AzTrials
AzTrials

Middle Meningeal Artery EmbolizationNCT07806552

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in Patients With Chronic Subdural Hematoma

A study testing middle meningeal artery embolization in people with Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization and Chronic Subdural Hematomas, run by Assiut University.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary : to evaluate the efficacy of MMAE on resolution and recurrence of hematoma in patients with CSDH. Secondary : evaluate the effect of MMAE on functional outcome, radiological changes, the need to repeat surgery, duration of hospital stay, time for hematoma to resolve. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
middle meningeal artery embolization
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
35 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Sep 2026to 28 Feb 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Any age.
  • Radiologically confirmed chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) on CT or MRI either Unilateral or Bilateral CSDH.
  • Patients considered suitable for standard surgical treatment of CSDH.
  • First presentation or recurrent CSDH requiring treatment.

Who cannot join

  • Acute subdural hematoma or acute-on-chronic SDH where the acute component is the primary pathology.
  • Acute and severe neurological deterioration.
  • Subdural hematomas secondary to:
  • Intracranial tumors.
  • Intracranial infections.
  • Contraindications to angiography or embolization (for the MMAE group), such as:
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Severe contrast allergy.
  • Untreatable coagulopathy.
  • Severe renal failure precluding contrast administration
  • Severe tortuosity or anatomical variations of the external carotid artery/MMA making catheterization unfeasible.

About this study

Official title: Impact of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization on Recurrence and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Primary : to evaluate the efficacy of MMAE on resolution and recurrence of hematoma in patients with CSDH.

Secondary : evaluate the effect of MMAE on functional outcome, radiological changes, the need to repeat surgery, duration of hospital stay, time for hematoma to resolve.

Read the detailed description

Chronic subdural hematoma(CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical disorders, particularly among older adults, and its incidence continues to increase worldwide because of population aging and the growing use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications. The condition usually develops following minor head trauma that results in rupture of bridging veins; however, current evidence suggests that the persistence and enlargement of CSDH are primarily driven by chronic inflammation, angiogenesis, and recurrent microhemorrhages originating from fragile neovascular membranes rather than the initial bleeding event alone. These pathological mechanisms contribute to progressive hematoma expansion, neurological deterioration, and substantial morbidity and mortality if left untreated.Surgical evacuation through burr-hole remains the standard treatment for symptomatic CSDH and is generally associated with rapid neurological improvement. Nevertheless, postoperative recurrence remains a major challenge, with recurrence rates ranging from approximately 8% to 20%, often necessitating repeat surgical intervention. Recurrent hematomas increase healthcare costs, prolong hospitalization, and are associated with poorer functional recovery, particularly in elderly and medically frail patients. Consequently, there has been increasing interest in adjunctive therapies that target the underlying pathophysiology responsible for recurrence rather than simply evacuating the hematoma.Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has recently emerged as a promising minimally invasive treatment for CSDH. The rationale for MMAE is based on occluding the vascular supply to the outer neomembrane of the hematoma, thereby reducing ongoing inflammatory exudation and recurrent microhemorrhage that sustain hematoma growth. Unlike conventional surgery, which addresses the hematoma itself, embolization targets the biological process responsible for hematoma persistence and recurrence. As a result, MMAE has been investigated both as a standalone therapy for selected patients and as an adjunct to surgical evacuation to reduce postoperative recurrence.MMAE significantly reduces the risk of hematoma recurrence and the need for repeat surgery compared with standard treatment alone, without increasing serious complications or mortality. However, although recurrence outcomes have shown clear improvement, the effect of MMAE on functional recovery, commonly assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).

Being tested
middle meningeal artery embolization
Medical subject headings
Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • middle meningeal artery embolizationProcedure or surgery

    Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is a minimally invasive endovascular procedure designed to treat chronic subdural hematomas by blocking blood flow to the MMA, preventing recurrent bleeding.

    Under local or general anesthesia, a catheter is inserted through a micro-puncture in the femoral or radial artery and navigated up to the external carotid system into the MMA under real-time fluoroscopic (X-ray) guidance. Angiography is performed to map the arterial anatomy and identify any dangerous anastomoses with the ophthalmic or internal carotid arteries.

    Once positioned safely, an embolic agent such as liquid embolic systems (e.g., Onyx, n-BCA), liquid-suspended microparticles (PVA), or microcoils is injected into the anterior and posterior branches of the MMA. This occludes the fragile, hypervascular membranes driving the hematoma, allowing the body to naturally reabsorb the collected blood and reducing the need for open surgical evacuation.

Study groups in NCT07806552
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Embolization of middle meningeal arteryExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: middle meningeal artery embolization

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recurrence Requiring Additional Surgical Intervention

    Composite outcome defined as recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma requiring repeat surgical intervention within 6 months. Recurrence may be identified by radiological enlargement or reaccumulation of the hematoma on CT associated with recurrent or worsening neurological symptoms leading to reoperation.

    Measured: six months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Sep 2026
  2. Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
35 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07806552
Sponsor's protocol ID
MMAE in CSDH
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
30 Aug 2026
Last updated
8 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108323

  • https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200501

  • https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002505

  • https://doi.org/10.20452/jmr.2025.20007

  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2025.123469

  • https://doi.org/10.1159/000543041

  • https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1623619

  • https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2592857

  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109128

  • Liu J, Ni W, Zuo Q, Yang H, Peng Y, Lin Z, Li Z, Wang J, Zhen Y, Luo J, Lin Y, Chen J, Hua X, Lu H, Zhong M, Liu M, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wan J, Li Y, Li T, Mao G, Zhao W, Gao L, Li C, Chen E, Cheng X, Zhang P, Wang Z, Chen L, Zhang Y, Tian B, Shen F, Lei Y, Wu Y, Li Y, Duan G, Xu L, Lv N, Yu J, Xu X, Du Z, Zhang H, Hu J, Li Z, Yuan Q, Zhou Y, Wu G, Zhang L, Gao C, Dai D, Wu X, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Zhao R, Su J, Xu Y, Ospel JM, Majoie CBLM, Goyal M, Li Q, Yang P, Gu Y, Mao Y; MAGIC-MT Investigators. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Nonacute Subdural Hematoma. N Engl J Med. 2024 Nov 21;391(20):1901-1912. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2401201.

    PubMed 39565989

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing middle meningeal artery embolization in people with Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization and Chronic Subdural Hematomas, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recurrence Requiring Additional Surgical Intervention (time frame: six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07806552, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in