AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT07804537

Assessment of Lung Function (Lufu) at Sea Level LA vs. High Altitude HA in Healthy Individuals

A study testing Re-ascent from sea level to 2850m in people with Healthy and Healthy Adult, run by Silvia Ulrich Somaini at 1 site in Switzerland.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To study the effect of a re-ascent to high altitude (Quito Ecuador: 2850m) after a one-week stay at sea level (after prior descent from 2850m) on lung function and pulmonary resistance/reactance in healthy individuals, who live permanently > 2600m. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy, Healthy Adult, High Altitude Effects
What is being tested?
Re-ascent from sea level to 2850m
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
14 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
25 Sep 2026to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 18-80 years and of all genders
  • Permanent residence > 2600 m
  • healthy: no self perceived cardiopulmonary disease limiting daily activities
  • written informed consent to participate in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Age <18 years or >80 years
  • Participants who cannot follow the study investigations
  • Participants permanently living < 2600m
  • Participants who traveled and stayed overnight at altitudes <2000 m in the past 4 weeks.
  • any self-perceived cardiopulmonary disease limiting daily activities

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Silvia Ulrich, Prof. Dr. med. contact

+41442552220

silvia.ulrich@usz.ch

Michael Furian, Prof. Dr. sc. ETH contact

+41442552220

Switzerland1 site
  • University Hospital of Zurich

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Effect of a One-week Descent From 2850m to Sea Level and Re-ascent in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Healthy Controls Permanently Living > 2600m on Pulmonary Hemodynamics, Exercise Capacity, Blood Oxygenation, Sleep Disordered Breathing and Further Outcomes

To study the effect of a re-ascent to high altitude (Quito Ecuador: 2850m) after a one-week stay at sea level (after prior descent from 2850m) on lung function and pulmonary resistance/reactance in healthy individuals, who live permanently > 2600m.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this research is to investigate the lung function and pulmonary resistance/reactance before and after re-ascent (sea level for 7 days after prior descent from 2850m vs. re-ascent to 2850m) in healthy individuals, who permanently live at high altitude over 2600m.

Being tested
Re-ascent from sea level to 2850m
Keywords
Health, High altitude, Lung function, Forced oscillation technique
Medical subject headings
Altitude Sickness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Re-ascent from sea level to 2850mBehavioural

    Descent from 2850m to sea level with a stay for 7 days and re-ascent/return back to their usual living altitude at 2850m

Study groups in NCT07804537
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lung function at sea level and at 2850mExperimentalAssessment of lung function and pulmonary resistance/reactance on day four at sea level (after prior descent from 2850m) and after re-ascent (after totally one week at sea level) back to 2850m by bus (in one day)
Receives: Behavioral: Re-ascent from sea level to 2850m

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. FEV1 after re-ascent to 2850m

    Difference/change in forced expiratory volume in one second FEV1 between sea level (measurement on the 4th day) and day after re-ascent to 2850m in healthy individuals

    Measured: From Day 4 at sea level to the day after re-ascent (Day 9)

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Forced Vital Capacity FVC after re-ascent to 2850m

    Difference/change in forced vital capacity FVC between sea level (measurement on the 4th day) and day after re-ascent to 2850m in healthy individuals

    Measured: From Day 4 at sea level to the day after re-ascent (Day 9)

  2. FEV1/FVC after re-ascent to 2850m

    Difference/change in FEV1/FVC between sea level (measurement on the 4th day) and day after re-ascent to 2850m in healthy individuals

    Measured: From Day 4 at sea level to the day after re-ascent (Day 9)

  3. Respiratory Impedance (forced oscillation technique) after re-ascent to 2850m

    Difference/change in respiratory impedance (forced oscillation technique) between sea level (measurement on the 4th day) and day after re-ascent to 2850m in healthy individuals

    Measured: From Day 4 at sea level to the day after re-ascent (Day 9)

  4. Respiratory resistance (forced oscillation technique) after re-ascent to 2850m

    Difference/change in respiratory resistance (forced oscillation technique) between sea level (measurement on the 4th day) and day after re-ascent to 2850m in healthy individuals

    Measured: From Day 4 at sea level to the day after re-ascent (Day 9)

  5. Respiratory reactance (forced oscillation technique) after re-ascent to 2850m

    Difference/change in respiratory reactance (forced oscillation technique) between sea level (measurement on the 4th day) and day after re-ascent to 2850m in healthy individuals

    Measured: From Day 4 at sea level to the day after re-ascent (Day 9)

  6. FEV1 after 4 days at sea level

    Difference/change in FEV1 between 2850m (prior to descent) and day 4 at sea level in healthy individuals

    Measured: From high altitude (2850m) to day 4 at sea level

  7. Forced Vital Capacity FVC after 4 days at sea level

    Difference/change in forced vital capacity FVC between 2850m (prior to descent) and day 4 at sea level in healthy individuals

    Measured: From high altitude (2850m) to day 4 at sea level

  8. FEV1/FVC after 4 days at sea level

    Difference/change in FEV1/FVC between 2850m (prior to descent) and day 4 at sea level in healthy individuals

    Measured: From high altitude (2850m) to day 4 at sea level

  9. Respiratory Impedance (forced oscillation technique) after 4 days at sea level

    Difference/change in respiratory Impedance (forced oscillation technique) between 2850m (prior to descent) and day 4 at sea level in healthy individuals

    Measured: From high altitude (2850m) to day 4 at sea level

  10. Respiratory resistance (forced oscillation technique) after 4 days at sea level

    Difference/change in respiratory resistance (forced oscillation technique) between 2850m (prior to descent) and day 4 at sea level in healthy individuals

    Measured: From high altitude (2850m) to day 4 at sea level

  11. Respiratory reactance (forced oscillation technique) after 4 days at sea level

    Difference/change in respiratory reactance (forced oscillation technique) between 2850m (prior to descent) and day 4 at sea level in healthy individuals

    Measured: From high altitude (2850m) to day 4 at sea level

  12. FEV1 pre-descent and after re-ascent (2850m)

    Difference/change in FEV1 at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in healthy individuals

    Measured: Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)

  13. Forced Vital Capacity FVC pre-descent and after re-ascent (2850m)

    Difference/change in forced vital capacity FVC at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in healthy individuals

    Measured: Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)

  14. FEV1/FVC pre-descent and after re-ascent (2850m)

    Difference/change in FEV1/FVC at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in healthy individuals

    Measured: Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)

  15. Respiratory Impedance (forced oscillation technique) pre-descent and after re-ascent (2850m)

    Difference/change in respiratory impedance (forced oscillation technique) at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in healthy individuals

    Measured: Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)

  16. Respiratory resistance (forced oscillation technique) pre-descent and after re-ascent (2850m)

    Difference/change in respiratory resistance (forced oscillation technique) at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in healthy individuals

    Measured: Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)

  17. Respiratory reactance (forced oscillation technique) pre-descent and after re-ascent (2850m)

    Difference/change in respiratory reactance (forced oscillation technique) at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in healthy individuals

    Measured: Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Sep 2026
  2. Study start25 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion4 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Healthy participants living permanently \> 2600m around Quito (Ecuador) will be assessed at 2850m, after relocation to sea level for 7 days and after re-ascent
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
14 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07804537
Sponsor's protocol ID
Ec_LAvsHA_Lufu_H
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
17 Aug 2026
Last updated
4 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data will be provided upon request and based on a clear intention reviewed by an ethical review board.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Re-ascent from sea level to 2850m in people with Healthy and Healthy Adult, run by Silvia Ulrich Somaini at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Silvia Ulrich, Prof. Dr. med. (+41442552220, silvia.ulrich@usz.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

FEV1 after re-ascent to 2850m (time frame: From Day 4 at sea level to the day after re-ascent (Day 9)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in