AzTrials
AzTrials

PK in Healthy VolunteersNCT07804758

Ultra-Micronized vs Liposomal PEA 600 mg: A Crossover PK Study in Healthy Subjects

A study testing ultra-micronised PEA and liposomal PEA in people with PK in Healthy Volunteers and Liposomal Encapsulation, run by S&R Farmaceutici S.p.A. at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a crossover pharmacokinetic study comparing two oral formulations of palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) as a dietary supplement: ultra-micronized PEA 600 mg (Normast 600) and liposomal PEA 600 mg (AliaMed), in 6 healthy subjects following a single oral dose. Eligible subjects presenting at the Crabion S.r.l. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
ultra-micronised PEA and liposomal PEA
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
6 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
13 Apr 2026to 30 Apr 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18-70 years
  • BMI 18-30 kg/m²
  • Healthy participants
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Use of PEA-based supplements in the preceding 2 weeks.
  • Significant liver, kidney, gastrointestinal or metabolic conditions.
  • Known allergy or intolerance to PEA or excipients.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Crabion S.R.L.

    Corciano, PG, 06073

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A Comparative Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study of a Dietary Supplement: 600 mg of Ultra-micronized Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) (Normast 600) Versus 600 mg of PEA in a Liposomal Formulation (AliaMed) in Healthy Subjects Following a Single Oral Dose.

This is a crossover pharmacokinetic study comparing two oral formulations of palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) as a dietary supplement: ultra-micronized PEA 600 mg (Normast 600) and liposomal PEA 600 mg (AliaMed), in 6 healthy subjects following a single oral dose.

Eligible subjects presenting at the Crabion S.r.l. research center for routine screening, who meet the inclusion criteria and provide informed consent, will be enrolled and allocated to one of two groups using non-random, systematic alternate allocation.

Read more

On Day 1, after a fasting baseline blood draw (T0), Group 1 subjects will receive a single 600 mg dose of ultra-micronized PEA (Normast 600), while Group 2 subjects will receive a single 600 mg dose of liposomal PEA (AliaMed). Subjects may eat breakfast immediately after dosing. Blood samples (~3 mL each) will be collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours post-dose. Subjects will remain at the center for approximately 4 hours (through the penultimate draw) and will return the following morning for the final 24-hour sample. Subjects will be monitored throughout their stay and asked to report any adverse effects.

A 7-day washout period will follow. On Day 2 (post-washout), subjects will cross over to the alternate formulation: Group 1 will receive liposomal PEA and Group 2 will receive ultra-micronized PEA, each as a single 600 mg dose. Blood samples will be collected at the same time points as Day 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours) and analyzed per the same parameters.

Read the detailed description

Detailed Description

Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is an endogenous lipid mediator belonging to the N-acylethanolamine family, extensively studied for its analgesic, immunomodulatory, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties. It is currently used as a nutraceutical for its antinociceptive, neuroprotective, and immunomodulatory effects, particularly in supporting brain and joint health and in mitigating inflammatory processes. Despite this significant potential, the clinical utility of PEA is limited by its poor water solubility, extensive gastrointestinal metabolism, and consequently low oral bioavailability. Over the years, several technological strategies have been explored to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of PEA, including particle-size reduction techniques such as micronization and ultra-micronization, as well as the use of lipid-based carriers such as liposomal delivery systems.

This single-center, open-label, randomized (systematic alternate allocation), two-treatment, two-period, single-dose crossover study is designed to compare the oral absorption of a single 600 mg dose of PEA administered in two different technological formulations: an ultra-micronized formulation (Normast 600, tablet) and a liposomal formulation (AliaMed, sachet), in order to evaluate the impact of formulation technology on the nutraceutical utilization of the molecule.

A total of 6 healthy adult subjects will be enrolled at the Crabion S.r.l. research center (Corciano, Perugia, Italy) among individuals presenting for routine laboratory testing who meet the eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent.

Participants will be allocated to one of two sequence groups using non-random, systematic alternate allocation: Group 1 (n=3) will receive Treatment A (ultra-micronized PEA, Normast 600) in Period 1 followed, after washout, by Treatment B (liposomal PEA, AliaMed) in Period 2; Group 2 (n=3) will receive Treatment B in Period 1 followed by Treatment A in Period 2. On Day 1 of each period, after a fasting baseline blood draw (T0), subjects will take a single oral 600 mg dose of PEA according to group assignment; breakfast will be permitted immediately after dosing. Venous blood samples (~3 mL per draw) will be collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours post-dose. Subjects will remain at the research center for approximately 4 hours (through the 4-hour draw) and will return the following morning for the 24-hour sample. A 7-day washout period separates the two treatment periods, after which the crossover occurs and the alternate formulation is administered following the same sampling schedule.

At each visit, clinical examination and blood collection are performed for: complete blood count (T0 and 24h only), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (all time points), plasma PEA quantification (all time points), and plasma 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) quantification (all time points). Blood is collected using a 22G two-way cannula needle into NaEDTA-anticoagulated tubes (hematology, PEA, 2-AG, ESR) and into dry tubes with separator gel (CRP). PEA and 2-AG are quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) following protein precipitation, extraction, and purification with appropriate organic solvents; absolute quantification is based on a multi-level calibration curve prepared in matrix, with linearity, accuracy, and precision verified according to international bioanalytical guidelines.

Sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1.9.7 based on the primary endpoint (AUC₁ ≠ AUC₂), using a paired-samples t-test consistent with the crossover design, an effect size of 1.327 derived from AUC data of a reference pharmacokinetic comparison study of two PEA formulations, a type I error probability (α) of 0.05, and a statistical power (1-β) of 80%, yielding a total sample size of 6 subjects.

The overall study duration is 24 days, comprising: subject enrollment (1 day); the study phase itself, including both treatment periods and washout (9 days); execution of chemical/biochemical analyses at the CRABION S.r.l. laboratory (7 days); and statistical analysis and data processing (7 days). Blood samples will not be retained beyond the end of the study, as they will be fully utilized for study-related analyses.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines, and applicable clinical research regulations. The main procedural risk is associated with venipuncture and may occasionally include mild discomfort or transient pain, minor hematoma at the puncture site, vasovagal reaction (spontaneously and rapidly resolving), or, in very rare cases, local inflammation or infection. These risks are considered minimal and proportionate to the scientific objective of the study; appropriate monitoring is in place to ensure immediate intervention if such events occur.

Being tested
ultra-micronised PEA, liposomal PEA
Keywords
pharmacokinetic, PEA, palmitoylethanolamide, liposomal technology, ultra-micronization, AUC

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ultra-micronised PEADietary supplement

    Participants received ultra-micronised PEA followed by liposomal PEA after the washout period.

  • liposomal PEADietary supplement

    Participants received liposomal PEA followed by ultra-micronized PEA after the washout period.

Study groups in NCT07804758
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1ExperimentalIn this arm of the study, participants initially take a single dose of 600 mg micronised PEA (u-micron) and, following a washout period, take 600 mg of liposomal PEA
Receives: Dietary Supplement: ultra-micronised PEA
Arm 2ExperimentalIn this arm of the study, participants initially take liposomal PEA and, following a washout period, take micronised PEA (u-micron)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: liposomal PEA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of the AUC after single dose between Liposomal PEA and ultra-micronised PEA

    The primary objective of the study is to compare systemic exposure to palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), expressed as the area under the curve (AUC), following a single dose of the two PEA formulations under evaluation:

    • Liposomal PEA
    • Ultra-micronised PEA

    Measured: From the enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Evaluation of half-life (t1/2)

    Evaluation of half-life of both PEA formulations

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

  2. Evaluation of Cmax

    Evaluation of the difference in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) between the two PEA formulations.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

  3. Evaluation of Tmax

    Evaluation of the difference in time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) between the two PEA formulations.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

  4. Evaluation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)

    Assessment of the safety and tolerability of the two PEA formulations by monitoring changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

  5. Evaluation of C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Assessment of the safety and tolerability of the two PEA formulations by monitoring changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Sep 2026
  2. Study start13 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2026
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
6 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07804758
Sponsor's protocol ID
PEA01
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
31 Aug 2026
Last updated
4 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data collected during the study will not be made available to other researchers due to institutional policies and participant privacy considerations.

Publications

  • Briskey, D., Mallard, A.R., & Rao, A. (2020). Increased Absorption of Palmitoylethanolamide Using a Novel Dispersion Technology System (LipiSperse).

  • Ceccarelli, G., Pennetta, C., Montalbano, F., Licciardi, M., Melfi, V., & Iannitti, R.G. (2025). A Novel Liposomal Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) with Enhanced Gastrointestinal Permeating Properties. Nutraceuticals.

  • Basu D. Palmitoylethanolamide, an endogenous fatty acid amide, and its pleiotropic health benefits: A narrative review. J Biomed Res. 2024 Oct 22;39(3):215-228. doi: 10.7555/JBR.38.20240053.

    PubMed 39433509
  • Gabrielsson L, Mattsson S, Fowler CJ. Palmitoylethanolamide for the treatment of pain: pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;82(4):932-42. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13020. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

    PubMed 27220803
  • Clayton P, Hill M, Bogoda N, Subah S, Venkatesh R. Palmitoylethanolamide: A Natural Compound for Health Management. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 18;22(10):5305. doi: 10.3390/ijms22105305.

    PubMed 34069940

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ultra-micronised PEA and liposomal PEA in people with PK in Healthy Volunteers and Liposomal Encapsulation, run by S&R Farmaceutici S.p.A. at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of the AUC after single dose between Liposomal PEA and ultra-micronised PEA (time frame: From the enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07804758, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in