Animal-Human BondingAudiCAJNCT07811479
Benefits of Judicial Assistance Dogs for Child Victims in Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Units (UAPEDs)
A study testing Judicial Assistance Dog in people with Animal-Human Bonding and Animal-assisted Intervention, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Child maltreatment is common and encompasses various forms, including psychological, physical, and sexual abuse, exposure to domestic violence, neglect, and sexual exploitation. Each year, French police and gendarmerie services record more than 50,000 child victims of intrafamilial violence, according to data from the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Animal-Human Bonding, Animal-assisted Intervention, Behavioural Responses to Contact With Dogs
- What is being tested?
- Judicial Assistance Dog
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2026to 1 Apr 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- First-time interview in a child advocacy and pediatric assessment unit (UAPED)
- Age ≥ 7 years
- Ability to understand and complete the Stat-trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C)
- Written informed consent obtained from the child's legal guardian
Who cannot join
- Previous contact with the Judicial Assistant Dog
- Known dog allergy
- Lack of informed consent from the legal guardian
- Lack of assent from the child
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Child maltreatment is common and encompasses various forms, including psychological, physical, and sexual abuse, exposure to domestic violence, neglect, and sexual exploitation. Each year, French police and gendarmerie services record more than 50,000 child victims of intrafamilial violence, according to data from the Ministerial Statistical Service for Internal Security (SSMSI). Approximately two-thirds of these children are victims of physical violence and one-third are victims of sexual violence. These figures have increased steadily over recent years, particularly for sexual violence, in the context of greater disclosure by victims. Violence against children constitutes a major public health issue because of its short- and long-term physical, psychological, and developmental consequences, as well as the increased risk of involvement in future violence during adolescence or adulthood, either as victims or perpetrators.
Children presumed to be victims of abuse are managed in Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Units (Unités d'Accueil Pédiatrique Enfance en Danger, UAPEDs) by multidisciplinary teams comprising physicians, psychologists, nurses, and social workers, following judicial referral or concerns raised by parents or caregivers. Depending on the circumstances, the child may undergo a forensic interview conducted on-site by law enforcement officers (police or gendarmerie), followed by a medico-legal and/or psychological assessment to evaluate the impact of the alleged abuse. This model enables comprehensive care to be delivered in a single location and within a limited timeframe, with professionals working around the child, thereby minimizing repeated disclosures and reducing the risk of retraumatization. The vast majority of forensic interviews are conducted by investigators trained in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) protocol for interviewing children.
Read more
It has been hypothesized that the involvement of a Judicial Assistance Dog (JAD) may provide benefits to children during forensic interviews, a key stage of the judicial process that can be highly stressful for child victims of abuse who are asked to recount traumatic experiences to an unfamiliar investigator.
For centuries, dogs have been domesticated to accompany humans. Since the late twentieth century, they have been specifically trained to assist vulnerable individuals, support people with chronic conditions, and participate in animal-assisted interventions. The role of dogs as part of healthcare and psychosocial support has been extensively studied in recent years. Animal-assisted interventions have been used in a variety of clinical settings with the aim of reducing anxiety, pain, and stress-related symptoms through mechanisms involving emotional regulation and attentional processes. Several studies have reported benefits among children with mental health conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders, and problematic video gaming behaviors. Assistance dogs are also frequently incorporated into interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder to promote prosocial behaviors, with beneficial interactions observed regardless of the child's verbal communication abilities. In pediatric hospital settings, animal-assisted therapy has been associated with reductions in both blood pressure and pain levels.
These effects may be mediated by physiological mechanisms. Exposure to a dog for 15 minutes has been associated with significant reductions in cortisol levels (13), while human-dog interactions have also been linked to changes in electroencephalographic activity and heart rate, potentially enhancing shared attention and emotional regulation.
The concept of the Judicial Assistance Dog first emerged in the United States in the early 2000s within court settings. In France, following a model similar to that developed in North America, the first Judicial Assistance Dog, named Lol, joined the Cahors Court of Justice in 2019 to support victims throughout judicial proceedings. Orko, the second Judicial Assistance Dog trained in France, joined the Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Unit of Orléans University Hospital in 2020.
Several potential benefits of Judicial Assistance Dogs during forensic interviews have been suggested, including reductions in signs of distress and anxiety among child victims. A study conducted in the United States demonstrated significant decreases in heart rate and blood pressure among presumed child victims of sexual abuse who were accompanied by an assistance dog during the forensic process.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to measure the anxious state of the minor when he first arrives at the unit (T0) and 10 minutes later (T1) with or without the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog (JAD).
The minor is randomized in one of the two groups of the study:
- the interventional group (minor in the dedicated waiting room with the JAD for 10min)
- or the control group (minor in the dedicated waiting room without the JAD for 10min).
Then an anxiety measure occurs. Two time point are evaluated: at arrival (T0) and after waiting 10min (T1):
- Anxiety questionnaire: STAI-C translated in French answered with the help of a registered nurse trained for psychometric tests (10 min)
- Anxiety level self-assessment (2 min)
- Cardiac frequency measure by the registered nurse in charge of the minor (5 min): an average of 3 measures will be taken
- Conditions
- Animal-Human Bonding, Animal-assisted Intervention, Behavioural Responses to Contact With Dogs
- Being tested
- Judicial Assistance Dog
- Keywords
- Judicial Assistant Dog, Anxiety, Child victim, Forensic interview
- Medical subject headings
- Human-Animal Bond, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Judicial Assistance DogBehavioural
After randomization, the Judicial Assistance Dog will be introduced to the child in the waiting room, and the child will remain in contact with the dog for 10 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Judicial Assistance Dog group | Experimental | Children assigned to this group will have contact with the Judicial Assistance Dog before the forensic interview. Receives: Behavioral: Judicial Assistance Dog |
| Standard waiting room group | No intervention | Children assigned to this group will undergo the standard pre-interview waiting period without contact with the Judicial Assistance Dog. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on the chil's anxiety level prior to the forensic interview.
Comparison of the change in STAI-C scores between T1 (after 10 min of waiting) and T0 (baseline assessment upon arrival) between the intervention group (10-minute exposure to the Judicial Assistance Dog) and the control group (10 minutes in a standard waiting room)
Measured: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
Secondary outcomes (2)
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on heart rate
Comparison of the change in heart rate (beats per minute, bpm) between T1 (after 10 minutes of waiting) and T0 (baseline assessment upon arrival) between the intervention group (10-minute exposure to the judicial assistant dog) and the control group (10 minutes in a standard waiting room)
Measured: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on perceived anxiety
Comparison of the change in score on the Anxiety Level Self-Assessment Scale between T1 (after 10 minutes of waiting) and T0 (baseline assessment upon arrival) between the intervention group (10-minute exposure to the judicial assistant dog) and the control group (10 minutes in a standard waiting room).
Measured: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Sep 2026
- Study start1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Apr 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Animal-Human BondingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sarah EID, Doctor, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07811479
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUO-2026-06
- Acronym
- AudiCAJ
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Maoz I, Zubedat S, Dolev T, Aga-Mizrachi S, Bloch B, Michaeli Y, Eshed Y, Grinstein D, Avital A. Dog training alleviates PTSD symptomatology by emotional and attentional regulation. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Nov 19;12(1):1995264. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1995264. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34868486Norman RE, Byambaa M, De R, Butchart A, Scott J, Vos T. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
PubMed 23209385Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson S. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):68-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
PubMed 19056114
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Benefits of Judicial Assistance Dogs for Child Victims in Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Units (UAPEDs)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07811479
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AudiCAJ / CHUO-2026-06
- Conditions
- Animal-Human Bonding, Animal-assisted Intervention, Behavioural Responses to Contact With Dogs
- Keywords
- Judicial Assistant Dog, Anxiety, Child victim, Forensic interview
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Child maltreatment is common and encompasses various forms, including psychological, physical, and sexual abuse, exposure to domestic violence, neglect, and sexual exploitation. Each year, French police and gendarmerie services record more than 50,000 child victims of intrafamilial violence, according to data from the Ministerial Statistical Service for Internal Security (SSMSI). Approximately two-thirds of these children are victims of physical violence and one-third are victims of sexual violence. These figures have increased steadily over recent years, particularly for sexual violence, in the context of greater disclosure by victims. Violence against children constitutes a major public health issue because of its short- and long-term physical, psychological, and developmental consequences, as well as the increased risk of involvement in future violence during adolescence or adulthood, either as victims or perpetrators.
Children presumed to be victims of abuse are managed in Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Units (Unités d'Accueil Pédiatrique Enfance en Danger, UAPEDs) by multidisciplinary teams comprising physicians, psychologists, nurses, and social workers, following judicial referral or concerns raised by parents or caregivers. Depending on the circumstances, the child may undergo a forensic interview conducted on-site by law enforcement officers (police or gendarmerie), followed by a medico-legal and/or psychological assessment to evaluate the impact of the alleged abuse. This model enables comprehensive care to be delivered in a single location and within a limited timeframe, with professionals working around the child, thereby minimizing repeated disclosures and reducing the risk of retraumatization. The vast majority of forensic interviews are conducted by investigators trained in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) protocol for interviewing children.
It has been hypothesized that the involvement of a Judicial Assistance Dog (JAD) may provide benefits to children during forensic interviews, a key stage of the judicial process that can be highly stressful for child victims of abuse who are asked to recount traumatic experiences to an unfamiliar investigator.
For centuries, dogs have been domesticated to accompany humans. Since the late twentieth century, they have been specifically trained to assist vulnerable individuals, support people with chronic conditions, and participate in animal-assisted interventions. The role of dogs as part of healthcare and psychosocial support has been extensively studied in recent years. Animal-assisted interventions have been used in a variety of clinical settings with the aim of reducing anxiety, pain, and stress-related symptoms through mechanisms involving emotional regulation and attentional processes. Several studies have reported benefits among children with mental health conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders, and problematic video gaming behaviors. Assistance dogs are also frequently incorporated into interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder to promote prosocial behaviors, with beneficial interactions observed regardless of the child's verbal communication abilities. In pediatric hospital settings, animal-assisted therapy has been associated with reductions in both blood pressure and pain levels.
These effects may be mediated by physiological mechanisms. Exposure to a dog for 15 minutes has been associated with significant reductions in cortisol levels (13), while human-dog interactions have also been linked to changes in electroencephalographic activity and heart rate, potentially enhancing shared attention and emotional regulation.
The concept of the Judicial Assistance Dog first emerged in the United States in the early 2000s within court settings. In France, following a model similar to that developed in North America, the first Judicial Assistance Dog, named Lol, joined the Cahors Court of Justice in 2019 to support victims throughout judicial proceedings. Orko, the second Judicial Assistance Dog trained in France, joined the Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Unit of Orléans University Hospital in 2020.
Several potential benefits of Judicial Assistance Dogs during forensic interviews have been suggested, including reductions in signs of distress and anxiety among child victims. A study conducted in the United States demonstrated significant decreases in heart rate and blood pressure among presumed child victims of sexual abuse who were accompanied by an assistance dog during the forensic process.
Detailed description
This study aims to measure the anxious state of the minor when he first arrives at the unit (T0) and 10 minutes later (T1) with or without the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog (JAD).
The minor is randomized in one of the two groups of the study:
- the interventional group (minor in the dedicated waiting room with the JAD for 10min)
- or the control group (minor in the dedicated waiting room without the JAD for 10min).
Then an anxiety measure occurs. Two time point are evaluated: at arrival (T0) and after waiting 10min (T1):
- Anxiety questionnaire: STAI-C translated in French answered with the help of a registered nurse trained for psychometric tests (10 min)
- Anxiety level self-assessment (2 min)
- Cardiac frequency measure by the registered nurse in charge of the minor (5 min): an average of 3 measures will be taken
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Judicial Assistance Dog group | Experimental | Behavioral: Judicial Assistance DogChildren assigned to this group will have contact with the Judicial Assistance Dog before the forensic interview. |
| Standard waiting room group | No intervention | –Children assigned to this group will undergo the standard pre-interview waiting period without contact with the Judicial Assistance Dog. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- First-time interview in a child advocacy and pediatric assessment unit (UAPED)
- Age ≥ 7 years
- Ability to understand and complete the Stat-trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C)
- Written informed consent obtained from the child's legal guardian
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Previous contact with the Judicial Assistant Dog
- Known dog allergy
- Lack of informed consent from the legal guardian
- Lack of assent from the child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Judicial Assistance DogAfter randomization, the Judicial Assistance Dog will be introduced to the child in the waiting room, and the child will remain in contact with the dog for 10 minutes. | Behavioural | Judicial Assistance Dog group |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on the chil's anxiety level prior to the forensic interview.
Time frame: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
Comparison of the change in STAI-C scores between T1 (after 10 min of waiting) and T0 (baseline assessment upon arrival) between the intervention group (10-minute exposure to the Judicial Assistance Dog) and the control group (10 minutes in a standard waiting room)
2 secondary outcomes
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on heart rate
Time frame: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on perceived anxiety
Time frame: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 34868486Maoz I, Zubedat S, Dolev T, Aga-Mizrachi S, Bloch B, Michaeli Y, Eshed Y, Grinstein D, Avital A. Dog training alleviates PTSD symptomatology by emotional and attentional regulation. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Nov 19;12(1):1995264. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1995264. eCollection 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 23209385Norman RE, Byambaa M, De R, Butchart A, Scott J, Vos T. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 19056114Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson S. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):68-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Animal-Human Bonding
Active, not recruitingObservational study
REMBRANDT: REcovery of the MicroBiome fRom Antibiotics for Dental implanTs
Dysbiosis, Clostridium Difficile
Recruiting
Turtle-Assisted Animal Interaction on Dental Anxiety and Physiological Parameters in Children
Animal-Human Bonding, Dental Anxiety
Active, not recruiting
Multi-site, Longitudinal Trial Evaluating the Efficacy, Mechanisms, and Moderators of Service Dogs for Military Veterans With PTSD
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Combat Stress Disorders
Enrolling by invitation
Service Dogs and Prolonged Exposure Therapy for Military-Connected PTSD
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, PTSD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Sarah EID, Doctor principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Judicial Assistance Dog in people with Animal-Human Bonding and Animal-assisted Intervention, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sarah EID, Doctor (+33238651544, sarah.eid@chu-orleans.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on the chil's anxiety level prior to the forensic interview. (time frame: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07811479, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.