AzTrials
AzTrials

Intraoperative HypotensionNCT07808125

A Comparative Study Protocol Investigating the Association Between Intraoperative Hypotension and the Use of Ring- Versus Propofol-Based Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery

An observational study of Intraoperative Hypotension, run by Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

we conducted this multicentre retrospective cohort study to evaluate the association between the choice of induction agent (ciprofol versus propofol) and the incidence of IOH in geriatric patients having non-cardiac surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Intraoperative Hypotension
How many people
85,000 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2013to 30 Sep 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: This was a multicentre retrospective observational study of elderly patients aged 65 years or older who underwent non-cardiac surgery at three hospitals between 1 January 2013 and 1 September 2024. The analysis included surgical procedures performed under general anaesthesia in which either ciprofol alone or propofol alone was used. Procedures with missing key identifiers, uncertain general-anaesthesia status, absent event records, invalid anaesthesia times, or an anaesthesia duration of 24 hours or longer were excluded. Procedures without at least one valid intraoperative MAP measurement within the anaesthesia time window, as well as records with missing age or invalid sex information, were also excluded. Missing preoperative MAP values were not an exclusion criterion. The final analytical population comprised approximately 85,000 surgical procedures.

Who may be able to join

  • Surgical procedures recorded at the three participating hospitals: NanYi, AnYi, and ZhongDa
  • Surgical procedures with a non-missing PATIENT_ID
  • Patients who received either ciprofol alone or propofol alone during anesthesia
  • Surgical procedures performed under general anesthesia
  • Surgical procedures with a corresponding record in the anesthesia event dataset
  • Surgical procedures with valid anesthesia start and end times, including times supplemented from operation-room or event records when necessary
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Surgical procedures with an anesthesia duration greater than 0 minutes and less than 24 hours
  • Surgical procedures with at least one valid intraoperative MAP measurement recorded within the anesthesia time window
  • Patients with available age information
  • Patients with a recorded sex of male or female

Who cannot join

  • Surgical procedures with a missing PATIENT_ID
  • Procedures involving both ciprofol and propofol, neither drug, missing drug indicators, or other invalid drug coding
  • Non-general anesthesia procedures or procedures for which the anesthesia method could not be confirmed as general anesthesia
  • Surgical procedures with both the operation department and operation name missing
  • Surgical procedures without a corresponding anesthesia event record
  • Surgical procedures with invalid anesthesia timing, including an anesthesia end time earlier than or equal to the anesthesia start time
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Surgical procedures with an anesthesia duration of 24 hours or longer
  • Surgical procedures without any valid intraoperative MAP measurement within the anesthesia time window
  • Patients with missing age
  • Records with sex values other than male or female

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Ciprofol is Associated With Lower Intraoperative Hypotension Than Propofol in Elderly Non-cardiac Surgical Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

we conducted this multicentre retrospective cohort study to evaluate the association between the choice of induction agent (ciprofol versus propofol) and the incidence of IOH in geriatric patients having non-cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that ciprofol use would be associated with a lower risk of clinically significant intraoperative hypotension and a reduced overall hypotension burden compared with propofol in routine clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is a frequent and clinically significant complication during non-cardiac surgery, particularly in the geriatric population .On a population basis, the hypotensive harm threshold for AKI is a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of around 65 mm Hg. Maintaining MAP above this level during surgery is therefore recommended. Mounting evidence suggests that even brief periods of low arterial blood pressure are independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative myocardial injury acute kidney injury (AKI), and 30-day mortality . Elderly patients are uniquely vulnerable to these adverse outcomes due to age-related physiological decline, reduced cardiovascular reserve, and multiple comorbidities . Consequently, maintaining hemodynamic stability during the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia is a cornerstone of perioperative care in this fragile cohort .

Propofol remains the most widely utilized intravenous anesthetic agent worldwide ; however, its administration is frequently complicated by dose-dependent vasodilation and myocardial depression, leading to a high incidence of IOH . To mitigate these risks, ciprofol, a novel 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivative and GABA(A) receptor agonist, has been developed . While several studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated that ciprofol possesses higher potency and a more favorable safety profile compared with propofol , most evidence to date is derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or specific procedural sedation settings. These studies often employ restrictive inclusion criteria and standardized protocols that may not fully reflect the complexities of real-world clinical practice.

The "real-world" impact of ciprofol on the incidence of IOH-especially when administered across diverse surgical settings and multi-institutional practices-remains poorly defined. Specifically, it is unclear whether ciprofol's theoretical pharmacological advantages translate into a lower incidence of IOH in elderly patients undergoing varied non-cardiac procedures in routine clinical care.

Keywords
Ciprofol, Propofol, intraoperative hypotension, geriatric anaesthesia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07808125
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CiprofolAnesthetic induction for surgical procedures utilizing ciprofol as the sole induction agent
PropofolAnesthetic induction for surgical procedures utilizing propofol as the sole induction agent

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. prolonged intraoperative hypotension

    The primary outcome was prolonged intraoperative hypotension (IOH) during general anaesthesia. IOH was defined as at least one intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurement <65 mm Hg recorded between anaesthesia induction and the end of anaesthesia.

    Measured: During the operation

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. IOH burden at the event level

    IOH burden at the event level, quantified as the area under the MAP threshold of 65 mm Hg (AUC, mm Hg·min), reflecting both the depth and duration of hypotension

    Measured: During the operation

  2. duration of individual IOH episodes

    duration of individual IOH episodes

    Measured: During the operation

  3. number of IOH episodes

    total number of IOH episodes per patient during surgery

    Measured: During the operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Sep 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2013
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
85,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07808125
Sponsor's protocol ID
KY20260824-KS-03
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
3 Sep 2026
Last updated
8 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared because this retrospective study uses existing hospital medical records containing sensitive clinical information. Data sharing is restricted by institutional policies and privacy considerations. De-identified aggregate results may be made available in the publication or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to institutional approval.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Intraoperative Hypotension, run by Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

prolonged intraoperative hypotension (time frame: During the operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in