AzTrials
AzTrials

Skeletal MuscleNCT07806513

Circulating Muscle-specific microRNAs and Renal, Nutritional and Inflammatory Biomarkers of Skeletal Muscle Loss During the First 18 Months After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

An observational study of Skeletal Muscle and Bariatric Surgery, run by General Committee of Teaching Hospitals and Institutes, Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Metabolic and bariatric surgery produces substantial and durable weight loss, but a considerable proportion of that loss is not adipose tissue. Pooled estimates indicate approximately 8 kg of fat-free mass and 3 kg of skeletal muscle mass are lost within twelve months, with more than half occurring in the first three… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Skeletal Muscle, Bariatric Surgery
How many people
110 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
17 Jan 2025to 8 Aug 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The cohort is deliberately restricted to a single procedure to remove procedure type as a source of heterogeneity in a first-in-population biomarker study, and because sleeve gastrectomy is the predominant operation at the participating center. Participants are assessed before surgery (within one week) and at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. This schedule captures the front-loaded catabolic window and the plateau established by twelve months. At every visit, participants undergo anthropometry, bioimpedance body composition, muscle function testing, dietary and physical-activity assessment, fasting venepuncture, and recording of medication exposure, tolerance and adverse events.

Who may be able to join

  • Consecutive adults (≥18 years)
  • scheduled for primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
  • meeting current ASMBS/IFSO indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery

Who cannot join

  • revisional or secondary bariatric procedure
  • chronic kidney disease stage 3 or worse
  • dialysis or transplantation
  • chronic liver disease with synthetic dysfunction
  • active or recently treated malignancy
  • known neuromuscular or myopathic disease
Show all 11Show fewer
  • systemic corticosteroid or anabolic agent exposure within three months
  • cardiac pacemaker or implantable defibrillator
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • clinical evidence of abnormal hydration at baseline
  • inability to perform handgrip or chair-stand testing

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • The surgical department of Medical Research Institute Hospital, Alexandria University

    Alexandria, 21531

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Circulating Muscle-specific microRNAs and Renal, Nutritional and Inflammatory Biomarkers of Skeletal Muscle Loss During the First 18 Months After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Metabolic and bariatric surgery produces substantial and durable weight loss, but a considerable proportion of that loss is not adipose tissue. Pooled estimates indicate approximately 8 kg of fat-free mass and 3 kg of skeletal muscle mass are lost within twelve months, with more than half occurring in the first three months. No validated circulating biomarker of skeletal muscle loss exists for this population, and body composition can currently be assessed only intermittently. Muscle-specific microRNAs (myomiRs) are mechanistically plausible candidates but have never been measured in patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery. This study will characterise the trajectory of skeletal muscle loss over eighteen months after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and evaluate, as exploratory analyses, whether circulating myomiRs and routinely accessible renal, nutritional and inflammatory measures track that trajectory.

Read the detailed description

Metabolic and bariatric surgery is the most effective durable treatment for severe obesity, but the weight lost is not confined to adipose tissue. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 59 longitudinal studies comprising 2,270 individuals reported pooled twelve-month losses of 8.13 kg (95% CI -9.01 to -7.26) of lean body mass, 8.23 kg (-10.74 to -5.73) of fat-free mass and 3.18 kg (-5.64 to -0.71) of skeletal muscle mass, and established that the loss is markedly front-loaded, with approximately 55% of the twelve-month lean-body-mass loss occurring within the first three post-operative months. A 2026 meta-analysis of 21 randomised trials confirmed the magnitude in contemporary practice, with bariatric surgery producing 9.14 kg of fat-free mass loss representing 32.9% of total weight lost, compared with 31.5% for incretin-based therapy and 14.3% for diet and exercise.

Longitudinal imaging confirms both the magnitude and the timing. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an 11.1% reduction in skeletal muscle volume at twelve months, with most loss occurring by three months, while serial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry after sleeve gastrectomy showed lean tissue mass falling approximately 20% by twelve months, after which a new steady state was established. In a 2026 cohort of 179 patients, fat-free mass at six months was the only independent predictor of fat-free mass at twelve months, and 41-46% of patients exceeded the 25% threshold for excessive relative fat-free mass loss.

The clinical consequences are substantial: sarcopenia rose from 8% before surgery to 32% at one year in a prospective cohort of 184 patients, and a recent scoping review concluded that approximately one in four patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery meets criteria for sarcopenic obesity, while noting the absence of standardised diagnostic approaches. Critically, mass and function do not move together: lean mass fell by 7.4 kg in meta-analysis while pooled handgrip change was -0.46 kg and not statistically significant.

Direct body-composition measurement remains the reference standard but is intermittent and cannot signal accelerating catabolism between visits. No validated circulating biomarker of skeletal muscle loss exists for this population. The clinical value of such a marker has risen sharply now that lean-mass preservation is pharmacologically achievable: in a phase 2 trial, bimagrumab plus semaglutide produced lean mass loss of 2.3% versus 6.9% for semaglutide alone.

Muscle-specific microRNAs are plausible candidates. Expression of miR-133a and miR-206 rises during human skeletal muscle development and differentiation, miR-206 promotes myoblast differentiation, and miR-1 and miR-206 regulate satellite-cell proliferation through repression of Pax7. Circulating myomiRs have been proposed as a distinct biomarker class for monitoring skeletal muscle. Human evidence is not uniform: serum hsa-miR-133a-3p was significantly lower in sarcopenic older adults in the SarcoPhAge cohort, and lower circulating miR-133b and miR-206 were associated with sarcopenia and nutritional status in a case-control study, whereas a plasma study found miR-133a and miR-133b unchanged in sarcopenia. Directly relevant to the present population, intraoperative sampling during bariatric surgery demonstrated that miR-206 is approximately 2,000-fold enriched in skeletal muscle relative to visceral adipose tissue, establishing tissue specificity in exactly the patients under study.

Two recent studies temper expectations and are addressed prospectively. An unbiased screen of 352 circulating microRNA targets in sarcopenic obesity identified miR-486-5p among discriminators but did not identify miR-133a-3p or miR-206, and a 2026 trial of twelve-week high-intensity interval training found muscle myomiRs unchanged. Both examined either an established steady-state phenotype or an anabolic training adaptation. The early post-operative window is neither: it is a period of rapid negative energy and protein balance with active muscle catabolism, in which release of muscle-derived microRNAs plausibly reflects ongoing tissue remodelling rather than a stable phenotypic difference. This distinction is testable, and a null result is informative. To guard against target mis-selection, hsa-miR-486-5p is included as a comparator.

Renal markers warrant parallel attention. Creatinine is muscle-derived, and estimation error correlates with appendicular skeletal muscle index, while the difference between cystatin C-based and creatinine-based estimates carries information about muscle quantity. This is operationalised in the sarcopenia index (creatinine ÷ cystatin C × 100), validated in 2026 with an optimal cut-off of 77.3, but never applied in a bariatric surgical cohort. Albumin and prealbumin are inflammation-sensitive and are explicitly not valid proxies for total body protein or muscle mass, although transthyretin tracks lean body mass in other settings; composite inflammation ratios show only modest discrimination. These measures are therefore included as contextual and exploratory markers with a pre-specified realistic performance ceiling.

Three gaps are addressed. First, no study has measured circulating miR-133a-3p or miR-206 in patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery. Second, the creatinine-to-cystatin C sarcopenia index has not been evaluated in this population. Third, the prealbumin/CRP ratio has not been examined against directly measured muscle loss after surgery.

Keywords
bariatric surgery, sleeve gastrectomy, sarcopenia, body composition, microRNA, biomarkers
Medical subject headings
Sarcopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07806513
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomySleeve gastrectomy: The operation is standard care, not a study intervention, but is standardised and documented because technical variation would otherwise contaminate the biomarker trajectory. Greater curvature devascularisation commences 4-6 cm proximal to the pylorus and extends to the angle of His with complete fundal mobilisation; gastric transection is performed over a 36-40 Fr calibration bougie; staple-line reinforcement policy, operative time, blood loss, resected specimen weight, conversion and length of stay are recorded for every case, and the operating surgeon is entered as a random effect in sensitivity analysis.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. change in skeletal muscle mass

    change in skeletal muscle mass (kg) measured by multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis from baseline to eighteen months, using a single device that does not change during the study.

    Measurement conditions follow ESPEN guidance: overnight fast, no alcohol for 48 hours, no vigorous exercise for 24 hours, bladder voided, consistent time of day and posture. Prediction equations for bioimpedance are validated for a body mass index of 16-34 kg/m² without abnormal hydration, and the present cohort lies above this range while undergoing rapid fluid shifts.

    Measured: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity

    Sarcopenia is diagnosed using EWGSOP2 with its published erratum, sarcopenic obesity using the ESPEN-EASO consensus, with muscle mass normalised to body weight; and malnutrition using GLIM as revised in the 2025 five-year update, which specifies that muscle-mass assessment should be guided by available technological resources.

    Measured: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 months

  2. quantify change in muscle function

    Handgrip strength is measured with a calibrated dynamometer using the standardised Southampton protocol, and the five-times chair-stand test is timed. Consistent with the GLIS conceptual consensus, which reclassified impaired physical performance as an outcome of sarcopenia rather than a defining component, and with the EWGSOP2 diagnostic algorithm, function is measured and analysed independently of mass; their concordance is a pre-specified secondary analysis.

    Measured: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 months

  3. renal glomerular filtration rate

    creatinine, cystatin C - is performed on an automated analyser, and high-sensitivity CRP by nephelometry. Because both creatinine and cystatin C are measured, and consistent with KDIGO 2024 guidance that the glomerular filtration rate category should be estimated from creatinine and cystatin C combined where available, the primary renal estimate is the combined equation, with single-marker and EKFC equations reported in parallel; this choice is stated explicitly as a regional methodological judgement given the European position advocating against uncritical adoption of the 2021 equation outside North America. Absolute, non-indexed glomerular filtration rate is reported alongside indexed values, because body-surface-area indexing is misleading in severe obesity.

    Measured: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Sep 2026
  2. Study start17 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completion17 Jul 2026
  4. Study completion8 Aug 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
110 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07806513
Sponsor's protocol ID
muscle-specific biomarkers
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
1 Sep 2026
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Can be asked by the contact person

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Skeletal Muscle and Bariatric Surgery, run by General Committee of Teaching Hospitals and Institutes, Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

change in skeletal muscle mass (time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in