appropriate supervision model for telerehabilitation after stroke and support the development of practical, scalable, and cost-efficient rehabilitation programs that can provide structured upper limb training within the home environment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A - Maximum supervision telerehabilitation | Experimental | Procedure: Maximum supervision telerehabilitationParticipants in the maximum-supervision group will receive three 45-minute videoconference sessions per week for eight weeks, providing a total of 24 therapist-supervised sessions. During these sessions, the therapist will monitor exercise performance, provide verbal and visual feedback. |
| Group B - Minimum supervision telerehabilitation | Experimental | Procedure: Minimum Supervision TelerehabilitationParticipants in the minimum-supervision group will perform their prescribed 45-minute home exercise sessions independently three times per week for the same eight-week period. They will receive weekly therapist check-ins to review progress, address difficulties, and support adherence. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Stroke either ischemic or hemorrhagic clinically diagnosed or confirmed by MRI or CT.
- Stroke duration between 3 and 24 months.
- Age between 40 and 70 years.
- FMA score of 23-56 out of 66 points on the hemiplegic side.
- Mini mental state examination score greater than 24 out of 30.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- - Presence of aphasia or apraxia or unilateral neglect.
- Unable to understand or remember or follow commands.
- Modified ashworth scale score greater than 3 for spasticity.
- History of other brain diseases or brain surgery.
- Other causes of severe upper limb dysfunction.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum supervision telerehabilitationParticipants in the maximum supervision group will receive physiotherapist-supervised home-based telerehabilitation comprising three 45-minute real-time videoconference sessions per week so 24 sessions over eight weeks. An individualized upper limb exercise program will be prescribed from a standardized exercise pool based on each participant's baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score and functional abilities. Exercises will progress from range of motion for week 1-2 to bimanual tasks for week 3-4 to grasp and release activities for week 5-6 and fine motor activities for week 7-8 with progression tailored to performance and performed within fatigue limits. Participants will receive an exercise booklet and demonstration videos for support. | Procedure or surgery | Group A - Maximum supervision telerehabilitation |
| Minimum Supervision TelerehabilitationParticipants in the minimum-supervision group will perform their prescribed 45-minute home exercise sessions independently three times per week for the same eight-week period. The individualized upper limb exercise program will be selected from a standardized exercise pool according to each participant's baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score and functional abilities. Exercises will progress from range-of-motion activities during weeks 1-2, to bimanual tasks during weeks 3-4, grasp-and-release activities during weeks 5-6, and fine motor activities during weeks 7-8 with progression tailored to performance and performed within fatigue limits. Participants will receive an exercise booklet and demonstration videos to facilitate independent exercise performance. Physiotherapists will conduct weekly remote check-ins to monitor adherence, address difficulties, and provide guidance, while participants will maintain a self-reported exercise log. | Procedure or surgery | Group B - Minimum supervision telerehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Coordination
Time frame: 8 Weeks
Comprehensive coordination scale will be used to asses upper limb coordination with higher scores indicating better coordination.
Upper-limb motor function
Time frame: 8 Weeks
Upper limb motor function refers to the ability of the affected upper extremity to perform voluntary, controlled, and coordinated movements following stroke. It will be assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Participants with baseline FMA-UE scores of 23-56 will be included, indicating mild to moderate upper limb impairment. The FMA-UE will be measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after the 8-week intervention (post-intervention) to determine changes in motor function.
Upper limb task performance
Time frame: 8 weeks
Upper limb task performance refers to the ability of the affected upper extremity to perform functional movements and goal-directed tasks required for daily activities. It will be assessed using the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), which evaluates functional upper limb movements through standardized tasks. Performance is scored on a 0-5 functional ability scale, with higher scores indicating better function, and task completion time is also recorded.. The WMFT will be measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after the 8-week intervention (post-intervention) to determine changes in upper limb task performance.
Proprioception
Time frame: 8 Weeks
Proprioception refers to the ability to perceive the position and movement of the affected upper limb without relying on visual input. It will be assessed using the Thumb Localization Test, which evaluates the participant's ability to accurately identify the position of the affected thumb. It will be measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after the 8-week intervention (post-intervention) to determine changes in proprioceptive function.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Sep 2026.
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
Delay AvoIding Primary Evaluation for ThRombectomy of Acute StrokE Patients With Large Vessel OCclusion in the Angiography SuiTe
Stroke, Acute
RecruitingPhase 4
Xeomin® and Gait Related Mobility After Stroke
Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Rehabilitation Setting
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
EEG Feedback-Based Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Post-Stroke Dysphagia
Ischemic Stroke, Post-stroke Dysphagia
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Stroke and Cognitive Impairment in Moyamoya Disease and Moyamoya Syndrome
Moyamoya Disease, Moyamoya Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Maximum supervision telerehabilitation and Minimum Supervision Telerehabilitation in people with Stroke and Telerehabilitation, run by Foundation University Islamabad at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tehreem Fatima, DPT (+923160515404, peelupaul4@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Coordination (time frame: 8 Weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2026.