Cervical RadiculopathyNCT07808476
Efficacy Of Gross Myofascial Release With Neural Mobilization Versus Neural Mobilization Alone On Pain, Functional Limitations, And Cervical Range Of Motion In Cervical Radiculopathy
A study testing Gross Myofascial Release + Neural Mobilization and Neural Mobilization in people with Cervical Radiculopathy, run by Ibadat International University, Islamabad at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
This is a randomized control trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of gross myofascial release with neural mobilization versus neural mobilization alone on pain, functional limitations, and cervical range of motion in cervical radiculopathy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Radiculopathy
- What is being tested?
- Gross Myofascial Release + Neural Mobilization and Neural Mobilization
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2026to 30 Nov 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female patients aged between 25-55 years
- Presence of chronic neck pain radiating to one upper limb
- Positive Upper Limb Tension Test-I (Median nerve)
- Patients having pain, numbness, tingling, or paresthesia in the cervical nerve root distribution.
- Symptom's duration of at least 4 weeks
Who cannot join
- Patients with cervical myelopathy
- History of cervical spine fracture, tumor, infection, or malignancy
- Previous cervical spine surgery
- Severe osteoporosis or inflammatory joint disease
- Presence of systemic neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis or stroke
- Patients with severe cervical instability or vertebral artery insufficiency
- Recent physiotherapy treatment for cervical radiculopathy within the last 3 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
My Health Wellness center, Peshawar
Peshawar, KPK
Dr. Naeem ullah (PT), DPT, MS PT MSK, +923308088558, naeemphysio58@gmail.com
About this study
This is a randomized control trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of gross myofascial release with neural mobilization versus neural mobilization alone on pain, functional limitations, and cervical range of motion in cervical radiculopathy. Cervical radiculopathy, is characterized by neck pain, pain radiating down the arm, numbness, tingling, weakness of muscles and functionality limitations with compression or irritation of the cervical nerve root due to cervical spondylosis, cervical disc herniations or degeneration of the cervical spine leading to cervical radiculopathy and the diminished quality of life from decreased day-to-day functional capacity and productivity at work. The study will evaluate pain, functional limitations, and cervical range of motion.
- Conditions
- Cervical Radiculopathy
- Being tested
- Gross Myofascial Release + Neural Mobilization, Neural Mobilization
- Keywords
- gross myofascial release, neural mobilization,
- Medical subject headings
- Radiculopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gross Myofascial Release + Neural MobilizationOther
Participants allocated to the experimental group will receive Gross Myofascial Release (GMFR) followed by median nerve neural mobilization. The GMFR intervention will include a gross stretch of the posterior cervical musculature and an upper-quarter (arm pull) fascial stretch. The stretch will be maintained for 90 seconds or until a palpable release of fascial tension is appreciated. Neural mobilization will be performed using the median nerve slider technique.. Neural mobilization will be performed by simultaneously moving the shoulder into greater abduction while the cervical spine is moved into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding(1 set of 10 repetitions with a 3-second hold per repetition). Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment. The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions).
Neural MobilizationOther
Participants allocated to the control group will receive neural mobilization technique. The intervention will be performed with the participant in the supine position, with the shoulder abducted and externally rotated, elbow extended, forearm supinated, and wrist, fingers, and thumb maintained in extension. Neural mobilization will be applied by simultaneously increasing shoulder abduction while moving the cervical spine into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding. Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment. The treatment will be administered in 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with each repetition held for 3 seconds and a 60-second rest interval between sets, The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Myofascial Release + Neural Mobilization | Experimental | Participants in this group will receive Gross Myofascial Release followed by median nerve neural mobilization. The GMFR intervention will include a gross stretch of the posterior cervical musculature and an upper-quarter (arm pull) fascial stretch. The stretch will be maintained for 90 seconds or until a palpable release of fascial tension is appreciated. Neural mobilization will be performed using the median nerve slider technique. Neural mobilization will be performed by simultaneously moving the shoulder into greater abduction while the cervical spine is moved into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding(1 set of 10 repetitions with a 3-second hold per repetition). Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment. The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions). Receives: Other: Gross Myofascial Release + Neural Mobilization |
| Neural Mobilization with conventional therapy | Active comparator | Participants allocated to the control group will receive neural mobilization technique. The intervention will be performed with the participant in the supine position, with the shoulder abducted and externally rotated, elbow extended, forearm supinated, and wrist, fingers, and thumb maintained in extension. Neural mobilization will be applied by simultaneously increasing shoulder abduction while moving the cervical spine into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding. Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment. The treatment will be administered in 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with each repetition held for 3 seconds and a 60-second rest interval between sets, The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions). Receives: Other: Neural Mobilization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Universal Goniometer
The Universal Goniometer (UG) will used in this study to measure active cervical range of motion (ROM), is a simple, inexpensive, and portable clinical instrument that provides objective measurements of joint movement in degrees. Cervical range of motion is recorded in degrees (°) for each movement direction. Lower ROM values indicate greater movement restriction and functional impairment, whereas higher values reflect improved cervical mobility.
Measured: Baseline to 4th week
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) will used in this study to evaluate the level of functional disability associated with cervical radiculopathy. The NDI is one of the most widely accepted patient-reported outcome measures for assessing the impact of neck pain on daily functioning. The questionnaire consists of 10 items, including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreational activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, The total NDI score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores representing greater functional disability. For clinical interpretation, scores are commonly classified as follows: 0-4 (no disability), 5-14 (mild disability), 15-24 (moderate disability), 25-34 (severe disability), and 35-50 (complete disability). A reduction in the total score following treatment indicates an improvement in functional status and a decreased impact of neck pain on daily activities.
Measured: Baseline to 4th week
Visual Analogue Scale
The intensity of the pain will be measured with the help of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 10-cm horizontal line with two opposite endpoints marked with the following words: "no pain" at one end and "worst imaginable pain" at the other. The patient will then mark a point on the line that they feel most accurately reflects their current pain. The distance in centimeters or millimeters between the "no pain" point and the patient's mark will be taken as the measure of the patient's pain.
Measured: Baseline to 4th week
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine was used in this study to confirm the diagnosis cervical radiculopathy before participant enrollment. It enables accurate identification of disc herniation, foraminal stenosis, nerve root compression, and other degenerative changes associated with cervical radiculopathy.
Measured: Baseline to 4th week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2026
- Study start10 Jul 2026
- Primary completion15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical RadiculopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ibadat International University, Islamabad
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- salma bibi, Study chair, Ibadat International University, Islamabad
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07808476
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IIUI/RERC/ADT/2026/07/371
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Agarwal, V., Goel, A., Srivastava, A., Rawat, P., & Singh, R. (2024). Optimizing Pain Relief and Range of Motion in Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A Study on Neural Tissue Mobilization and Cervical Stabilization Exercises. Cureus, 16(7), e65646. doi:10.7759/cureus.65646 Borrella-Andrés, S., Marqués-García, I., Lucha-López, M. O., Fanlo-Mazas, P., Hernández-Secorún, M., Pérez-Bellmunt, A., . . . Hidalgo-García, C. (2021). Manual Therapy as a Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 9936981. doi:10.1155/2021/9936981 Butler, D. S. (2005). The neurodynamic techniques: a definitive guide from the Noigroup team: Noigroup publications. Gauns, S. V., & Gurudut, P. V. (2018). A randomized controlled trial to study the effect of gross myofascial release on mechanical neck pain referred to upper limb. International journal of health sciences, 12(5), 51. Kuligowski, T., Skrzek, A., & Cieślik, B. (2021). Manual Therapy in Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(11). doi:10.3390/ijerph18116176 Lopez-Pardo, M. J., Calvache-Mateo, A., Martin-Nunez, J., Heredia-Ciuro, A., Lopez-Lopez, L., Valenza, M. C., & Cabrera-Martos, I. (2024). Routine physical therapy with and without neural mobilization in chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders with nerve-related symptoms: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Healthcare. Lutke Schipholt, I. J., Scholten-Peeters, G. G. M., Logghe, S., Koop, M., Donders, S., Stenneberg, M. S., & Coppieters, M. W. (2024). The CROM-VAS Test: A novel and reliable clinical test to assess immediate pain relief following treatment for movement-evoked neck pain. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 74, 103191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103191 Mahmoud, L., Aly, S., & Abd Alhamid, H. M. M. (2025). Gross myofascial release on pain and function in cervical radiculopathy: a randomised controlled study. Human Movement, 26,
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy Of Gross Myofascial Release With Neural Mobilization Versus Neural Mobilization Alone On Pain, Functional Limitations, And Cervical Range Of Motion In Cervical Radiculopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07808476
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IIUI/RERC/ADT/2026/07/371
- Conditions
- Cervical Radiculopathy
- Keywords
- gross myofascial release, neural mobilization,
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ibadat International University, IslamabadUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized control trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of gross myofascial release with neural mobilization versus neural mobilization alone on pain, functional limitations, and cervical range of motion in cervical radiculopathy. Cervical radiculopathy, is characterized by neck pain, pain radiating down the arm, numbness, tingling, weakness of muscles and functionality limitations with compression or irritation of the cervical nerve root due to cervical spondylosis, cervical disc herniations or degeneration of the cervical spine leading to cervical radiculopathy and the diminished quality of life from decreased day-to-day functional capacity and productivity at work. The study will evaluate pain, functional limitations, and cervical range of motion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Myofascial Release + Neural Mobilization | Experimental | Other: Gross Myofascial Release + Neural MobilizationParticipants in this group will receive Gross Myofascial Release followed by median nerve neural mobilization. The GMFR intervention will include a gross stretch of the posterior cervical musculature and an upper-quarter (arm pull) fascial stretch. The stretch will be maintained for 90 seconds or until a palpable release of fascial tension is appreciated. Neural mobilization will be performed using the median nerve slider technique. Neural mobilization will be performed by simultaneously moving the shoulder into greater abduction while the cervical spine is moved into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding(1 set of 10 repetitions with a 3-second hold per repetition). Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment. The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions). |
| Neural Mobilization with conventional therapy | Active comparator | Other: Neural MobilizationParticipants allocated to the control group will receive neural mobilization technique. The intervention will be performed with the participant in the supine position, with the shoulder abducted and externally rotated, elbow extended, forearm supinated, and wrist, fingers, and thumb maintained in extension. Neural mobilization will be applied by simultaneously increasing shoulder abduction while moving the cervical spine into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding. Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment. The treatment will be administered in 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with each repetition held for 3 seconds and a 60-second rest interval between sets, The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male and female patients aged between 25-55 years
- Presence of chronic neck pain radiating to one upper limb
- Positive Upper Limb Tension Test-I (Median nerve)
- Patients having pain, numbness, tingling, or paresthesia in the cervical nerve root distribution.
- Symptom's duration of at least 4 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with cervical myelopathy
- History of cervical spine fracture, tumor, infection, or malignancy
- Previous cervical spine surgery
- Severe osteoporosis or inflammatory joint disease
- Presence of systemic neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis or stroke
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Myofascial Release + Neural MobilizationParticipants allocated to the experimental group will receive Gross Myofascial Release (GMFR) followed by median nerve neural mobilization. The GMFR intervention will include a gross stretch of the posterior cervical musculature and an upper-quarter (arm pull) fascial stretch. The stretch will be maintained for 90 seconds or until a palpable release of fascial tension is appreciated. Neural mobilization will be performed using the median nerve slider technique.. Neural mobilization will be performed by simultaneously moving the shoulder into greater abduction while the cervical spine is moved into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding(1 set of 10 repetitions with a 3-second hold per repetition). Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment. The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions). | Other | Gross Myofascial Release + Neural Mobilization |
| Neural MobilizationParticipants allocated to the control group will receive neural mobilization technique. The intervention will be performed with the participant in the supine position, with the shoulder abducted and externally rotated, elbow extended, forearm supinated, and wrist, fingers, and thumb maintained in extension. Neural mobilization will be applied by simultaneously increasing shoulder abduction while moving the cervical spine into contralateral side flexion to facilitate median nerve sliding. Each treatment session will also include a 10-minute hot pack before treatment and 10 minutes of TENS after treatment. The treatment will be administered in 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with each repetition held for 3 seconds and a 60-second rest interval between sets, The total session duration will be approximately 40 minutes, administered 3 sessions per week on alternate days for 4 weeks (12 sessions). | Other | Neural Mobilization with conventional therapy |
Primary outcome
Universal Goniometer
Time frame: Baseline to 4th week
The Universal Goniometer (UG) will used in this study to measure active cervical range of motion (ROM), is a simple, inexpensive, and portable clinical instrument that provides objective measurements of joint movement in degrees. Cervical range of motion is recorded in degrees (°) for each movement direction. Lower ROM values indicate greater movement restriction and functional impairment, whereas higher values reflect improved cervical mobility.
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time frame: Baseline to 4th week
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) will used in this study to evaluate the level of functional disability associated with cervical radiculopathy. The NDI is one of the most widely accepted patient-reported outcome measures for assessing the impact of neck pain on daily functioning. The questionnaire consists of 10 items, including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreational activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, The total NDI score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores representing greater functional disability. For clinical interpretation, scores are commonly classified as follows: 0-4 (no disability), 5-14 (mild disability), 15-24 (moderate disability), 25-34 (severe disability), and 35-50 (complete disability). A reduction in the total score following treatment indicates an improvement in functional status and a decreased impact of neck pain on daily activities.
Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: Baseline to 4th week
The intensity of the pain will be measured with the help of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 10-cm horizontal line with two opposite endpoints marked with the following words: "no pain" at one end and "worst imaginable pain" at the other. The patient will then mark a point on the line that they feel most accurately reflects their current pain. The distance in centimeters or millimeters between the "no pain" point and the patient's mark will be taken as the measure of the patient's pain.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time frame: Baseline to 4th week
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine was used in this study to confirm the diagnosis cervical radiculopathy before participant enrollment. It enables accurate identification of disc herniation, foraminal stenosis, nerve root compression, and other degenerative changes associated with cervical radiculopathy.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2026.
- BackgroundAgarwal, V., Goel, A., Srivastava, A., Rawat, P., & Singh, R. (2024). Optimizing Pain Relief and Range of Motion in Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A Study on Neural Tissue Mobilization and Cervical Stabilization Exercises. Cureus, 16(7), e65646. doi:10.7759/cureus.65646 Borrella-Andrés, S., Marqués-García, I., Lucha-López, M. O., Fanlo-Mazas, P., Hernández-Secorún, M., Pérez-Bellmunt, A., . . . Hidalgo-García, C. (2021). Manual Therapy as a Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 9936981. doi:10.1155/2021/9936981 Butler, D. S. (2005). The neurodynamic techniques: a definitive guide from the Noigroup team: Noigroup publications. Gauns, S. V., & Gurudut, P. V. (2018). A randomized controlled trial to study the effect of gross myofascial release on mechanical neck pain referred to upper limb. International journal of health sciences, 12(5), 51. Kuligowski, T., Skrzek, A., & Cieślik, B. (2021). Manual Therapy in Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(11). doi:10.3390/ijerph18116176 Lopez-Pardo, M. J., Calvache-Mateo, A., Martin-Nunez, J., Heredia-Ciuro, A., Lopez-Lopez, L., Valenza, M. C., & Cabrera-Martos, I. (2024). Routine physical therapy with and without neural mobilization in chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders with nerve-related symptoms: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Healthcare. Lutke Schipholt, I. J., Scholten-Peeters, G. G. M., Logghe, S., Koop, M., Donders, S., Stenneberg, M. S., & Coppieters, M. W. (2024). The CROM-VAS Test: A novel and reliable clinical test to assess immediate pain relief following treatment for movement-evoked neck pain. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 74, 103191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103191 Mahmoud, L., Aly, S., & Abd Alhamid, H. M. M. (2025). Gross myofascial release on pain and function in cervical radiculopathy: a randomised controlled study. Human Movement, 26,
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cervical Radiculopathy
Recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Electrical Dry Needling for Chronic Cervical Radiculopathy
Cervical Radiculopathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Correlation Between Forward Head Posture and Executive Functions in Cervical Radiculopathy
Cervical Radiculopathy, Forward Head Posture
Recruiting
Myo-Electrical and Nerve Root Function Response to Focused Extracorpeal Shock Wave in Cervical Radiculopathy
Cervical Radiculopathy
Not yet recruiting
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy
Cervical Disc Herniation, Cervical Foraminal Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
Cervical Spinal Cord Signal Abnormalities in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain
Cervical Radiculopathy, Cervical Myelomalacia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
salma bibi study chair
Ibadat International University, Islamabad
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Gross Myofascial Release + Neural Mobilization and Neural Mobilization in people with Cervical Radiculopathy, run by Ibadat International University, Islamabad at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact komal hameed, MSPT (+923315798880, komal.hamees4455@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Universal Goniometer (time frame: Baseline to 4th week). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07808476, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026.